Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
Content TypeContent Type
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
34
result(s) for
"Poertner, John"
Sort by:
Moving Best Practice to Evidence-Based Practice in Child Welfare
by
Poertner, John
,
Kessler, Michelle L.
,
Gira, Emmanuelle
in
Best practice
,
Child Abuse
,
Child abuse & neglect
2005
Increased emphasis is being placed on improving outcomes for abused and neglected children served by the child welfare system. To achieve this goal, the notion of “best practice” is widely embraced. Unfortunately, there is no consensus on its definition. Various interpretations include (a) practice wisdom, (b) emulating other systems, (c) expert consultants, (d) professional guidelines, and (e) evidence-based practice. In this article, the authors describe the advantages and disadvantages of each of these definitions. While all of them have a role to play in improving results of child welfare interventions, the authors argue that best practice is optimally defined as evidence-based practice. At the same time, there are many difficulties in employing this form of best practice, including a lack of evidence, the transfer of information, and the organizational culture in which the worker operates. Suggested solutions to these difficulties are discussed.
Journal Article
Moving Best Practice to Evidence-Based Practice in Child Welfare
by
Gira, Emmanuelle
,
Poertner, John
,
Kessler, Michelle L
in
Best practice
,
Child welfare
,
Evidence based
2005
Increased emphasis is being placed on improving outcomes for abused and neglected children served by the child welfare system. To achieve this goal, the notion of 'best practice' is widely embraced. Unfortunately, there is no consensus on its definition. Various interpretations include (a) practice wisdom, (b) emulating other systems, (c) expert consultants, (d) professional guidelines, and (e) evidence-based practice. In this article, the authors describe the advantages and disadvantages of each of these definitions. While all of them have a role to play in improving results of child welfare interventions, the authors argue that best practice is optimally defined as evidence-based practice. At the same time, there are many difficulties in employing this form of best practice, including a lack of evidence, the transfer of information, and the organizational culture in which the worker operates. Suggested solutions to these difficulties are discussed. References. Adapted from the source document.
Journal Article
The Child Health and Illness Profile–Adolescent Edition: Assessing Weil-Being in Group Homes or Institutions
2002
The Child Health and Illness Profile–Adolescent Edition (CHIP-AE), a new standardized instrument, was administered to 63 adolescents living in group homes or institutions. Youth reported high levels of satisfaction with their physical health, resilience and problem-solving skills, and academic achievement. Youth reported low levels of self-esteem, emotional comfort and psychosocial stability, family involvement, and work performance. They also took more risks, had more threats to achievement, and had poorer peer influences than other youth. This study demonstrates the potential usefulness of the CHIP-AE as a tool for assessing the health and well-being of youth living in group homes and institutions. Suggestions for future use of the CHIP-AE are discussed.
Journal Article
Judges', Caseworkers', and Substance Abuse Counselors' Indicators of Family Reunication with Substance-Affected Parents
2002
The decision to reunify children with their substance-affected parent is highly complex & requires a tremendous amount of work & change on the part of the affected parent. This exploratory study identified indicators for safe reunification of children placed in foster care due to parental substance abuse. Judges who hear juvenile cases, private agency child welfare caseworkers, & substance abuse counselors from a large midwestern state were surveyed using an instrument composed of a preliminary list of indicators identified through focus groups with these professional groups. Responses from 196 professionals who rated the importance of each item & subsequent factor analysis resulted in identification of 97 indicators. These indicators were grouped into the categories of motivation, recovery competency, & reliability, social support, parenting skills, & legal issues. Implications of the findings for practice are discussed. 6 Tables, 39 References. Adapted from the source document.
Journal Article
The Child Health and Illness Profile--Adolescent Edition: Assessing Well-Being in Group Homes or Institutions
2002
The Child Health and Illness Profile--Adolescent Edition (CHIP-AE) was administered to 63 adolescents in group settings. Domains studied were satisfaction, resilience, risk, achievement, and disorders. Compared to a normed group, youth in group homes or institutions felt physically healthy and safe and were resilient. Of concern were low self-esteem, high emotional discomfort, risk taking, and low work performance. (KK)
Journal Article
Judges', Caseworkers', and Substance Abuse Counselors' Indicators of Family Reunification with Substance-Affected Parents
by
Poertner, John
,
Karoll, Brad R.
in
Child
,
Child Abuse
,
Child Custody - legislation & jurisprudence
2002
The decision to reunify children with their substance-affected parent is highly complex and requires a tremendous amount of work and change on the part of the affected parent. This exploratory study identified indicators for safe reunification of children placed in foster care due to parental substance abuse. Judges who hear juvenile cases, private agency child welfare caseworkers, and substance abuse counselors from a large midwestern state were surveyed using an instrument composed of a preliminary list of indicators identified through focus groups with these professional groups. Responses from 196 professionals who rated the importance of each item and subsequent factor analysis resulted in identification of 97 indicators. These indicators were grouped into the categories of motivation, recovery, competency, and reliability; social support; parenting skills; and legal issues. Implications of the findings for practice are discussed.
Journal Article