Explore the vast range of titles available.

In a cohort of BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) mRNA vaccine recipients ( n  = 1,090), we observed that spike-specific IgG antibody levels and ACE2 antibody binding inhibition responses elicited by a single vaccine dose in individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection ( n  = 35) were similar to those seen after two doses of vaccine in individuals without prior infection ( n  = 228). Post-vaccine symptoms were more prominent for those with prior infection after the first dose, but symptomology was similar between groups after the second dose. Virus-specific antibody levels after a single dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine in individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 are similar to levels after two doses of the vaccine in infection-naive individuals.

ObjectivesWe sought to understand the demographic and clinical factors associated with variations in longitudinal antibody response following completion of two-dose regiment of BNT162b2 vaccination.DesignThis study is a 10-month longitudinal cohort study of healthcare workers and serially measured anti-spike protein IgG (IgG-S) antibody levels using mixed linear models to examine their associations with participant characteristics.SettingA large, multisite academic medical centre in Southern California, USA.ParticipantsA total of 843 healthcare workers met inclusion criteria including completion of an initial two-dose course of BNT162b2 vaccination, complete clinical history and at least two blood samples for analysis. Patients had an average age of 45±13 years, were 70% female and 7% with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.ResultsVaccine-induced IgG-S levels remained in the positive range for 99.6% of individuals up to 10 months after initial two-dose vaccination. Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was the primary correlate of sustained higher postvaccination IgG-S levels (partial R2=0.133), with a 1.74±0.11 SD higher IgG-S response (p<0.001). Female sex (beta 0.27±0.06, p<0.001), younger age (0.01±0.00, p<0.001) and absence of hypertension (0.17±0.08, p=0.003) were also associated with persistently higher IgG-S responses. Notably, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection augmented the associations of sex (−0.42 for male sex, p=0.08) and modified the associations of hypertension (1.17, p=0.001), such that infection-naïve individuals with hypertension had persistently lower IgG-S levels whereas prior infected individuals with hypertension exhibited higher IgG-S levels that remained augmented over time.ConclusionsWhile the IgG-S antibody response remains in the positive range for up to 10 months following initial mRNA vaccination in most adults, determinants of sustained higher antibody levels include prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, female sex, younger age and absence of hypertension. Certain determinants of the longitudinal antibody response appear significantly modified by prior infection status. These findings offer insights regarding factors that may influence the ‘hybrid’ immunity conferred by natural infection combined with vaccination.

Background Individuals with post-acute sequelae of COVID (PASC) may have a persistence in immune activation that differentiates them from individuals who have recovered from COVID without clinical sequelae. To investigate how humoral immune activation may vary in this regard, we compared patterns of vaccine-provoked serological response in patients with PASC compared to individuals recovered from prior COVID without PASC. Methods We prospectively studied 245 adults clinically diagnosed with PASC and 86 adults successfully recovered from prior COVID. All participants had measures of humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 assayed before or after receiving their first-ever administration of COVID vaccination (either single-dose or two-dose regimen), including anti-spike (IgG-S and IgM-S) and anti-nucleocapsid (IgG-N) antibodies as well as IgG-S angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) binding levels. We used unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted regression analyses to examine the association of PASC compared to COVID-recovered status with post-vaccination measures of humoral immunity. Results Individuals with PASC mounted consistently higher post-vaccination IgG-S antibody levels when compared to COVID-recovered (median log IgG-S 3.98 versus 3.74, P < 0.001), with similar results seen for ACE2 binding levels (median 99.1 versus 98.2, P = 0.044). The post-vaccination IgM-S response in PASC was attenuated but persistently unchanged over time (P = 0.33), compared to in COVID recovery wherein the IgM-S response expectedly decreased over time (P = 0.002). Findings remained consistent when accounting for demographic and clinical variables including indices of index infection severity and comorbidity burden. Conclusion We found evidence of aberrant immune response distinguishing PASC from recovered COVID. This aberrancy is marked by excess IgG-S activation and ACE2 binding along with findings consistent with a delayed or dysfunctional immunoglobulin class switching, all of which is unmasked by vaccine provocation. These results suggest that measures of aberrant immune response may offer promise as tools for diagnosing and distinguishing PASC from non-PASC phenotypes, in addition to serving as potential targets for intervention.

T-cells specifically bind antigens to induce adaptive immune responses using highly specific molecular recognition, and a diverse T-cell repertoire with expansion of antigen-specific clones can indicate robust immune responses after infection or vaccination. For patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a spectrum of chronic intestinal inflammatory diseases usually requiring immunomodulatory treatment, the T-cell response has not been well characterized. Understanding the patient factors that result in strong vaccination responses is critical to guiding vaccination schedules and identifying mechanisms of T-cell responses in IBD and other immune-mediated conditions. Here we used T-cell receptor sequencing to show that T-cell responses in an IBD cohort were influenced by demographic and immune factors, relative to a control cohort of health care workers (HCWs). Subjects were sampled at the time of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, and longitudinally afterwards; TCR Vβ gene repertoires were sequenced and analyzed for COVID-19-specific clones. We observed significant differences in the overall strength of the T-cell response by age and vaccine type. We further stratified the T-cell response into Class-I- and Class-II-specific responses, showing that Ad26.COV2.S vector vaccine induced Class-I-biased T-cell responses, whereas mRNA vaccine types led to different responses, with mRNA-1273 vaccine inducing a more Class-I-deficient T-cell response compared to BNT162b2. Finally, we showed that these T-cell patterns were consistent with antibody levels from the same patients. Our results account for the surprising success of vaccination in nominally immuno-compromised IBD patients, while suggesting that a subset of IBD patients prone to deficiencies in T-cell response may warrant enhanced booster protocols.

Introduction Amidst highly transmissible SARS‐CoV‐2 variants that continue to circulate in the community, individuals with cancer exhibit variations in immunity and susceptibility for reasons that remain poorly understood. Methods In a longitudinal cohort study with ongoing SARS‐CoV‐2 serological and outcomes surveillance, we examined adults receiving cancer treatment (cases, n = 229) or who were free of cancer and other major comorbidities (controls, n = 800), prior to the Omicron era onset and onwards (September 24, 2021–March 10, 2024). The main outcomes were longitudinal SARS‐CoV‐2 anti‐spike receptor binding domain IgG (IgG‐SRBD) antibody response and Omicron and subvariant infection frequency and severity. Results Among the 229 participants with cancer (age 66 ± 12 years, 51% female), the most prevalent subtypes included nonmelanoma skin (23%), breast (20%), and hematologic (18%). In mixed‐effects linear models, hematologic cancer and B‐cell targeted agents were associated with reduced longitudinal IgG‐SRBD response (p < 0.05). In multivariable regression analyses, hematologic cancer (p = 0.037) and B‐cell targeted agents (p = 0.030) were associated with increased frequency of new infections. The frequency of new infections resulting in moderate illness was increased in patients with active/recent cancer treatment (44%) versus healthy controls (10%; p < 0.001); there were no severe or critical infections. Patients with hematologic, breast, prostate, or skin cancer (p < 0.01), treated with local therapy (odds ratio [OR] 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–3.15; p = 0.032), B‐cell targeted therapy (OR 4.81; 95% CI 1.78–12.93; p = 0.002), or small molecule agents (OR 2.34; 95% CI 1.05–5.23; p = 0.037) were associated with increased infection severity. Conclusions Individuals with hematologic cancer or exposed to B‐cell‐targeted therapy had reduced humoral immunity and more frequent and severe infections. Active breast, prostate, or skin cancer, or treatment with local therapy or small molecule agents had elevated risk for more severe, but not more frequent, infections. Despite overall low rates of infection associated with lower respiratory disease, certain higher‐risk cancer patients may benefit from further protective measures.

Background Measuring anti-viral antibody affinity in blood plasma or serum is a rational quantitative approach to assess humoral immune response and acquired protection. Three common vaccines against SARS-CoV-2—Comirnaty developed by Pfizer/BioNTech, Spikevax developed by Moderna/NIAID, and Jcovden (previously Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine) developed by Johnson & Johnson/Janssen (J&J)—induce antibodies to a variety of immunogenic epitopes including the epitopes located in the ACE2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein. Blocking RBD with antibodies interferes with the binding of the virus to ACE2 thus protecting against infection. Methods We perform measurements in the serum of the recipients of Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J vaccines, and we compare the apparent affinities of vaccine-induced antibodies against the RBD of the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 virus and the Delta and Omicron variants. We use our recently published method to determine the apparent affinity of anti-spike protein antibodies directly in human serum. This involves probing antibody-antigen equilibria with a small number of antigen-coated magnetic microparticles and imaging them on a fluorescence microscope. Results Recipients of two-dose Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, as well as recipients of the single-dose J&J vaccine, develop high-affinity antibodies toward RBD derived from ancestral SARS-CoV-2. Affinities of these antibodies to Delta-RBD are approximately 10 times weaker, and even more drastically reduced (∼1000-fold) toward Omicron-RBD. Conclusions Vaccine-induced antibodies against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 RBD demonstrate ~10-fold and ~1000-fold weaker affinities toward Delta- and Omicron-RBD, respectively. Our approach offers a direct means for evaluating vaccine-induced adaptive immunity and can be helpful in designing or updating vaccines. Plain language summary Vaccination results in the production of proteins called antibodies that can bind viruses. The strength (affinity) of the binding between an antibody and a virus gives an indication of how well vaccination can prevent infection by the virus. Here, we compare the affinity of antibodies towards different types (variants) of SARS-CoV-2 viral protein in the serum of individuals who have been vaccinated with vaccines produced by Pfizer (Comirnaty), Moderna (Spikevax), and Johnson & Johnson (Jcovden). We discovered that all three vaccines generated antibodies that strongly bind the original SARS-CoV-2 virus, but the binding of the Delta variant was ten-times weaker. Moreover, the binding of the antibodies to the Omicron variant was more than a thousand-times weaker. Our findings explain why current vaccines are less efficient at preventing infection by the Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants. Macdonald, Schaub et al. measure apparent antibody affinities to the ACE-2 receptor binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in recipients of the Pfizer, Moderna and J&J vaccines. All vaccinated individuals develop high-affinity antibodies, however the affinities are weaker to Delta and Omicron variants compared to ancestral virus.

Lay Summary T-cell and antibody responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination in inflammatory bowel disease patients are poorly correlated. T-cell responses are preserved by most biologic therapies, but augmented by anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment. While anti-TNF therapy blunts the antibody response, cellular immunity after vaccination is robust.

Importance Some individuals who were infected by the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant may have been completely unaware of their infectious status while the virus was actively transmissible. Objective To examine awareness of infectious status among individuals during the recent Omicron variant surge in a diverse and populous urban region of Los Angeles County. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study analyzed the records of adult employees and patients of an academic medical center who were enrolled in a longitudinal COVID-19 serological study in Los Angeles County, California. These participants had 2 or more serial anti-nucleocapsid IgG (IgG-N) antibody measurements at least 1 month apart, with the first occurring after the end of a regional Delta variant surge (September 15, 2021) and a subsequent one occurring after the start of a regional Omicron variant surge (December 15, 2021). Adults with evidence of new SARS-CoV-2 infection occurring during the Omicron variant surge period through May 4, 2022, were included in the present study sample. Exposures Recent Omicron variant infection as evidenced by SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion. Main Outcomes and Measures Awareness of recent SARS-CoV-2 infection was ascertained from review of self-reported health updates, medical records, and COVID-19 testing data. Results Of the 210 participants (median [range] age, 51 (23-84) years; 136 women [65%]) with serological evidence of recent Omicron variant infection, 44% (92) demonstrated awareness of any recent Omicron variant infection and 56% (118) reported being unaware of their infectious status. Among those who were unaware, 10% (12 of 118) reported having had any symptoms, which they attributed to a common cold or other non–SARS-CoV-2 infection. In multivariable analyses that accounted for demographic and clinical characteristics, participants who were health care employees of the medical center were more likely than nonemployees to be aware of their recent Omicron variant infection (adjusted odds ratio, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.30-4.65). Conclusions and Relevance Results of this study suggest that more than half of adults with recent Omicron variant infection were unaware of their infectious status and that awareness was higher among health care employees than nonemployees, yet still low overall. Unawareness may be a highly prevalent factor associated with rapid person-to-person transmission within communities.

COVID-19 has highlighted challenges in the measurement quality and comparability of serological binding and neutralization assays. Due to many different assay formats and reagents, these measurements are known to be highly variable with large uncertainties. The development of the WHO international standard (WHO IS) and other pool standards have facilitated assay comparability through normalization to a common material but does not provide assay harmonization nor uncertainty quantification. In this paper, we present the results from an interlaboratory study that led to the development of (1) a novel hierarchy of data analyses based on the thermodynamics of antibody binding and (2) a modeling framework that quantifies the probability of neutralization potential for a given binding measurement. Importantly, we introduced a precise, mathematical definition of harmonization that separates the sources of quantitative uncertainties, some of which can be corrected to enable, for the first time, assay comparability. Both the theory and experimental data confirmed that mAbs and WHO IS performed identically as a primary standard for establishing traceability and bridging across different assay platforms. The metrological anchoring of complex serological binding and neuralization assays and fast turn-around production of an mAb reference control can enable the unprecedented comparability and traceability of serological binding assay results for new variants of SARS-CoV-2 and immune responses to other viruses.

Given the limited availability of serological testing to date, the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in different populations has remained unclear. Here, we report very low SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in two San Francisco Bay Area populations. Seroreactivity was 0.26% in 387 hospitalized patients admitted for non-respiratory indications and 0.1% in 1,000 blood donors in early April 2020. We additionally describe the longitudinal dynamics of immunoglobulin-G (IgG), immunoglobulin-M (IgM), and in vitro neutralizing antibody titers in COVID-19 patients. The median time to seroconversion ranged from 10.3–11.0 days for these 3 assays. Neutralizing antibodies rose in tandem with immunoglobulin titers following symptom onset, and positive percent agreement between detection of IgG and neutralizing titers was >93%. These findings emphasize the importance of using highly accurate tests for surveillance studies in low-prevalence populations, and provide evidence that seroreactivity using SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid protein IgG and anti-spike IgM assays are generally predictive of in vitro neutralizing capacity. Highly accurate antibody tests for SARS-CoV-2 are needed for surveillance in low-prevalence populations. Here, the authors find seroprevalence of less than 1% in two San Francisco Bay Area populations at the beginning of April, and that seroreactivity is generally predictive of in vitro neutralising activity.