Explore the vast range of titles available.

Study Objectives: To identify dose(s) of lemborexant that maximize insomnia treatment efficacy while minimizing next-morning residual sleepiness and evaluate lemborexant effects on polysomnography (PSG) measures (sleep efficiency [SE], latency to persistent sleep [LPS], and wake after sleep onset [WASO]) at the beginning and end of treatment. Methods: Adults and elderly subjects with insomnia disorder per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Bayesian, adaptive, parallel-group study, receiving lemborexant (1, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 25 mg) or placebo for 15 nights. Efficacy assessments included a utility function that combined efficacy (SE) and safety (residual morning sleepiness as measured by Karolinska Sleepiness Scale [KSS]), PSG measures, and sleep diary. Safety assessments included KSS, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, computerized reaction time tests, and adverse events (AEs). Results: A total of 616 subjects were screened; 291 were randomized. Baseline characteristics were similar between lemborexant groups and placebo (∼63% female, median age: 49.0 years). The study was stopped for early success after the fifth interim analysis when the 15-mg dose met utility index/KSS criteria for success; 3 other doses also met the criteria. Compared with placebo, subjects showed significant improvements in SE, subjective SE, LPS, and subjective sleep onset latency at the beginning and end of treatment for lemborexant doses ≥ 5 mg ( P < .05). WASO and subjective WASO showed numerically greater improvements for doses > 1 mg. AEs, mostly mild to moderate, included dose-related somnolence. Conclusions: Lemborexant doses ranging from 2.5–10 mg provided efficacy for the treatment of insomnia while minimizing next-morning residual sleepiness. Clinical Trial Registration: Title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Bayesian Adaptive Randomization Design, Dose Response Study of the Efficacy of E2006 in Adults and Elderly Subjects With Chronic Insomnia; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01995838 ; Identifier: NCT01995838 Citation: Murphy P, Moline M, Mayleben D, Rosenberg R, Zammit G, Pinner K, Dhadda S, Hong Q, Giorgi L, Satlin A. Lemborexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) for the treatment of insomnia disorder: results from a Bayesian, adaptive, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(11):1289–1299.

Discontinuing long‐term pharmacotherapy for insomnia can result in rebound insomnia or withdrawal symptoms and suboptimal treatment. Post hoc analyses evaluated rebound insomnia and withdrawal symptoms among the subset of subjects from a phase III, 12‐month, global, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group study who completed 12 or 6 months of active treatment and follow‐up period. Study E2006‐G000‐303 (Study 303) included adults (N = 655) with subjective sleep‐onset latency ≥30 min and/or subjective wake‐after‐sleep onset ≥60 min at least three times weekly during the 4 weeks before enrollment. Subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to lemborexant 5 mg (LEM5) or 10 mg (LEM10) or placebo for 6 months. Thereafter, for an additional 6 months, LEM5‐ and LEM10‐treated subjects continued lemborexant and the placebo group was rerandomized 1:1 to LEM5 or LEM10. Month 12 was followed by abrupt discontinuation and a 2‐week end‐of‐study follow‐up. Using daily electronic sleep diaries, patients reported (subjective) sleep end points (sleep‐onset latency, wake‐after‐sleep onset, sleep efficiency, and total sleep time). Withdrawal symptoms were assessed using the Tyrer Benzodiazepine Withdrawal Symptoms Questionnaire (T‐BWSQ). Sleep outcome improvements with lemborexant at month 12 were generally maintained throughout the 2‐week off‐treatment period wherein <20% of subjects experienced significant worsening of insomnia symptoms versus screening. There was no evidence of withdrawal symptoms by T‐BWSQ following lemborexant discontinuation. This analysis demonstrates rebound insomnia is unlikely to occur with lemborexant, and its effectiveness is maintained after abrupt discontinuation without placebo replacement following 6–12 months of treatment.

Abstract Study Objectives To assess potential effects of lemborexant on next-morning driving performance in adult and elderly healthy volunteers. Methods Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo and active-controlled, four period incomplete crossover study in 48 healthy volunteers (22 females), 23–78 years old. Participants were treated at bedtime for eight consecutive nights with two of three dose levels of lemborexant (2.5, 5, or 10 mg), zopiclone 7.5 mg (on the first and last night with placebo on intervening nights), or placebo. Driving performance was assessed in the morning on days 2 and 9 using a standardized highway driving test in normal traffic, measuring standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP). Drug–placebo differences in SDLP >2.4 cm were considered to reflect clinically meaningful driving impairment. Results Mean drug–placebo differences in SDLP following lemborexant 2.5, 5, and 10 mg on days 2 and 9 were 0.74 cm or less. The upper bound of the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for lemborexant treatment groups were all below 2.4 cm and the 95% CIs included zero, indicating that the effects were neither clinically meaningful nor statistically significant. Symmetry analysis further supported the lack of clinically meaningful impairment with lemborexant. Conclusions When assessed starting ~9 h after lemborexant administration at bedtime the previous night, there was no statistically significant or clinically meaningful effect on driving performance in healthy adults and elderly, as assessed by either mean differences in SDLP relative to placebo or symmetry analysis. In this study, lemborexant at doses up to 10 mg was well-tolerated. Clinical Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02583451. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02583451.

Using data from a clinical study of lemborexant, evaluate responses to the Patient Global Impression-Insomnia (PGI-I) questionnaire, a simple 4-item questionnaire that assesses patients' perceptions of the effects of medication on sleep, which may help evaluate clinically meaningful changes from the patient's perspective. Study E2006-G001-303, a 12-month, placebo (PBO)-controlled (first 6 months) Phase 3 study in adults with insomnia disorder, randomized subjects (1:1:1) to lemborexant 5 mg (LEM5; n=316), 10 mg (LEM10; n=315), or PBO (n=318). The second 6 months are not presented here. PGI-I results were analyzed post hoc in relation to patient-reported (subjective) sleep-onset latency (sSOL) and total-sleep-time (sTST). At 6 months: 67.3% (LEM5) and 68.8% (LEM10) of subjects reported positive effects of medication helping them sleep versus 45.0% (both <0.0001) with PBO. Positive effects on \"time to fall asleep\" were reported by 72.8% (LEM5) and 73.1% (LEM10) versus 46.1% with PBO ( <0.0001), and 58.0% (LEM5) and 62.0% (LEM10) reported positive effects on sleep duration versus 39.9% with PBO ( <0.0001). Subjects reporting positive effects on \"time to fall asleep\" had greater change from baseline (CFB; improvement) at 6 months in median sSOL (in minutes; LEM5= -26.8; LEM10= -32.1; PBO= -17.5; <0.01) versus those reporting negative effects (LEM5= -9.1; LEM10= -10.4; PBO= -8.6; LEM5 vs PBO, =0.52; LEM10 vs PBO, =0.69). For sTST (in minutes) at 6 months, mean CFB tended to be greater for subjects reporting positive (LEM5=81.2, LEM10=93.2, PBO=74.8; LEM5 vs PBO, =0.28; LEM10 vs PBO, =0.18) versus negative (LEM5=46.4, LEM10=35.0, PBO=38.6; LEM5 vs PBO, =0.44; LEM10 vs PBO, =0.52) effects, although this was not statistically significant. Patient impressions of the effects of lemborexant were positive based on the PGI-I and reflected improvements in subjective sleep outcome measures, indicating that the brief PGI-I tool may be useful in clinical practice.

Aim Individuals with insomnia frequently have comorbid depression or anxiety. This study sought to provide a preliminary indication of the effects of lemborexant (LEM) in subjects treated for mild depression/anxiety symptoms. Methods E2006‐G000‐303 (NCT02952820; EudraCT 2015‐001463‐39; SUNRISE‐2) was a 12‐month, phase 3, randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind study where subjects with insomnia disorder were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, LEM 5 mg (LEM5), or LEM 10 mg (LEM10) for 6 months. During the second 6 months (not reported), placebo‐treated subjects were re‐randomized to LEM5 or LEM10. In this post hoc analysis, changes from baseline (CFB) in subject‐reported (subjective) sleep onset latency (sSOL), sleep efficiency (sSE), wake after sleep onset (sWASO), total sleep time (sTST), Fatigue Severity Scale, and Insomnia Severity Index were evaluated in subjects treated with medications for symptoms of depression/anxiety (subpopulation). Results Of 949 randomized subjects, 61 treated with medications for symptoms of depression/anxiety were included. In the subpopulation, CFB comparing LEM with placebo were generally smaller than the overall population due to a larger placebo response in the subpopulation. However, the magnitudes of CFB within the active treatment groups for sSOL, sWASO, sTST, and sSE were similar between the subpopulation and the overall population. No new safety signals were observed in the subpopulation. Conclusion LEM treatment benefited subjects with insomnia treated with medications for depression/anxiety symptoms, with no new safety signals. A greater placebo response in the subpopulation than in the overall population decreased the drug versus placebo effect size for LEM, as has been reported for other insomnia medications. Subjects with insomnia disorder treated for mild depression or anxiety symptoms from E2006‐G000‐303, a 12‐month, phase 3, randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind study where subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, lemborexant 5 mg, or lemborexant 10 mg for 6 months, were evaluated. Lemborexant treatment had a positive effect on sleep in subjects with insomnia disorder treated with medications for depression/anxiety symptoms, with no new safety signals.

Abstract Study Objectives To assess long-term efficacy and safety of lemborexant (LEM), a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist, versus placebo in adults with insomnia disorder. Methods This was a 12-month, global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group phase 3 study comprising a 6-month placebo-controlled period (reported here) followed by a 6-month active-treatment-only period (reported separately). A total of 949 participants with insomnia (age ≥18 years) were randomized, received treatment with an oral dose of placebo or LEM (5 mg [LEM5] or 10 mg [LEM10]) and were analyzed. Sleep onset and sleep maintenance endpoints were analyzed from daily electronic sleep diary data. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored throughout the study. Results Decreases from baseline in patient-reported (subjective) sleep onset latency and subjective wake after sleep onset, and increases from baseline in subjective sleep efficiency, were significantly greater with LEM5 and LEM10 versus placebo. Significant benefits over placebo were observed at the end of month 6, and at most time points assessed over the 6-month period, indicating long-term sustained efficacy of LEM. A significantly greater percentage of sleep onset responders and sleep maintenance responders were observed with LEM treatment versus placebo. Participants treated with LEM reported a significant improvement in quality of sleep after 6 months versus placebo. The majority of TEAEs were mild or moderate. There was a low rate of serious TEAEs and no deaths. Conclusions LEM5 and LEM10 provided significant benefit on sleep onset and sleep maintenance in individuals with insomnia disorder versus placebo, and was well tolerated. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02952820; ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu, EudraCT Number 2015-001463-39

Introduction The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a 7-item self-reported questionnaire evaluating perception of symptom severity included in Phase 3 studies of lemborexant (LEM), a competitive dual orexin receptor antagonist approved in several countries to treat adults with insomnia. The ISI total score, and items 4-7 for daytime function (DF), improved significantly with LEM treatment compared to placebo (PBO) as assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months. Here we report shifts in DF scores at 6 months depending on baseline severity. Methods Study 303 was a 12-month, randomized, double-blind PBO-controlled (first 6months; Treatment Period 1 [TP1]) phase 3 study in subjects (age ≥18y) with insomnia disorder. Subjects were randomized to PBO, LEM 5mg (LEM5) or 10mg (LEM10) for 6 months. ISI items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (no problem) to 4 (very severe problem). Daytime-related items include ratings on sleep satisfaction, extent symptoms are noticeable to others, cause worry/distress, or interferes with daily function. Data were analyzed by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test of general association vs placebo. Results Of the 949 subjects, 749 (78.9%) completed the ISI at baseline and end of TP1: PBO (258/318 [81.1%]; LEM5, 257/316 [81.3%]; LEM10, 234/315 [74.3%]). Baseline daytime ISI-total-score distribution was similar between groups; most had scores of 9-12 (66.7-68.6%). At the end of TP1, more subjects with baseline scores of 9-12 shifted to 0-4 with LEM5 (49.7%) and LEM10 (46.2%) than with PBO (26.6%). Similarly, more subjects with baseline scores of 13-16 shifted to 0-4 with LEM5 (39.1%) and LEM10 (46.3%) than with PBO (29.6%). An additional 28.1% and 25.9% of subjects with LEM5 or LEM10, respectively, with baseline scores of 13-16 shifted to scores of 9-12, compared with 31.5% of PBO. The overall shift distributions were significantly different, favoring both LEM groups (p< 0.01). Conclusion More LEM-treated subjects improved in daytime functioning as evidenced by the significantly large number of subjects whose scores moved into the lower categories (i.e., better sleep) compared with PBO subjects. These data support important improvements in daytime function that are evident even after 6 months of continuous LEM treatment. Support (if any) Eisai Inc.

Introduction The Patient Global Impression–Insomnia version (PGI-I) is a self-report instrument used to evaluate a patient’s perception of the effects of their insomnia medication on their sleep relative to starting treatment. The PGI-I includes 3 items related to medication effects (helped/worsened sleep; decreased/increased time to fall asleep; and increased/decreased total sleep; responses include: 1=positive, 2=neutral, 3=negative) and 1 item related to perceived appropriateness of study medication strength (responses include: 1=too strong, 2=just right, 3=too weak). In Study E2006-G000-303 (Study 303; SUNRISE-2; NCT02952820), significantly greater percentages of subjects reported a positive impact of the dual orexin receptor antagonist lemborexant (LEM) versus placebo (PBO) at 1, 3, and 6mo for each of the PGI-I items related to medication effects. PGI-I results at 9 and 12mo are presented here for subjects that received continuous treatment with LEM for up to 12mo. Methods Study 303 was a 12-mo, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled (first 6mo [Period 1]), phase 3 study. Subjects were aged ≥18y with insomnia disorder. During Period 1, subjects received PBO (n=318) or LEM (5mg, [LEM5], n=316; 10mg, [LEM10], n=315). During Period 2 (second 6mo), LEM subjects continued their assigned dose while PBO subjects were rerandomized to LEM5 or LEM10 (reported separately). Subjects were also administered the PGI-I at months 9 and 12. Results At 9 and 12mo, the majority of LEM5 (9mo, n=241; 12mo, n=205) and LEM10 (9mo, n=211; 12mo, n=192) subjects reported that their study medication “helped” sleep at night (9mo: LEM5=73.4%; LEM10=76.3%; 12mo: LEM5=74.6%; LEM10=77.6%), reduced time to fall asleep (9mo: LEM5=79.3%, LEM10=78.2%; 12mo: LEM5=76.6%, LEM10=80.2%), and increased total sleep time (9mo: LEM5=62.2%, LEM10=73.0%; 12mo: LEM5=62.4%; LEM10=65.1%). Also, at both 9 and 12mo, the majority of subjects in the LEM5 and LEM10 groups, responded that treatment strength was “just right” (9mo: LEM5=60.6%, LEM10=62.1%; 12mo: LEM5=63.4%; LEM10=60.4%). LEM was well tolerated. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. Conclusion The majority of subjects receiving LEM5 or LEM10 reported a positive medication effect at both 9 and 12mo, sustaining similar positive effects for LEM achieved earlier, during the first 6mo of treatment in Study 303. Support (if any) Eisai Inc.