Explore the vast range of titles available.

Women with advanced endometrial cancer that progressed during platinum-containing therapy were randomly assigned to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or physician’s choice of chemotherapy (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). The median progression-free survival was 7.2 months with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and 3.8 months with chemotherapy; the median overall survival was 18.3 months and 11.4 months, respectively.

Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV), a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate targeting folate receptor α (FRα), is approved for the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer in the United States. We conducted a phase 3, global, confirmatory, open-label, randomized, controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of MIRV with the investigator's choice of chemotherapy in the treatment of platinum-resistant, high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Participants who had previously received one to three lines of therapy and had high FRα tumor expression (≥75% of cells with ≥2+ staining intensity) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive MIRV (6 mg per kilogram of adjusted ideal body weight every 3 weeks) or chemotherapy (paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival; key secondary analytic end points included objective response, overall survival, and participant-reported outcomes. A total of 453 participants underwent randomization; 227 were assigned to the MIRV group and 226 to the chemotherapy group. The median progression-free survival was 5.62 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.34 to 5.95) with MIRV and 3.98 months (95% CI, 2.86 to 4.47) with chemotherapy (P<0.001). An objective response occurred in 42.3% of the participants in the MIRV group and in 15.9% of those in the chemotherapy group (odds ratio, 3.81; 95% CI, 2.44 to 5.94; P<0.001). Overall survival was significantly longer with MIRV than with chemotherapy (median, 16.46 months vs. 12.75 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.89; P = 0.005). During the treatment period, fewer adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred with MIRV than with chemotherapy (41.7% vs. 54.1%), as did serious adverse events of any grade (23.9% vs. 32.9%) and events leading to discontinuation (9.2% vs. 15.9%). Among participants with platinum-resistant, FRα-positive ovarian cancer, treatment with MIRV showed a significant benefit over chemotherapy with respect to progression-free and overall survival and objective response. (Funded by ImmunoGen; MIRASOL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04209855.).

Bevacizumab is approved in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of ovarian cancer, either in first-line therapy or for patients with recurrent disease not previously treated with the same drug. We aimed to test the value of continuing bevacizumab beyond progression after first-line treatment with the same drug. In our open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 82 sites in four countries, we enrolled women (aged ≥18 years) who had previously received first-line platinum-based therapy including bevacizumab, and had recurrent (≥6 months since last platinum dose), International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stage IIIB–IV ovarian cancer with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a carboplatin-based doublet intravenously (carboplatin area under the concentration curve [AUC] 5 on day 1 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1, every 21 days; carboplatin AUC 4 on day 1 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every 21 days; or carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 on day 1, every 28 days), or a carboplatin-based doublet plus bevacizumab (10 mg/kg intravenous every 14 days combined with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin–carboplatin, or 15 mg/kg every 21 days combined with gemcitabine–carboplatin or paclitaxel–carboplatin). Evaluable disease according to RECIST 1.1 guidelines was required before randomisation. Randomisation was done through the trial website with a minimisation procedure, stratified by centre, time of recurrence, performance status, and type of second-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01802749 and EudraCT 2012-004362-17. Between Dec 6, 2013, and Nov 11, 2016, 406 patients were recruited (203 [50%] assigned to the bevacizumab group and 203 [50%] to the standard chemotherapy group). 130 patients (64%) in the bevacizumab group and 131 (65%) in the standard chemotherapy group had progressed after receiving a last dose of platinum more than 12 months before, and 146 patients (72%) in the bevacizumab group and 147 (72%) in the standard chemotherapy group had progressed after completion of first-line bevacizumab maintenance. 161 participants (79%) progressed in the standard chemotherapy group, as did 143 (70%) in the bevacizumab group. Median progression-free survival was 8·8 months (95% CI 8·4–9·3) in the standard chemotherapy group and 11·8 months (10·8–12·9) in the bevacizumab group (hazard ratio 0·51, 95% CI 0·41–0·65; log-rank p<0·0001). Most common grade 3–4 adverse events were hypertension (20 [10%] in the standard chemotherapy group vs 58 (29%) in the bevacizumab group), neutrophil count decrease (81 [41%] vs 80 [40%]), and platelet count decrease (43 [22%] vs 61 [30%]). 68 patients (33%) died in the standard chemotherapy group and 79 (39%) died in the bevacizumab group; two deaths (1%) in the standard chemotherapy group and one death (<1%) in the bevacizumab group were deemed to be treatment-related. Continuing bevacizumab beyond progression combined with chemotherapy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer improves progression-free survival compared with standard chemotherapy alone and might be considered in clinical practice. Hoffmann–La Roche and Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro.

The development of guidelines is one of the core activities of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and European Society of Gynaecologial Oncology (ESGO), as part of the mission of both societies to improve the quality of care for patients with cancer across Europe. ESMO and ESGO jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based recommendations in several selected areas in order to improve the quality of care for women with ovarian cancer. The ESMO–ESGO consensus conference on ovarian cancer was held on April 12–14, 2018 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of ovarian cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel worked on five clinically relevant questions regarding ovarian cancer relating to each of the following four areas: pathology and molecular biology, early-stage and borderline tumours, advanced stage disease and recurrent disease. Relevant scientific literature, as identified using a systematic search, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. The recommendations presented here are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. This article presents the recommendations of this ESMO–ESGO consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

The MITO-END3 trial compared carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) with avelumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (CPA) as first-line treatment in endometrial cancer (EC) patients and demonstrated a significant interaction between avelumab response and mismatch repair status. To investigate prognostic/predictive biomarker, 29 MITO-END3-EC patients were evaluated at pretreatment (B1) and at the end of CP/CPA treatment (B2) for peripheral myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and Tregs. At B2, effector Tregs frequency was significantly higher in patients treated with CPA as compared to CP ( p  = 0.038). Both treatments (CP/CPA) induced significant decrease in peripheral M-MDSC (− 5.41%) in TCGA 2-MSI-high as compared to TCGA-category 4 tumors ( p  = 0.004). In accordance, both treatments induced M-MDSCs (+ 5.34%) in MSS patients as compared to MSI-high patients ( p  = 0.001). Moreover, in a subgroup of patients, primary tumors were highly infiltrated by M-MDSCs in MSS as compared to MSI-high ECs. A post hoc analysis displayed higher frequency of M-MDSCs ( p  = 0.020) and lower frequency of CD4+ ( p  < 0.005) at pretreatment in EC patients as compared to healthy donors. In conclusion, the peripheral evaluation of MDSCs and Tregs correlated with molecular features in EC treated with CP/CPA and may add insights in identifying EC patients responder to first-line chemo/chemo-immunotherapy. Graphical abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of granulosa cell tumour (GCT) of the ovary in a large series of patients treated in MITO centres (Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer) and to define prognostic parameters for relapse and survival. Methods: A retrospective multi-institutional review of patients with GCTs of the ovary treated or referred to MITO centres was conducted. Surgical outcome, intraoperative and pathological findings and follow-up data were analysed. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to determine the predictors for survival and recurrence. Results: A total of 97 patients with primary GCT of the ovary were identified. The median follow-up period was 88 months (range 6–498). Of these, 33 patients had at least one episode of disease recurrence, with a median time to recurrence of 53 months (range 9–332). Also, 47% of recurrences occurred after 5 years from initial diagnosis. At multivariate analysis, age and stage were independent poor prognostic indicators for survival; surgical treatment outside MITO centres and incomplete surgical staging retained significant predictive value for recurrence in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: This study confirms the generally favourable prognosis of GCTs of the ovary, with 5-year overall survival approaching 97%. Nevertheless, prognosis after 20 years was significantly poorer, with 20-year survival rate of 66.8% and a global mortality of 30–35. These findings support the need for lifelong follow-up even in early-stage GCT.

Quantitative 99m Tc-MIBI thyroid scintigraphy is a useful tool in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. The aim of our report is to compare the diagnostic performance of different quantitative methods. We prospectively evaluated 20 patients affected by a thyroid nodule with a cytological diagnosis of class III or IV according to the Bethesda system. Planar images of the thyroid were acquired 10 and 60 minutes after 99m Tc-MIBI administration and two different quantitative methods applied (i.e. wash-out index, WO ind; retention index, R.I.). All patients underwent lobectomy or thyroidectomy and final histological findings were matched with MIBI results obtained with both quantitative methods. Four out of 20 patients had a final histological result of differentiated thyroid cancer, while benign findings were found in the remaining cases. Overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV were 100% in all for the WO ind and 100%, 57.1%, 62.5%, 25% for the R.I., respectively. In conclusion 99m Tc-semiquantitative MIBI thyroid scintigraphy with WO ind calculation is highly accurate in differential diagnosis of nodules with indeterminate cytology reading.

When used as maintenance therapy, the PARP inhibitor olaparib provided a significant progression-free survival benefit in women with ovarian cancer who had a response to primary chemotherapy, particularly in those whose tumors were deficient in homologous recombination (e.g., BRCA -mutated tumors). Hematologic toxic effects were observed.

Introduction/Background*Data supporting stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic gynecological cancer patients are increasing, but stereotactic treatments have not yet been fully explored. The aim of this retrospective, multicenter study (MITO RT-02) was to define efficacy and safety of SBRT in a very large, real life dataset of metastatic/persistent/recurrent cervical cancer (MPR-CC) patients.MethodologyClinical and SBRT parameters have been collected in order to fulfill primary endpoints, i.e. the rate of complete response (CR) to SBRT, and the 24-month actuarial local control (LC) rate on ‘per lesion’ basis. The secondary end-points were acute and late toxicities. Objective response rate (ORR) included CR and partial response (PR). Clinical benefit (CB) included ORR and stable disease (SD). Toxicity was evaluated by RTOG/EORTC and CTC-AE scales, according to center policy.Result(s)*Fifteen centers participated to the study; after evaluation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, 84 CC patients, carrying a total of 126 lesions treated by SBRT between March 2006 and February 2021, were selected for the analysis. Patient characteristics and treatment data are summarized in table 1. Complete and partial response, as well as stable disease were observed in 73 (57.9%), 30 (23.8%), and 16 (12.7%) lesions, respectively, reaching about 94% CB rate. With a median follow-up of 14 months (range: 3-130), the 24-month actuarial LC, DFS and OS rate were 61.8%, 22.3%, 52.9%, respectively. Mild acute toxicity was experienced in 14 (16.6%) patients; late toxicity was documented in 4 patients (4.7%).Abstract 933 Table 1Patients and treatments characteristics N. (%) Patients 84 Lesions 126 Age, yrs Median (range) 58 (30-92) ECOG Performance Status 0-1 2-3 79 (94.1) 5 (5.9) Histotype Squamous Adenocarcinoma Adenosquamous Clear cell Other 77 (61.1) 36 (28.6) 5 (4.0) 3 (2.4) 5 (4.0) N. lesions per patients 1 2 >3 61 (72.6) 13 (15.4) 10 (12.0) Type of lesion (%) Lymph node Parenchyma Bone 70 (55.5) 46 (36.5) 10 (8.0) Anatomic Site Neck Thorax Abdomen Pelvis Bone 7 (5.5) 34 (27.0) 32 (25.4) 46 (36.6) 7 (5.5) Metachronous lesions No Yes 99 (78.6) 27 (21.4) N. patients undergoing previous radiotherapy in site No Yes 53 (63.1) 31 (36.9) Equipments INAC Cyberknife Tomotherapy MRI LINAC 108 (85.7) 10 (7.9) 1 (0.8) 7 (5.6) Type of treatment SRS, stereotactic radiosurgery (single fraction) SBRT, stereotactic radiotherapy (more fractions) 26 (20.6) 100 (79.4) PTV Median, range (cc) 16.8 (1.8-223.3) Total dose, Gy Median (range) 35 (5-60) Dose/fraction, Gy Median (range) 7 (2.5-26) Dose prescription Specific isodose Isocenter Target mean 48 (38.1) 32 (25.4) 46 (36.5) Conclusion*This study confirms the efficacy and safety of SBRT in MPR-CC patients. The low toxicity profile suggests a wider use of this treatment in this setting, however combinations with new drugs are needed to improve outcomes.

Introduction/Background*High-risk locally advanced cervical cancer has a poor prognosis, and more than half of patients recur in 2 years. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concurrent chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer. The immunostimulatory activity of the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab may be enhanced by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). After the KEYNOTE-158 study, in which pembrolizumab showed durable antitumor activity, pembrolizumab monotherapy was approved for patients with PD-L1–positive recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer who progressed during or after chemotherapy. ENGOT-cx11/GOG 3047/KEYNOTE-A18 (NCT04221945) is a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluating pembrolizumab with CCRT for the treatment of high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer.MethodologyApproximately 980 patients with high-risk (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2014 stage IB2-IIB with node-positive disease or stage III-IVA), locally advanced, histologically confirmed cervical cancer who have not received systemic therapy, immunotherapy, definitive surgery, or radiation will be randomized 1:1 to receive either 5 cycles of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) + CCRT followed by 15 cycles of pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W or 5 cycles of placebo Q3W + CCRT followed by 15 cycles of placebo Q6W. CCRT includes 5 cycles (optional 6th dose) of cisplatin 40 mg/m2 Q1W + EBRT followed by brachytherapy. Randomization is stratified by planned EBRT type (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] or volumetric-modulated arc therapy [VMAT] vs non-IMRT or non-VMAT), cancer stage at screening (stage IB2-IIB vs III-IVA), and planned total radiotherapy dose. Treatment will continue until the patient has received 20 cycles of pembrolizumab (5 cycles 200 mg Q3W, 15 cycles 400 mg Q6W) vs placebo (~2 years) or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 by investigator and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include PFS by blinded independent central review, PFS at 2 years, OS at 3 years, complete response at 12 weeks, objective response rate, PFS and OS by PD-L1 status, quality of life, and safety. Enrolment began May 2020 and is planned for 193 sites in 30 countries.Klikněte nebo klepněte sem a zadejte text.