Explore the vast range of titles available.

Richard Lifton, Barbara Kazmierczak and colleagues report the identification of a new enterocolitic and autoinflammatory syndrome, which they find is caused by de novo gain-of-function mutations affecting the inflammasome protein NLRC4. Cells with mutant NLRC4 produce elevated levels of cleaved caspase-1, which leads to cell death by pyroptosis. Upon detection of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, innate immune receptors initiate inflammatory responses. These receptors include cytoplasmic NOD-like receptors (NLRs) whose stimulation recruits and proteolytically activates caspase-1 within the inflammasome, a multiprotein complex. Caspase-1 mediates the production of interleukin-1 family cytokines (IL1FCs), leading to fever and inflammatory cell death (pyroptosis) 1 , 2 . Mutations that constitutively activate these pathways underlie several autoinflammatory diseases with diverse clinical features 3 . We describe a family with a previously unreported syndrome featuring neonatal-onset enterocolitis, periodic fever, and fatal or near-fatal episodes of autoinflammation. We show that the disease is caused by a de novo gain-of-function mutation in NLRC4 encoding a p.Val341Ala substitution in the HD1 domain of the protein that cosegregates with disease. Mutant NLRC4 causes constitutive IL1FC production and macrophage cell death. Infected macrophages from affected individuals are polarized toward pyroptosis and exhibit abnormal staining for inflammasome components. These findings identify and describe the cause of a life-threatening but treatable autoinflammatory disease that underscores the divergent roles of the NLRC4 inflammasome.

Oral use of the selective FLT3 kinase inhibitor gilteritinib in patients who had relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3 mutations led to a median overall survival of 9.3 months (vs. 5.6 months with standard chemotherapy) and complete remission with full or partial hematologic recovery in 34.0% of patients (vs. 15.3%).

Comprehensive preclinical studies of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) have been elusive due to limited ability of MDS stem cells to engraft current immunodeficient murine hosts. Here we report a MDS patient-derived xenotransplantation model in cytokine-humanized immunodeficient “MISTRG” mice that provides efficient and faithful disease representation across all MDS subtypes. MISTRG MDS patient-derived xenografts (PDX) reproduce patients’ dysplastic morphology with multi-lineage representation, including erythro- and megakaryopoiesis. MISTRG MDS-PDX replicate the original sample’s genetic complexity and can be propagated via serial transplantation. MISTRG MDS-PDX demonstrate the cytotoxic and differentiation potential of targeted therapeutics providing superior readouts of drug mechanism of action and therapeutic efficacy. Physiologic humanization of the hematopoietic stem cell niche proves critical to MDS stem cell propagation and function in vivo. The MISTRG MDS-PDX model opens novel avenues of research and long-awaited opportunities in MDS research. Myelodyplastic hematopoietic stem cells (MDS HSC) have eluded in vivo modeling. Here the authors present a highly efficient MDS patient-derived xenotransplantation model in cytokine-humanized mice with replication of the donors’ genetic complexity and myeloid, erythroid, and megakaryocytic lineage dysplasia.

Data on the efficacy and safety of interferon (IFN)-α for the treatment of essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) are inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis and searched MEDLINE and EMBASE via Ovid, Scopus, COCHRANE registry of clinical trials, and Web of Science from inception through 03/2019 for studies of pegylated IFN (peg-IFN) and non-pegylated IFN (non-peg-IFN) in PV and ET patients. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates for the primary outcome of overall response rate (ORR) defined as a composite of complete response, partial response, complete hematologic response (CHR) and partial hematologic response. Peg-IFN and non-peg-IFN were compared by meta-regression analyses. In total, 44 studies with 1359 patients (730 ET, 629 PV) were included. ORR were 80.6% (95% confidence interval: 76.6–84.1%, CHR: 59.0% [51.5%–66.1%]) and 76.7% (67.4–84.0%; CHR: 48.5% [37.8–59.4%]) for ET and PV patients, respectively. In meta-regression analyses results did not differ significantly for non-peg-IFN vs. peg-IFN. Annualized rates of thromboembolic complications and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events were low at 1.2% and 8.8% for ET and 0.5% and 6.5% for PV patients, respectively. Both peg-IFN and non-peg-IFN can be effective and safe long-term treatments for ET and PV.

The hypomethylating drugs azacitidine and decitabine have shown efficacy in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia, but complete tumour responses are infrequent and of short duration, possibly because of the short half-lives and suboptimal bone marrow exposure of the drugs. Guadecitabine, a next-generation hypomethylating drug, has a longer half-life and exposure than its active metabolite decitabine. A phase 1 study established 60 mg/m2 guadecitabine for 5 days as an effective treatment schedule. In this phase 2 study, we aimed to assess the safety and activity of two doses and schedules of guadecitabine in older (≥65 years) patients with treatment-naive acute myeloid leukaemia who were not candidates for intensive chemotherapy. We did a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 1/2 study of guadecitabine in cohorts of patients with treatment-naive acute myeloid leukaemia, relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes; here we report the phase 2 results from the cohort of treatment-naive patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. We included patients aged at least 65 years from 14 US medical centres (hospitals and specialist cancer clinics) who were not candidates for intensive chemotherapy and randomly assigned them (1:1) using a computer algorithm (for dynamic randomisation) to guadecitabine 60 or 90 mg/m2 on days 1–5 (5-day schedule) of a 28-day treatment cycle. Treatment allocation was not masked. We also assigned additional patients to guadecitabine 60 mg/m2 in a 10-day schedule in a 28-day treatment cycle after a protocol amendment. The primary endpoint was composite complete response (complete response, complete response with incomplete platelet recovery, or complete response with incomplete neutrophil recovery regardless of platelets). Response was assessed in all patients (as-treated) who received at least one dose of guadecitabine. We present the final analysis, although at the time of the database lock, 15 patients were still in follow-up for overall survival. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01261312. Between Aug 24, 2012, and Sept 15, 2014, 107 patients were enrolled: 54 on the 5-day schedule (26 randomly assigned to 60 mg/m2 and 28 to 90 mg/m2) and 53 were assigned to the 10-day schedule. Median age was 77 years (range 62–92), and median follow-up was 953 days (IQR 721–1040). All treated patients were assessable for a response. The number of patients who achieved a composite complete response did not differ between dose groups or schedules (13 [54%, 95% CI 32·8–74·4] with 60 mg/m2 on the 5-day schedule; 16 [59%; 38·8–77·6] with 90 mg/m2 on the 5-day schedule; and 26 [50%, 35·8–64·2] with 60 mg/m2 on the 10-day schedule). The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events, regardless of relationship to treatment, were febrile neutropenia (31 [61%] of 51 patients on the 5-day schedule vs 36 [69%] of 52 patients on the 10-day schedule), thrombocytopenia (25 [49%] vs 22 [42%]), neutropenia (20 [39%] vs 18 [35%]), pneumonia (15 [29%] vs 19 [37%]), anaemia (15 [29%] vs 12 [23%]), and sepsis (eight [16%] vs 14 [27%]). The most common serious adverse events, regardless of relationship to treatment, for the 5-day and 10-day schedules, respectively, were febrile neutropenia (27 [53%] vs 25 [48%]), pneumonia (14 [27%] vs 16 [31%]), and sepsis (eight [16%] vs 14 [27%]). 23 (22%) patients died because of adverse events (mainly from sepsis, eight [8%]; and pneumonia, five [5%]); four deaths were from adverse events deemed treatment-related (pneumonia, two [2%]; multiorgan failure, one [1%]; and sepsis, one [1%], all in the 10-day cohort). More than half of older treatment-naive patients with acute myeloid leukaemia achieved a composite complete response with guadecitabine at all drug doses and schedules investigated, with tolerable toxicity. The recommended guadecitabine regimen for this population is 60 mg/m2 in a 5-day schedule. A phase 3 study in this patient population is ongoing (NCT02348489) to assess guadecitabine 60 mg/m2 in a 5-day schedule versus standard of care. Astex Pharmaceuticals and Stand Up To Cancer.

Acquired aplastic anemia (AA) is an immune-mediated disorder leading to bone marrow failure characterized by pancytopenia, with infectious and bleeding complications. The disease course may be complicated by paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), necessitating screening with flow cytometry (FC) at the time of AA diagnosis. Management strategies vary based on disease severity. Severe AA patients are usually heavily transfusion-dependent (HT-AA) and typically treated with antithymocyte globulin, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and eltrombopag (EPAG) as triple therapy, while allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is often reserved for younger patients with matched sibling donors. Moderate AA patients are less transfusion-dependent (LT-AA) and may be observed or treated with CNI or EPAG. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Blue Cross Blue Shield Axis database, examining adult patients diagnosed with AA between 07/01/2016 and 06/30/2022. We evaluated their management within the first 6 months following the diagnosis. Of 793 identified individuals (542 LT-AA, 251 HT-AA), with a median age of 49 years, only 42.6% received AA-directed therapy. Triple therapy and HSCT were infrequently used for patients with HT-AA (4.4% and 18.7%, respectively), while the most common treatment was the combination of a CNI and EPAG (LT-AA 37.8%, HT-AA 51.7%). The median time from diagnosis to treatment was 22 days, with older patients (age ≥ 40 years) experiencing treatment initiation delays ( p  = 0.03). FC testing was underutilized with only 55.5% of patients undergoing evaluation. These findings highlight the need for better access to diagnostic evaluation and appropriate AA-directed therapy for patients with AA in real-world settings.

Hyperleukocytosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with inferior outcomes. There is limited high quality evidence to support the benefits of leukapheresis. We retrospectively collected data from patients with newly-diagnosed AML who presented with a white cell count (WBC) >50 × 109/L to 12 centers in the United States and Europe from 2006 to 2017 and received intensive chemotherapy. Logistic regression models estimated odds ratios for 30-day mortality and achievement of composite complete remission (CRc). Cox proportional hazard models estimated hazard ratios for overall survival (OS). Among 779 patients, clinical leukostasis was reported in 27%, and leukapheresis was used in 113 patients (15%). Thirty-day mortality was 16.7% (95% CI: 13.9–19.3%). Median OS was 12.6 months (95% CI: 11.5–14.9) among all patients, and 4.5 months (95% CI: 2.7–7.1) among those ≥65 years. Use of leukapheresis did not significantly impact 30-day mortality, achievement of CRc, or OS in multivariate analysis based on available data or in analysis based on multiple imputation. Among patients with investigator-adjudicated clinical leukostasis, there were statistically significant improvements in 30-day mortality and OS with leukapheresis in unadjusted analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. Given the significant resource use, cost, and potential complications of leukapheresis, randomized studies are needed to evaluate its value.

Prior experience indicated that use of higher doses of cytarabine during induction for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with a histone deacetylase inhibitor resulted in high response rates. S1203 was a randomized multicenter trial for previously untreated patients aged 18–60 with AML which compared daunorubicin and cytarabine (DA), idarubicin with higher dose cytarabine (IA) and IA with vorinostat (IA + V). The primary endpoint was event free survival (EFS). 738 patients were randomized: 261 to each DA and IA arms and 216 to the IA + V arm. 96, 456, and 150 patients had favorable-, intermediate-, and unfavorable-risk cytogenetics, respectively. 152 were NPM1 and 158 FLT3 mutated. The overall remission rate was 77.5% including 62.5% CR and 15.0% CRi. No differences in remission, EFS, or overall survival were observed among the 3 arms except for the favorable cytogenetics subset who had improved outcomes with DA and postremission high dose cytarabine. A trend towards increased toxicity was observed with the IA and IA + V arms. The use of higher dose cytarabine during induction therapy in younger patients with AML, with or without vorinostat, does not result in improved outcomes. (Funded by the US National Institutes of Health and others, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01802333.)

Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) regulates mitotic checkpoints and cell division. PLK1 overexpression is reported in numerous cancers, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and is associated with poor prognosis. Volasertib is a selective, potent cell-cycle kinase inhibitor that targets PLK to induce mitotic arrest and apoptosis. This phase 1 trial investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, and anti-leukemic activity of volasertib in combination with decitabine in AML patients aged ≥ 65 years. Thirteen patients were treated with escalating volasertib doses (3 + 3 design; 300 mg, 350 mg, and 400 mg) plus standard-dose decitabine. Dose-limiting toxicity was reported in one patient in cycle 1; the MTD of volasertib in combination with decitabine was determined as 400 mg. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, and decreased appetite. Objective response rate was 23%. The combination was well tolerated, and the adverse event profile was in line with previous findings.