Explore the vast range of titles available.

Advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) is a rare, KIT D816V-driven hematologic neoplasm characterized by mast cell infiltration and shortened survival. We report the results of a prespecified interim analysis of an ongoing pivotal single-arm phase 2 trial (no. NCT03580655 ) of avapritinib, a potent, selective KIT D816V inhibitor administered primarily at a once-daily starting dose of 200 mg in patients with AdvSM ( n  = 62). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included mean baseline change in AdvSM–Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score and quality of life, time to response, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, changes in measures of disease burden and safety. The primary endpoint was successfully met ( P  = 1.6 × 10 -9 ), with an ORR of 75% (95% confidence interval 57–89) in 32 response-evaluable patients with AdvSM who had sufficient follow-up for response assessment, including 19% with complete remission with full or partial hematologic recovery. Reductions of ≥50% from baseline in serum tryptase (93%), bone marrow mast cells (88%) and KIT D816V variant allele fraction (60%) were observed. The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (24%), thrombocytopenia (16%) and anemia (16%). Avapritinib demonstrated a high rate of clinical, morphological and molecular responses and was generally well tolerated in patients with AdvSM. In a prespecified interim analysis of a pivotal phase 2 trial, avapritinib, a selective KIT inhibitor, elicited robust clinical and molecular responses, was generally well tolerated and led to improved patient-reported outcomes in patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis.

The incorporation of pediatric-inspired regimens in the adolescent-young-adult (AYA) and adult populations have resulted improved survival outcomes (Stock et al. Blood 133(14):1548–1559 2019; Dunsmore et al. J Clin Oncol 38(28):3282–3293 2020; DeAngelo et al. Leukemia 29(3):526-534 2015). Nonetheless incorporation of such regimens is limited by increased toxicity to asparaginase. Dosing strategies that reduce the weight-based dose of pegylated-L-asparaginase (PEG-asparaginase) utilizing activity monitoring have been shown to result in better tolerability of these regimens. The purpose of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of treating adults with Philadelphia chromosome negative (Ph−) ALL with pediatric-inspired regimens that incorporate PEG-asparaginase dose adjustments and asparaginase activity level monitoring. Patients aged 18–65 years initiated on pediatric-inspired regimens utilizing dose-reduced PEG-asparaginase with therapeutic drug monitoring-guided adjustments were included. The screening of 122 patients treated between 2015 and 2021 resulted in the inclusion of 54 patients. The median age of the cohort was 35 years (16–65 years), and median body mass index (BMI) was 30 kg/m2 (18.3–53.4 kg/m2). The 36-month survival estimate was 62.1% (95% CI 48.1–77.7%), and the median overall survival (OS) was 62.2 months (95% CI 35.1–89.3 months). In the AYA cohort, the 36-month survival was 71.2% (95% CI 55.8–91%) and the median overall survival was not reached. Survival was not significantly affected by immunophenotype or BMI. Discontinuation due to toxicity or hypersensitivity reactions was low at 11% and 9% respectively. The encouraging survival outcomes and favorable tolerability of this older population in the real-world setting support the use of individualized PEG-asparaginase dosing with PharmD-guided therapeutic drug monitoring.

Secondary AML is associated with a disproportionately poor prognosis, consistently shown to exhibit inferior response rates, event-free survival, and overall survival in comparison with de novo AML. Secondary AML may arise from the evolution of an antecedent hematologic disorder, or it may arise as a complication of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation therapy in the case of therapy-related AML. Because of the high frequency of poor-risk cytogenetics and high-risk molecular features, such as alterations in TP53, leukemic clones are often inherently chemoresistant. Standard of care induction had long remained conventional 7 + 3 until its reformulation as CPX-351, recently FDA approved specifically for secondary AML. However, recent data also suggests relatively favorable outcomes with regimens based on high-dose cytarabine or hypomethylating agents. With several investigational agents being studied, the therapeutic landscape becomes even more complex, and the treatment approach involves patient-specific, disease-specific, and therapy-specific considerations.

Background Novel therapies for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are imperative, particularly for those with high-risk features. Selinexor, an exportin 1 (XPO1/CRM1) inhibitor, has demonstrated anti-leukemia activity as a single agent, as well as in combination with anthracyclines and/or DNA-damaging agents. Methods We report the findings of a phase I dose escalation trial with cohort expansion in 20 patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory AML that combined selinexor with age-adjusted high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HiDAC/Mito). Results Three (15%) patients received the initial dose of 60 mg of selinexor (~ 35 mg/m 2 ), and 17 (85%) received the target level of 80 mg (~ 50 mg/m 2 ). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Common adverse events included febrile neutropenia (70%), diarrhea (40%), anorexia (30%), electrolyte abnormalities (30%), bacteremia (25%), cardiac toxicities (25%), fatigue (25%), and nausea/vomiting (25%). None were unexpected given the HiDAC/Mito regimen. Serious adverse events occurred in 6 (30%) patients; one was fatal. Ten (50%) patients achieved a complete remission (CR), 3 (15%) achieved CR with incomplete recovery (CRi), 1 (5%) achieved partial remission (PR), and 6 (30%) had progressive disease for an overall response rate (ORR) of 70%. Eight of 14 (57%) responders proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Correlative studies of WT1 levels showed persistently detectable levels in patients who either did not respond or relapsed quickly after induction. Conclusion The selinexor/HiDAC/Mito regimen is feasible and tolerable at selinexor doses of 80 mg/day (~ 50 mg/m 2 /day) twice weekly. The recommended phase II dose is 80 mg and warrants further study in this combination. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02573363 . Registered October 5, 2015

Patient education in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has become increasingly complex with the introduction of new treatments and chemotherapy regimens. Video education presents an opportunity to supplement traditional patient education and address some of the gaps associated with standard methods. This single-center study sought to assess the potential impact of supplemental video education on patients receiving induction chemotherapy for AML. Participants were consented to be randomized to receive their education with or without a supplemental video designed for their treatment regimen. We then provided a survey to each participant to assess knowledge retention, anxiety, and overall satisfaction with their care. Patients that received video education were found to have significantly improved knowledge retention compared to those that did not. There were no differences detected in anxiety or patient satisfaction. Video education appears to be an effective supplemental method for patient education in AML. Limitations include the single-center nature of the study at an urban academic medical center with a relatively well-educated, primarily Caucasian, younger population. Future research is warranted to assess the video in a diverse set of languages and to explore its broader benefits.

Eltrombopag has been shown to improve response rates when added to standard therapy in adults with severe aplastic anemia in controlled trial settings. However, outcomes in real-world populations have mostly been examined in small retrospective studies. This robust, multicenter, retrospective cohort study across six academic health systems compared outcomes in patients who received immunosuppressive therapy with or without eltrombopag. The study included 82 patients who received front-line therapy from January 2014 to August 2021. Overall response rates at 6 months did not differ significantly for patients receiving eltrombopag versus immunosuppressive therapy alone (58% v. 65%, p  = 0.56). However, complete response rates at 6 and 12 months were over two times higher in the eltrombopag arm (29% v. 12%, p  = 0.06 and 48% v. 18%, p  = 0.005). Rates of hepatotoxicity were similar across both arms. Eltrombopag addition did not impact overall survival (median not reached in either arm at 2 years, p  = 0.86) or disease-free survival (median not reached v. 13.3 months at 2 years, p  = 0.20). Eltrombopag may not produce as large of a benefit in real-world settings compared to controlled trial settings but may offer patients deeper responses with similar rates of toxicity to immunosuppressive therapy alone.

Histopathology, the standard method to assess BM in hematologic malignancies such as myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), suffers from notable limitations in both research and clinical settings. BM biopsies in patients fail to detect disease heterogeneity, may yield a nondiagnostic sample, and cannot be repeated frequently in clinical oncology. Endpoint histopathology precludes monitoring disease progression and response to therapy in the same mouse over time, missing likely variations among mice. To overcome these shortcomings, we used MRI to measure changes in cellularity, macromolecular constituents, and fat versus hematopoietic cells in BM using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), magnetization transfer, and chemical shift–encoded fat imaging. Combining metrics from these imaging parameters revealed dynamic alterations in BM following myeloablative radiation and transplantation. In a mouse MPLW515L BM transplant model of MPN, MRI detected effects of a JAK2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib, within 5 days of initiating treatment and identified differing kinetics of treatment responses in subregions of the tibia. Histopathology validated the MRI results for BM composition and heterogeneity. Anatomic MRI scans also showed reductions in spleen volume during treatment. These findings establish an innovative, clinically translatable MRI approach to quantify spatial and temporal changes in BM in MPN.

Polycythemia vera is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by erythrocytosis. Rusfertide, an injectable peptide mimetic of the master iron regulatory hormone hepcidin, restricts the availability of iron for erythropoiesis. The safety and efficacy of rusfertide in patients with phlebotomy-dependent polycythemia vera are unknown. In part 1 of the international, phase 2 REVIVE trial, we enrolled patients in a 28-week dose-finding assessment of rusfertide. Part 2 was a double-blind, randomized withdrawal period in which we assigned patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive rusfertide or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was a response, defined by hematocrit control, absence of phlebotomy, and completion of the trial regimen during part 2. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed by means of the modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) patient diary (scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms). Seventy patients were enrolled in part 1 of the trial, and 59 were assigned to receive rusfertide (30 patients) or placebo (29 patients) in part 2. The estimated mean (±SD) number of phlebotomies per year was 8.7±2.9 during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide and 0.6±1.0 during part 1 (estimated difference, 8.1 phlebotomies per year). The mean maximum hematocrit was 44.5±2.2% during part 1 as compared with 50.0±5.8% during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide. During part 2, a response was observed in 60% of the patients who received rusfertide as compared with 17% of those who received placebo (P = 0.002). Between baseline and the end of part 1, rusfertide treatment was associated with a decrease in individual symptom scores on the MPN-SAF in patients with moderate or severe symptoms at baseline. During parts 1 and 2, grade 3 adverse events occurred in 13% of the patients, and none of the patients had a grade 4 or 5 event. Injection-site reactions of grade 1 or 2 in severity were common. In patients with polycythemia vera, rusfertide treatment was associated with a mean hematocrit of less than 45% during the 28-week dose-finding period, and the percentage of patients with a response during the 12-week randomized withdrawal period was greater with rusfertide than with placebo. (Funded by Protagonist Therapeutics; REVIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04057040.).

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized clinically by cytopenias, fatigue, and splenomegaly stemming from extramedullary hematopoiesis. MF commonly arises from mutations in JAK2, MPL, and CALR, which manifests as hyperactive Jak/Stat signaling. Triple-negative MF is diagnosed in the absence of JAK2, MPL, and CALR but when clinical, morphologic criteria are met and other mutation(s) is/are present, including ASXL1, EZH2, and SRSF2. While the clinical and classic molecular features of MF are well-established, emerging evidence indicates that additional mutations, specifically within the Ras/MAP Kinase signaling pathway, are present and may play important role in disease pathogenesis and treatment response. KRAS and NRAS mutations alone are reportedly present in up to 15 and 14% of patients with MF (respectively), and other mutations predicted to activate Ras signaling, such as CBL, NF1, BRAF, and PTPN11, collectively exist in as much as 21% of patients. Investigations into the prevalence of RAS and related pathway mutations in MF and the mechanisms by which they contribute to its pathogenesis are critical in better understanding this condition and ultimately in the identification of novel therapeutic targets.

Abstract In recent years, an explosion of novel agents has shifted the treatment paradigm for patients with acute myeloid leukemia. The optimal place in therapy for many of these novel agents remains unknown due to limited guidance from national guidelines and the way these agents were studied prior to entering the market. A critical evaluation of the literature and incorporation of oncology stewardship principles can be helpful in determining an optimal place for these agents while being mindful of the overall cost that is associated with therapies. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the efficacy and safety data for five controversial agents and provide examples of the use of stewardship practices in determining their place in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.