Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Prehabilitation and recovery programmes aim to optimise patients’ physical fitness and mental well-being before, during and after cancer treatment. This paper aimed to understand the impact of such a programme on emotional well-being in individuals undergoing cancer surgery. The programme was multi-modal, containing physical activity, well-being and nutritional support. Methods Qualitative interviews were conducted with 16 individuals who participated in a prehabilitation and recovery programme. Twenty-four health care staff involved in referral completed an online survey. An inductive, thematic analysis was conducted, integrating perspectives of patients and staff, structured with the Framework approach. Results Patients seemed to experience emotional benefits from the programme, appearing less anxious and more confident in their ability to cope with treatment. They seemed to value having something positive to focus on and control over an aspect of treatment. Ongoing, implicit psychological support provided by Exercise Specialists, who were perceived as expert, available and caring, seemed valued. Some patients appeared to appreciate opportunities to talk about cancer with peers and professionals. Discomfort with talking about cancer with other people, outside of the programme, was expressed. Conclusions Participation in a prehabilitation and recovery programme appeared to yield valuable emotional well-being benefits, even without referral to specialist psychological support. Study registration The study protocol was uploaded onto the Open Science Framework 24 September 2020 ( https://osf.io/347qj/ ).

Background Healthcare workers perform clinical behaviours which impact on patient diagnoses, care, treatment and recovery. Some methods of supporting healthcare workers in changing their behaviour make use of social norms by exposing healthcare workers to the beliefs, values, attitudes or behaviours of a reference group or person. This review aimed to evaluate evidence on (i) the effect of social norms interventions on healthcare worker clinical behaviour change and (ii) the contexts, modes of delivery and behaviour change techniques (BCTs) associated with effectiveness. Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Searches were undertaken in seven databases. The primary outcome was compliance with a desired healthcare worker clinical behaviour and the secondary outcome was patient health outcomes. Outcomes were converted into standardised mean differences (SMDs). We performed meta-analyses and presented forest plots, stratified by five social norms BCTs ( social comparison , credible source , social reward , social incentive and information about others’ approval ). Sources of variation in social norms BCTs, context and mode of delivery were explored using forest plots, meta-regression and network meta-analysis. Results Combined data from 116 trials suggested that social norms interventions were associated with an improvement in healthcare worker clinical behaviour outcomes of 0.08 SMDs (95%CI 0.07 to 0.10) ( n = 100 comparisons), and an improvement in patient health outcomes of 0.17 SMDs (95%CI 0.14 to 0.20) ( n = 14), on average. Heterogeneity was high, with an overall I 2 of 85.4% (healthcare worker clinical behaviour) and 91.5% (patient health outcomes). Credible source was more effective on average, compared to control conditions (SMD 0.30, 95%CI 0.13 to 0.47, n = 7). Social comparison also appeared effective, both on its own (SMD 0.05, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.08, n = 33) and with other BCTs, and seemed particularly effective when combined with prompts/cues (0.33, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.44, n = 5). Conclusions Social norms interventions appeared to be an effective method of changing the clinical behaviour of healthcare workers and have a positive effect on patient health outcomes in a variety of health service contexts. Although the overall result is modest and variable, there is the potential for social norms interventions to be applied at large scale. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42016045718 .

Background ‘Prehabilitation’ interventions aim to enhance individuals’ physical fitness prior to cancer treatment, typically involve exercise training as a key component, and may continue to support physical activity, strength, and fitness during or after treatment. However, uptake of prehabilitation is variable. This study investigated how patients from diverse socio-economic status groups perceived an exemplar prehabilitation and recovery programme, aiming to understand factors impacting acceptability, engagement and referral. Methods This research was conducted in the context of the Prehab4Cancer and Recovery Programme, a prehabilitation and recovery programme available across Greater Manchester, UK. Qualitative, semi-structured phone/video-call interviews were conducted with 18 adult patient participants referred to the programme (16 ‘engagers’, 2 ‘non-engagers’; half the sample lived in localities with low socio-economic status scores). An online questionnaire with free-response and categorical-response questions was completed by 24 ‘clinician’ participants involved in referral (nurses, doctors and other staff roles). An inductive, multi-perspective, thematic analysis was performed, structured using the Framework approach. Results Discussing and referring patients to prehabilitation can be challenging due to large quantities of information for staff to cover, and for patients to absorb, around the time of diagnosis. The programme was highly valued by both participant groups; the belief that participation would improve recovery seemed a major motivator for engagement, and some ‘clinicians’ felt that prehabilitation should be treated as a routine part of treatment, or extended to support other patient groups. Engagers seemed to appreciate a supportive approach where they did not feel forced to do any activity and tailoring of the programme to meet individual needs and abilities was appreciated. Initial engagement could be daunting, but gaining experience with the programme seemed to increase confidence. Conclusions The prehabilitation programme was highly valued by engagers. Introducing prehabilitation at a challenging time means that personalised approaches might be needed to support engagement, or participation could be encouraged at a later time. Strategies to support individuals lacking in confidence, such as buddying, may be valuable. Study registration The study protocol was uploaded onto the Open Science Framework 24 September 2020 ( https://osf.io/347qj/ ).

Manual therapies are forms of force-based manipulations (FBM) and involve the application of mechanical force to the outside of the body with therapeutic intent. The United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) U24 FBM Taxonomy and Terminology Committee (FBM-TTC) was formed to better understand why responses to FBM differ between individuals. One objective for this multi-disciplinary working group was to develop a framework outlining factors that should be considered, measured, and reported when developing and performing studies on FBM. The workgroup collaborated to develop a model outlining elements to consider during FBM research and practice. Three different models were proposed by members of the group who voted on a preferred model using a rank-ordered process and refined the selected model based on consensus and published literature. A 3-dimensional (3D) matrix model was chosen that includes three elements: contextual factors influencing FBM outcomes, structure and function levels focusing on biological and physiological aspects, and force parameters. Each element expands into different components and sub-levels. The model is designed to be interactive, integrative, and dynamic. The model provides a framework to guide protocol development for FBM mechanistic research and clinical outcome studies. For example, researchers can design more robust studies systematically varying force parameters by considering other matrix components, while clinicians may develop more personalized treatment plans. The model supports the complexity of mechanistic responses to FBM by integrating the multitude of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that impact responses. Detailed discussion of each element is beyond the scope of this paper; however, content experts are encouraged to expand on this dynamic model. An innovative 3D model was developed to guide FBM research. The framework integrates foundational elements and accommodates new insights, making it a valuable tool to advance FBM science and practice.

Background Total hip replacement is a common surgical procedure in which the ‘ball’ and ‘socket’ components of the hip joint are replaced with implants. The HipHOP study (Hip arthroplasty with Hybrid Or cemented implants: Patient reported outcomes) evaluated the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of two implant types. Qualitative research was embedded within the HipHOP study and aimed to understand factors which might affect the implementation of a future trial’s findings. Methods Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted by telephone with sixteen orthopaedic surgeons. Purposive sampling ensured inclusion of surgeons who did and did not agree to their patients being included in the feasibility trial at two hospital sites, and also surgeons at a further two sites which were not involved in the feasibility trial. An inductive, thematic analysis was conducted, structured using the Framework approach. Findings were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results To facilitate implementation of trial findings, it seemed important that advice be based on good quality research evidence showing clear benefits to the recommended approach and be supported by trusted professional organisations. Participants also considered the influence of surgeons’ personal surgical results, recognising that outcomes may be affected by an individual surgeon’s training and experience with an implant type. The importance of enabling surgeons to gain necessary skills was highlighted. The TDF seemed to be particularly valuable in understanding factors underlying implementation behaviour in this context, with the CFIR showing potential to contribute to understanding within some areas. Conclusions For a trial’s findings to be influential in changing practice, it seems that: the trial needs to be well-designed and provide clear, strong findings; surgeons need to believe that changing practice will improve their personal outcomes; and suitable training opportunities need to be provided where surgeons lack experience using a recommended implant type. Trial registration Registered 19/02/2021, ISRCTN11097021.

IntroductionShoulder osteoarthritis most commonly affects older adults, causing pain, reduced function and quality of life. Total shoulder replacements (TSRs) are indicated once other non-surgical options no longer provide adequate pain relief. Two main types of TSRs are widely used: anatomic TSR (aTSR) and reverse TSR (rTSR). It is not clear whether one TSR type provides better short- or long-term outcomes for patients, and which, if either, is more cost-effective for the National Health Service (NHS).Methods and analysisRAPSODI-UK is a multi-centre, pragmatic, two-parallel arm, superiority randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of aTSR versus rTSR for adults aged 60+ with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis, an intact rotator cuff and bone stock suitable for TSR. Participants in both arms of the trial will receive usual post-operative rehabilitation. We aim to recruit 430 participants from approximately 28 NHS sites across the UK. The primary outcome is the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) at 2 years post-randomisation. Outcomes will be collected at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include the pain and function subscales of the SPADI, the Oxford Shoulder Score, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), complications, range of movement and strength, revisions and mortality. The between-group difference in the primary outcome will be derived from a constrained longitudinal data analysis model. We will also undertake a full health economic evaluation and conduct qualitative interviews to explore perceptions of acceptability of the two types of TSR and experiences of recovery with a sample of participants.Ethics and disseminationEthics committee approval for this trial was obtained (London - Queen Square Research Ethics Committee, Rec Reference 22/LO/0617) on 4 October 2022. The results of the main trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and using other professional and media outlets.Trial registration numberISRCTN12216466.

Background Health workers routinely carry out clinical behaviours, such as prescribing, test-ordering or hand-washing, which impact on patient diagnoses, care, treatment and recovery. Social norms are the implicit or explicit rules that a group uses to determine values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviours. A social norms intervention seeks to change the clinical behaviour of a target health worker by exposing them to the values, beliefs, attitudes or behaviours of a reference group or person. This study aims to find out whether or not social norms interventions are effective ways of encouraging health workers to carry out desired behaviours and to identify which types of social norms intervention, if any, are most effective. Methods A systematic review will be conducted. The inclusion criteria are a population of health professionals, a social norms intervention that seeks to change a clinical behaviour, and randomised controlled trials. Searches will be undertaken in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, British Nursing Index, ISI Web of Science, PsycINFO and Cochrane trials. Titles and abstracts will be reviewed against the inclusion criteria to exclude any that are clearly ineligible. Two reviewers will independently screen all the remaining full texts to identify relevant papers. For studies which meet our inclusion criteria, two reviewers will extract data independently, code for behaviour change techniques and assess quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcome measure will be compliance with desired behaviour. To assess the effect of social norms on the behaviour of health workers, we will perform fixed effects meta-analysis and present forest plots, stratified by behaviour change technique. We will explore sources of variation using meta-regression and may use multi-component-based network meta-analysis to explore which forms of social norms are more likely to be effective, if our data meet the necessary requirements. Discussion The study will provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of different methods of applying social norms to change the clinical behaviour of health professionals. We will disseminate the research to academics, health workers and members of the public and use the findings from the review to plan future research on the use of social norms with health workers. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42016045718. Future protocol changes will be clearly stated in PROSPERO.

To apply component network meta-analysis (CNMA) models to an existing Cochrane review of psychological preparation interventions for adults undergoing surgery and to extend the models to account for covariates to identify the most effective components for improving postoperative outcomes. Interventions consisted of between one and four components of psychological preparation: procedural information (P), sensory information (S), behavioral instruction (B), cognitive interventions (C), relaxation (R), and emotion-focused techniques (E). We used CNMA models to assess the effect of each component for three outcomes: length of stay, pain, and negative affect. We found evidence that the most effective component for reducing length of stay depends on the type of surgery and that R may improve pain. There was insufficient evidence that individual components contributed to the overall reduction in negative affect, but P and S emerged as the most likely beneficial components. Overall, we were unable to identify any one component as the most effective across all three outcomes. The CNMA method allowed us to address questions about the effects of specific components that could not be answered using standard Cochrane methodology.

Abstract Recreation and sport settings (RSS) are ideal for health promotion, however, they often promote unhealthy eating. Choice architecture, a strategy to nudge consumers towards healthier options, has not been comprehensively reviewed in RSS and indicators for setting-based multi-level, multi-component healthy eating interventions in RSS are lacking. This scoping review aimed to generate healthy food environment indicators for RSS by reviewing peer-reviewed and grey literature evidence mapped onto an adapted choice architecture framework. One hundred thirty-two documents were included in a systematic search after screening. Data were extracted and coded, first, according to Canada’s dietary guideline key messages, and were, second, mapped onto a choice architecture framework with eight nudging strategies (profile, portion, pricing, promotion, picks, priming, place and proximity) plus two multi-level factors (policy and people). We collated data to identify overarching guiding principles. We identified numerous indicators related to foods, water, sugary beverages, food marketing and sponsorship. There were four cross-cutting guiding principles: (i) healthy food and beverages are available, (ii) the pricing and placement of food and beverages favours healthy options, (iii) promotional messages related to food and beverages supports healthy eating and (iv) RSS are committed to supporting healthy eating and healthy food environments. The findings can be used to design nested, multipronged healthy food environment interventions. Future research is needed to test and systematically review the effectiveness of healthy eating interventions to identify the most promising indicators for setting-based health promotion in RSS.

Older adults in lower socioeconomic status (SES) areas are the least active of all adult groups but are often absent from physical activity research. The present study aimed to elicit perspectives on acceptability of physical activity from older adults and physical activity providers in lower SES areas. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 older adults and eight physical activity trainers/providers in lower SES areas. An inductive, multi-perspective Thematic Analysis was conducted. Eight themes were identified that covered one or both groups’ perceptions of what was important in ensuring acceptability of activity provision. Older adults perceived a lack of value that was reinforced by lack of resources and unequal provision. Acceptability was hindered by centralisation of facilities and lack of understanding of needs by facility management. Facilitating social interaction within physical activities appeared key, thereby meeting multiple needs with fewer resources. In conclusion, to increase acceptability of physical activity for older adults in low SES areas, providers should address the lack of perceived value felt by many older adults. Equitable provision of physical activities addressing multiple needs may allow older adults with limited resources to be physically active without sacrificing other needs. Facilitating creation of social bonds may foster maintenance of physical activities.