Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Radical surgery is the mainstream treatment for patients presenting with advanced primary or recurrent gastrointestinal cancers; however, the rate of postoperative complications is exceptionally high. The current evidence suggests that improving patients’ fitness during the preoperative period may enhance postoperative recovery. Thus, the primary aim of this study is to establish the effectiveness of prehabilitation with a progressive, individualised, preoperative exercise and education program compared to usual care alone in reducing the proportion of patients with postoperative in-hospital complications. The secondary aims are to investigate the effectiveness of the preoperative intervention on reducing the length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, improving quality of life and morbidity, and reducing costs. Methods This is a multi-centre, assessor-blinded, pragmatic, comparative, randomised controlled trial. A total of 172 patients undergoing pelvic exenteration, cytoreductive surgery, oesophagectomy, hepatectomy, gastrectomy or pancreatectomy will be recruited. Participants will be randomly allocated to prehabilitation with a preoperative exercise and education program (intervention group), delivered over 4 to 8 weeks before surgery by community physiotherapists/exercise physiologists, or usual care alone (control group). The intervention will comprise 12 to 24 individualised, progressive exercise sessions (including aerobic/anaerobic, resistance, and respiratory exercises), recommendations of home exercises (16 to 32 sessions), and daily incidental physical activity advice. Outcome measures will be collected at baseline, the week prior to surgery, during the hospital stay, and on the day of discharge from hospital, and 1 month and 1 months postoperatively. The primary outcome will be the development of in-hospital complications. Secondary outcomes include the length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, quality of life, postoperative morbidity and costs. Discussion The successful completion of this trial will provide robust and high-quality evidence on the efficacy of a preoperative community- and home-based exercise and education intervention on important postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing major gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Trial registration This trial was registered prospectively with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12621000617864 ) on 24th May 2021.

Objective To establish the feasibility and acceptability of a preoperative exercise program, and to obtain pilot data on the likely difference in key surgical outcomes to inform the sample size calculation for a full-scale trial. Design Pilot randomized controlled trial. Setting Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Subjects We included patients undergoing elective pelvic exenteration or cytoreductive surgery aged 18 to 80 years, who presented to the participating gastrointestinal surgeon at least 2 weeks prior to surgery. Patients presenting cognitive impairment, co-morbidity preventing participation in exercise, inadequate English language, currently participating in an exercise program or unable to attend the exercise program sessions were excluded. Methods Participants were randomized to a 2–6 weeks preoperative, face-to-face, individualised exercise program or to usual care. Feasibility was assessed with consent rates to the study, and for the intervention group, retention and adherence rates to the preoperative exercise program. Acceptability of the exercise program was assessed with a semi-structured questionnaire exploring the advice received and the amount, duration and intensity of the exercise program. In addition, postoperative complication rates (Clavien-Dindo), length of hospital stay and self-reported measures of health-related quality of life (SF-36v2) were collected at baseline, day before surgery and in-hospital up to discharge from hospital. Results Of 122 patients screened, 26 (21%) were eligible and 22 (85%) accepted to participate in the trial and were randomized to the intervention (11; 50%) or control group (11; 50%). The median age of the include participants was 63 years. Adherence to the preoperative exercise sessions was 92.7%, with all participants either satisfied (33%) or extremely satisfied (67%) with the overall design of the preoperative exercise program. No significant differences in outcomes were found between groups. Conclusions The results of our pilot trial demonstrate that a preoperative exercise program is feasible and acceptable to patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. There is an urgent need for a definite trial investigating the effectiveness of a preoperative exercise program on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. This could potentially reduce postoperative complication rates, length of hospital stay and subsequently overall health care costs. Trial registration ACTRN12617001129370. Registered on August 1, 2017, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=373396&showOriginal=true&isReview=true

Introduction: Pelvic cancers present significant health challenges and often require aggressive treatment strategies. Pelvic exenteration, which involves the resection of multiple pelvic organs, is currently the only curative option for advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies. Due to its extensive nature, it carries a high risk for postoperative complications and extended hospital stays. Current evidence suggest that improved preoperative fitness is associated with better postoperative outcomes. This study explored the relationship between preoperative self-reported physical activity levels and surgical outcomes following pelvic exenteration. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive adult patients undergoing pelvic exenteration at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital between May 2017 and December 2023. Eligible participants completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form (IPAQ-SF) preoperatively. Primary outcomes included postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, and survival. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses explored the association between preoperative physical activity and postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 256 participants were included, of which 115 (44.9%) were classified as active. Active patients experienced fewer postoperative complications (p = 0.047) and shorter hospital stays (p = 0.007), compared to inactive participants. There was no significant association between preoperative physical activity levels and survival outcomes (p = 0.749). Younger age, preoperative physical activity level, and advanced primary malignancy were significantly associated with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays. Conclusions: Higher levels of preoperative physical activity is associated with fewer postoperative complications and shorter hospital stays in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration. These findings support the potential benefits of incorporating prehabilitation programs to improve surgical outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

Background There is a need for evidence of the effectiveness of pre-operative exercise for patients undergoing major cancer surgery; however, recruitment to such trials can be challenging. The PrE-operative Physical Activity (PEPA) Trial will establish the feasibility and acceptability of a pre-operative exercise programme aimed to improve patient outcomes after cytoreductive surgery and pelvic exenteration. The secondary aim is to obtain pilot data on the likely difference in key outcomes (post-operative complications, length of hospital stay, post-operative functional capacity and quality of life) to inform the sample size calculation for the substantive randomised clinical trial. Methods/design Twenty patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and pelvic exenteration at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney will be recruited and randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to either 2 to 6 weeks’ pre-operative exercise programme (intervention group) or usual care (control group). Those randomised to the intervention group will receive up to six individualised, 1-h physiotherapy sessions (including aerobic and endurance exercises, respiratory muscle exercises, stretching and flexibility exercises), home exercises (instruction and recommendations on how to progress the exercises at home) and encouragement to be more active by using an activity tracker to measure the number of steps walked daily. Patients allocated to the control group will not receive any specific advice about exercise training. Feasibility will be assessed with consent rates to the study, and for the intervention group, retention and adherence rates to the exercise programme. Acceptability of the exercise programme will be assessed with a semi-structured questionnaire. The following measures of the effectiveness of the intervention will be collected at baseline (2 to 6 weeks pre-operative), a week before surgery, during hospital stay and pre hospital discharge: post-operative complication rates (Clavien-Dindo), post-operative functional capacity (Six-minute Walk Test) and quality of life (SF-36v2®) and length of hospital stay. Functional status will be additionally measured using Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET), at baseline and within a week before surgery. Discussion The PEPA Trial will provide important information about the feasibility and acceptability of a pre-operative exercise programme for patients undergoing major cancer surgery. Data from the PEPA Trial will be used to inform the design, methodology and to calculate sample size required for a larger, definitive trial. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ID: ACTRN12617001129370 . Registered on 1 August 2017.

BackgroundsThere is mixed evidence on the value of preoperative cardiorespiratory exercise test (CPET) to predict postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing a cancer surgical procedure. The purpose of this review was to investigate the association between preoperative CPET variables and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and quality of life in patients undergoing cancer surgery.MethodsA search was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, and Web of science from inception to April 2020. Cohort studies investigating the association between preoperative CPET variables, including peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2), anaerobic threshold (AT), or ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (VE/VCO2), and postoperative outcomes (complications, length of stay, and quality of life) were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS tool. A random-effect model meta-analysis was performed whenever possible.ResultsFifty-two unique studies, including 10,030 patients were included. Overall, most studies were rated as having low risk of bias. Higher preoperative peak VO2 was associated with absence of postoperative complications (mean difference [MD]: 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26–3.29) and no pulmonary complication (MD: 1.47; 95% CI: 0.49–2.45). Preoperative AT and VE/VCO2 also demonstrated some positive trends. None of the included studies reported a negative trend.ConclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated a significant association between superior preoperative CPET values, especially peak VO2, and better postoperative outcomes. The assessment of preoperative functional capacity in patients undergoing cancer surgery has the potential to facilitate treatment decision making.

Background Recently, the number of prehabilitation trials has increased significantly. The identification of key research priorities is vital in guiding future research directions. Thus, the aim of this collaborative study was to define key research priorities in prehabilitation for patients undergoing cancer surgery. Methods The Delphi methodology was implemented over three rounds of surveys distributed to prehabilitation experts from across multiple specialties, tumour streams and countries via a secure online platform. In the first round, participants were asked to provide baseline demographics and to identify five top prehabilitation research priorities. In successive rounds, participants were asked to rank research priorities on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was considered if > 70% of participants indicated agreement on each research priority. Results A total of 165 prehabilitation experts participated, including medical doctors, physiotherapists, dieticians, nurses, and academics across four continents. The first round identified 446 research priorities, collated within 75 unique research questions. Over two successive rounds, a list of 10 research priorities reached international consensus of importance. These included the efficacy of prehabilitation on varied postoperative outcomes, benefit to specific patient groups, ideal programme composition, cost efficacy, enhancing compliance and adherence, effect during neoadjuvant therapies, and modes of delivery. Conclusions This collaborative international study identified the top 10 research priorities in prehabilitation for patients undergoing cancer surgery. The identified priorities inform research strategies, provide future directions for prehabilitation research, support resource allocation and enhance the prehabilitation evidence base in cancer patients undergoing surgery.

Background/Objective: Despite surgery being the primary curative treatment for cancer, patients with compromised preoperative physical, nutritional, and psychological status are often at a higher risk for complications. While various screening tools exist to assess physical, nutritional, and psychological status, there is currently no standardised self-reporting tool, or established cut-off points for comprehensive risk assessment. This study aims to develop, validate, and implement an online self-reporting preoperative screening tool that identifies modifiable risk factors in cancer surgery patients. Methods: This mixed-methods study consists of three distinct stages: (1) Development—(i) a scoping review to identify available physical, nutritional, and psychological screening tools; (ii) a Delphi study to gain consensus on the use of available screening tools; and (iii) a development of the online screening tool to determine patients at high risk of postoperative complications. (2) Testing—a prospective cohort study determining the correlation between at-risk patients and postoperative complications. (3) Implementation—the formulation of an implementation policy document considering feasibility. Conclusions: The timely identification of high-risk patients, based on their preoperative physical, nutritional, and psychological statuses, would enable referral to targeted interventions. The implementation of a preoperative online screening tool would streamline this identification process while minimising unwarranted variation in preoperative treatment optimisation. This systematic approach would not only support high-risk patients but also allow for more efficient provision of surgery to low-risk patients through effective risk stratification.

IntroductionGastrointestinal cancer surgery commonly leads to postoperative complications and other adverse outcomes. While prehabilitation shows promise in reducing adverse postoperative outcomes, most hospitals have resource limitations that preclude its use as standard of care. Additionally, the need to expedite surgery from diagnosis often creates a narrow window for prehabilitation initiatives. Online, self-reported screening tools may address these challenges by facilitating early identification of high-risk patients and enabling targeted preoperative interventions, thereby allowing equitable allocation of limited resources. Therefore, the primary aim of this study is to evaluate the predictive utility of a tri-modal (physical, nutritional, psychological) screening tool for patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery.MethodsThis prospective international cohort study will recruit 1214 adults undergoing elective gastrointestinal cancer surgery across 35 sites from 19 countries. Participants will complete an online screening tool developed through a comprehensive, multistep, predefined process. The screening tool comprises the Duke Activity Status Index, Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form and the Patient Health Questionnaire-4, in English, Spanish, French or Portuguese. These tools were selected based on a scoping review, followed by an international Delphi consensus process. The primary outcomes include rate of postoperative complications, major complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification grade III–V) and overall complication severity assessed by the Comprehensive Complications Index; all assessed 30 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include hospital length of stay, readmission rate within 30 days, discharge destination (home vs other), days at home and alive in 30 days postsurgery, 30-day all-cause mortality and 12-month survival. Primary analyses will establish optimal screening tool cut-points to stratify patients into clinically actionable risk categories for postoperative complications and examine the independent predictive value of these screening scores after adjusting for established clinical risk factors.Ethics and disseminationThis study has received ethical approval from the Sydney Local Health District Human Research and Ethics Committee (X25-0333 and 2025/ETH02465) and has been registered on the Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/HVCGD). The results of Preoperative Risk Evaluation for Cancer Treatment will be submitted to reputable journals and presented at national and international conferences.