Explore the vast range of titles available.

Aims The use of beta‐blocker therapy in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is debated. We aimed at describing patterns of beta‐blocker prescription through a nationwide survey. Methods and results From 11 referral centres, we retrospectively collected data of CA patients with a first evaluation after 2016 (n = 642). Clinical characteristics at first and last evaluation were collected, with a focus on medical therapy. For patients in whom beta‐blocker therapy was started, stopped, or continued between first and last evaluation, the main reason for beta‐blocker management was requested. Median age of study population was 77 years; 81% were men. Arterial hypertension was found in 58% of patients, atrial fibrillation (AF) in 57%, and coronary artery disease in 16%. Left ventricular ejection fraction was preserved in 62% of cases, and 74% of patients had advanced diastolic dysfunction. Out of the 250 CA patients on beta‐blockers at last evaluation, 215 (33%) were already taking this therapy at first evaluation, while 35 (5%) were started it, in both cases primarily because of high‐rate AF. One‐hundred‐nineteen patients (19%) who were on beta‐blocker at first evaluation had this therapy withdrawn, mainly because of intolerance in the presence of heart failure with advanced diastolic dysfunction. The remaining 273 patients (43%) had never received beta‐blocker therapy. Beta‐blockers usage was similar between CA aetiologies. Patients taking vs. not taking beta‐blockers differed only for a greater prevalence of arterial hypertension, coronary artery disease, AF, and non‐restrictive filling pattern (P < 0.01 for all) in the former group. Conclusions Beta‐blockers prescription is not infrequent in CA. Such therapy may be tolerated in the presence of co‐morbidities for which beta‐blockers are routinely used and in the absence of advanced diastolic dysfunction.

ObjectiveWe sought to investigate prevalence, incidence and prognostic implications of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA), thereby identifying the predictors of time to PPM implantation.MethodsSeven hundred eighty-seven patients with CA (602 men, median age 74 years, 571 transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR), 216 light-chain amyloidosis (AL)) evaluated at two European referral centres were retrospectively included. Clinical, laboratory and instrumental data were analysed. The associations between PPM implantation and mortality, heart failure (HF) or a composite endpoint of mortality, cardiac transplantation and HF were analysed.Results81 (10.3%) patients had a PPM before initial evaluation. Over a median follow-up time of 21.7 months (IQR 9.6–45.2), 81 (10.3%) additional patients (18 with AL (22.2%) and 63 with ATTR (77.8%)) underwent PPM implantation with a median time to implantation of 15.6 months (IQR 4.2–40), complete atrioventricular block was the most common indication (49.4%). Independent predictors of PPM implantation were QRS duration (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.03, p<0.001) and interventricular septum (IVS) thickness (HR 1.1, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.17, p=0.003). The model to estimate the probability of PPM at 12 months and containing both factors showed a C-statistic of 0.71 and a calibration of slope of 0.98.ConclusionsConduction system disease requiring PPM is a common complication in CA that affects up to 20.6% of patients. QRS duration and IVS thickness are independently associated with PPM implantation. A PPM implantation at 12 months model was devised and validated to identify patients with CA at higher risk of requiring a PPM and who require closer follow-up.

Aortic valve stenosis and cardiac amyloidosis, particularly transthyretin-related, often coexist and share a common clinical and demographic profile. Several pathophysiological hypotheses have been proposed regarding the causes of this association, neither of which fully substantiated in practice. The key to detect the coexistence of cardiac amyloidosis and aortic valve stenosis lies in clinical suspicion. It is possible to hypothesize concurrent cardiac amyloidosis in patients with aortic valve stenosis with the aid of clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and extracardiac \"red flags\". Subsequent non-invasive diagnostic steps are often sufficient to establish a definitive diagnosis. The early diagnosis of this condition is pivotal since the presence of dual pathology worsens patient's prognosis, especially without intervention. Available data on treatment show a better outcome in terms of survival and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous correction of valvular heart disease rather than medical therapy alone, regardless of the presence of cardiac amyloidosis. Furthermore, it seems that cardiac amyloidosis does not impact survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, even if higher rates of rehospitalizations have been described. Indeed, percutaneous treatment of valvular heart disease is currently considered the primary therapeutic option. Subsequently a disease-modifying treatment for transthyretin amyloidosis may be considered in order to delay disease progression and improve outcomes, even if specific data are still lacking.

Systemic amyloidosis is a hereditary or acquired disease characterized by deposition of amyloid insoluble fibrils into body organs and tissues, causing structural abnormalities and organ dysfunction, i.e. heart failure. This disease is classified according to the precursor protein involved; immunoglobulin light chains, transthyretin and apolipoprotein A1 underlie the cardiac involvement. Amyloid cardiomyopathy is characterized by symmetric biventricular hypertrophy, preserved systolic function, and pronounced diastolic dysfunction. Although transthyretin-related cardiac amyloidosis has always been considered a rare disease, in the last few years it has been found to be one of the most common causes of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, thanks to better diagnostic algorithms and considerable improvements in cardiac imaging. Achieving an early diagnosis is a challenge for the modern cardiologist since new disease-modifying therapies have been developed in recent years. This article aims to answer to the main questions about transthyretin-related cardiac amyloidosis: when to suspect it, how to diagnose it and how to treat it.

Systemic amyloidosis is a hereditary or acquired disease characterized by deposition of amyloid insoluble fibrils into body organs and tissues, causing structural abnormalities and organ dysfunction, i.e. heart failure. This disease is classified according to the precursor protein involved; immunoglobulin light chains, transthyretin and apolipoprotein A1 underlie the cardiac involvement. Amyloid cardiomyopathy is characterized by symmetric biventricular hypertrophy, preserved systolic function, and pronounced diastolic dysfunction. Although transthyretin-related cardiac amyloidosis has always been considered a rare disease, in the last few years it has been found to be one of the most common causes of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, thanks to better diagnostic algorithms and considerable improvements in cardiac imaging. Achieving an early diagnosis is a challenge for the modern cardiologist since new disease-modifying therapies have been developed in recent years.

Aortic valve stenosis and cardiac amyloidosis, particularly transthyretin-related, often coexist and share a common clinical and demographic profile. Several pathophysiological hypotheses have been proposed regarding the causes of this association, neither of which fully substantiated in practice. The key to detect the coexistence of cardiac amyloidosis and aortic valve stenosis lies in clinical suspicion. It is possible to hypothesize concurrent cardiac amyloidosis in patients with aortic valve stenosis with the aid of clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and extracardiac “red flags”. Subsequent non-invasive diagnostic steps are often sufficient to establish a definitive diagnosis. The early diagnosis of this condition is pivotal since the presence of dual pathology worsens patient’s prognosis, especially without intervention. Available data on treatment show a better outcome in terms of survival and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous correction of valvular heart disease rather than medical therapy alone, regardless of the presence of cardiac amyloidosis. Furthermore, it seems that cardiac amyloidosis does not impact survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, even if higher rates of rehospitalizations have been described. Indeed, percutaneous treatment of valvular heart disease is currently considered the primary therapeutic option. Subsequently a disease-modifying treatment for transthyretin amyloidosis may be considered in order to delay disease progression and improve outcomes, even if specific data are still lacking.