Explore the vast range of titles available.

The Covid-19 pandemic has already stressed health care systems throughout the world, requiring rationing of medical equipment and care. The authors discuss the ethical values relevant to health care rationing and provide six recommendations to guide fair allocation of scarce medical resources during the pandemic.

As terrorist actors revise their tactics to outmaneuver increasing counter-terrorism security measures, a recent trend toward less-sophisticated attack methods has emerged. Most notable of these “low tech” trends are the Targeted Automobile Ramming MAss Casualty (TARMAC) attacks. Between 2014 and November 2017, 18 TARMAC attacks were reported worldwide, resulting in 181 deaths and 679 injuries. TARMAC attack-related injuries are unique compared to accidental pedestrian trauma and other causes of mass casualty incidents (MCI), and therefore they require special consideration. No other intentional mass casualty scenario is the result of a blunt, non-penetrating trauma mechanism. Direct vehicle impact results in high-power injuries including blunt trauma to the central nervous system (CNS), and thoracoabdominal organs with crush injuries if the victims are run over. Adopting new strategies and using existing technology to diagnose and treat MCI victims with these injury patterns will save lives and limit morbidity. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is one such technology, and its efficacy during MCI response is receiving an increasing amount of attention. Ultrasound machines are becoming increasingly available to emergency care providers and can be critically important during a MCI when access to other imaging modalities is limited by patient volume. By taking ultrasound diagnostic techniques validated for the detection of life-threatening cardiothoracic and abdominal injuries in individuals and applying them in a TARMAC mass casualty situation, physicians can improve triage and allocate resources more effectively. Here, we revisit the high-yield applications of POCUS as a means of enhanced prehospital and hospital-based triage, improved resource utilization, and identify their potential effectiveness during a TARMAC incident.

Previous studies have demonstrated the use of virtual reality (VR) in mass-casualty incident (MCI) simulation; however, it is uncertain if VR simulations can be a substitute for in-person disaster training. Demonstrating that VR MCI scenarios can elicit the same desired stress response achieved in live-action exercises is a first step in showing non-inferiority. The primary objective of this study was to measure changes in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) response via a decrease in heart rate variability (HRV) in subjects participating in a VR MCI scenario. An MCI simulation was filmed with a 360º camera and shown to participants on a VR headset while simultaneously recording electrocardiography (EKG) and HRV activity. Baseline HRV was measured during a calm VR scenario immediately prior to exposure to the MCI scenarios, and SNS activation was captured as a decrease in HRV compared to baseline. Cognitive stress was measured using a validated questionnaire. Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank analysis, Welch's t-test, and multivariate logistic regression were performed with statistical significance established at P <.05. Thirty-five subjects were enrolled: eight attending physicians (two surgeons, six Emergency Medicine [EM] specialists); 13 residents (five Surgery, eight EM); and 14 medical students (six pre-clinical, eight clinical-year students). Sympathetic nervous system activation was observed in all groups during the MCI compared to baseline (P <.0001) and occurred independent of age, sex, years of experience, or prior MCI response experience. Overall, 23/35 subjects (65.7%) reported increased cognitive stress in the MCI (11/14 medical students, 9/13 residents, and 3/8 attendings). Resident and attending physicians had higher odds of discordance between SNS activation and cognitive stress compared to medical students (OR = 8.297; 95% CI, 1.408-64.60; P = .030). Live-actor VR MCI simulation elicited a strong sympathetic response across all groups. Thus, VR MCI training has the potential to guide acquisition of confidence in disaster response.

This article captures the webinar narrative on March 31, 2020 of four expert panelists addressing three questions on the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Each panelist was selected for their unique personal expertise, ranging from front-line emergency physicians from multiple countries, an international media personality, former director of the US Strategic National Stockpile, and one of the foremost international experts in disaster medicine and public policy. The forum was moderated by one of the most widely recognized disaster medical experts in the world. The four panelists were asked three questions regarding the current pandemic as follows:1.What do you see as a particular issue of concern during the current pandemic?2.What do you see as a particular strength during the current pandemic?3.If you could change one thing about the way that the pandemic response is occurring, what would you change?

Violence against health care professionals in the workplace is underreported and understudied. Additional data are needed to understand steps that might be taken to reduce the risk. In January 2015, a surgeon at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston was shot and killed at work by the son of a deceased patient. Even though the event received substantial media coverage, reporters did not highlight the fact that although the murder of a health care worker is rare, episodes of workplace violence against medical providers happen daily across the country. Although the majority of these incidents of workplace violence are verbal, many others constitute assault, battery, domestic violence, stalking, or sexual harassment. 1 This review focuses on our current knowledge about workplace violence in various health care settings, including . . .

To the Editor: In his review article, Phillips (April 28 issue) 1 ignores the fact that workplace violence against medical providers can be affected by the episodes reported in the past. In China today, the doctor–patient relationship has reached an unprecedented level of tension. 2 Type II workplace violence (in which the perpetrator is a customer or patient of the workplace or employees) has become common in Chinese hospitals. The media of China are interested in reporting the episodes of hospital violence. Some journalists may easily show sympathy to the “weak” and report the events partially or falsely because of a lack . . .

To the Editor: In his review article, Phillips (April 28 issue)1 ignores the fact that workplace violence against medical providers can be affected by the episodes reported in the past. In China today, the doctor–patient relationship has reached an unprecedented level of tension.2 Type II workplace violence (in which the perpetrator is a customer or patient of the workplace or employees) has become common in Chinese hospitals. The media of China are interested in reporting the episodes of hospital violence. Some journalists may easily show sympathy to the “weak” and report the events partially or falsely because of a lack . . .