Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
19
result(s) for
"Pietanza, M Catherine"
Sort by:
Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
2018
The addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy for metastatic lung cancer without
EGFR
or
ALK
mutations resulted in better progression-free and overall survival than chemotherapy alone. Immune-related adverse effects were more common with the combination.
Journal Article
Patient-reported outcomes following pembrolizumab or placebo plus pemetrexed and platinum in patients with previously untreated, metastatic, non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-189): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
2020
Pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum led to superior overall survival and progression-free survival, and a higher proportion of patients with a confirmed complete or partial response over placebo plus pemetrexed–platinum in the KEYNOTE-189 study. We aimed to evaluate prespecified exploratory patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients in KEYNOTE-189.
In the multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 KEYNOTE-189 study done at 126 cancer centres in 16 countries, eligible patients aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer without sensitising EGFR or ALK alterations, measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg) or saline placebo every 3 weeks for up to 2 years (35 cycles); all patients received four cycles of intravenous pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) with carboplatin (5 mg/mL per min) or cisplatin (75 mg/m2; investigator's choice) every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by pemetrexed maintenance therapy every 3 weeks. Permuted block randomisation (block size six) was done with an interactive voice-response system and stratified by PD-L1 expression, choice of platinum, and smoking status. Patients, investigators, and other study personnel were unaware of treatment assignment. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13) were administered at cycles 1–5, every three cycles thereafter during year 1, and every four cycles during years 2–3. The primary endpoints (overall survival and progression-free survival) have been published previously. Key PRO endpoints were change from baseline to week 12 (during chemotherapy) and week 21 (following chemotherapy) in QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QOL) score, and time to deterioration in cough, chest pain, or dyspnoea. PROs were analysed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study medication and who completed at least one PRO assessment, and the results are provided with two-sided, nominal p values. This ongoing study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02578680.
Between Feb 26, 2016, and March 6, 2017, 616 patients were enrolled; median follow-up was 10·5 months (range 0·2–20·4) as of data cutoff on Nov 8, 2017. 402 (99%) of 405 patients in the pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum group and 200 (99%) of 202 patients in the placebo plus pemetrexed–platinum-treated group completed at least one PRO assessment. At baseline, 359 (89%) of 402 patients in the pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum group and 180 (90%) of 200 in the placebo plus pemetrexed–platinum group were compliant with QLQ-C30; at week 12, 319 (90%) of 354 and 149 (89%) of 167 patients were compliant, respectively; and at week 21, 249 (76%) of 326 and 91 (64%) of 143 patients were compliant, respectively. From baseline to week 12, GHS/QOL scores were maintained with both pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum (least-squares mean change: 1·0 point [95% CI −1·3 to 3·2] increase) and placebo plus pemetrexed–platinum (−2·6 points [−5·8 to 0·5] decrease; between-group difference: 3·6 points [−0·1 to 7·2]; p=0·053). From baseline to week 21, GHS/QOL scores were better maintained with pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum (least-squares mean change: 1·3 points [95% CI −1·2 to 3·6] increase) than with placebo plus pemetrexed–platinum (−4·0 points [−7·7 to −0·3] decrease; between-group difference: 5·3 points [1·1 to 9·5]; p=0·014). Median time to deterioration in cough, chest pain, or dyspnoea was not reached (95% CI 10·2 months to not reached) with pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum, and was 7·0 months (4·8 months to not reached) with placebo plus pemetrexed–platinum (hazard ratio 0·81 [95% CI 0·60–1·09], p=0·16).
The addition of pembrolizumab to standard chemotherapy maintained GHS/QOL, with improved GHS/QOL scores at week 21 in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group compared with the placebo plus chemotherapy group. These data further support use of pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.
Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Journal Article
Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) consensus definitions for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated immune-related adverse events (irAEs) terminology
by
Feltquate, David
,
Suarez-Almazor, Maria E
,
Champiat, Stephane
in
Autoimmune diseases
,
Cancer
,
Consensus
2023
Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy may vary substantially in their clinical presentation, including natural history, outcomes to treatment, and patterns. The application of clinical guidelines for irAE management can be challenging for practitioners due to a lack of common or consistently applied terminology. Furthermore, given the growing body of clinical experience and published data on irAEs, there is a greater appreciation for the heterogeneous natural histories, responses to treatment, and patterns of these toxicities, which is not currently reflected in irAE guidelines. Furthermore, there are no prospective trial data to inform the management of the distinct presentations of irAEs. Recognizing a need for uniform terminology for the natural history, response to treatment, and patterns of irAEs, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a consensus panel composed of leading international experts from academic medicine, industry, and regulatory agencies. Using a modified Delphi consensus process, the expert panel developed clinical definitions for irAE terminology used in the literature, encompassing terms related to irAE natural history (ie, re-emergent, chronic active, chronic inactive, delayed/late onset), response to treatment (ie, steroid unresponsive, steroid dependent), and patterns (ie, multisystem irAEs). SITC developed these definitions to support the adoption of a standardized vocabulary for irAEs, which will have implications for the uniform application of irAE clinical practice guidelines and to enable future irAE clinical trials.
Journal Article
First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for metastatic PD-L1-positive NSCLC: real-world analysis of time on treatment
2019
To determine real-world time on treatment (rwToT) with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%.
The Kaplan–Meier rwToT was estimated from electronic health record data for adults who initiated first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for stage IV, PD-L1 TPS ≥50% NSCLC, with negative/unknown
aberrations, and ≥6 months’ follow-up until database cutoff.
A total of 386 patients with ECOG 0–1 had a median rwToT of 6.9 months (95% CI: 5.6–8.3) and 12-month on-treatment rate of 36.4% (31.2–41.6) versus 40.3% (32.5–47.9) and 37.6% (31.9–43.4) in KEYNOTE-024 (KN024) and KN042 (stage IV/TPS ≥50% subpopulation), respectively. The 24-month restricted-mean rwTOT (extrapolated) was 10.5 months (9.4–11.7), versus 11.0 (9.5–12.5) and 10.4 (9.3–11.5) in KN024 and KN042, respectively.
First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy rwToT in metastatic PD-L1 TPS ≥50% NSCLC for trial-matched patients is similar to treatment duration in KN024 and KN042.
Journal Article
Outcomes of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for PD-L1-positive (TPS ≥50%) metastatic NSCLC at US oncology practices
by
Chandwani, Sheenu
,
Burke, Thomas
,
Piperdi, Bilal
in
antineoplastic agents
,
Cancer
,
Clinical medicine
2019
To determine real-world outcomes with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor expression ≥50%.
This retrospective study included adults with ECOG 0–1 initiating first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy on/after 24 October 2016 (EHR cohort) or from 1 December 2016 through 30 November 2017 (spotlight cohort) with ≥6-month follow-up. We estimated Kaplan–Meier overall survival (OS, both cohorts), and, for spotlight, real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) by Kaplan–Meier and real-world tumor response (rwTR).
For 423 patients in the EHR cohort and 188 in spotlight, median OS was 18.9 months (95% CI: 14.9–25.5) and 19.1 months (12.6-not reached), respectively. For spotlight, median rwPFS was 6.8 months (5.3–8.1); rwTR of complete/partial response was 48% (41–56%).
Observed OS, rwPFS and rwTR were consistent with clinical trial findings.
This study analyzed electronic health record data to determine outcomes for patients who received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. These patients received treatment at oncology clinics, not in a clinical trial, and had lung tumors with ≥50% expression of the protein PD-L1. Although patients were older, on average, and included fewer men than in clinical trials, overall survival and tumor response rates resembled those recorded in the Phase III pivotal clinical trials, KEYNOTE-024 and -042, with median overall survival of 19 months, 12-month survival rate of 60% and tumor response rate of 48%.
Journal Article
Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with adenocarcinoma-like features: napsin A expression and genomic alterations
by
Rekhtman, Natasha
,
Travis, William D
,
Kadota, Kyuichi
in
692/699/67/1612/1350
,
692/699/67/1612/2143
,
82/51
2018
Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a highly aggressive malignancy, which was recently found to comprise three major genomic subsets: small cell carcinoma-like, non-small cell carcinoma (predominantly adenocarcinoma)-like, and carcinoid-like. To further characterize adenocarcinoma-like subset, here we analyzed the expression of exocrine marker napsin A, along with TTF-1, in a large series of LCNECs (
n
=112), and performed detailed clinicopathologic and genomic analysis of napsin A-positive cases. For comparison, we analyzed napsin A expression in other lung neuroendocrine neoplasms (177 carcinoids, 37 small cell carcinomas) and 60 lung adenocarcinomas. We found that napsin A was expressed in 15% of LCNEC (17/112), whereas all carcinoids and small cell carcinomas were consistently negative. Napsin A reactivity in LCNEC was focal in 12/17 cases, and weak or moderate in intensity in all cases, which was significantly lower in the extent and intensity than seen in adenocarcinomas (
P
<0.0001). The combination of TTF-1-diffuse/napsin A-negative or focal was typical of LCNEC but was rare in adenocarcinoma, and could thus serve as a helpful diagnostic clue. The diagnosis of napsin A-positive LCNECs was confirmed by classic morphology, diffuse labeling for at least one neuroendocrine marker, most consistently synaptophysin, and the lack of distinct adenocarcinoma component. Genomic analysis of 14 napsin A-positive LCNECs revealed the presence of mutations typical of lung adenocarcinoma (
KRAS
and/or
STK11
) in 11 cases. In conclusion, LCNECs are unique among lung neuroendocrine neoplasms in that some of these tumors exhibit low-level expression of exocrine marker napsin A, and harbor genomic alterations typical of adenocarcinoma. Despite the apparent close biological relationship, designation of adeno-like LCNEC as a separate entity from adenocarcinoma is supported by their distinctive morphology, typically diffuse expression of neuroendocrine marker(s) and aggressive behavior. Further studies are warranted to assess the clinical utility and optimal method of identifying adenocarcinoma-like and other subsets of LCNEC in routine practice.
Journal Article
459 Phase 3 study of first-line pembrolizumab with and without vibostolimab (anti-TIGIT) in patients with PD-L1–positive metastatic NSCLC
by
Castro, Gilberto de
,
Cho, Byoung
,
Takahashi, Toshiaki
in
Cancer therapies
,
Chemotherapy
,
Immunotherapy
2021
BackgroundVibostolimab (MK-7684) is a humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds to the T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domains (TIGIT), blocking the interaction between TIGIT and its ligands, CD112 and CD155. Pembrolizumab, an anti–PD-1 mAb, significantly improves OS versus chemotherapy in patients with PD-L1–positive advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the first-in-human study (NCT02964013), the combination of vibostolimab plus pembrolizumab had a manageable safety profile and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced NSCLC naive to anti–PD-(L)1 therapy; ORR was 31% and 25% in patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1% and <1%, respectively. The current phase 3 study (NCT04738487) is comparing first-line treatment with MK-7684A, a co-formulation of vibostolimab plus pembrolizumab, versus pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with PD-L1–positive metastatic NSCLC.MethodsThis randomized, multicenter, double-blind study is enrolling adults with pathologically confirmed, previously untreated, metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥1% (centrally confirmed). Patients must have measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, an ECOG PS of 0–1, have no EGFR mutations or ALK or ROS1 gene rearrangements, and have no active or untreated CNS metastases. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous treatment with vibostolimab 200 mg plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles (approximately 2 years) or until PD, unacceptable AEs, intercurrent illness, or investigator decision. Patients who stop treatment after a CR or after completing 35 cycles and subsequently have PD can receive up to 17 additional cycles (approximately 1 year) of their randomized therapy. Randomization is stratified by ECOG PS (0 vs 1), PD-L1 TPS (1%–49% vs ≥50%), and region of enrollment (East Asia vs non-East Asia). The dual primary endpoints are PFS, per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR), and OS. Secondary endpoints include ORR and DOR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. Radiographic imaging occurs at baseline, Q9W from randomization through week 54, and then Q12W until PD, the start of new anticancer treatment, withdrawal of consent, or death. Health-related quality of life is assessed using validated patient-reported outcome instruments including the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30. AEs are graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Approximately 598 patients will be randomized. Enrollment began in April of 2021, and is ongoing at 42 sites in 11 countries.AcknowledgementsMedical writing assistance was provided by Rozena Varghese, PharmD, CMPP, of ICON plc (North Wales, PA, USA), funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04738487Ethics ApprovalAn independent institutional review board or ethics committee approved the protocol at each study site, and the trial is being conducted in compliance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients are required to provide informed consent prior to participation in the study.
Journal Article
Real-World Time on Treatment with First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 Expression ≥ 50%: 3-Year Follow-Up Data
2022
Our aim was to evaluate real-world time on treatment (rwToT), overall and by KRAS mutation status, with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in real-world oncology practice in the US. rwToT is a readily available, intermediate-range endpoint that is moderately to highly correlated with overall survival in clinical trials and real-world data. Using deidentified electronic medical record data, we studied patients with ECOG performance status (PS) of 0–2 who initiated pembrolizumab (1 November 2016 to 31 March 2020) for advanced NSCLC with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50% and without EGFR/ALK/ROS1 genomic alterations. The data cutoff was 31 March 2021, and the median study follow-up was 34 months. The Kaplan–Meier median rwToT with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy was 7.4 months (95% CI, 6.3–8.1) for 807 patients with PS 0–1, which was consistent with the median treatment duration in the KEYNOTE-024 trial (7.9 months). The median rwToT for 237 patients with PS 2 was 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.4–2.8). For those with KRAS-mutated and KRAS wild-type nonsquamous NSCLC and PS 0–1, the median rwToT was 7.6 months and 7.0 months, respectively. Our findings suggest long-term benefit of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% in real-world settings in the US, particularly for patients with good performance status at the start of therapy, irrespective of KRAS status.
Journal Article
Bringing the genomic landscape of small-cell lung cancer into focus
2012
Genomic characterization efforts in small-cell lung cancer have been complicated by the paucity of high-quality surgical resection specimens for this aggressive lung cancer subtype that is usually diagnosed at unresectable stages in small biopsies or cytology specimens. Now, two papers report genomic analyses of small-cell lung cancer, highlighting subsets of tumors driven by amplification of
FGFR1
,
SOX2
or
MYC
family members or by a
MYCL1
fusion oncogene, among many other recurrent alterations.
Journal Article
364 KRAS mutations in patients with nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer: prevalence and relationship with PD-L1 expression, tumor mutation burden and smoking status
2021
BackgroundPembrolizumab is a standard-of-care first-line treatment for advanced/metastatic NSCLC, either as monotherapy (for patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥1%) or combined with platinum chemotherapy. An improved OS benefit has been demonstrated for both pembrolizumab monotherapy and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with higher tumor PD-L1 expression, and for pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with higher tissue tumor mutation burden (tTMB). Mutations in KRAS occur relatively frequently in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC but infrequently in those with squamous NSCLC; most mutations are in codon 12. Notably, the pembrolizumab OS treatment effect was not diminished in patients with KRAS G12C mutations in phase 3 studies evaluating pembrolizumab monotherapy and pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy.1 2 Herein we describe prevalence of KRAS mutations among patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC from two phase 3 clinical studies evaluating first-line pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-042 and KEYNOTE-189) and the relationship of such mutations with select patient characteristics.MethodsKEYNOTE-042 (NCT02220894) evaluated pembrolizumab versus platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced PD-L1–positive NSCLC (any histology) without EGFR/ALK alterations. KEYNOTE-189 (NCT02578680) evaluated pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus platinum-based chemotherapy alone for metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without EGFR/ALK alterations irrespective of tumor PD-L1 expression. Whole-exome sequencing of tumor tissue and matched normal DNA (blood) was performed for patients with nonsquamous histology. PD-L1 TPS was evaluated using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay (Agilent Technologies, Carpinteria, CA, USA). Prevalence of KRAS mutations and their relationships with TMB, PD-L1 TPS, and smoking status were analyzed descriptively.Results590 patients with nonsquamous NSCLC were included in these analyses (KEYNOTE-042, n=301; KEYNOTE-189, n=289). Overall, 42.9% of patients had tTMB ≥175 mut/exome, 81.4% were current/former smokers and, 40.3%, 42.7%, and 16.9% had PD-L1 TPS ≥50%, 1–49% and <1% respectively. KRAS G12C, G12D, and G12V mutations occurred in 11.0%, 4.1%, and 5.4% of patients, respectively. Prevalence of KRAS mutations by patient characteristics is summarized in the table (table 1). KRAS G12C mutations occurred almost exclusively in current/former smokers. KRAS G12C was enriched in tumors with tTMB ≥175 mut/exome and tumors with PD-L1 TPS ≥50%. Prevalence was highest in tumors with both tTMB ≥175 mut/exome and PD-L1 TPS ≥50%.Abstract 364 Table 1KRAS Mutation PrevalenceConclusions KRAS G12C mutations occurred with moderate frequency in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC, with most occurring in current/former smokers. KRAS G12C mutations occurred at higher frequency in patient subgroups defined by higher tTMB and PD-L1 TPS.AcknowledgementsMedical writing assistance was provided by Christabel Wilson, MSc, of ICON plc (North Wales, PA, USA), funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.Trial RegistrationKEYNOTE-042, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02220894; KEYNOTE-189, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02578680ReferencesGadgeel S, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Felip E, et al. KRAS mutational status and efficacy in KEYNOTE-189: pembrolizumab (pembro) plus chemotherapy (chemo) vs placebo plus chemo as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. Ann Oncol 2019;30(suppl 11):xi64-xi5.Herbst RS, Lopes G, Kowalski DM, et al. Association of KRAS mutational status with response to pembrolizumab monotherapy given as first-line therapy for PD-L1-positive advanced non-squamous NSCLC in KEYNOTE-042. Ann Oncol 2019;30(suppl 11):xi63-xi4.Ethics ApprovalFor both trials, the protocol and all amendments were approved by the appropriate ethics committee at each center, the study was conducted in accordance with the standards of Good Clinical Practice. Patients provided written informed consent before enrollment.
Journal Article