Explore the vast range of titles available.

Approximately 36% of the United States (US) population is infected with Helicobacter pylori (HP), a known major risk factor for peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. HP eradication reduces the rate of complications; however, the benefits are undermined by rising rates of HP eradication treatment failure. This real-world observational cohort analysis aims to describe HP diagnostic and treatment patterns among insured patients in the US. Using diagnoses, lab results, and treatment patterns, we identified adults (18+) with new diagnoses of HP in the Veradigm Health Insights EHR Database linked to Komodo claims data (1/1/2016–12/31/2019). Patients were required to have ≥ 12 months of data pre-/post-index. We captured patient characteristics, HP-related diagnostic testing, and the use of US guideline-recommended HP eradication regimens. HP eradication rates following first-line eradication treatment were measured among patients with available lab results. Overall, 31.8% of the 60,593 included patients did not receive guideline-recommended treatment. Among the 68.2% (41,340) with first-line treatment, 80.2% received clarithromycin-based triple therapy, and 6.6% received bismuth quadruple therapy. Of the 4569 patients with a repeated course of eradication therapy, 53.4% received the same regimen as their first-line, the majority (90.7%) of whom received two rounds of clarithromycin-based triple therapy. Among the 2455 patients with results of HP non-serology testing following first-line treatment, the 180-day eradication rate was 80.2% overall, with differences based on treatments and demographics. This study highlights gaps between guideline-recommended HP management and real-world patterns, underscoring the need to improve HP testing, treatment, and follow-up practices.

Background Psoriasis is a common autoimmune dermatologic condition which has a pronounced negative impact on patient quality of life and disease burden. Currently, there are a number of treatments available for psoriasis, with differences in efficacy, mechanism of action, mode of administration, adverse effects, and tolerability. However, a reliable, validated patient-reported instrument to address patient expectations and of psoriasis treatment has not been developed. This project was undertaken with the aim of developing a fit-for-purpose self-reported instrument to inform patient expectations and preferences of psoriasis treatments. Methods Two studies, both utilizing qualitative and quantitative methods, were conducted in patients within the entire spectrum of psoriasis severity. In Study 1, a group concept mapping (GCM) exercise was conducted with dermatologists and moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients to identify concepts important in the treatment of psoriasis. In Study 2, a preliminary Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire (TAQ) was developed using GCM-derived concepts from Studies 1 and 2, followed by cognitive debriefing (CD) telephone interviews of the preliminary TAQ. In Study 2, another GCM exercise was conducted with mild and newly diagnosed psoriasis patients. Psychometric analyses were performed on the TAQ to evaluate validity and reliability. Results The Study 1 GCM exercise generated 43 concepts from moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients (n = 20) and dermatologists (n = 10). In Study 2, 37 GCM concepts were generated from mild and newly diagnosed psoriasis patients (n = 20). From the 2 GCM exercises, 28 concepts were selected to form the preliminary TAQ; CD interviews indicated strong understanding and relevance of TAQ items among patients with disease ranging from mild to severe. The final TAQ consisted of 20 items; psychometric analysis demonstrated strong validity and reliability of the TAQ. Conclusions The TAQ is a novel psychometrically validated patient-reported instrument to inform healthcare providers of patients’ expectations of and preferences for treatment of their psoriasis and can help in shared decision making between patients and physicians.

Although all disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) reduce risk of relapse in multiple sclerosis (MS), many factors, including route of administration, influence selection of first-line DMT. Knowledge of real-world treatment patterns and effectiveness in reducing relapses across DMTs is important to understanding factors influencing this choice. This study sought to describe treatment patterns and relapses among newly treated adults with MS and by DMT route of administration (oral, injectable, and infusion). IBM MarketScan research databases were used to identify MS adults newly initiating DMTs (index event) from January 1, 2011–April 1, 2016, who had 12 months of continuous preindex and postindex medical and pharmacy benefits. Newly treated patients were those with ≥2 nondiagnostic claims with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (340) or Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (G35) code and no DMT prescription claims in the 12 months’ preindex. Persistence and adherence were measured from index until the earliest of ≥60 days without DMT, switching DMTs, or end of follow-up. Relapses were defined using a validated claims-based algorithm and measured in the 12-month preindex and postindex periods. Regression analysis adjusting for patient characteristics and prior relapses was used to determine the association between DMT route of administration and odds of 12-month persistence, odds of postindex relapse, and number of postindex relapses. Of 9378 newly treated MS patients meeting inclusion criteria; average age was 46.7 years, and 73.3% were female. Most patients initiated an injectable (65.5%) or oral (26.1%) DMT. Relapses decreased markedly from preindex to postindex (32.9%–24.0%), which was highest among oral users (35.8%–21.6%). Patients with no (vs ≥3) relapses preindex were more likely to be relapse free postindex (81.6% vs 31.4%). Nonpersistence (39.1% overall) was lowest among oral users (33.4%) and higher among those with versus without a postindex relapse (50.6% vs 35.5%). Patients initiating oral versus injectable agents were more likely to be persistent at 12 months (odds ratio [OR], 1.45; p < 0.0001) and less likely to relapse (OR, 0.75; p < 0.0001) postindex. Switches were uncommon (~10%) across cohorts. Preindex relapses were associated with increased odds of postindex relapses (OR, 1.73; p < 0.0001) but not with odds of persistence at 12 months. The 12-month nonpersistence rate was high among all MS patients but lower among oral users. Oral users were also less likely to relapse postindex. Despite the effectiveness of DMTs in reducing relapses, the low persistence, lack of switching to a new DMT, and continued relapses highlight an unmet need in the MS treatment landscape. •Nonpersistence in multiple sclerosis (MS) may lead to relapse and disability.•Over a third of MS patients were nonpersistent with disease-modifying therapy (DMT).•Over one fifth of patients had a relapse within 1 year of initiating a DMT.•Persistence was higher and relapse rates lower with oral vs injectable DMTs.

The aim of this study was to elicit utilities for radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) and evaluate the impact of treatment response and toxicities on quality of life. RR-DTC health states were developed based on data from a previous qualitative study and iterative review by clinical experts. Following piloting, health states underwent valuation by 100 members of the UK public during time trade-off interviews. Mean utilities and descriptive distribution statistics were calculated, and a logistic regression analysis was conducted. The demographic characteristics of the study sample were generally reflective of the UK population. Clear differentiation in valuation between health states was observed. No response/stable disease had an adjusted utility value of 0.87, with a corresponding gain of +0.04 following a treatment response and a decline of -0.35 for disease progression. Adverse events were associated with utility decrements between -0.47 (grade III diarrhea) and -0.05 (grade I/II alopecia). The trade-off interviews derived utility weights show clear differentiation between RR-DTC health states in response to treatment. The values reported in this study are suitable for cost-effectiveness evaluations for new treatments in RR-DTC.

Real-world analyses of treatments for patients with metastatic breast cancer are limited. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of -paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer using data from an electronic medical record database from community practices across the USA. We performed a retrospective cohort study using fully de-identified data from an independent US electronic medical record platform of patients with metastatic breast cancer initiating single-agent -paclitaxel or paclitaxel as a first- or second-line treatment from December 1, 2010 to October 6, 2014. The clinical efficacy objectives were time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and time to next treatment (TTNT). Subgroup analyses were performed in patients with 2 types of metastatic breast cancer as follows: 1) hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, and 2) triple-negative disease. This analysis included 925 patients. Patients receiving -paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel had significantly longer TTD (median 4.2 vs. 2.8 months, <0.0001) and TTNT (median 6.0 vs. 4.2 months, <0.0001); similar outcomes were observed for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative disease. Compared with paclitaxel, -paclitaxel was associated with significantly longer TTD in patients with triple-negative disease. -Paclitaxel was associated with significantly less all-grade neuropathy, anemia, pain, and diarrhea than paclitaxel. Antiemetic and antihistamine use were significantly less frequent with -paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel, whereas use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, hydrating agents, and bone-directed therapy to decrease skeletal-related events were more frequent. -Paclitaxel demonstrated improved clinical effectiveness compared with paclitaxel when examining TTD and TTNT in patients with metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting.

Compare treatment switching rates and costs among biologic-naive psoriasis patients initiating apremilast or biologics. This retrospective claims analysis used IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases to identify patients who initiated apremilast or a biologic (ie, tumor necrosis factor [TNF] or interleukin [IL] inhibitor) for psoriasis treatment between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to adjust for possible selection bias and maximize the number of patients available for analysis. Treatment switching, days to switch, and healthcare costs were assessed at 12 months. -test and chi-square test were used to evaluate differences between cohorts for continuous and categorical variables as appropriate; Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to assess cost differences. In total, 88,025 patients newly initiated apremilast, a TNF inhibitor, or an IL inhibitor. After inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied and patients were propensity score matched, 1645 (apremilast), 1207 (TNF inhibitor), and 438 (IL inhibitor) patients were included in this analysis. Twelve-month switch rates were significantly lower for apremilast initiators compared with TNF inhibitor initiators (14% vs 25%; p<0.01) and comparable to IL inhibitors (14% vs 11%; p>0.05). No statistical difference was observed in days to switch at 12 months for any treatment group. Total healthcare costs were lower for apremilast initiators compared with TNF and IL inhibitor initiators ($34,028 vs $55,973 and $64,430; p<0.0001). Per-patient per-month (PPPM) costs were significantly lower for apremilast initiators compared with TNF inhibitor and IL inhibitor initiators ($2834 vs $4662 and $5366; p<0.0001). Over a 12-month follow-up, biologic-naive psoriasis patients initiating apremilast had significantly lower switching rates compared with patients on TNF inhibitors and similar rates as patients on IL inhibitors. PPPM and total healthcare costs were significantly lower for patients initiating apremilast vs TNF or IL inhibitors, primarily due to lower pharmacy costs.

Biologics and apremilast have advanced psoriasis management by adding treatment options. This study evaluated persistence, adherence and healthcare costs among biologic-naive patients receiving apremilast or biologics. Administrative claims data for adults starting apremilast or biologics from 1 January 2013 to 30 June 2016 were matched based on demographics. Apremilast (n = 703) and biologics (n = 1378) had similar baseline characteristics. 12-month persistence and adherence rates were similar. Adjusted total healthcare costs were lower with apremilast versus biologics (p < 0.001) due to lower total outpatient pharmacy costs (p < 0.001). Real-world apremilast users had similar adherence and lower total healthcare costs versus biologic users. Apremilast's cost advantage was evident regardless of whether the patients were persistent or nonpersistent, or switched or did not switch treatments.

ObjectiveManagement of erosive oesophagitis (EE) remains suboptimal, with many patients experiencing incomplete healing, ongoing symptoms, and relapse despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. The Study of Acid-Related Disorders investigated patient burden of individuals with EE in a real-world setting.DesignUS gastroenterologists (GIs) or family physicians (FPs)/general practitioners (GPs) treating patients with EE completed a physician survey and enrolled up to four patients with EE for a patient survey, with prespecified data extracted from medical records.Results102 GIs and 149 FPs/GPs completed the survey; data were available for 73 patients (mean age at diagnosis, 45.4 years). Omeprazole was healthcare professional (HCP)-preferred first-line treatment (60.8% GIs; 56.4% FPs/GPs), and pantoprazole preferred second line (29.4% and 32.9%, respectively). Price and insurance coverage (both 55.5% HCPs) and familiarity (47.9%) key drivers for omeprazole; insurance coverage (52.0%), price (50.0%), familiarity (48.0%), initial symptom relief (46.0%), and safety (44.0%) key drivers for pantoprazole. Only 49.3% patients took medication as instructed all the time; 56.8% independently increased medication frequency some of the time. Despite treatment, 57.5% patients experienced heartburn and 30.1% regurgitation; heartburn was the most bothersome symptom. 58.9% patients believed that their symptoms could be better controlled; only 28.3% HCPs were very satisfied with current treatment options. 83.6% patients wanted long-lasting treatment options. Fast symptom relief for patients was a top priority for 66.1% HCPs, while 56.6% would welcome alternatives to PPIs.ConclusionThis real-world multicentre study highlights the need for new, rapidly acting treatments in EE that reduce symptom burden, offer durable healing and provide symptom control.

Patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) often respond well to treatment but some become refractory to radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment, and treatment options are limited. Despite the humanistic and economic burden RAI refractory disease imposes on patients, published research concerning treatment patterns and health care resource utilization is sparse. Data were collected from an online retrospective chart review study in the US and five European Union (EU) countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and UK) with physicians recruited from an online panel. Physicians (N=211) provided demographics, disease history, treatment information, and health care resource utilization for one to four of their patients with radioactive iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC). The majority of the patients with RR-DTC (N=623) were female (56%), and their mean age was 58.2 years. In this sample, 63.2% had papillary thyroid cancer and 57.0% were in Stage IV when deemed RAI refractory. Patients with RR-DTC experienced regional recurrence in the thyroid bed/central neck area (25.3%) and had distant metastatic disease (53.6%). At the time data were collected, 50.7% were receiving systemic treatment. Of those, 78.5% were on first-line treatment and 62.7% were receiving multikinase inhibitors. Regional differences for prescribed treatments were observed; the US was more likely to have patients receiving multikinase inhibitors (79.2%) compared with UK (41.2%) and Italy (17.1%). Additional details regarding treatment patterns and resource utilization are discussed. The current study aimed to obtain a greater understanding of RR-DTC treatment globally. These results can assist in the development and implementation of treatment guidelines and ultimately enhance the care of patients with RR-DTC.

We evaluated treatment patterns and healthcare costs of initiating psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment with oral apremilast versus biologics. Claims data identified biologic-naive adults with PsA who initiated either apremilast or a biologic from 2013 to 2016. Medication adherence was similar at 12 months (76.9 vs 73.4%; p = 0.175) between apremilast (n = 381) and matched biologic (n = 761) patients. Apremilast users had $12,715 lower total costs per-patient-per-month (p < 0.001), largely due to outpatient pharmacy and medical costs. Commercially insured patients with PsA initiating apremilast had adherence similar to those initiating biologics but lower total healthcare costs.