Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background To perform a systematic review with meta-analysis with the dual intent of assessing the impact of attaining aggressive vs. conservative beta-lactams PK/PD target on the clinical efficacy for treating Gram-negative infections in critical patients, and of identifying predictive factors of failure in attaining aggressive PK/PD targets. Methods Two authors independently searched PubMed-MEDLINE and Scopus database from inception to 23rd December 2023, to retrieve studies comparing the impact of attaining aggressive vs. conservative PK/PD targets on clinical efficacy of beta-lactams. Independent predictive factors of failure in attaining aggressive PK/PD targets were also assessed. Aggressive PK/PD target was considered a100%fT >4xMIC , and clinical cure rate was selected as primary outcome. Meta-analysis was performed by pooling odds ratios (ORs) extrapolated from studies providing adjustment for confounders using a random-effects model with inverse variance method. Results A total of 20,364 articles were screened, and 21 observational studies were included in the meta-analysis (N = 4833; 2193 aggressive vs. 2640 conservative PK/PD target). Attaining aggressive PK/PD target was significantly associated with higher clinical cure rate (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.15–2.49) and lower risk of beta-lactam resistance development (OR 0.06; 95% CI 0.01–0.29). Male gender, body mass index > 30 kg/m 2 , augmented renal clearance and MIC above the clinical breakpoint emerged as significant independent predictors of failure in attaining aggressive PK/PD targets, whereas prolonged/continuous infusion administration of beta-lactams resulted as protective factor. The risk of bias was moderate in 19 studies and severe in the other 2. Conclusions Attaining aggressive beta-lactams PK/PD targets provided significant clinical benefits in critical patients. Our analysis could be useful to stratify patients at high-risk of failure in attaining aggressive PK/PD targets.

PurposeThis Position Paper aims to review and discuss the available data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antibacterials, antifungals and antivirals in critically ill adult patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). This Position Paper also provides a practical guide on how TDM can be applied in routine clinical practice to improve therapeutic outcomes in critically ill adult patients. MethodsLiterature review and analysis were performed by Panel Members nominated by the endorsing organisations, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic and Critically Ill Patient Study Groups of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), International Association for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT) and International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (ISAC). Panel members made recommendations for whether TDM should be applied clinically for different antimicrobials/classes.ResultsTDM-guided dosing has been shown to be clinically beneficial for aminoglycosides, voriconazole and ribavirin. For most common antibiotics and antifungals in the ICU, a clear therapeutic range has been established, and for these agents, routine TDM in critically ill patients appears meritorious. For the antivirals, research is needed to identify therapeutic targets and determine whether antiviral TDM is indeed meritorious in this patient population. The Panel Members recommend routine TDM to be performed for aminoglycosides, beta-lactam antibiotics, linezolid, teicoplanin, vancomycin and voriconazole in critically ill patients.ConclusionAlthough TDM should be the standard of care for most antimicrobials in every ICU, important barriers need to be addressed before routine TDM can be widely employed worldwide.

The increase of infections caused by difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) Gram-negatives is becoming an ever-growing remarkable issue for public health [...]

Background Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may represent an invaluable tool for optimizing antimicrobial therapy in septic patients, but extensive use is burdened by barriers. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a newly established expert clinical pharmacological advice (ECPA) program in improving the clinical usefulness of an already existing TDM program for emerging candidates in tailoring antimicrobial therapy among critically ill patients. Methods This retrospective observational study included an organizational phase (OP) and an assessment phase (AP). During the OP (January–June 2021), specific actions were organized by MD clinical pharmacologists together with bioanalytical experts, clinical engineers, and ICU clinicians. During the AP (July–December 2021), the impact of these actions in optimizing antimicrobial treatment of the critically ill patients was assessed. Four indicators of performance of the TDM-guided real-time ECPA program were identified [total TDM-guided ECPAs July–December 2021/total TDM results July–December 2020; total ECPA dosing adjustments/total delivered ECPAs both at first assessment and overall; and turnaround time (TAT) of ECPAs, defined as optimal (< 12 h), quasi-optimal (12–24 h), acceptable (24–48 h), suboptimal (> 48 h)]. Results The OP allowed to implement new organizational procedures, to create a dedicated pathway in the intranet system, to offer educational webinars on clinical pharmacology of antimicrobials, and to establish a multidisciplinary team at the morning bedside ICU meeting. In the AP, a total of 640 ECPAs were provided for optimizing 261 courses of antimicrobial therapy in 166 critically ill patients. ECPAs concerned mainly piperacillin–tazobactam (41.8%) and meropenem (24.9%), and also other antimicrobials had ≥ 10 ECPAs (ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, fluconazole, ganciclovir, levofloxacin, and linezolid). Overall, the pre–post-increase in TDM activity was of 13.3-fold. TDM-guided dosing adjustments were recommended at first assessment in 61.7% of ECPAs (10.7% increases and 51.0% decreases), and overall in 45.0% of ECPAs (10.0% increases and 35.0% decreases). The overall median TAT was optimal (7.7 h) and that of each single agent was always optimal or quasi-optimal. Conclusions Multidisciplinary approach and timely expert interpretation of TDM results by MD Clinical Pharmacologists could represent cornerstones in improving the cost-effectiveness of an antimicrobial TDM program for emerging TDM candidates.

This study investigates the use of Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODEs) as an alternative to traditional compartmental models and Nonlinear Mixed-Effects (NLME) models for drug concentration prediction in pharmacokinetics. Unlike standard models that rely on strong assumptions and often struggle with high-dimensional covariate relationships, NODEs offer a data-driven approach, learning differential equations directly from data while integrating covariates. To evaluate their performance, NODEs were applied to a real-world Dalbavancin pharmacokinetic dataset comprising 218 patients and compared against a two-compartment model and an NLME within a cross-validation framework, which ensures an evaluation of robustness. Given the challenge of limited data availability, a data augmentation strategy was employed to pre-train NODEs. Their predictive performance was assessed both with and without covariates, while model explainability was analyzed using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values. Results show that, in the absence of covariates, NODEs performed comparably to state-of-the-art NLME models. However, when covariates were incorporated, NODEs demonstrated superior predictive accuracy. SHAP analyses further revealed how NODEs leverage covariates in their predictions. These results establish NODEs as a promising alternative for pharmacokinetic modeling, particularly in capturing complex covariate interactions, even when dealing with sparse and small datasets, thus paving the way for improved drug concentration predictions and personalized treatment strategies in precision medicine.

Dalbavancin is a novel, long-acting lipoglycopeptide characterized by a long elimination half-life coupled with excellent in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-positives. Although it is currently approved only for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, an ever-growing amount of evidence supports the efficacy of dalbavancin as a long-term therapy in osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint infections, endocarditis, and bloodstream infections. This article provides a critical reappraisal of real-world use of dalbavancin for off-label indications. A search strategy using specific keywords (dalba-vancin, osteomyelitis, endocarditis, long-term suppressive therapy, bloodstream infection, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile) until April 2021 was performed on the PubMed-MEDLINE database. As for other novel antibiotics, a conundrum between approved indications and potential innovative therapeutic uses has emerged for dalbavancin as well. The promising efficacy in challenging scenarios (i.e., osteomyelitis, endocarditis, prosthetic joint infections), coupled with the unique pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties, makes dalbavancin a valuable alternative to daily in-hospital intravenous or outpatient antimicrobial regimens in the treatment of long-term Gram-positive infections. This makes dalbavancin valuable in the current COVID-19 scenario, in which hospitalization and territorial medicine empowerment are unavoidable. Keywords: dalbavancin, osteomyelitis, endocarditis, long-term suppressive therapy, PK/PD properties, COVID-19

Translating findings emerged from pivotal trials of novel beta-lactams into real-world clinical practice represents a major concern. Real-world evidence assessing the efficacy of novel beta-lactams in different clinical scenarios may provide some benefits in selecting proper place in therapy. This review aims to perform a critical reappraisal of the issues emerged from pivotal trials of novel beta-lactams and leveraging real-world evidence supporting proper place in therapy in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed-MEDLINE from January 2015 to September 2025 for identifying pivotal trials and real-world evidence concerning the use of cefiderocol and of novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination (BL/BLIc) including those of tomorrow (ie, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefepime-enmetazobactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, sulbactam-durlobactam, aztreonam-avibactam). Critical issues emerged from pivotal trials in terms of potential appropriate place in therapy of each included agent were summarized. Four different therapeutic algorithms were proposed according to the pattern of antibiotic susceptibility of the pathogens, the genotype of resistance, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) features of selected agents: a) extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing ; b) carbapenem-producing (CPE); c) metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing ; d) carbapenem-resistant (CRAB). Real-world evidence suggested that cefepime-enmetazobactam may represent an effective carbapenem-sparing strategy in the management of infections caused by ESBL-producing and a potential alternative to ceftazidime-avibactam for treating OXA-48-producing infections. Cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, and aztreonam-avibactam could finally represent a definitive answer in the challenging scenario of infections caused by MBL-producing and . Lastly, the valuable role of sulbactam-durlobactam in CRAB infections was already recognized by international guidelines. Real-world evidence concerning both well-designed observational studies and PK/PD models may represent a mandatory tool for overcoming issues associated with pivotal trials evaluating novel BL/BLIc. The implementation of dedicated well-designed real-world studies would be warranted for ensuring a constant update of proposed therapeutic algorithms.

Background Linezolid is an anti-Gram-positive antimicrobial agent used at a fixed dose of 600 mg every 12 h. Objectives The objective of this study was to assess the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of linezolid in a retrospective cohort of overweight and obese hospitalized patients. Patients and Methods Population pharmacokinetic and Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) of an area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to 24 h (AUC24)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio > 100, defined as the pharmacodynamic target of efficacy, with incremental candidate dosages. Maximum permissible doses were defined as those causing a ≤ 25% of probability of a linezolid trough of > 8.06 mg/L, associated with thrombocytopenia. The cumulative fraction of response was calculated for the permissible linezolid doses by testing the PTA against the MIC distributions of a large collection of Staphylococci and Enterococci. Results A total of 352 trough (minimum) and 293 peak (maximum) linezolid concentrations from 112 patients were included. The final mixed-saturative model accounted for 88% of drug concentrations variability over time, and estimated creatinine clearance [by means of the Chronic Kidney Diseases Epidemiology formula (CrCL CKD-EPI )] was the only covariate that improved the model fit. Dose reduction to 450 mg every 12 h may be optimal for patients with coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections and a CrCL CKD-EPI < 130 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Dose escalation to 450 mg every 8 h may be optimal for patients with a CrCL CKD-EPI ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Escalation to 600 mg every 8 h should not be recommended due to an unacceptable high risk of thrombocytopenia. Patients with CrCL CKD-EPI ≥ 130 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and/or co-medication with P-glycoprotein modulators require therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize linezolid doses. Conclusions Dosage adjustments of linezolid in this population should be based on CrCL CKD-EPI estimates, rather than on body size descriptors.

Background/Objectives: The aztreonam/avibactam combination represents a promising therapeutic option for severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, particularly in critically ill patients. Due to marked pharmacokinetic variability and the need to achieve joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets of both agents, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may play a pivotal role in optimizing treatment. This study aimed to develop and validate two rapid, accurate, and sensitive UHPLC–qTOF MS/MS sequential methods for quantifying aztreonam and avibactam in human plasma, suitable for routine clinical TDM. Methods: Plasma concentrations were determined by means of ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–qTOF MS/MS), operating in positive and negative electrospray ionization modes for aztreonam and avibactam, respectively. Sample preparation consisted of protein precipitation with isotopically labeled internal standards. The method’s validation was performed according to the European Medicines Agency guidelines, by assessing selectivity, linearity, precision, accuracy, recovery, matrix effects, carry-over, and stability. Clinical applicability was evaluated by reprocessing plasma samples, which were already previously collected for routine clinical practice from 20 hospitalized patients undergoing treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam. Results: The methods showed excellent linearity (R2 ≥ 0.999) over ranges of 0.2–100 µg/mL for aztreonam and 0.1–50 µg/mL for avibactam. Lower limits of quantification were 0.2 µg/mL and 0.1 µg/mL, respectively. Intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy met the EMA criteria at all of the quality control levels. Extraction recovery exceeded 90% for both analytes, and matrix effects were effectively compensated by internal standards. Stability testing highlighted the need for careful sample handling, particularly for aztreonam under repeated freeze–thaw conditions. Clinical application revealed substantial inter-individual variability in steady-state concentrations. Conclusions: The validated UHPLC–qTOF MS/MS assays provide robust and sensitive sequential quantification of aztreonam and avibactam in human plasma, supporting TDM-guided dose optimization in clinical practice.

Background/Objectives: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of β-lactams (BL), BL/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations (BL/BLIc), and of fosfomycin may play a key role in optimizing antimicrobial therapy and in preventing resistance development, especially when used by continuous infusion in critically ill or immunocompromised patients. Unfortunately, analytical methods for simultaneously quantifying multiple BL/BLIc in plasma are still lacking. Methods: The aim of this study was to develop and validate two rapid, sensitive, and accurate UPLC–qTOF–MS/MS methods for the simultaneous quantification of five novel β-lactam or β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, cefiderocol, and ceftobiprole) along with fosfomycin. Methods: Human plasma samples were prepared by protein precipitation using methanol containing isotopically labeled internal standards. Chromatographic separation was achieved within 10–12 min using two Agilent Poroshell columns (EC-C18 and PFP) under positive and negative electrospray ionization modes. The method was validated according to the EMA guidelines by assessing selectivity, linearity, precision, accuracy, matrix effects, extraction recovery, and stability. Results: The methods exhibited excellent linearity (R2 ≥ 0.998) across the calibration ranges for all of the analytes (1.56–500 µg/mL), with limits of quantification ranging from 1.56 to 15.62 µg/mL. Intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy were always within ±15%. Extraction recovery always exceeded 92%, and the matrix effects were effectively corrected through isotopic internal standards. No carry-over or isobaric interferences were observed. All the analytes were stable for up to five days at 4 °C, but the BL and BL/BLIc stability was affected by multiple freeze–thaw cycles. Conclusions: These UPLC-qTOF-MS/MS multi-analyte methods enabled a simultaneous, reliable quantification in plasma of five novel beta-lactams and of fosfomycin. Robustness, high throughput, and sensitivity make these multi-methods feasible for real-time TDM, supporting personalized antimicrobial dosing and improved therapeutic outcomes in patients with severe or multidrug-resistant infections.