Explore the vast range of titles available.

Bevacizumab is approved in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of ovarian cancer, either in first-line therapy or for patients with recurrent disease not previously treated with the same drug. We aimed to test the value of continuing bevacizumab beyond progression after first-line treatment with the same drug. In our open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 82 sites in four countries, we enrolled women (aged ≥18 years) who had previously received first-line platinum-based therapy including bevacizumab, and had recurrent (≥6 months since last platinum dose), International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stage IIIB–IV ovarian cancer with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a carboplatin-based doublet intravenously (carboplatin area under the concentration curve [AUC] 5 on day 1 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1, every 21 days; carboplatin AUC 4 on day 1 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every 21 days; or carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 on day 1, every 28 days), or a carboplatin-based doublet plus bevacizumab (10 mg/kg intravenous every 14 days combined with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin–carboplatin, or 15 mg/kg every 21 days combined with gemcitabine–carboplatin or paclitaxel–carboplatin). Evaluable disease according to RECIST 1.1 guidelines was required before randomisation. Randomisation was done through the trial website with a minimisation procedure, stratified by centre, time of recurrence, performance status, and type of second-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01802749 and EudraCT 2012-004362-17. Between Dec 6, 2013, and Nov 11, 2016, 406 patients were recruited (203 [50%] assigned to the bevacizumab group and 203 [50%] to the standard chemotherapy group). 130 patients (64%) in the bevacizumab group and 131 (65%) in the standard chemotherapy group had progressed after receiving a last dose of platinum more than 12 months before, and 146 patients (72%) in the bevacizumab group and 147 (72%) in the standard chemotherapy group had progressed after completion of first-line bevacizumab maintenance. 161 participants (79%) progressed in the standard chemotherapy group, as did 143 (70%) in the bevacizumab group. Median progression-free survival was 8·8 months (95% CI 8·4–9·3) in the standard chemotherapy group and 11·8 months (10·8–12·9) in the bevacizumab group (hazard ratio 0·51, 95% CI 0·41–0·65; log-rank p<0·0001). Most common grade 3–4 adverse events were hypertension (20 [10%] in the standard chemotherapy group vs 58 (29%) in the bevacizumab group), neutrophil count decrease (81 [41%] vs 80 [40%]), and platelet count decrease (43 [22%] vs 61 [30%]). 68 patients (33%) died in the standard chemotherapy group and 79 (39%) died in the bevacizumab group; two deaths (1%) in the standard chemotherapy group and one death (<1%) in the bevacizumab group were deemed to be treatment-related. Continuing bevacizumab beyond progression combined with chemotherapy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer improves progression-free survival compared with standard chemotherapy alone and might be considered in clinical practice. Hoffmann–La Roche and Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro.

SummaryBackgroundAdding immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy might improve outcomes for patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. We aimed to compare carboplatin and paclitaxel versus avelumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment with avelumab given concurrent to chemotherapy and as maintenance after the end of chemotherapy. MethodsMITO END-3 is an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial conducted at 31 cancer institutes, hospitals, and universities in Italy. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed advanced (FIGO stage III–IV) or recurrent endometrial cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–1, and no previous systemic anticancer therapy as primary treatment for advanced or metastatic disease. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computerised minimisation procedure stratified by centre, histology, and stage at study entry, to either receive carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 5 mg/mL × min) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m 2; standard group) intravenously every 3 weeks for six to eight cycles or avelumab (10 mg/kg intravenously) added to carboplatin and paclitaxel (experimental group) every 3 weeks and then every 2 weeks as a single maintenance treatment after the end of chemotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients, treating clinicians, and those assessing radiological examinations were not masked to study treatment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, measured in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis. Experimental group superiority was tested with 80% power and one-tailed α 0·20. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03503786) and EudraCT (2016–004403–31). FindingsFrom April 9, 2018, to May 13, 2021, 166 women were assessed for eligibility and 39 were excluded. 125 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin and paclitaxel (n=62) or avelumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (n=63) and included in the ITT population. The median follow-up was 23·3 months (IQR 13·2–29·6) and was similar between the two groups. 91 progression-free survival events were reported, with 49 events in 62 patients in the standard group and 42 events in 63 patients in the experimental group. The median progression-free survival was 9·9 months (95% CI 6·7–12·1) in the standard group and 9·6 months (7·2–17·7) in the experimental group (HR of progression or death 0·78 [60% CI 0·65–0·93]; one-tailed p=0·085). Serious adverse events were reported more frequently in the experimental group (24 vs seven events in the standard group); neutrophil count decrease was the most frequent grade 3–4 adverse event (19 [31%] of 61 patients in the experimental group vs 26 [43%] of 61 patients in the standard group). Two deaths occurred in the experimental group during treatment (one respiratory failure following severe myositis [possibly related to treatment] and one cardiac arrest [not related to treatment]). InterpretationAdding avelumab to first-line chemotherapy deserves further testing in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, although consideration of mismatch repair status is warranted. FundingPfizer.

Inhibition of angiogenesis is a valuable treatment strategy for ovarian cancer. Pazopanib is an anti-angiogenic drug active in ovarian cancer. We assessed the effect of adding pazopanib to paclitaxel for patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory advanced ovarian cancer. We did this open-label, randomised phase 2 trial at 11 hospitals in Italy. We included patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer previously treated with a maximum of two lines of chemotherapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1, and no residual peripheral neurotoxicity. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 with or without pazopanib 800 mg daily, and stratified by centre, number of previous lines of chemotherapy, and platinum-free interval status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01644825. This report is the final analysis; the trial is completed. Between Dec 15, 2010, and Feb 8, 2013, we enrolled 74 patients: 37 were randomly assigned to receive paclitaxel and pazopanib and 37 were randomly assigned to receive paclitaxel only. One patient, in the paclitaxel only group, withdrew from the study and was excluded from analyses. Median follow-up was 16·1 months (IQR 12·5–20·8). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the pazopanib plus paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel only group (median 6·35 months [95% CI 5·36–11·02] vs 3·49 months [2·01–5·66]; hazard ratio 0·42 [95% CI 0·25–0·69]; p=0·0002). We recorded no unexpected toxic effects or deaths from toxic effects. Adverse events were more common in the pazopanib and paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel only group. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (11 [30%] in the pazopanib group vs one [3%] in the paclitaxel group), fatigue (four [11%] vs two [6%]), leucopenia (four [11%] vs one [3%]), hypertension (three [8%] vs none [0%]), raised aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase (three [8%] vs none), and anaemia (two [5%] vs five [14%]). One patient in the pazopanib group had ileal perforation. Our findings suggest that a phase 3 study of the combination of weekly paclitaxel plus pazopanib for patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory advanced ovarian cancer is warranted. National Cancer Institute of Napoli and GlaxoSmithKline.

Ovarian cancer remains a major issue for gynecological oncologists, and most patients are diagnosed when the disease is already advanced with a poor chance of survival. Debulking surgery followed by platinum‐taxane chemotherapy is the current standard of care, but based on several different strategies currently under evaluation, some encouraging data have been published in the last 4 to 5 years. This review provides a state‐of‐the‐art overview of the available alternatives to conventional treatment and the most promising new combinations. For example, neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not seem to be inferior to primary debulking. Despite its outcome improvements, intraperitoneal chemotherapy struggles for acceptance due to the heavy toxicity. Dose‐dense chemotherapy, after showing an impressive efficacy in Asian populations, has not produced equal results in a European cohort, and the results of alternative platinum doublets are not superior to those of carboplatin and paclitaxel. In this setting, adherence to a maintenance therapy after first‐line treatment and multiple (primarily antiangiogenic) agents appears to be effective. Although many questions, including the duration of maintenance treatment and the use of bevacizumab beyond progression, remain unanswered, new biologic agents, such as poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, nintedanib, and mitogen‐activated protein/extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitors, have emerged as potential therapeutic options in the very near future. Based on the multiplicity of available strategies, the histological and molecular features of the tumor, in addition to patient's clinical condition and disease state, continue to gain importance in guiding treatment choices.

Purpose of ReviewTherapeutic alternatives to treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are increasing, and combination therapies, including antiangiogenic agents and tyrosine kinase/mTOR/immune checkpoint inhibitors, are identified as the gold standard driven by the results of recent clinical studies. Nevertheless, the real-world RCC population is very heterogeneous, with categories of patients not represented in the enrolled trial population who may not benefit more from these treatments. The purpose of this expert review is to assess the rationale on which tyrosine kinase alone may still be a viable first-line treatment option for some subgroups of patients with mRCC.Recent FindingsThe first-line treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy can still be considered an effective tool for addressing selected mRCCs, as highlighted by the successful outcome in a range of subjects such as favorable-risk patients, the ones suffering from autoimmune diseases, those with pancreatic or lung metastases, or previously undergoing organ transplantation and elderly subjects.SummarySome selected categories of patients may still benefit from monotherapy with TKI, and smart sequential therapies can also be considered instead of a combination strategy. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors can also act as immune modulator agents, boosting the immune response to facilitate and potentiate the therapeutic effectiveness of subsequent immunotherapy.

Cervical cancer (CC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death among females. The options of treatment for recurrent/advanced CC are limited and patients experiencing recurrence after first line platinum-based chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. In this context, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)s antagonizing PD-1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have profoundly changed the treatment scenario and outcomes in CC in the first or subsequent lines both as monotherapies or in combination with chemotherapy or other ICIs. Herein, we report the clinical case of a 74-year-old woman with metastatic CC with negative tumor PD-L1 expression who having disease progression after first-line of systemic treatment with platinum, thus undergoing to anti-PD-1 namely cemiplimab. The patient achieved a surprising, fast and complete metabolic response to cemiplimab immediately discontinued after only two cycles due to the onset of rare and severe immune-related adverse events (irAE)s such cardiovascular toxicity and hypertransaminasemia. Despite this, thirteen months later, the patient remains disease-free despite cemiplimab was withdrawn.

Immunotherapy is acquiring a primary role in treating endometrial cancer (EC) with a relevant benefit for many patients. Regardless, patients progressing during immunotherapy or those who are resistant represent an unmet need. The mechanisms of immune resistance and escape need to be better investigated. Here, we review the major mechanisms of immune escape activated by the indolamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) pathway in EC and focus on potential therapeutic strategies based on IDO1 signaling pathway control. IDO1 catalyzes the first rate-limiting step of the so-called “kynurenine (Kyn) pathway”, which converts the essential amino acid l -tryptophan into the immunosuppressive metabolite l -kynurenine. Functionally, IDO1 has played a pivotal role in cancer immune escape by catalyzing the initial step of the Kyn pathway. The overexpression of IDO1 is also associated with poor prognosis in EC. These findings can lead to advantages in immunotherapy-based approaches as a rationale for overcoming the immune escape. Indeed, besides immune checkpoints, other mechanisms, including the IDO enzymes, contribute to the EC progression due to the immunosuppression induced by the tumor milieu. On the other hand, the IDO1 enzyme has recently emerged as both a promising therapeutic target and an unfavorable prognostic biomarker. This evidence provides the basis for translational strategies of immune combination, whereas IDO1 expression would serve as a potential prognostic biomarker in metastatic EC.

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a rare, aggressive epithelial ovarian cancer subtype, accounting for approximately 10% of cases and associated with a poor prognosis due to chemoresistance and unique tumor biology. OCCC is frequently linked to endometriosis and characterized by mutations in ARID1A and PIK3CA , hyperactivation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, and overexpression of VEGF, HIF-1α, and IL-6. These features drive tumor proliferation, angiogenesis, immune evasion, and resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. The tumor microenvironment of OCCC is highly immunosuppressive, with infiltration of regulatory T cells, tumor-associated macrophages, and upregulation of immune checkpoint molecules, such as PD-1, PD-L1, and LAG-3. These characteristics suggest that the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway plays a critical role in tumor immune evasion and could be an attractive target for therapeutic intervention. Despite the typical composition of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in ovarian cancer, until now overall the results of trials testing immune checkpoint inhibitors so far have been disappointing. It is interesting to note instead that several subgroup analyses reported exceptional OCCC sensitivity to ICIs. Indeed, current and preliminary trials exploring ICIs, anti-angiogenic agents, and combinatorial therapies in OCCC show promising outcomes. Strategies targeting multiple pathways, including VEGF, IL-6, HIF-1α, and HDAC6, alongside ICIs, are under investigation to overcome resistance mechanisms. Additionally, IL-10 inhibition or ferroptosis pathway activation offers novel therapeutic potential. Personalized, biomarker-driven approaches, targeting ARID1A and PIK3CA mutations or combining immune and anti-angiogenic agents, are gaining traction in OCCC management. This review highlights OCCC molecular underpinnings and therapeutic challenges, emphasizing the need for innovative, multi-targeted strategies. Advances in understanding genetic-immunological interplay in OCCC may enable more effective and durable treatments and improved patient outcomes.

A low fT3/fT4 ratio has been associated with poorer prognosis in several diseases. Inflammatory indexes (IIs) and the skeletal muscle index (SMI) are established prognostic factors in various cancer types. However, their interplay and individual contributions to the prognosis of cervical cancer remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of these biomarkers on survival outcomes in cervical cancer patients treated with innovative immunotherapy. This retrospective study included 101 patients with cervical cancer treated with cemiplimab at 12 Italian oncology centres. Patients with thyroid comorbidities or missing fT3/fT4 ratio data were excluded. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in relation to the fT3/fT4 ratio. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and correlations between the fT3/fT4 ratio, ECOG Performance Status, IIs and SMI. An optimal fT3/fT4 cutoff for OS prediction was identified at 0.29. Median OS was 10.9 months for patients with a low fT3/fT4 ratio, while it was not reached for those with high fT3/fT4 levels (HR = 2.70; 95% CI: 1.17-6.22; p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis confirmed that both the fT3/fT4 ratio and ECOG PS independently influenced OS. Among the IIs analysed, the systemic inflammatory index (SII) demonstrated the strongest correlation with fT3/fT4 levels (OR = 3.82; 95% CI: 1.39-10.50; p = 0.0092). Exploratory analysis also revealed significantly lower SMI values in patients with lower fT3/fT4 ratios (p = 0.034). This study highlights the prognostic significance of the fT3/fT4 ratio, IIs, and SMI in cervical cancer patients treated with cemiplimab. Given the exploratory nature of these findings, further validation in larger, prospective cohorts is warranted to support their integration into clinical practice and the development of innovative prognostic tools.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the fourth biggest cause of cancer-related death in women. Over recent decades, improvements have been made in treatment outcome in terms of response rate and survival. To date, intensive surgical staging and cytoreduction, followed by primary chemotherapy with the carboplatin-paclitaxel regimen, are considered the gold standard for the management of this disease. Nevertheless, despite good initial response to systemic therapy after optimal debulking surgery, the long-term survival remains poor, with a high risk of recurrence. Furthermore, medical therapy of ovarian cancer impacts quality of life owing to the common occurrence of chemotherapy side effects, such as alopecia, neurotoxicity and fatigue. In order to improve the efficacy and reduce the toxicity of first-line chemotherapy, more than 10,000 women have been involved in worldwide randomized trials in the last 10 years. Several treatment alternatives have been investigated, such as intraperitoneal chemotherapy, alternative doublets and triplet regimens, in the effort to find an optimal first-line treatment strategy. In this review we discuss the results of these trials, the recent progresses and the most important ongoing studies, including those with emerging target and biological agents.