Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
20 result(s) for "Planquette, B."
Sort by:
Early postoperative prophylactic noninvasive ventilation after major lung resection in COPD patients: a randomized controlled trial
Objectives To investigate whether prophylactic postoperative NIV prevents respiratory complications following lung resection surgery in COPD patients. Methods In seven thoracic surgery departments, 360 COPD patients undergoing lung resection surgery were randomly assigned to two groups: conventional postoperative treatment without ( n  = 179) or with ( n  = 181) prophylactic NIV, applied intermittently during 6 h per day for 48 h following surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of acute respiratory events (ARE) at 30 days postoperatively (ITT analysis). Secondary endpoints were acute respiratory failure (ARF), intubation rate, mortality rate, infectious and non-infectious complications, and duration of ICU and hospital stay. Measurements and main results ARE rates did not differ between the prophylactic NIV and control groups (57/181, 31.5 vs. 55/179, 30.7 %, p  = 0.93). ARF rate was 18.8 % in the prophylactic NIV group and 24.5 % in controls ( p  = 0.20). Re-intubation rates were similar in the prophylactic NIV and control group [10/181 (5.5 %) and 13/179 (7.2 %), respectively, p  = 0.53]. Mortality rates were 5 and 2.2 % in the control and prophylactic NIV groups, respectively ( p  = 0.16). Infectious and non-infectious complication rates, and duration of ICU and hospital stays were similar between groups. Conclusions Prophylactic postoperative NIV did not reduce the rate of ARE in COPD patients undergoing lung resection surgery and did not influence other postoperative complications rates, mortality rates, and duration of ICU and hospital stay.
Fibrinolysis for Acute Care of Pulmonary Embolism in the Intermediate Risk Patient
Controversy over the role of fibrinolysis in patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) has persisted because of the lack of adequately sized trials. The PEITHO study now allows a more precise estimate of the risk to benefit ratio of fibrinolysis in these patients. This trial enrolled patients with intermediate-risk PE who were randomized to receive heparin with either tenecteplase or placebo. Fibrinolysis was associated with a significant reduction in the combined end-point of death or hemodynamic decompensation, but also with a significant increase in the risk of major bleeding. The primary efficacy end-point occurred in 2.6 % of the patients in the tenecteplase group and in 5.6 % of the patients in the placebo group (OR, 0.44; 95 % CI, 0.23 to 0.87), conversely, major extracranial bleeding occurred in 6.3 % and 1.2 % in the tenecteplase and placebo groups, respectively (OR, 5.55; 95 % CI, 2.3 to 13.39) and stroke occurred in 2.4 % and in 0.2 % of the patients in the tenecteplase group and in the placebo group, respectively (OR, 12.10; 95 % CI, 1.57 to 93.39). No difference was observed for the risk of death alone and the risk of full-dose thrombolytic therapy outweighs its benefit in patients with intermediate-risk PE. Recent meta-analyses suggest that fibrinolysis may be associated with a slight reduction in overall mortality offset by an increase in major bleeding. Two pilot studies suggest that a reduced dose of fibrinolysis may produce significant hemodynamic improvement with a low risk of major bleeding. These options need to be evaluated in larger studies including patients with a higher risk of adverse outcome than those included in the PEITHO study.
Hypothermia for Neuroprotection in Convulsive Status Epilepticus
In patients with convulsive status epilepticus, the addition of cooling to 32 to 34°C for 24 hours did not have a significant effect on the percentage of patients with good outcomes at 90 days as compared with standard seizure treatment alone. Convulsive status epilepticus is among the most challenging life-threatening neurologic emergencies. 1 Antiepileptic drug treatment is initiated rapidly and adjusted in response to clinical and electroencephalographic (EEG) findings. 2 The in-hospital mortality associated with this condition is approximately 20% and, if status epilepticus remains refractory to treatment, can be as high as 40%. 3 – 7 Functional impairments after status epilepticus may be due to the effect of seizures on cortical neurons or to cerebral damage due to the underlying process that caused the seizures. In a prospective, multicenter study, 50% of survivors of convulsive status epilepticus who were admitted to an intensive care . . .
Chatbot-based serious games: A useful tool for training medical students? A randomized controlled trial
Chatbots, conversational agents that walk medical students (MS) though a clinical case, are serious games that seem to be appreciated by MS. Their impact on MS's performance in exams however was not yet evaluated. Chatprogress is a chatbot-based game developed at Paris Descartes University. It contains 8 pulmonology cases with step-by-step answers delivered with pedagogical comments. The CHATPROGRESS study aimed to evaluate the impact of Chatprogress on students' success rate in their end-term exams. We conducted a post-test randomized controlled trial held on all fourth-year MS at Paris Descartes University. All MS were asked to follow the University's regular lectures, and half of them were randomly given access to Chatprogress. At the end of the term, medical students were evaluated on pulmonology, cardiology and critical care medicine. The primary aim was to evaluate an increase in scores in the pulmonology sub-test for students who had access to Chatprogress, compared to those who didn't. Secondary aims were to evaluate an increase in scores in the overall test (Pulmonology, Cardiology and Critical care medicine test (PCC)) and to evaluate the correlation between access to Chatprogress and overall test score. Finally, students' satisfaction was assessed using a survey. From 10/2018 to 06/2019, 171 students had access to Chatprogress (the Gamers) and among them, 104 ended up using it (the Users). Gamers and Users were compared to 255 Controls with no access to Chatprogress. Differences in scores on the pulmonology sub-test over the academic year were significantly higher among Gamers and Users vs Controls (mean score: 12.7/20 vs 12.0/20, p = 0.0104 and mean score: 12.7/20 vs 12.0/20, p = 0.0365 respectively). This significant difference was present as well in the overall PCC test scores: (mean score: 12.5/20 vs 12.1/20, p = 0.0285 and 12.6/20 vs 12.1/20, p = 0.0355 respectively). Although no significant correlation was found between the pulmonology sub-test's scores and MS's assiduity parameters (number of finished games among the 8 proposed to Users and number of times a User finished a game), there was a trend to a better correlation when users were evaluated on a subject covered by Chatprogress. MS were also found to be fans of this teaching tool, asking for more pedagogical comments even when they got the questions right. This randomised controlled trial is the first to demonstrate a significant improvement in students' results (in both the pulmonology subtest and the overall PCC exam) when they had access to Chatbots, and even more so when they actually used it.
Antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa for COPD exacerbation in ICU: a 10-year retrospective study
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a frequent source of hospitalization. Antibiotics are largely prescribed during COPD exacerbation. Our hypothesis is that large broad-spectrum antibiotics are more and more frequently prescribed. Our results confirm this trend and highlight that the increase in large broad-spectrum use in COPD exacerbation is largely unexplained. Acute COPD exacerbation (AECOPD) is frequently due to respiratory tract infection, and the benefit of antipseudomonal antibiotics (APA) is still debated. Health care-associated pneumonia (HCAP) was defined in 2005 and requires broad-spectrum antibiotherapy. The main objectives are to describe the antibiotic use for AECOPD in intensive care unit and to identify factors associated with APA use and AECOPD prognosis. We conducted a monocentric, retrospective study on all AECOPDs in the intensive care unit treated by antibiotics for respiratory tract infection. Treatment failure (TF) was defined by death, secondary need for mechanical ventilation, or secondary systemic steroid treatment. A multivariate analysis was used to assess factors associated with APA prescription and TF. From January 2000 to December 2011, 111 patients were included. Mean age was 69 years (±12), mean forced expiratory volume 38% of theoretic value (±13). Thirty-five (31%) patients were intubated, and 52 (47%) were treated with noninvasive ventilation. From 107 patients, 8 (7%) cases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were documented. APAs were prescribed in 21% of patients before 2006 versus 57% after (P=0.001). TF prevalence was 31%. Risk factors for P. aeruginosa in COPD and HCAP diagnosis did not influence APA, whereas the post-2006 period was independently associated with APA prescription (odds ratio 6.2; 95% confidence interval 1.9-20.3; P=0.0013). APA did not improve TF (odds ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval 0.37-3.2). HCAP guidelines were followed by an increase in APA use in AECOPD, without an improvement in prognosis. HCAP prevalence cannot account for the increasing APA trend. Time effect reveals a drift in practices. The microbiological effect of such a drift must be evaluated.
Prone position versus usual care in hypoxemic COVID-19 patients in medical wards: a randomised controlled trial
Background Benefit of early awake prone positioning for COVID-19 patients hospitalised in medical wards and who need oxygen therapy remains to be demonstrated. The question was considered at the time of COVID-19 pandemic to avoid overloading the intensive care units. We aimed to determine whether prone position plus usual care could reduce the rate of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or intubation or death as compared to usual care alone. Methods In this multicentre randomised clinical trial, 268 patients were randomly assigned to awake prone position plus usual care ( N  = 135) or usual care alone ( N  = 132). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who underwent NIV or intubation or died within 28 days. Main secondary outcomes included the rates of NIV, of intubation or death, within 28 days. Results Median time spent each day in the prone position within 72 h of randomisation was 90 min (IQR 30–133). The proportion of NIV or intubation or death within 28 days was 14.1% (19/135) in the prone position group and 12.9% (17/132) in the usual care group [odds ratio adjusted for stratification (aOR) 0.43; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14–1.35]. The probability of intubation, or intubation or death (secondary outcomes) was lower in the prone position group than in the usual care group (aOR 0.11; 95% CI 0.01–0.89 and aOR 0.09; 95% CI 0.01–0.76, respectively) in the whole study population and in the prespecified subgroup of patients with SpO 2  ≥ 95% on inclusion (aOR 0.11; 95% CI 0.01–0.90, and aOR 0.09; 95% CI 0.03–0.27, respectively). Conclusions Awake prone position plus usual care in COVID-19 patients in medical wards did not decrease the composite outcome of need for NIV or intubation or death. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04363463 . Registered 27 April 2020.
Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure: trends in use and outcomes
Purpose Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) had proven benefits in clinical trials that included selected patients admitted to highly skilled centers. Whether these benefits apply to every patient and in everyday practice deserves appraisal. The aim of the study was to assess the use and outcomes of NIV over the last 15 years. Methods Multicenter database study of critically ill patients who required ventilatory support for acute respiratory failure between 1997 and 2011. The impact of first-line NIV on 60-day mortality was evaluated using a marginal structural model. Follow-up was censored on day 60. Results Of 3,163 patients, 1,232 (39 %) received NIV. Over the study period, first-line NIV increased from 29 to 42 %, and NIV success rates increased from 69 to 84 %. NIV decreased 60-day mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.75; 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI), 0.68–0.83; P  < 0.0001]. This protective effect was observed in patients with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure (aHR, 0.71; 95 % CI, 0.57–0.90; P  = 0.004), but not in patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema (aHR, 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.70–1.03; P  = 0.10) or in patients with hypoxemic ARF, either immunocompetent (aHR, 1.18; 95 % CI, 0.87–1.59; P  = 0.30) or immunocompromised (aHR, 0.89; 95 % CI, 0.70–1.13; P  = 0.35). NIV failure was an independent time-dependent risk factor for mortality (aHR, 4.2; 95 % CI, 2.8–6.2; P  < 0.0001). Conclusions The use of NIV increased steadily over the study period. First-line NIV was associated with better 60-day survival and fewer ICU-acquired infections compared to first-line intubation. Survival benefits from NIV occurred only in patients with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure and immunocompromised patients.
Limited screening with versus without (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT for occult malignancy in unprovoked venous thromboembolism: an open-label randomised controlled trial
Clear guidelines for the investigation of occult malignancy after unprovoked venous thromboembolism are not yet available. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/CT could serve as a comprehensive screening strategy for occult malignancy in this context. We aimed to compare a screening strategy based on (18)F-FDG PET/CT with a limited screening strategy for detection of malignant disease in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism. In an open-label, multicentre, randomised study we enrolled patients from four French university hospitals. Patients aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (not provoked by a major inherited or acquired risk factor) were invited to participate. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a limited screening strategy (physical examination, usual laboratory tests, and basic radiographs) or a screening strategy consisting of the limited strategy plus an (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan. Randomisation was done with a dedicated central web-based randomisation system, in block sizes of six, stratified by centre, and concealed from the investigators. Patients and investigators were not masked to study group assignment. Patients were followed up for 2 years. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a cancer diagnosis in each group after the initial screening assessment. Analyses were conducted in modified intention-to-test and per-protocol populations. This trial is completed and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00964275. Between March 3, 2009, and Aug 18, 2012, we enrolled and randomly assigned 399 patients; five withdrew consent, leaving 197 in each group for the modified intention-to-test analysis. After initial screening assessment, cancer was diagnosed in 11 (5·6%) patients in the (18)F-FDG PET/CT group and four (2·0%) patients in the limited screening group (absolute risk difference 3·6%, 95% CI -0·4 to 7·9; p=0·07). At the initial screening assessment, seven (64%) of the 11 cancers diagnosed in the (18)F-FDG PET/CT group were early-stage compared with two of four cancers diagnosed in the limited screening group (p=1·00). One (0·5%) occult malignancy was detected in 186 patients who had negative initial screening in the (18)F-FDG PET/CT group, compared with nine (4·7%) in 193 patients in the limited screening group (absolute risk difference 4·1%, 95% CI 0·8 to 8·4, p=0·01). Overall, five (42%) of the 12 cancers diagnosed in the (18)F-FDG PET/CT group were advanced stage, compared with seven (54%) of the 13 cancers diagnosed in the limited screening group (p=0·70). 16 patients died during follow-up, eight (4·1%) in each group. Two (1·0%) patients in the (18)F-FDG PET/CT group and five (2·5%) in the limited screening group had cancer-related deaths. A strategy including limited screening and a (18)F-FDG PET/CT was not associated with a significantly higher rate of cancer diagnosis after unprovoked venous thromboembolism. The risk of subsequent cancer diagnosis was, however, lower in patients who had negative initial screening that included (18)F-FDG PET/CT than in patients who had negative initial limited screening. Whether or not (18)F-FDG PET/CT might be useful in a more selected population of patients with a high risk of cancer remains to be determined. Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (French Department of Health).
Guidewire localization by transthoracic echocardiography during central venous catheter insertion: a periprocedural method to evaluate catheter placement
Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of guidewire detection in right cardiac cavities by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in order to detect catheter misplacement and to optimize central venous catheter (CVC) positioning. Ultrasonic control for catheter tip positioning was compared to that by chest X-ray (CXR). Methods We conducted a monocentric prospective observational study (January–November 2010). All consecutive patients undergoing CVC insertion were included. The puncture was performed using the landmark method or ultrasound guidance. TTE was performed during the procedure to follow the arrival of the guidewire in the right cardiac cavities. Catheter misplacement was defined as an aberrant position on the postprocedural CXR (catheter positioning in ipsilateral or contralateral veins). The primary endpoint was the prediction of catheter misplacement by guidewire detection in the cardiac cavities. The secondary endpoint was the optimization of the catheter tip placement in the superior vena cava. Results A total of 98 patients received 101 CVC. The guidewire was visualized in 92 cases. In five cases, the guidewire was not seen in the right cardiac cavities and CXR showed catheter misplacement. In four cases, poor echogenicity led to the ultrasound examination being abandoned. Catheter misplacement was detected by TTE with a sensitivity of 96 % (CI 90–98 %), a specificity of 83 % (CI 44–97 %), a positive predictive value of 98 %, and a negative predictive value of 55 %. Likelihood ratios were LR+ 5.7 (CI 0.96–34.4) and LR− 0.05 (CI 0.02–0.14). Guidewire removal under TTE avoided an excessively distal position of the catheter tip in all cases. Conclusion TTE is a reliable tool to detect catheter misplacement and to optimize catheter tip positioning during the procedure of CVC insertion.