Explore the vast range of titles available.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending–dose study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of multiple doses of milvexian, an oral small-molecule FXIa inhibitor, in healthy Japanese participants. Participants received oral milvexian daily under fasted (50 mg and 200 mg) or fed conditions (500 mg) or placebo over 14 days; 24 participants (8/cohort: 6 milvexian; 2 placebo) were planned. Due to an unblinding event, participants in one cohort (200 mg daily) were discontinued, and a second cohort enrolled; 32 participants were included in safety and pharmacodynamic analyses, and 24/32 in pharmacokinetic analyses. Milvexian up to 500 mg daily for 14 days was generally well tolerated, with no deaths, serious adverse events, or discontinuations due to adverse events. Milvexian exposure increased between 50-mg and 200-mg doses. Median T max was similar with 50-mg and 200-mg doses (2.5–3.0 h) and delayed under fed conditions (500 mg, 7.0–8.0 h). Median T 1/2 was similar across doses (8.9–11.9 h). Multiple oral milvexian administrations resulted in concentration-related prolongation of aPTT and decreased FXI clotting activity. Milvexian was generally safe and well tolerated. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of milvexian demonstrates suitability for further clinical development in Japanese participants.

Milvexian (BMS‐986177/JNJ‐70033093) is a small molecule, active‐site inhibitor of factor XIa (FXIa) being developed to prevent and treat thrombotic events. The safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of milvexian were assessed in a two‐part, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, sequential single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) study in healthy adults. Participants in SAD panels (6 panels of 8 participants; n = 48) were randomized (3:1) to receive milvexian (4, 20, 60, 200, 300, or 500 mg) or placebo. The 200‐ and 500‐mg panels investigated the pharmacokinetic impact of a high‐fat meal. Participants in MAD panels (7 panels of 8 participants; n = 56) were randomized (3:1) to receive milvexian (once‐ or twice‐daily) or placebo for 14 days. All milvexian dosing regimens were safe and well‐tolerated, with only mild treatment‐emergent adverse events and no clinically significant bleeding events. In SAD panels, maximum milvexian plasma concentration occurred 3 h postdose in all fasted panels. The terminal half‐life (T1/2) ranged from 8.3 to 13.8 h. In fasted panels from 20 to 200 mg, absorption was dose‐proportional; results at higher doses (300 and 500 mg) were consistent with saturable absorption. Food increased milvexian bioavailability in a dose‐dependent fashion. In MAD panels, steady‐state milvexian plasma concentration was reached within 3 and 6 dosing days with once‐ and twice‐daily dosing, respectively. Renal excretion was less than 20% in all panels. Prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time was observed and was directly related to drug exposure. These results suggest that the safety, tolerability, PK, and PD properties of milvexian are suitable for further clinical development.

Milvexian (BMS-986177/JNJ-70033093) is a potent, oral small molecule that inhibits the active form of factor XI with high affinity and selectivity. This study assessed the single-dose pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of milvexian co-administered with rifampin, an organic anion transport protein (OATP) inhibitor and potent cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inducer. In this open-label, nonrandomized, single-sequence study, healthy participants ( N  = 16) received single doses of milvexian on Day 1 (100 mg), milvexian and rifampin (600 mg) on Day 4, rifampin on Days 5–11, milvexian and rifampin on Day 12, and rifampin on Days 13–14. Pharmacokinetic data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Administration of milvexian, alone or in combination with rifampin, was generally safe and well tolerated. Single-dose co-administration of rifampin and milvexian demonstrated no meaningful changes in milvexian exposure versus milvexian alone (C max , 110%; AUC [0–T] , 102%; AUC [INF] , 101%). After multiple doses of rifampin and milvexian, peak and total milvexian exposure substantially decreased versus milvexian alone (C max , 22%; AUC [0–T] , 15%; AUC [INF] , 15%). Results were consistent with preclinical data, indicating that milvexian is a substrate for CYP3A4/5 and P-gp but not OATP. The implications of these results on the need for dose adjustment of milvexian will be further elucidated following the completion of phase 2 and 3 trials. Trial registration The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02959060; submitted 7/11/2016, first posted 8/11/2016).

Milvexian, an oral activated Factor XI (FXIa) inhibitor, is in clinical studies where it may be combined with antiplatelet agents, including aspirin and/or clopidogrel, to prevent thromboembolic diseases. This phase I trial assessed safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of milvexian coadministration with aspirin and/or clopidogrel in healthy participants through 3 drug-drug interaction studies using a 3-period, 3-treatment, crossover design. A total of 113 participants were randomized to receive milvexian (200 mg; twice daily for 5 days) or matched placebo coadministered with once-daily aspirin (325 mg for 5 days) and/or clopidogrel (Day 1: 300 mg; Days 2–5: 75 mg). Milvexian was safe and well tolerated, with and without aspirin and/or clopidogrel. Eight mild bleeding adverse events (AEs) were reported in 5 of 113 participants across various treatment arms. Peak and total exposures of milvexian were similar with or without clopidogrel and/or aspirin. Exposure-dependent prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time and reduction of FXI clotting activity by milvexian were similar with coadministration of aspirin and/or clopidogrel. Milvexian, with or without coadministration of aspirin and/or clopidogrel, did not affect bleeding time or platelet aggregation. Administration of milvexian alone or with aspirin and/or clopidogrel was safe and well tolerated without increased incidence of AEs, including bleeding. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of milvexian, including bleeding time, were similar with or without aspirin and/or clopidogrel. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier : NCT03698513.

Mavacamten is the first cardiac myosin inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adults with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The phase III EXPLORER‐HCM (NCT03470545) study used a dose‐titration scheme based on mavacamten exposure and echocardiographic assessment of Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradient (VLVOTg) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Using population pharmacokinetic/exposure‐response modeling and simulations of virtual patients, this in silico study evaluated alternative dose‐titration regimens for mavacamten, including regimens that were guided by echocardiographic measures only. Mavacamten exposure‐response models for VLVOTg (efficacy) and LVEF (safety) were developed using patient data from five clinical studies and characterized using nonlinear mixed‐effects models. Simulations of five echocardiography‐guided regimens were performed in virtual cohorts constructed based on either expected or equal population distributions of cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) metabolizer phenotypes. Each regimen aimed to maximize the proportions of patients who achieved a VLVOTg below 30 mm Hg while maintaining LVEF above 50% over 40 weeks and 104 weeks, respectively. The exposure‐response models successfully characterized mavacamten efficacy and safety parameters. Overall, the simulated regimen with the optimal benefit–risk profile across CYP2C19 phenotypes had steps for down‐titration at weeks 4 and 8 (for VLVOTg <20 mm Hg), and up‐titration at week 12 (for VLVOTg ≥30 mm Hg and LVEF ≥55%), and every 12 weeks thereafter. This simulation‐optimized regimen is recommended in the mavacamten US prescribing information.

Mavacamten is a selective, allosteric, reversible cardiac myosin inhibitor that has been developed for the treatment of adults with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model was developed to characterize mavacamten pharmacokinetics (PK) and the variation in mavacamten exposure associated with intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Data from 12 clinical studies (phases 1, 2, and 3) were used. Evaluable participants were those who had at least one mavacamten concentration measurement with associated sampling time and dosing information. The base model included key covariates: body weight, cytochrome P450 isozyme 2C19 (CYP2C19) phenotype with respect to PK, and formulation. The final model was generated using stepwise covariate testing and refinement processes. Simulations were performed to evaluate PK: apparent clearance (CL/F); apparent central and peripheral volumes of distribution; and steady‐state average, trough, and maximum concentrations. Overall, 9244 measurable PK observations from 497 participants were included. A two‐compartment model structure was selected. After stepwise covariate model building and refinement, additional covariates included were: specified mavacamten dose, omeprazole or esomeprazole administration, health/disease status, estimated glomerular filtration rate, fed status, and sex. The final PopPK model accurately characterized mavacamten concentrations. At any given dose, CYP2C19 phenotype was the most influential covariate on exposure parameters (e.g., median CL/F was reduced by 72% in CYP2C19:poor metabolizers compared with the reference participant [CYP2C19:normal metabolizer]). CL/F was also approximately 16% higher in women than in men but lower in participants receiving concomitant omeprazole or esomeprazole (by 33% and 42%, respectively) than in participants not receiving such concomitant therapy.

Milvexian is an oral, small‐molecule factor XIa inhibitor being developed to prevent thromboembolic events. This study assessed the absolute bioavailability (F) of milvexian following single doses of milvexian spray‐dried dispersion (SDD) formulation under fed and fasted conditions, and milvexian solution, in healthy adult participants using an intravenous microtracer approach. This was a phase I, open‐label, partially randomized, 4‐sequence, 5‐period crossover study. After fasting for ≥10 h, participants received milvexian 200‐mg oral solution with a 100‐μg 14C milvexian intravenous microtracer at the time of maximum observed plasma concentration. Following a 3‐day washout, participants were randomized to 1 of 4 milvexian SDD treatment sequences in a crossover fashion: 25 mg fasted, 25 mg fed, 200 mg fasted, or 200 mg fed. Pharmacokinetic data were collected up to 72 h postdose. Seventeen participants were dosed, and 14 completed treatment. Under fasted conditions, milvexian F was ~100%, 58.2%, and 54.2% following administration of the oral solution, 25 mg SDD, and 200 mg SDD, respectively. Under fed conditions, milvexian F following 25 mg and 200 mg SDD was 44.3% and 75.6%, respectively. The milvexian SDD formulation at 25 mg and 200 mg resulted in similar F in a fasted state; under fed conditions, milvexian F decreased at 25 mg and increased at 200 mg. These findings clarify pharmacokinetic‐related gaps observed in previous studies.

Apixaban is an oral small‐molecule, direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor approved in adults for treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and for reducing risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence after initial anticoagulant therapy. This phase I study (NCT01707394) evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), and safety of apixaban in pediatric subjects (<18 years), enrolled by age group, at risk of venous or arterial thrombotic disorder. A single apixaban dose, targeting adult steady‐state exposure with apixaban 2.5 mg, was administered using two pediatric formulations: 0.1 mg sprinkle capsule (age <28 days); 0.4 mg/ml solution (age 28 days to <18 years; dose range, 1.08–2.19 mg/m2). End points included safety, PKs, and anti‐FXa activity. For PKs/PDs, four to six blood samples were collected ≤26 h postdosing. A population PK model was developed with data from adults and pediatric subjects. Apparent oral clearance (CL/F) included fixed maturation function based on published data. From January 2013 to June 2019, 49 pediatric subjects received apixaban. Most adverse events were mild/moderate, and the most common was pyrexia (n = 4/15). Apixaban CL/F and apparent central volume of distribution increased less than proportionally with body weight. Apixaban CL/F increased with age, reaching adult values in subjects aged 12 to <18 years. Maturation affected CL/F most notably in subjects aged <9 months. Plasma anti‐FXa activity values were linearly related to apixaban concentrations, with no apparent age‐related differences. Pediatric subjects tolerated single apixaban doses well. Study data and population PK model supported phase II/III pediatric trial dose selection.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling has a number of applications, including assessing drug–drug interactions (DDIs) in polymorphic populations, and should be iteratively refined as science progresses. The Simcyp Simulator is annually updated and version 21 included updates to hepatic and intestinal CYP2C19 enzyme abundance, including addition of intermediate and rapid metabolizer phenotypes and changes to the ultra-rapid metabolizer enzyme abundance, with implications for population clearance and DDI predictions. This work details verification of the updates with sensitive CYP2C19 substrates, omeprazole and lansoprazole, using available clinical data from literature. Multiple assessments were performed, including recovery of areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and Cmax from compiled datasets for each drug, recovery of victim DDI ratios with CYP2C19 and/or CYP3A4 inhibition and recovery of relative exposure between phenotypes. Simulated data were within respective acceptance criteria for >80% of omeprazole AUC values, >70% of lansoprazole AUC and Cmax, >60% of AUC and Cmax DDI ratios and >80% of exposure ratios between different phenotypes. Recovery of omeprazole Cmax was lower (>50–70% within 2-fold) and possibly attributed to the variety of formulations used in the clinical dataset. Overall, the results demonstrated that the updated data used to parameterize CYP2C19 phenotypes reasonably described the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole and lansoprazole in genotyped or phenotyped individuals.

Objective The aim of this study was to assess the effect of moderate or severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of milvexian. Methods This open-label, parallel-group study assessed the PK, safety, and tolerability of a single oral 60 mg dose of milvexian in participants with normal renal function ( n  = 8; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) and participants with moderate ( n  = 8; eGFR ≥ 30 to ≤ 59 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) or severe ( n  = 8; eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) renal impairment. Regression analysis was performed using linear regression of log-transformed PK parameters versus eGFR. Results Milvexian was well tolerated, with no deaths, serious adverse events, or serious bleeding reported. The maximum milvexian concentration ( C max ) was similar for all groups. Based on a regression analysis of milvexian concentration versus eGFR, participants with eGFR values of 30 and 15 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , respectively, had area under the curve (AUC) values that were 41% and 54% greater than in participants with normal renal function. Median time to maximum concentration ( T max ) was similar for the three groups (4.5–5.0 h). The half-life increased for participants with moderate (18.0 h) or severe (17.7 h) renal impairment compared with those with normal renal function (13.8 h). Conclusion A single dose of milvexian 60 mg was safe and well tolerated in participants with normal renal function and moderate or severe renal impairment. There was a similar increase in milvexian exposure between the moderate and severe renal groups. Clinical Trials Registration This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03196206, first posted 22 June 2017).