Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Interventions to improve patient-centered care for persons with multimorbidity are in constant growth. To date, the emphasis has been on two separate kinds of interventions, those based on a patient-centered care approach with persons with chronic disease and the other ones created specifically for persons with multimorbidity. Their effectiveness in primary healthcare is well documented. Currently, none of these interventions have synthesized a patient-centered care approach for care for multimorbidity. The objective of this project is to determine the particular elements of patient-centered interventions and interventions for persons with multimorbidity that are associated with positive health-related outcomes for patients. Method A scoping review was conducted as the method supports the rapid mapping of the key concepts underpinning a research area and the main sources and types of evidence available. A five-stage approach was adopted: (1) identifying the research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) selecting studies; (4) charting the data; and (5) collating, summarizing and reporting results. We searched for interventions for persons with multimorbidity or patient-centered care in primary care. Relevant studies were identified in four systematic reviews (Smith et al. (2012;2016), De Bruin et al. (2012), and Dwamena et al. (2012)). Inductive analysis was performed. Results Four systematic reviews and 98 original studies were reviewed and analysed. Elements of interventions can be grouped into three main types and clustered into seven categories of interventions: 1) Supporting decision process and evidence-based practice; 2) Providing patient-centered approaches; 3) Supporting patient self-management; 4) Providing case/care management; 5) Enhancing interdisciplinary team approach; 6) Developing training for healthcare providers; and 7) Integrating information technology. Providing patient-oriented approaches, self-management support interventions and developing training for healthcare providers were the most frequent categories of interventions with the potential to result in positive impact for patients with chronic diseases. Conclusion This scoping review provides evidence for the adaption of patient-centered interventions for patients with multimorbidity. Findings from this scoping review will inform the development of a toolkit to assist chronic disease prevention and management programs in reorienting patient care.

Millions of people worldwide have complex health and social care needs. Care coordination for these patients is a core dimension of integrated care and a key responsibility for primary healthcare. Registered nurses play a substantial role in care coordination. This review draws on previous theoretical work and provides a synthesis of care coordination interventions as operationalized by nurses for complex patient populations in primary healthcare. We followed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for scoping reviews. We carried out a systematic search across CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus and ProQuest. Only empirical studies were included. We performed a thematic analysis using deductive (the American Nurses Association Framework) and inductive approaches. Findings were discussed with a group of experts. Thirty-four articles were included in the synthesis. Overall, nursing care coordination activities were synthesized into three categories: those targeting the patient, family and caregivers; those targeting health and social care teams; and those bringing together patients and professionals. Interpersonal communication and information transfer emerged as cross-cutting activities that support every other activity. Our results also brought to light the nurses' contribution to care coordination efforts for patients with complex needs as well as critical components that should be present in every care coordination intervention for this clientele. These include an increased intensity and frequency of activities, relational continuity of care, and home visits. With the growing complexity of patient's needs, efforts must be directed towards enabling the primary healthcare level to effectively play its substantial role in care coordination. This includes finding primary care employment models that would facilitate multidisciplinary teamwork and the delivery of integrated care, and guarantee the delivery of intensive yet efficient coordinated care.

BackgroundProblem gambling among sexual and gender diversity (SGD) populations has received increasing attention in research. While the literature shows that these populations are more likely than others to experience addiction and mental health issues, little is known about gambling among them. In our online survey (n=1519), a group of SGD participants reported problematic gambling practices.ObjectiveThe present study, conducted as part of a broader mixed-methods study on gambling among SGD populations, aimed to gather qualitative data to gain insight into why problem gambling seemed high in our online survey.Design, setting and participantsThis qualitative descriptive study was conducted via semi-structured individual interviews with voluntary participants who gamble and were from sexually diverse populations across Canada (n=23). A primarily inductive approach with a deductive component was employed to conduct a thematic analysis of the collected data.ResultsParticipants shared their thoughts on specific difficulties faced by SGD populations and gambling. These included themes such as gambling as a coping mechanism for SGD-related struggles, a lack of visibility and awareness of gambling issues and help resources, seeking a sense of community and belonging through gambling and other addictive behaviours and a minor theme regarding perspectives on risk-taking. Other contextual influences included the COVID-19 pandemic, online gambling and financial needs.ConclusionThis study adds to the existing knowledge of problem gambling among SGD populations by providing a qualitative perspective of sexually diverse participants on the issue. It also provides support for the minority stress framework as a potential reason why people from SGD populations might be at a higher risk of problem gambling.

IntroductionIn the health sciences, it can take up to 17 years for 14% of research findings to be adopted in clinical practice. Adopting a learning health system (LHS) approach may help accelerate the transition of medicoadministrative and clinical data to knowledge, knowledge to performance and performance to data. However, little is currently known about whether healthcare organisations are both willing and able to adopt such an innovation. Therefore, the aim of this study is to generate validity evidence in support of a measure assessing healthcare organisations’ readiness to implement an LHS approach.Methods and analysisA three-round Delphi method will be used to establish consensus on the relevance, clarity and comprehensiveness of the LHS readiness questionnaire’s domains, subdomains and items. The questionnaire has been developed based on a review of the literature. Participants with expertise in LHS across Canada and internationally will be purposively recruited using a modified Dillman approach, with opportunities for additional snowball sampling. Descriptive statistics will be calculated from all closed-ended Delphi survey responses. A conventional content analysis will be conducted on all open-ended responses.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been obtained from the McGill University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Institutional Review Board (AO3-E23-24B). The findings of this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences, knowledge mobilisation workshops and through policy briefs and position papers.

Background Globally, registered nurses (RNs) are increasingly working in primary care interdisciplinary teams. Although existing literature provides some information about the contributions of RNs towards outcomes of care, further evidence on RN workforce contributions, specifically towards patient-level outcomes, is needed. This study synthesized evidence regarding the effectiveness of RNs on patient outcomes in primary care. Methods A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A comprehensive search of databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE Complete, PsycINFO, Embase) was performed using applicable subject headings and keywords. Additional literature was identified through grey literature searches (ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, MedNar, Google Scholar, websites, reference lists of included articles). Quantitative studies measuring the effectiveness of a RN-led intervention (i.e., any care/activity performed by a primary care RN) that reported related outcomes were included. Articles were screened independently by two researchers and assessed for bias using the Integrated Quality Criteria for Review of Multiple Study Designs tool. A narrative synthesis was undertaken due to the heterogeneity in study designs, RN-led interventions, and outcome measures across included studies. Results Forty-six patient outcomes were identified across 23 studies. Outcomes were categorized in accordance with the PaRIS Conceptual Framework (patient-reported experience measures, patient-reported outcome measures, health behaviours) and an additional category added by the research team (biomarkers). Primary care RN-led interventions resulted in improvements within each outcome category, specifically with respect to weight loss, pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance, blood pressure and glycemic control, exercise self-efficacy, social activity, improved diet and physical activity levels, and reduced tobacco use. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with RN-led care. Conclusions This review provides evidence regarding the effectiveness of RNs on patient outcomes in primary care, specifically with respect to satisfaction, enablement, quality of life, self-efficacy, and improvements in health behaviours. Ongoing evaluation that accounts for primary care RNs’ unique scope of practice and emphasizes the patient experience is necessary to optimize the delivery of patient-centered primary care. Protocol registration ID PROSPERO: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. 2018. ID=CRD42 018090767 .

Background Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs are recognized as effective in reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease. However, CR programs are offered inequitably across regions and are available in less than 15% of remote areas worldwide. The main goal of this study was to design a CR program adapted to the contexts of remote areas to improve the service offered to patients. Methods We used an iterative user-centered design approach to understand the user context and services offered in cardiac rehabilitation in remote areas. We conducted two co-design processes with knowledge users in two remote regions. Two advisory committees were created in each of these regions, comprising managers ( n  = 6), healthcare professionals ( n  = 12) and patients ( n  = 2). We utilized the BACPR guidelines and the Hautes Autorités de santé operational model to support data collection in coding sessions to develop the CR program. We conducted four cycles of co-design with each of the committees to develop the cardiac rehabilitation program. Qualitative data were analyzed iteratively after each cycle. Results The co-design process resulted in developing a prototype cardiac rehabilitation program similar in both regions. It is based on a contextualized six-phase pathway of care designed for remote regions. For each phase 0 to 6 of the care pathway, knowledge users were asked to describe how to offer these phases in remote areas. Participants made structural changes to phases 0, 2, 3 and 4 in order to overcome staffing shortages in remote areas. These changes make it possible to decentralize cardiac rehabilitation expertise away from specialized centers, to ensure equity of service across the territory. Therapeutic patient education was integrated into phase 4 to meet patients' needs. Participants suggested that three follow-up offerings could come from nursing services to increase access to the cardiac rehabilitation program (primary care, home care, special chronic disease programs) in patients' home communities. Conclusion The co-design process enables us to meet the needs of remote regions in program development. This final program can be the subject of future implementation research.

With the rise of people being affected with chronic illness, now the leading cause of mortality worldwide, primary care is overwhelmed with the demand for healthcare services. Primary healthcare is the first resource for patients living with chronic illness, but in 2019, COVID-19 brought healthcare professionals to increase services through virtual care for patients living with chronic illness. In the workplace, such professionals often need to be sufficiently resourced to collaborate, to address collaborative care barriers in telehealth and to keep patients engaged in their health. We performed a scoping review to identify how patients living with chronic diseases actively engage and describe their involvement in the process of interprofessional collaboration within the context of telehealth in primary care settings. We followed Arksey and O’Malley’s and the Joanna Briggs Institute’s methodological guidelines to conduct this scoping review. The analysis of the retained twelve studies showed little distinction between the experience of interprofessional collaboration from the patient’s perspective in a telehealth context compared to a face-to-face context. However, we were able to identify gaps (eg, limited insight onto engagement dynamic, lack of patient-centric research, and insufficient research on patient engagement) relating to the experiences of patients, patient engagement, and professionals who have used telehealth. In an era of digital innovations, this lack of literature regarding the patient experience may jeopardize the quality of the interprofessional collaboration services offered to patients and patient engagement. This gap in patient engagement integrated into interprofessional collaboration in a telehealth context needs to be addressed.

Background Internationally, policy-makers and health administrators are seeking evidence to inform further integration and optimal utilization of registered nurses (RNs) within primary care teams. Although existing literature provides some information regarding RN contributions, further evidence on the impact of RNs towards quality and cost of care is necessary to demonstrate the contribution of this role on health system outcomes. In this study we synthesize international evidence on the effectiveness of RNs on care delivery and system-level outcomes in primary care. Methods A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Searches were conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE Complete, PsycINFO, and Embase for published literature and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and MedNar for unpublished literature between 2019 and 2022 using relevant subject headings and keywords. Additional literature was identified through Google Scholar, websites, and reference lists of included articles. Studies were included if they measured effectiveness of a RN-led intervention (i.e., any care/activity performed by a primary care RN within the context of an independent or interdependent role) and reported outcomes of these interventions. Included studies were published in English; no date or location restrictions were applied. Risk of bias was assessed using the Integrated Quality Criteria for Review of Multiple Study Designs tool. Due to the heterogeneity of included studies, a narrative synthesis was undertaken. Results Seventeen articles were eligible for inclusion, with 11 examining system outcomes (e.g., cost, workload) and 15 reporting on outcomes related to care delivery (e.g., illness management, quality of smoking cessation support). The studies suggest that RN-led care may have an impact on outcomes, specifically in relation to the provision of medication management, patient triage, chronic disease management, sexual health, routine preventative care, health promotion/education, and self-management interventions (e.g. smoking cessation support). Conclusions The findings suggest that primary care RNs impact the delivery of quality primary care, and that RN-led care may complement and potentially enhance primary care delivered by other primary care providers. Ongoing evaluation in this area is important to further refine nursing scope of practice policy, determine the impact of RN-led care on outcomes, and inform improvements to primary care infrastructure and systems management to meet care needs. Protocol registration ID PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews. 2018. ID= CRD42018090767 .

Family Care Teams were introduced in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) as a strategy to strengthen primary care through team-based models that optimize interprofessional collaboration. Nurses, including nurse practitioners (NPs), registered nurses (RNs), and licensed practical nurses (LPNs), play critical roles in these models; however, little is known about nurses' transition to these settings or the supports shaping their integration and effectiveness. To address this gap, we explored nurses' experiences transitioning into Family Care Teams, including supports for integration and the barriers and facilitators influencing this process. As part of a qualitative descriptive study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 nurses (6 NPs, 13 RNs, 6 LPNs) employed in Family Care Teams across five NL health zones. During the interviews, nurses described their experiences working in Family Care Teams, available practice supports, current roles, and barriers and facilitators to maximizing scope of practice. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis and constant comparison. Participants described their transition to Family Care Teams in two stages: 1) orientation and 2) supportive learning relationships. Orientation was highly variable, ranging in length and structure. Learning in this area was often self-directed, technology-focused, and asynchronous, with limited emphasis on clinical preparation or role expectations. Mentorship and shadowing opportunities were inconsistently available, with many nurses lacking access to experienced role models within the newly established teams. These gaps contributed to role ambiguity, underutilization of nursing scope of practice, and prolonged adjustment periods. Our findings reveal gaps in orientation and mentorship during nurses' transition into Family Care Teams in NL. A common yet adaptable transition framework, expanded student placements, and structured mentorship are critical to optimizing nursing roles in team-based care. Strengthening practice supports and clarifying nursing contributions can improve access and care quality while informing broader initiatives to support nurses' transition into primary care.