Explore the vast range of titles available.

Introduction We assessed the effect of the prandial state on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of single and multiple doses of orforglipron (LY3502970), an oral, non-peptide glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), in two studies (A and B). Methods Study A and study B were phase 1, randomized, crossover studies in healthy adults aged 18–65 years and 21–70 years, respectively. Participants received single (3 mg, study A) or multiple (16 mg, study B) oral doses of orforglipron under fasted and fed conditions. Blood samples were collected pre- and postdose to assess area under the concentration–time curve (AUC), maximum observed drug concentration ( C max ), time of C max ( t max ), and half-life ( t 1/2 ) associated with terminal rate constant. AUC and C max were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model. Treatment differences were presented as ratios of geometric least squares means (GLSM). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), adverse events of special interest, and serious adverse events were assessed. Results Study A included 12 participants (mean age 45.0 years; male 66.7%); study B included 34 participants (mean age 42.8 years; male 88.2%). GLSM AUC and C max were lower by 23.7% and 23.2% in study A, and 17.6% and 20.9% in study B, in the fed versus fasted states, respectively. In both studies, t 1/2 and median t max were comparable between fed and fasted states. The majority of TEAEs in both studies were gastrointestinal tract-related conditions. No serious adverse events or deaths were reported in either study. Conclusion The observed pharmacokinetic differences due to the prandial state are unlikely to contribute to clinically meaningful differences in the efficacy of orforglipron. The safety profile was consistent with the known profiles of other GLP-1 RAs. Given the absence of prandial restrictions, orforglipron may emerge as a convenient oral treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes or obesity. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT03929744 and NCT05110794.

Introduction Insulin efsitora alfa (efsitora) is a basal insulin with a flat pharmacokinetic profile and long half-life, enabling weekly dosing. These attributes may provide stable glucose levels. This exploratory phase 1 study aimed to assess the hypoglycemic risk during experimental conditions that mimic situations encountered in daily life. Methods This was a single-site, open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence study in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) previously treated with basal insulin. The incidence, duration, and nadir glucose of hypoglycemia were assessed after treatment with efsitora versus insulin glargine (glargine) during three provocation conditions: 24-h prolonged fasting, prolonged fasting with exercise, and double dosing of study insulin. Results The 54 enrolled adults (BMI 21.8–39.7 kg/m 2 , HbA1c 6.5–9.4%) achieved stable fasting glucose before undergoing provocation. Most hypoglycemic events were level 1 (≥ 54 to < 70 mg/dL) and resolved spontaneously or after oral glucose. The incidences of level 1 hypoglycemia for efsitora and glargine were not significantly different: for prolonged fasting, the incidences were 44.7 vs. 42.6% and the difference in proportion was 2.1% (95% CI: – 17.2, 21.4); for prolonged fasting with exercise, the corresponding values were 65.9 vs. 50.0% and 15.9% (– 3.0, 34.8); for double dosing, the corresponding values were 68.1 vs. 61.7% and 6.4% (– 12.8, 25.6). Level 2 hypoglycemia (< 54 mg/dL) was infrequent during both treatments and all provocations. No severe hypoglycemia was observed. Mean nadir glucose (range 62.8–66.3 mg/dL) and hypoglycemia duration (range 76.6–115.2 min) were also similar for the two treatments, depending on the provocation. Conclusion Overall, weekly efsitora did not increase the incidence, duration, or severity of hypoglycemia compared to daily glargine during provocation periods in patients with T2D. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04957914.

Obesity is a major risk factor for many leading causes of illness and death worldwide. Data are needed regarding the efficacy and safety of the nonpeptide glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist orforglipron as a once-daily oral therapy for weight reduction in adults with obesity. In this phase 2, randomized, double-blind trial, we enrolled adults with obesity, or with overweight plus at least one weight-related coexisting condition, and without diabetes. Participants were randomly assigned to receive orforglipron at one of four doses (12, 24, 36, or 45 mg) or placebo once daily for 36 weeks. The percentage change from baseline in body weight was assessed at week 26 (primary end point) and at week 36 (secondary end point). A total of 272 participants underwent randomization. At baseline, the mean body weight was 108.7 kg, and the mean body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) was 37.9. At week 26, the mean change from baseline in body weight ranged from -8.6% to -12.6% across the orforglipron dose cohorts and was -2.0% in the placebo group. At week 36, the mean change ranged from -9.4% to -14.7% with orforglipron and was -2.3% with placebo. A weight reduction of at least 10% by week 36 occurred in 46 to 75% of the participants who received orforglipron, as compared with 9% who received placebo. The use of orforglipron led to improvement in all prespecified weight-related and cardiometabolic measures. The most common adverse events reported with orforglipron were gastrointestinal events, which were mild to moderate, occurred primarily during dose escalation, and led to discontinuation of orforglipron in 10 to 17% of participants across dose cohorts. The safety profile of orforglipron was consistent with that of the GLP-1 receptor agonist class. Daily oral orforglipron, a nonpeptide GLP-1 receptor agonist, was associated with weight reduction. Adverse events reported with orforglipron were similar to those with injectable GLP-1 receptor agonists. (Funded by Eli Lilly; GZGI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05051579.).

Orforglipron, an oral, non-peptide glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, is in development for type 2 diabetes and obesity. We assessed the efficacy and safety of orforglipron versus placebo or dulaglutide in participants with type 2 diabetes. In this 26-week, phase 2, double-blind, randomised, multicentre study, participants were recruited from 45 centres (private clinics, hospitals, and research centers) in the USA, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia. Adult participants aged 18 years or older with type 2 diabetes treated with diet and exercise, with or without metformin, and with a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7·0–10·5%, and stable BMI of 23 kg/m2 or more, were randomly assigned (5:5:5:5:5:3:3:3:3) via an interactive web-response system to placebo, dulaglutide 1·5 mg once per week, or orforglipron 3 mg, 12 mg, 24 mg, 36 mg (group 1), 36 mg (group 2), 45 mg (group 1), or 45 mg (group 2) once per day with no food or water restrictions. Two different dose escalation regimens were evaluated for each of the 36 mg and 45 mg cohorts. Participants were masked to the study drug, dulaglutide, and placebo. The primary efficacy outcome The primary efficacy outcome was mean change in HbA1c from baseline with orforglipron versus placebo at week 26. Efficacy was analysed in all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of study drug and excluded data after the permanent discontinuation of study drug or initiation of rescue medication. Safety was analysed in all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05048719) and is completed. Between Sept 15, 2021, and Sept 30, 2022, 569 participants were screened and 383 were enrolled and randomly assigned to a group. 352 (92%) completed the study and 303 (79%) completed 26 weeks of treatment. At baseline, the mean age was 58·9 years, HbA1c was 8·1%, BMI was 35·2 kg/m2, 226 (59%) were men, and 157 (41%) were women. At week 26, mean change in HbA1c with orforglipron was up to –2·10% (–1·67% placebo adjusted), versus –0·43% with placebo and –1·10% with dulaglutide. HbA1c reduction was statistically superior with orforglipron versus placebo (estimated treatment difference –0·8% to –1·7%). Change in mean bodyweight at week 26 was up to –10·1 kg (95% CI –11·5 to –8·7; –7·9 kg placebo adjusted [–9·9 to –5·9]) with orforglipron versus –2·2 kg (–3·6 to –0·7) for placebo and –3·9 kg (–5·3 to –2·4) for dulaglutide. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events ranged from 61·8% to 88·9% in orforglipron-treated participants, compared with 61·8% with placebo and 56·0% with dulaglutide. The majority were gastrointestinal events (44·1% to 70·4% with orforglipron, 18·2% with placebo, and 34·0% with dulaglutide) of mild to moderate severity. Three participants receiving orforglipron and one participant receiving dulaglutide had clinically significant (<54 mg/dL [<3 mmol/L]) hypoglycaemia and no participants had severe hypoglycaemia. One death occurred in the placebo group and was not related to study treatment. In this phase 2 trial the novel, oral, non-peptide GLP-1 receptor agonist orforglipron at doses of 12 mg or greater showed significant reductions in HbA1c and bodyweight compared with placebo or dulaglutide. The adverse event profile was similar to other GLP-1 receptor agonists in similar stage of development. Orforglipron might provide an alternative to injectable GLP-1 receptor agonists and oral semaglutide, with the prospect of less burdensome administration to achieve treatment goals in people with type 2 diabetes. Eli Lilly and Company.

Abstract Context In a clinical study, tirzepatide, a glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GIP/GLP-1RA), provided superior glycemic control vs the GLP-1RA semaglutide. The physiologic mechanisms are incompletely understood. Objective This work aimed to evaluate treatment effects by model-based analyses of mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) data. Methods A 28-week double–blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin was conducted at 2 clinical research centers in Germany. Interventions included tirzepatide 15 mg, semaglutide 1 mg, and placebo. Main outcome measures included glycemic control, model-derived β-cell function indices including insulin secretion rate (ISR) at 7.2–mmol/L glucose (ISR7.2), β-cell glucose sensitivity (β-CGS), insulin sensitivity, and estimated hepatic insulin-to-glucagon ratio. Results Tirzepatide significantly reduced fasting glucose and MMTT total glucose area under the curve (AUC) vs semaglutide (P < .01). Incremental glucose AUC did not differ significantly between treatments; therefore, greater total glucose AUC reduction with tirzepatide was mainly attributable to greater suppression of fasting glucose. A greater reduction in total ISR AUC was achieved with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (P < .01), in the context of greater improvement in insulin sensitivity with tirzepatide (P < .01). ISR7.2 was significantly increased with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (P < .05), showing improved β-CGS. MMTT-derived β-CGS was increased but not significantly different between treatments. Both treatments reduced fasting glucagon and total glucagon AUC, with glucagon AUC significantly reduced with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (P < .01). The estimated hepatic insulin-to-glucagon ratio did not change substantially with either treatment. Conclusion These results suggest that the greater glycemic control observed for tirzepatide manifests as improved fasting glucose and glucose excursion control, due to improvements in ISR, insulin sensitivity, and glucagon suppression.

Context: In a clinical study, tirzepatide, a glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GIP/GLP-1RA), provided superior glycemic control vs the GLP-1RA semaglutide. The physiologic mechanisms are incompletely understood. Objective: This work aimed to evaluate treatment effects by model-based analyses of mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) data. Methods: A 28-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin was conducted at 2 clinical research centers in Germany. Interventions included tirzepatide 15 mg, semaglutide 1 mg, and placebo. Main outcome measures included glycemic control, model-derived [beta]-cell function indices including insulin secretion rate (ISR) at 7.2-mmol/L glucose (ISR7.2), [beta]-cell glucose sensitivity ([beta]-CGS), insulin sensitivity, and estimated hepatic insulin-to-glucagon ratio. Results: Tirzepatide significantly reduced fasting glucose and MMTT total glucose area under the curve (AUC) vs semaglutide (P<.01). Incremental glucose AUC did not differ significantly between treatments; therefore, greater total glucose AUC reduction with tirzepatide was mainly attributable to greater suppression of fasting glucose. A greater reduction in total ISR AUC was achieved with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (P <.01), in the context of greater improvement in insulin sensitivity with tirzepatide (P <.01). ISR7.2 was significantly increased with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (P <.05), showing improved [beta]-CGS. MMTT-derived [beta]-CGS was increased but not significantly different between treatments. Both treatments reduced fasting glucagon and total glucagon AUC, with glucagon AUC significantly reduced with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (P <.01). The estimated hepatic insulin-to-glucagon ratio did not change substantially with either treatment. Conclusion: These results suggest that the greater glycemic control observed for tirzepatide manifests as improved fasting glucose and glucose excursion control, due to improvements in ISR, insulin sensitivity, and glucagon suppression. Key Words: tirzepatide, p-cell function, glucose control, meal tolerance test, insulin sensitivity, glucagon

Background and Objective Atorvastatin is dosed in its active acid form although it exists in equilibrium with its inactive lactone form in vivo. Although in vitro atorvastatin acid displays pH-dependent conversion to the lactone metabolite, pharmacokinetic (PK) data on the effect of elevated gastric pH on atorvastatin and major atorvastatin-related species are not currently available. In this dedicated study, we investigated the effect of food and acid-reducing agents on the PK of atorvastatin and its three major metabolites in humans. Methods This was an open label, randomized, crossover study conducted in 17 healthy volunteers. Part 1 examined the PK of a 10-mg dose of atorvastatin co-administered with or without a 600-mg dose of sodium bicarbonate in fasted and fed states. Part 2 was a single assessment to examine the PK of a 10-mg dose of atorvastatin in the fasted state following a 5-day treatment course of 40-mg daily esomeprazole. Gastric pH was monitored during treatments using Heidelberg capsules. A linear mixed effects model was used to derive ratios for PK parameters of atorvastatin and metabolites between treatments. Results Similar to previous food effect studies, food significantly decreased the maximum concentration ( C max ) and increased the time to C max ( t max ) of atorvastatin, with minimal effect on total exposure of atorvastatin or metabolites. Neither sodium bicarbonate, in the fed or fasted state, nor treatment with esomeprazole had a clinically meaningful effect on the exposure of atorvastatin or its metabolites. Conclusions According to these results, atorvastatin PK does not appear to be sensitive to changes in gastric pH.

Atorvastatin is dosed in its active acid form although it exists in equilibrium with its inactive lactone form in vivo. Although in vitro atorvastatin acid displays pH-dependent conversion to the lactone metabolite, pharmacokinetic (PK) data on the effect of elevated gastric pH on atorvastatin and major atorvastatin-related species are not currently available. In this dedicated study, we investigated the effect of food and acid-reducing agents on the PK of atorvastatin and its three major metabolites in humans. This was an open label, randomized, crossover study conducted in 17 healthy volunteers. Part 1 examined the PK of a 10-mg dose of atorvastatin co-administered with or without a 600-mg dose of sodium bicarbonate in fasted and fed states. Part 2 was a single assessment to examine the PK of a 10-mg dose of atorvastatin in the fasted state following a 5-day treatment course of 40-mg daily esomeprazole. Gastric pH was monitored during treatments using Heidelberg capsules. A linear mixed effects model was used to derive ratios for PK parameters of atorvastatin and metabolites between treatments. Similar to previous food effect studies, food significantly decreased the maximum concentration (C ) and increased the time to C (t ) of atorvastatin, with minimal effect on total exposure of atorvastatin or metabolites. Neither sodium bicarbonate, in the fed or fasted state, nor treatment with esomeprazole had a clinically meaningful effect on the exposure of atorvastatin or its metabolites. According to these results, atorvastatin PK does not appear to be sensitive to changes in gastric pH.

An optimally designed once-weekly basal insulin with reduced day-to-day pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) fluctuations compared to daily basal insulins should have a low peak-to-trough ratio at steady state. An insulin with this flat profile could improve glycemic efficacy while reducing hypoglycemia. Basal insulin Fc (BIF; LY3209590) is an insulin IgG Fc-fusion protein developed for once weekly dosing. The results of the first in-human studies of BIF assessing the safety, tolerability, PK, and PD following single and once-weekly doses of BIF are presented below. The single ascending dose (SAD) study assessed 6 dose levels of BIF, administered to healthy subjects or patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In the multiple ascending dose (MAD) study, patients with T2DM previously treated with basal insulin received a one-time loading dose at Week 1 followed by a once-weekly maintenance dose for 5 additional weeks. Four fixed-dose maintenance dose levels were evaluated. The loading dose was implemented to rapidly achieve steady-state BIF concentration at each dose level. Patients with T2DM in the control group received insulin glargine at the same dose as their previous daily insulin dose. Key objectives were safety and tolerability, PK endpoints with a focus on half-life and peak-to-trough ratio at steady state, and finally PD measures. The SAD study included 57 patients with T2DM and 16 healthy subjects. The mean age of patients with T2DM was 58.4 years and the mean BMI was 29.5±3.2 kg/m2. The mean age of healthy subjects was 35.8±9.3 years and the mean BMI was 26.1±3.1 kg/m2. In the SAD study, BIF demonstrated linear PK with dose-proportional concentration profiles in healthy subjects and patients with T2DM. The maximum BIF concentration was reached on Day 4. BIF had a mean half-life of approximately 17 days in patients with T2DM. Following a single dose of BIF, a decrease in FBG was observed on Day 1 and was sustained until at least 5 days post-dose. In the MAD study in 33 subjects with T2DM aged between 40 and 69 years, BIF demonstrated a nearly peak-less PK profile over a one-week dosing interval with a peak-to-trough ratio of ~1.1 at steady state. This flat profile is in contrast to insulin glargine. Following once-daily dosing, insulin glargine has a daily peak-to-trough ratio of ~2. Over the 6-week duration, the 7-point glucose profiles remained constant over time and were similar to insulin glargine profiles. BIF was well tolerated and had a safety profile similar to insulin glargine-treated subjects. In particular, hypoglycemia rates were also similar to insulin glargine and there was no occurrence of hypoglycemic events with cognitive dysfunction. These data support continued development of BIF as a once-weekly insulin treatment of diabetes mellitus.

Between January 1 and May 26, 2008, a total of 150 nondiabetic patients with severe hypoglycemia were admitted to the five public hospitals in Singapore. On specific questioning, 45 patients (30%) admitted ingesting illegal sexual-enhancement drugs before the onset of hypoglycemia. To the Editor: The off-label use of drugs for the enhancement of sexual performance in persons without erectile dysfunction is a phenomenon that is increasingly recognized. 1 These drugs are available in illegal forms, including counterfeit versions of brand-name drugs for the treatment of erectile dysfunction and purported herbal remedies containing synthetic phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. 2 We describe an outbreak of severe hypoglycemia in Singapore; this outbreak was associated with contamination of illegal sexual-enhancement drugs with glyburide. Between January 1 and May 26, 2008, a total of 150 nondiabetic patients with severe hypoglycemia were admitted to the five public hospitals in . . .