Explore the vast range of titles available.

Mobile health apps (MHA) have the potential to improve health care. The commercial MHA market is rapidly growing, but the content and quality of available MHA are unknown. Instruments for the assessment of the quality and content of MHA are highly needed. The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) is one of the most widely used tools to evaluate the quality of MHA. Only few validation studies investigated its metric quality. No study has evaluated the construct validity and concurrent validity. This study evaluates the construct validity, concurrent validity, reliability, and objectivity, of the MARS. Data was pooled from 15 international app quality reviews to evaluate the metric properties of the MARS. The MARS measures app quality across four dimensions: engagement, functionality, aesthetics and information quality. Construct validity was evaluated by assessing related competing confirmatory models by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Non-centrality (RMSEA), incremental (CFI, TLI) and residual (SRMR) fit indices were used to evaluate the goodness of fit. As a measure of concurrent validity, the correlations to another quality assessment tool (ENLIGHT) were investigated. Reliability was determined using Omega. Objectivity was assessed by intra-class correlation. In total, MARS ratings from 1,299 MHA covering 15 different health domains were included. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a bifactor model with a general factor and a factor for each dimension (RMSEA = 0.074, TLI = 0.922, CFI = 0.940, SRMR = 0.059). Reliability was good to excellent (Omega 0.79 to 0.93). Objectivity was high (ICC = 0.82). MARS correlated with ENLIGHT (ps<.05). The metric evaluation of the MARS demonstrated its suitability for the quality assessment. As such, the MARS could be used to make the quality of MHA transparent to health care stakeholders and patients. Future studies could extend the present findings by investigating the re-test reliability and predictive validity of the MARS.

IntroductionThe integration of a web-based computer-adaptive patient-reported outcome test (CAT) platform with persuasive design optimised features including recommendations for action into routine healthcare could provide a promising way to translate reliable diagnostic results into action. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of such a platform for depression and anxiety (RehaCAT+) compared with the standard diagnostic system (RehaCAT) in cardiological and orthopaedic health clinics in routine care.Methods and analysisA two-arm, pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial will be conducted. Twelve participating rehabilitation clinics in Germany will be randomly assigned to a control (RehaCAT) or experimental group (RehaCAT+) in a 1:1 design. A total sample of 1848 participants will be recruited across all clinics. The primary outcome, depression severity at 12 months follow-up (T3), will be assessed using the CAT Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Emotional Distress-Depression Item set. Secondary outcomes are depression at discharge (T1) and 6 months follow-up (T2) as well as anxiety, satisfaction with participation in social roles and activities, pain impairment, fatigue, sleep, health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, physical functioning, alcohol, personality and health economic-specific general quality of life and socioeconomic cost and benefits at T1-3. User behaviour, acceptance, facilitating and hindering factors will be assessed with semistructured qualitative interviews. Additionally, a smart sensing substudy will be conducted, with daily ecological momentary assessments and passive collection of smartphone usage variables. Data analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle with additional per-protocol analyses. Cost-effectiveness analyses will be conducted from a societal perspective and the perspective of the statutory pension insurance.Ethics and disseminationThe study will be conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committee of Ulm University, has approved the study (on 24 February 2021 ref. 509/20). Written informed consent will be obtained for all participants. Results will be published via peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberDRKS00027447

The objective, unobtrusively collected GPS features (eg, homestay and distance) from everyday devices like smartphones may offer a promising augmentation to current assessment tools for depression. However, to date, there is no systematic and meta-analytical evidence on the associations between GPS features and depression. This study aimed to investigate the between-person and within-person correlations between GPS mobility and activity features and depressive symptoms, and to critically review the quality and potential publication bias in the field. We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CENTRAL, ACM, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, and Web of Science to identify eligible articles focusing on the correlations between GPS features and depression from December 6, 2022, to March 24, 2023. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied in a 2-stage inclusion process conducted by 2 independent reviewers (YT and JK). To be eligible, studies needed to report correlations between wearable-based GPS variables (eg, total distance) and depression symptoms measured with a validated questionnaire. Studies with underage persons and other mental health disorders were excluded. Between- and within-person correlations were analyzed using random effects models. Study quality was determined by comparing studies against the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. Publication bias was investigated using Egger test and funnel plots. A total of k=19 studies involving N=2930 participants were included in the analysis. The mean age was 38.42 (SD 18.96) years with 59.64% (SD 22.99%) of participants being female. Significant between-person correlations between GPS features and depression were identified: distance (r=-0.25, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.21), normalized entropy (r-0.17, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.04), location variance (r-0.17, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.04), entropy (r=-0.13, 95% CI -0.23 to -0.04), number of clusters (r=-0.11, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.03), and homestay (r=0.10, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.19). Studies reporting within-correlations (k=3) were too heterogeneous to conduct meta-analysis. A deficiency in study quality and research standards was identified: all studies followed exploratory observational designs, but no study referenced or fully adhered to the international guidelines for reporting observational studies (STROBE). A total of 79% (k=15) of the studies were underpowered to detect a small correlation (r=.20). Results showed evidence for potential publication bias. Our results provide meta-analytical evidence for between-person correlations of GPS mobility and activity features and depression. Hence, depression diagnostics may benefit from adding GPS mobility and activity features as an integral part of future assessment and expert tools. However, confirmatory studies for between-person correlations and further research on within-person correlations are needed. In addition, the methodological quality of the evidence needs to improve. OSF Registeries cwder; https://osf.io/cwder.

This paper outlines a significant research gap on sustainable cities: the need for more comprehensive and strategic frameworks for managing sustainable cities, particularly those integrating interdisciplinary elements, dimensions, and global trends. The proposed framework delineates sustainable cities’ elements, dimensions, and trends based on ISO 37120, incorporating pillars linked to the triple bottom line and the Sustainable Development Goals 30 (SDGs). This study suggests specific research agendas, emphasizing theoretical and practical implementation within urban contexts. The methodological approach involved both bibliometric and content analysis techniques, using IRA-MUTEQ software 0.8 Alpha 7. This enabled the identification of key analytical categories and leading authors, with categories derived from lexical forms, similarity analysis, correspondence factor analysis (CFA), and descending hierarchical classification (DHC). Notably, the terms ‘ISO’ and ‘37120’ did not emerge as prominent lexical forms in the IRAMUTEQ results, despite their frequent mentions in the analyzed studies.

In 2008 the International Cartographic Association (ICA) proposed a reference model to describe Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDI) based on the Reference Model of Open Distributed Processing (RM-ODP), which has been adapted and validated by several research projects. This paper details the experience of applying the extended ICA Model to an Academic SDI of environmental character and collaborative functions, such as the description of stakeholders' roles, functions, and responsibilities, called IDE-AMB (acronym in Portuguese). The intent is to transform the IDE-AMB into a database composed of information from several institutions and academic research. The stakeholders were described based on previously established literature and their needs for access, use, production, and sharing of geospatial data from different sources for the Integrated Management Center (NGI, acronym in Portuguese) ICMBio Antonina-Guaraqueçaba, located on the northern coast of the state of Paraná. We concluded that the ICA Model presents robustness; however, it still lacks conceptual reviews and needs to be adapted to the new realities and complexities of emerging SDI.