Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Many non-communicable diseases are rooted in social factors that determine health outcomes. Complex topics such as the social determinants of health are difficult to teach through traditional didactic methods. Since the introduction of the social accountability of medical schools’ framework in 1995 by the World Health Organisation, healthcare education institutions are encouraged to shift their traditional education models towards a socially accountable approach. Community engagement can facilitate a deeper understanding of health inequity, barriers to health care, and the social determinants of health whilst enabling institutions to meet their obligation to the communities they serve. This systematic review aimed to answer the following question: ‘‘What is the impact of community engaged healthcare education on undergraduate healthcare students' empathy and their views towards social accountability?’’. Methods This is a mixed-methods systematic review. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022306181). The following databases were searched: Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, ERIC, BEI for primary research studies published from 1995 to September 2024. Grey literature was also searched via EThOS and Google. Studies recruiting undergraduate students of regulated healthcare professions in countries of very high development were included. A convergent integrated approach to synthesis was followed. Results Out of the 19,590 papers yielded from the literature search, 76 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The following subthemes were generated under three overarching themes: Social accountability (advocacy for action; giving back to the community; bigger picture—identifying social determinants of health and barriers to healthcare; barriers to social accountability), Empathy (humanise community members—everybody has a story; overcome bias and challenge attitudes, assumptions and stereotypes; cultural competence and sensitivity; empathetic communication and interpersonal skills; feeling sympathy and sadness), and Shaping the future workforce (future professional demeanour; professional interests; interprofessional education and collaboration). Conclusions Community engaged education can help students better understand community needs, social determinants of health, improve empathy and cultural sensitivity, and build advocacy for social justice and change.

Data sources PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library database and ProQuest databases were searched.Study selection Observational and non-randomised studies in English language were considered for inclusion. Two reviewers independently selected the relevant studies. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion with a third reviewer. The outcome of interest for this review was oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients with Alzheimer's disease.Data extraction and synthesis Data extraction was conducted independently by two reviewers. Critical appraisal was conducted by two reviewers using the Joanna Briggs Institute 'Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument'.Results Six studies were included in the review, of which five were cross-sectional and one was a non-randomised controlled trial. OHRQoL was measured by the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) in one study and the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in the other five included studies. All six studies were judged as methodologically strong. When the results of four studies which used the GOHAI were pooled together in a meta-analysis, no statistically significant differences in the GOHAI scores between patients with Alzheimer's disease and controls were found (SMD = 0.09; 95%CI: -0.66 to 0.85).Conclusions The results of this review showed no significant difference in OHRQoL between patients with Alzheimer's disease and healthy controls.

Data sources Databases searched included PsycINFO, PubMed, SciELO, Scopus and Web of Science.Study selection Cross-sectional, longitudinal and retrospective studies that compared caries, periodontal disease or tooth loss in people who use drugs as compared to those who do not. Studies that included psychiatric populations and alcohol or tobacco users were not included in the review. Qualitative studies, in vitro investigations, animal studies, reviews, case reports and series, letters to editor and conference abstracts were also excluded. The authors included only English studies published before 1 July 2019. Two independent reviewers screened the papers on title and abstract and then full text. In case of disagreements, these were discussed between the two reviewers and a third one was consulted if needed.Data extraction and synthesis Two reviewers extracted the data and contacted the primary authors for necessary clarifications, if needed. The unweighted kappa was applied to examine inter-examiner agreement. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for observational studies was used to critically appraise the studies. The study selection results were presented through a flowchart. For the meta-analysis, the authors considered adjusted data. In some cases, crude estimates were used. Heterogeneity was estimated using the I2 statistic. The 'meta' package was used for the meta-analysis.Results Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. Drug use was associated with higher risk of periodontal disease (OR 1.44; 95% CI 0.8-2.6) and higher DMFT index (OR 4.11; 95% CI 2.07-8.15).Conclusions The review showed high risk of periodontal disease and caries among people who use drugs. The authors concluded that this association may be explained by irregular tooth brushing and long history of drug use. It is important to develop programmes that aim to improve oral hygiene practices among people who use drugs.

Data sources Databases searched included Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus.Study selection Cross-sectional studies that estimated dental healthcare needs and unmet dental needs in young people, aged 10-19 years were considered for inclusion. No limitations in terms of year of publication, language, location of the study, gender and race of the participants, or the type of dental health needs and unmet needs were applied. The papers were screened on title and abstract, and then on full text by two reviewers. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion and consultation with a third reviewer.Data extraction and synthesis Data were extracted by three reviewers. Critical appraisal was conducted by two reviewers using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. A PRISMA flowchart was used to present the study selection results. Summary measures on the prevalence of dental health needs and unmet needs were calculated. For the meta-analysis, the inverse variance method was used to obtain pooled summary measures.Results Fifty-seven studies were included in the review. The overall prevalence of dental healthcare needs was 49% (95% CI: 42-56) across all types of dental care. The highest prevalence was that for periodontal treatment needs (71%; 95% CI: 46-96 as reported in four studies), followed by that of general treatment needs (59.0%; 95% CI: 42-75 as reported in 12 studies), orthodontic treatment (46%; 95% CI: 38-53 as reported in 32 studies) and lastly that of malocclusion treatment needs (39%; 95% CI: 28-50 as reported in nine studies). The pooled prevalence of unmet dental needs as reported in nine studies was 34% (95% CI: 27-40) with the highest prevalence found in Southeast Asia (72.3%; 95% CI: 70.1-74.5) and the lowest in Europe (11.8%; 95% CI: 3.4-20.3).Conclusions The results of this review showed that the prevalence of dental healthcare needs was higher in America and Europe while unmet needs were more prevalent in Southeast Asia and Africa. The former could partly be explained by the lower number and sample sizes of studies conducted in developing countries.Commentary

Background Dental diseases are prevalent among asylum seekers and refugees (ASRs). Despite significant treatment needs, access to dental care in host countries is often limited. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the barriers and enablers to dental care access for ASRs in host countries of very high development. Methods Five health and social care databases and eight grey literature sources of information were searched. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool was used to critically appraise included studies. Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify common themes. These were then deductively organised according to Penchansky and Thomas’s modified access model. All review stages were conducted by two independent reviewers. Results Nine papers were included in the review. ASRs encounter significant challenges to accessing dental care in their host countries. These include affordability, communication difficulties, insufficient interpretation, limited knowledge of the healthcare systems and healthcare rights, and negative encounters with healthcare teams. The views and experiences of dental care teams providing care to ASRs were explored in only one study. Conclusions Both population and healthcare characteristics influence access to dental care for ASRs. Affordability, awareness and accommodation are most frequently described as barriers to dental access for this population. The diverse needs of this population need to be recognised by policy makers, commissioners and practitioners alike. Cultural competence needs to be incorporated into dental services and any interventions to improve access to dental care for this population. Registration PROSPERO- International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42019145570).

Introduction UK dentists experience high levels of stress, anxiety and burnout. Poor mental health can lead practitioners to exit the profession, contributing to workforce and service loss. Therefore, there is a need to focus on interventions to protect the mental health and wellbeing of dental teams. Three levels of intervention can be deployed in the workplace to support mental health and wellbeing: primary prevention, secondary prevention, and tertiary prevention.Aim The aim of this systematic review was to identify evidence on interventions used to prevent, improve or tackle mental health issues among dental team members and dental profession students in countries of very high development.Methods This systematic review was conducted according to a predefined protocol and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. The MEDLINE, Embase CINAHL, DOSS, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases were searched. Prospective empirical studies were considered for inclusion. The Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool (EPHPP) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. The identified interventions were categorised according to level of prevention.Results The search yielded 12,919 results. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. All of the studies concerned dentists or dental students. There were no studies for other groups of dental professionals. No primary prevention-level studies were identified. Secondary prevention-level studies (n = 4) included various psychoeducational interventions aiming to raise awareness and improve coping skills and led to significant improvements in stress levels and burnout of dentists and dental students. Tertiary prevention-level studies (n = 4) mainly employed counselling which was shown to be beneficial for dentists and students experiencing psychological ill-health.Conclusions Mental wellbeing awareness should be put at the centre of dental education and the workplace. Leadership and innovation are required to design primary-level interventions which can be implemented in the UK dental sector, with its distinct organisational and service characteristics.

Data sources Databases searched included the International Database for Medical Research MEDLINE/Pubmed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences (LILACS).Study selection Studies of observational design that examined the association between any screen-time behaviour and dietary intake in preschool and school-aged children (younger than 12 years) were selected by two independent reviewers. If a consensus could not be reached, a third reviewer was consulted.Data extraction and synthesis Data were extracted independently by two reviewers using a pre-tested data extraction form. Risk of bias was assessed using an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for cross-sectional studies. A PRISMA flow chart was used to present the study selection results. The GRADE system was used to evaluate the strength of evidence. A qualitative synthesis was used to report the results. A meta-analysis was not conducted.Results Nineteen studies were included in the review, all of which were of cross sectional design or conducted cross-sectional analysis. Fourteen studies were assessed as high quality, three as moderate quality and two as low quality. All studies found a significant positive association between television and/or total screen-time viewing and poor quality diet including lower intake of fruit and vegetables and higher intake of unhealthy foods. Screen-based sedentary behaviour was positively associated with cariogenic foods consumption in 15 studies. Based on the GRADE rating, there was moderate evidence of an association between TV viewing and intake of potentially cariogenic diet.Conclusions Although there could be an association between TV viewing and poor quality cariogenic diet in preschool and school-aged children, the authors conclude that the strength of evidence is limited.Commentary

AbstractIntroduction People who experience homelessness have poor oral health and limited access to dental services.Aim To examine whether 'peer education' could yield improved plaque management among people experiencing homelessness.Methods A quasi-experimental, one-group pre-test-post-test study was conducted, with follow-up at one and two months. Participants were living in temporary accommodation in Plymouth, UK. Plaque levels were assessed using the simplified oral hygiene index. A questionnaire and the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) were administered. Patient satisfaction and barriers to dental care were explored by interviews.Results The baseline sample included 24 people with a mean age of 36.88 ± 10.26 years. The mean OHIP-14 score was 25.08 ± 19.56; finding it uncomfortable to eat and being embarrassed attracted the highest values (2.46 ± 1.53 and 2.33 ± 1.63, respectively). Plaque levels decreased by month one and month two, though the changes were not statistically significant. Positive changes in confidence in toothbrushing at month two were identified (p = 0.01).Conclusion Experiencing pain and the opportunity to access treatment were key drivers of study participation. The study indicated that it is feasible to conduct oral health promotion projects for people in temporary accommodation. Adequately powered studies examining the impact of peer education on improving homeless people's oral health are warranted.

People with experience of homelessness commonly suffer from poor oral health and are likely to have low-level engagement with dental services. 'Teeth Matter' was a pilot study developed to examine whether peer education could result in improved plaque management among people who are experiencing homelessness. Based on the experience gained from developing and implementing the study, and taking into consideration the views of everyone involved, this paper provides a list of suggestions and resources that can be used to improve engagement of this population with oral health promotion activities. Some of the learning points are also applicable in the clinical setting.