Explore the vast range of titles available.

Elderly patients represent the most challenging and hard-to-treat patient population due to dismal characteristics of the disease, such as secondary-acute myeloid leukemia (AML), enrichment of unfavorable molecular genes (TP53) and comorbidities. We conducted a multicentric retrospective study to evaluate activity and safety in a real-life setting of hypomethylating drugs (HMAs) in patients older than 75 years with AML. Between September 2010 and December 2021, 220 patients were treated, 164 (74.5%) received AZAcitidine and 56 DECitabine; most patients (57.8%), received more than four cycles of HMAs. The best response obtained was CR in 51 patients (23.2%), PR in 23 (10.5%) and SD in 45 (20.5%); overall transfusion independence was obtained in 47 patients (34%), after a median of 3.5 months. The median OS (mOs) was 8 months (95% CI 5.9–10.2), with 1- and 2-years OS of 39.4% (95% CI 32.7–46) and 17.4% (95% CI 11.7–23.1), respectively; similar mOS was observed according to HMA treatment (AZA 8.3 vs. DEC 7.8 months, p = 0.810). A subset of 57 long survivors (44 in AZA group and 13 in DEC group) received at least 12 cycles of HMAs, their mOS was 24.3 months. In multivariate analysis, age (≥80), Charlson comorbidity index (≥3), creatinine clearance and the type of best response (≥PR) during treatment maintained independent significance in predicting survival. Infectious complications, most frequently pneumonia (35) and septic shock (12), were lethal in 49 patients (22.2%). Our data show that HMAs have similar efficacy compared to pivotal trials and are well tolerated in a setting of very elderly patients with several co-comorbidities.

Nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy (CINV) occur in 70-80% of onco-haematological patients undergoing antiblastic therapy. The anti-emetic therapy chosen according to the guidelines and characteristics of the single patient solve CINV in about 80% of cases. The concept of supportive care, which includes the treatment of CINV, has been formalized by the Multinational Association Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) to prevent and manage the side effects of antiblastic therapy. The evaluation of co-morbidities makes it possible to choose the most suitable antiemetic drug in compliance with multi-drug non-oncology therapies. The most immediate benefits are an improvement in the quality of life (QoL), a greater adherence of the patient to cancer therapy, and a lower interaction between drugs.

La nausea e il vomito indotti da chemioterapia (CINV) si presentano nel 70-80% dei pazienti oncoematologici sottoposti a terapia antiblastica. Una terapia antiemetica scelta in base alle linee-guida e alle caratteristiche del singolo malato risolvono la CINV in circa l’80% dei casi. Il concetto di terapia di supporto, nella quale è incluso il trattamento della CINV, è stato formalizzato dal MASCC (Multinational Association Supportive Care in Cancer) allo scopo di prevenire e di gestire gli effetti collaterali della terapia antiblastica. La valutazione delle comorbilità permette di scegliere il farmaco antiemetico più adatto nel rispetto delle interazioni delle terapie multifarmaco non oncologiche. I benefici più immediati sono un miglioramento della qualità di vita (QoL), una maggiore aderenza del paziente alle terapia oncologica, una minore interazione tra farmaci.

Aims: To define the peculiar features of patients with the deletion of the chromosome 20 long arm (del20q), data from 69 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) and isolated del20q, followed by the Gruppo Romano-Laziale Sindromi Mielodisplastiche (GROM-L) and Ospedale Torrette of Ancona, were collected and compared with those of 502 MDS patients with normal karyotype (NK-MDS). Results: Compared to the NK-MDS group, patients with del20q at diagnosis were older (p = 0.020) and mainly male (p = 0.006). They also had a higher rate of bone marrow blast < 5% (p = 0.004), a higher proportion of low and int-1 risk according to IPSS score (p = 0.023), and lower median platelet (PLT) count (p < 0.001). To date, in the del20q cohort, 21 patients (30.4%) received no treatment, 42 (61.0%) were treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), 3 (4.3%) with hypomethylating agents, and 3 (4.3%) with other treatments. Among 34 patients evaluable for response to ESA, 21 (61.7%) achieved stable erythroid response according to IWG 2006 criteria and 13 (38.2%) were resistant. Nine patients (13.0%) progressed to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) after a median time from diagnosis of 28 months (IR 4.1–51.7). The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 60.6 months (95% CI 54.7–66.4). the 5-year cumulative OS was 55.9% (95% CI 40.6–71.2). Conclusion: According to our results, we hypothesize that MDSs with isolated del 20q may represent a distinct biological entity, with peculiar clinical and prognostic features. The physio-pathological mechanisms underlying the deletion of the chromosome 20 long arm are still unclear and warrant future molecular analysis.

The Gruppo Romano Mielodisplasie (GROM) conducted a retrospective study in 543 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in “real-life” clinical practice. The 40.000-UI/week erythropoietin (EPO)-alpha and 30.000-UI/week EPO-beta starting dose were defined “standard,” and 80,000 UI/week EPO-alpha and 60.000 UI/week EPO-beta were defined “high.” Response was defined according to International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria. At ESA’s start, median age was 74.2 years (interquartile range (IR) 67.8–79.5) and median hemoglobin was 8.9 g/dl (IR 8.2–9.6). Median time from diagnosis to ESAs start was 3.8 months (IR 0.8–13.2). ESA starting dose was “standard” in 361 patients (66.5 %) and “high” in 182 patients (33.5 %). Erythroid response was observed in 82/185 (44.3 %) transfusion dependent (TD) patients as compared with 226/329 (68.6 %) transfusion independent (TI) ones ( p  < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, in TD patients, only endogenous EPO levels <50 mU/l were significant ( p  = 0.046), whereas in TI patients, high-dose ESAs ( p  < 0.001), abnormal creatinine levels (0.009), and endogenous EPO levels <50 mU/l ( p  = 0.014) were predictors of response. Responders showed a higher 5-year overall survival (OS) (57.8 vs. 32.2 %, p  < 0.001) and leukemia-free survival (76.0 vs. 49.8 %, p  < 0.001). At multivariable analysis for OS, response to ESA, low International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), no transfusion need, and female sex showed an independent favorable prognostic role. Our results confirm that treatment with ESAs is effective in a real-life MDS setting, particularly at high dose and in TI patients. Prospective studies are needed to define the optimal starting dose.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are common in elderly patients. Recombinant human erythro-poietin (rHuEPO) has been widely used to treat anemia in lower risk MDS patients, but few data are known about rHuEPO treatment in the very elderly patient group. In order to investigate the role of rHuEPO treatment in terms of response, overall survival (OS), and toxicity in a very elderly MDS patient group, 93 MDS patients treated with rHuEPO when aged ≥80 years were selected among MDS cases enrolled in a retrospective multicenter study by the cooperative group Gruppo Romano Mielodisplasie (GROM) from Jan 2002 to Dec 2010. At baseline, median age was 82.7 (range 80–99.1) with a median hemoglobin (Hb) level of 9 g/dl (range 6–10.8). The initial dose of rHuEPO was standard (epoetin alpha 40,000 IU/week or epoetin beta 30,000 IU/week) in 59 (63.4 %) pa-tients or high in 34 (36.6 %) (epoetin alpha 80,000 IU/week) patients. We observed an erythroid response (ER) in 59 (63.4 %) patients. No thrombotic event was reported. Independent predictive factors for ER were low transfusion requirement before treatment ( p  = 0.004), ferritin <200 ng/ml ( p  = 0.017), Hb >8 g/dl ( p  = 0.034), and a high-dose rHuEPO treatment ( p  = 0.032). Median OS from rHuEPO start was 49.3 months (95 % CI 27.5–68.4) in responders versus 30.6 months (95 % CI 7.3–53.8) in resistant patients ( p  = 0.185). In conclusion, rHuEPO treatment is safe and effective also in the very elderly MDS patients. However, further larger studies are warranted to evaluate if EPO treatment could be worthwhile in terms of quality of life and cost-efficacy in very old patients.