Explore the vast range of titles available.

Bloodstream infections in critically ill require a speeded-up microbiological diagnosis to improve clinical outcomes. In this pre-post intervention study, we evaluated how a molecular identification test directly performed on positive blood cultures of critically ill improves patient's therapeutic management. All adult patients staying at the intensive care unit (ICU) at the time of positive blood culture detection were study-eligible. In the 8-month pre-intervention period (P0), standard positive blood culture management was performed. In the 10-month intervention period (P1), a BioFire® FilmArray® blood culture identification (FA-BCID) test (bioMérieux) was additionally performed 24/7 at detection. The evaluated clinical outcome was time to optimal antimicrobial treatment of the bloodstream infection. FA-BCID microbiological test performances were also analysed. 163 positive blood culture episodes were allocated to P0 and 166 to P1. After the withdrawal of episodes in accordance with defined exclusion criteria, outcome analysis was performed on 110 bloodstream infections both in P0 and P1. Time to optimal antimicrobial treatment in P0 was 14h41 compared to 4h39 in P1. FA-BCID test results led to a treatment adjustment in 35/110 (31.8%) P1 episodes including 26 where the adjustment was the optimal antimicrobial treatment. FA-BCID testing identified 96.2% of the on-panel microorganisms thereby covering 85.2% of our ICU-strain epidemiology. Time to identification with FA-BCID testing was calculated at 1h35. Resistance detection was in complete concordance with routine results. Considering 150 FA-BCID tests were initially performed in P1, 4,3 tests were required to have 1 test leading to an improved therapeutic outcome. FA-BCID testing drastically reduced time to optimal antimicrobial treatment in critically ill with bloodstream infections.

The FA-PNEU is an automated multiplex PCR test allowing direct detection of 15 bacteria with a semi-quantitative value, 3 atypical bacteria, 9 viruses, and 7 antimicrobial resistance genes within 1 h and 15 min [2]. [...]bacterial documentation is essential to assess co-infection in COVID-19 critically ill. Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia panel for detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract specimens in the setting of a tertiary care academic center.

Severe community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. CAL02, a novel antitoxin agent with an unprecedented mode of action, consists of liposomes that capture bacterial toxins known to dysregulate inflammation, cause organ damage, and impede immune defence. We aimed to assess the safety of CAL02 as an add-on therapy to antibiotics. This randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial was done in ten intensive care units (ICUs) in France and Belgium (but only six units enrolled patients), in patients with severe community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia who required ICU admission and had been identified as being infected with S pneumoniae. We randomly assigned participants in two stages—the first stage randomly assigned six patients (1:1) to either low-dose CAL02 or placebo, and the second stage randomly assigned 18 patients (14:4) to either high-dose CAL02 or placebo, and stratified in four blocks (4:1, 4:1, 3:1, and 3:1), in addition to standard of care. Block randomisation was done with a computer-generated random number list. Participants, investigators, other site study personnel, the sponsor, and the sponsor's designees involved in study management and monitoring were masked to the randomisation list and treatment assignment. Patients were treated with low-dose (4 mg/kg) or high-dose (16 mg/kg) CAL02 or placebo (saline), in addition to standard antibiotic therapy. Two intravenous doses of study treatment were infused, with a 24 h interval, at a concentration of 10 mg/mL, stepwise, over a maximum of 2 h on days 1 and 2. The primary objective of the study was to assess the safety and tolerability of low-dose and high-dose CAL02 in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia treated with standard antibiotic therapy, and the primary analysis was done on the safety population (all patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment). Efficacy was a secondary outcome. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02583373. Between March 21, 2016, and Jan 13, 2018, we screened 280 patients with community-acquired pneumonia. 19 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, resulting in 13 patients in the CAL02 groups (three assigned to low-dose CAL02 and ten assigned to high-dose CAL02) and six in the placebo group. One patient randomly assigned to placebo was allocated to the wrong treatment group and received high-dose CAL02 instead of placebo. Thus, 14 patients received CAL02 (three received low-dose CAL02 and 11 received high-dose CAL02) and five patients received placebo, constituting the safety population. At baseline, the mean APACHE II score for the total study population was 21·5 (SD 4·9; 95% CI 19·3–23·7) and 11 (58%) of 19 patients had septic shock. Adverse events occurred in 12 (86%) of 14 patients in the CAL02 treatment groups combined and all five (100%) patients in the placebo group. Serious adverse events occurred in four (29%) of 14 patients in the CAL02 treatment groups combined and two (40%) of five patients in the placebo group. One non-serious adverse event (mild increase in triglycerides) in a patient in the high-dose CAL02 group was reported as related to study drug. However, analysis of the changes in triglyceride levels in the CAL02 groups compared with the placebo group revealed no correlation with administration of CAL02. No adverse events were linked to local tolerability events. All patients, apart from one who died in the low CAL02 group (death not related to the study drug) achieved clinical cure at the test of cure visit between days 15 and 22. The sequential organ failure assessment score decreased by mean 65·0% (95% CI 50·7–79·4) in the combined CAL02 groups compared with 29·2% (12·8–45·5) in the placebo group between baseline and day 8. The nature of adverse events was consistent with the profile of the study population and CAL02 showed a promising safety profile and tolerability. However, the difference between high-dose and low-dose CAL02 could not be assessed in this study. Efficacy was in line with the expected benefits of neutralising toxins. The results of this study support further clinical development of CAL02 and provide a solid basis for a larger clinical study. Combioxin.

Sepsis is a syndrome which is defined as a dysregulated host response to infection leading to organ failure. Since it remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, numerous drug candidates have already been tested, and continue to be developed, as potential adjunct therapies. Despite convincing mechanisms of action and robust pre-clinical data, almost all drug candidates in the field of sepsis have failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy in the past two decades. Accordingly, the development of new sepsis drugs has markedly decreased in the past few years. Nevertheless, thanks to a better understanding of sepsis pathophysiology and pathways, new promising drug candidates are currently being developed. Instead of a unique sepsis profile as initially suspected, various phenotypes have been characterised. This has  resulted in the identification of multiple targets for new drugs together with relevant biomarkers, and a better understanding of the most appropriate time to intervention. Within the entire sepsis drugs portfolio, those targeting the immune response are probably the most promising. Monoclonal antibodies targeting either cytokines or infectious agents are undoubtedly part of the potential successful therapeutic classes to come.

The clinical presentation of COVID-19 pneumonia is relatively homogenous and commonly associates high fever, hyperleukocytosis, severe hypoxemia, extensive bilateral radiologic infiltrates, and biological inflammatory syndrome. Since this presentation is shared with VAP, traditional diagnostic criteria for VAP are not valid in the critical COVID-19 population. [...]the microbiological documentation from deep respiratory secretions currently remains the sole criterion to support VAP diagnosis in COVID-19 patients. [...]many ICU perform less invasive endotracheal aspirate (ETA) with quantitative or semi-quantitative cultures, even if less reliable for deciding whether to institute antibiotic treatment or not.

Background This systematic review aimed to assess inhaled drug delivery in mechanically ventilated patients or in animal models. Whole lung and regional deposition and the impact of the ventilator circuit, the artificial airways and the administration technique for aerosol delivery were analyzed. Methods In vivo studies assessing lung deposition during invasive mechanical ventilation were selected based on a systematic search among four databases. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility and the risk of bias. Results Twenty-six clinical and ten experimental studies were included. Between 30% and 43% of nominal drug dose was lost to the circuit in ventilated patients. Whole lung deposition of up to 16% and 38% of nominal dose (proportion of drug charged in the device) were reported with nebulizers and metered-dose inhalers, respectively. A penetration index inferior to 1 observed in scintigraphic studies indicated major proximal deposition. However, substantial concentrations of antibiotics were measured in the epithelial lining fluid (887 (406–12,819) μg/mL of amikacin) of infected patients and in sub-pleural specimens (e.g., 197 μg/g of amikacin) dissected from infected piglets, suggesting a significant distal deposition. The administration technique varied among studies and may explain a degree of the variability of deposition that was observed. Conclusions Lung deposition was lower than 20% of nominal dose delivered with nebulizers and mostly occurred in proximal airways. Further studies are needed to link substantial concentrations of antibiotics in infected pulmonary fluids to pulmonary deposition. The administration technique with nebulizers should be improved in ventilated patients in order to ensure an efficient but safe, feasible and reproducible technique.

Purpose To determine if, compared with pressure support (PS), neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) reduces trigger delay, inspiratory time in excess, and the number of patient–ventilator asynchronies in intubated patients. Methods Prospective interventional study in spontaneously breathing patients intubated for acute respiratory failure. Three consecutive periods of ventilation were applied: (1) PS1, (2) NAVA, (3) PS2. Airway pressure, flow, and transesophageal diaphragmatic electromyography were continuously recorded. Results All results are reported as median (interquartile range, IQR). Twenty-two patients were included, 36.4% (8/22) having obstructive pulmonary disease. NAVA reduced trigger delay (ms): NAVA, 69 (57–85); PS1, 178 (139–245); PS2, 199 (135–256). NAVA improved expiratory synchrony: inspiratory time in excess (ms): NAVA, 126 (111–136); PS1, 204 (117–345); PS2, 220 (127–366). Total asynchrony events were reduced with NAVA (events/min): NAVA, 1.21 (0.54–3.36); PS1, 3.15 (1.18–6.40); PS2, 3.04 (1.22–5.31). The number of patients with asynchrony index (AI) >10% was reduced by 50% with NAVA. In contrast to PS, no ineffective effort or late cycling was observed with NAVA. There was less premature cycling with NAVA (events/min): NAVA, 0.00 (0.00–0.00); PS1, 0.14 (0.00–0.41); PS2, 0.00 (0.00–0.48). More double triggering was seen with NAVA, 0.78 (0.46–2.42); PS1, 0.00 (0.00–0.04); PS2, 0.00 (0.00–0.00). Conclusions Compared with standard PS, NAVA can improve patient–ventilator synchrony in intubated spontaneously breathing intensive care patients. Further studies should aim to determine the clinical impact of this improved synchrony.

Background Intensive care unit (ICU) survivors have reduced long-term survival compared to the general population. Identifying parameters at ICU discharge that are associated with poor long-term outcomes may prove useful in targeting an at-risk population. The main objective of the study was to identify clinical and biological determinants of death in the year following ICU discharge. Methods FROG-ICU was a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study of ICU survivors followed 1 year after discharge, including 21 medical, surgical or mixed ICUs in France and Belgium. All consecutive patients admitted to intensive care with a requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation and/or vasoactive drug support for more than 24 h following ICU admission and discharged from ICU were included. The main outcome measure was all-cause mortality at 1 year after ICU discharge. Clinical and biological parameters on ICU discharge were measured, including the circulating cardiovascular biomarkers N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitive troponin I, bioactive-adrenomedullin and soluble-ST2. Socioeconomic status was assessed using a validated deprivation index (FDep). Results Of 1570 patients discharged alive from the ICU, 333 (21%) died over the following year. Multivariable analysis identified age, comorbidity, red blood cell transfusion, ICU length of stay and abnormalities in common clinical factors at the time of ICU discharge (low systolic blood pressure, temperature, total protein, platelet and white cell count) as independent factors associated with 1-year mortality. Elevated biomarkers of cardiac and vascular failure independently associated with 1-year death when they are added to multivariable model, with an almost 3-fold increase in the risk of death when combined (adjusted odds ratio 2.84 (95% confidence interval 1.73–4.65), p  < 0.001). Conclusions The FROG-ICU study identified, at the time of ICU discharge, potentially actionable clinical and biological factors associated with poor long-term outcome after ICU discharge. Those factors may guide discharge planning and directed interventions. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01367093 . Registered on 6 June 2011.

The presence (or the risk) of a multidrug-resistant pathogen infecting the lungs was justification for administering two intravenous antibiotics in both the amikacin treatment group and the placebo group.2 Antimicrobial bitherapy is not superior to monotherapy in ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by non-resistant, Gram-negative bacteria.3 In the IHNALE trial,1 49% of identified pathogens were not multidrug-resistant and a treatment success of 77% in the placebo group reflected the high efficiency of intravenous bitherapy. [...]an additional benefit from aerosolised amikacin could not be reasonably expected. In 28 patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia treated by nebulised amikacin, amikacin tracheal concentrations were found to be 25 times higher and epithelial lining fluid concentrations were found to be four times higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration of multidrug-resistant, Gram-negative bacteria.4 These concentrations were interpreted as reflecting high amikacin distal lung deposition and justified the administration of 12 mg/kg per day in the INHALE trial. Interestingly, epithelial lining fluid concentrations of tobramycin in ventilated sheep receiving a single nebulisation were 100 times greater than interstitial space fluid concentrations measured by microdialysis.8 These data are highly suggestive of a massive bronchial contamination of the fiberscope and the bronchoalveolar lavage; therefore, elevated epithelial lining fluid concentrations of a nebulised drug can be considered an artefact.9 Finally, the insufficient optimisation of ventilator settings during the nebulisation could have further reduced amikacin distal lung deposition by potentiating the impaction of aerosolised particles on bronchial walls.