Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose: There are few data on the practical use of dupilumab by the patients and on the patients' experience with this treatment. Objective: The objective of our study was to describe the experience and perception of dupilumab treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Patients and Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study including adult patients with moderate to severe AD treated with dupilumab between January 2017 and December 2021. Clinical characteristics were collected and a questionnaire was sent to all patients. It consisted of different parts including the injection method and different numeric rating scales (NRS) evaluating the patient's satisfaction and the constraints related to the treatment. Results: Eighty-two patients were included and the information was available for 77 patients who responded to the questionnaire. Injection of dupilumab was performed by a nurse in 47% (n=36) of patients and 43% (n=33) were autonomous. Injections were performed by a family member for 7 patients or by the general practitioner (1 patient). A wearing-off of the beneficial effect of dupilumab was reported by 47% of patients leading to shorten the dosing interval. In contrast, dose spacing was reported by 9 patients (11%). After a mean follow-up time of 29.7 [+ or -] 10.7 months (median: 27 months), drug survival was 72%. From the patients' perspective, the mean patient's satisfaction NRS score was 7.5 [+ or -] 1.8, and the constraints related to the treatment were scored at 3.1 [+ or -] 2.1 on NRS. Conclusion: Although AD treatments may contribute to the burden of the disease, dupilumab was associated with a lower burden score, likely reflecting both treatment efficacy and easy of use and patient satisfaction. Keywords: atopic dermatitis, dupilumab, real life, experience

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic malignancy. However, unique immune response patterns can occur, such as pseudoprogression, which corresponds to new lesion development or temporary tumour growth followed by regression. Misidentifying pseudoprogression may halt ICI therapy, due to the absence of biomarkers to distinguish progression from pseudoprogression. In 2020, our team proposed small extracellular vesicles expressing PD‐L1 (sEV‐PD‐L1) as a predictor of melanoma treatment response. We report a case of pseudoprogression in a patient treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma, and showing reduced circulating sEV‐PD‐L1. To our knowledge, this is the first report of PD‐L1 monitoring in circulating sEV during pseudoprogression under ICI. A decrease in PD‐L1 in circulating sEV might be an early sign of disease response to ICI, and may help to diagnose pseudoprogression. This case supports further evaluation of sEV‐PD‐L1 to identify responder patients to ICI, especially in case of pseudoprogression. Trial Registration: EXOMEL1 P/2018/40 1 AC‐2015‐2496/DC‐2014‐2086. NCT05744076.

Angiosarcoma (AS) is a rare aggressive sarcoma with differentiation toward blood or lymphatic endothelium. There are few epidemiological data available on AS. To address this limitation, we investigated the epidemiological and clinical features of angiosarcoma diagnosed in a French administrative area (the Doubs department) from 1979 to 2016. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Doubs cancer registry database. A total of 45 patients with invasive AS were diagnosed between 1979 and 2016 in the Doubs department. Among the 45 AS, 51% were either cutaneous AS (27%), including head and neck and extremities, or breast AS (24%) as compared to visceral AS (42%). Eleven patients had metastasis at diagnosis (26%). Age-standardized incidence rate was 0.15 per 100,000 persons-years (95%CI, 0.10–0.20) for the entire study period (1979–2016) and 0.26 (95%CI, 0.15–0.42) for the last decade (2007–2016). Crude survival at 1, 3, 5 years after diagnosis was 44%, 21%, and 12%, respectively. Our population-based study provides updated data on the incidence and overall survival of AS in a French population-based cancer registry.

Background. Although infliximab (IFX) has been available since 2005, there are very little data on the long-term drug survival of infliximab in real-life. Objective. Our aim was to identify and describe psoriasis patients treated with IFX for longer than 6 years. Methods. Psoriasis patients treated with IFX for longer than 6 years were retrospectively included. Demographic and clinical data were collected in May 2018. Results. Between January 2005 and December 2012, 43 patients were maintained on IFX for 6 years or longer. IFX was introduced as a 4.5 line of systemic therapy. The mean duration of IFX treatment was 8.5 years (6–12). In May 2018, 30 patients (70%) were still maintained on IFX at 4–6 mg/kg every 8–10 weeks with an efficiency of about 100%. IFX was stopped in 13 patients (30%) mainly for loss of efficacy in 6 patients (46%). Three patients developed solid cancer including bladder cancer, lung cancer, and prostate cancer. Limitation. Retrospective study. Conclusion. We report the efficacy and safety of IFX maintained for up to 12 years in psoriasis patients. The long-term use of IFX was associated with a high BMI confirming the critical role of weight-based dosing for this drug.

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a leading cause of death in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Sensitivities and specificities of the current pulmonary function tests (PFTs) for the detection of ILD in SSc are poor. Objective: To determine whether diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) partitioned into membrane conductance for CO (DmCO) and alveolar capillary blood volume (Vcap) could provide more sensitive clues to ILD than current PFTs. Methods: DmCO and Vcap were determined in 35 consecutive SSc patients in whom a cardiac and/or pulmonary vascular abnormality had been rejected according to the recommended screening algorithm. ILD was diagnosed with high-resolution computed tomography. Results: Among 35 patients [6 men; median age (first–third quartile) 61.9 years (49.5–67.7)], 22 had no ILD and 13 did. Total lung capacity (TLC), vital capacity and DLCO [percentage of predicted value (%pred)] were lower in patients with ILD [86 (82–103) vs. 106 (98–112), p = 0.01, 96 (88–112) vs. 114 (104–121), p = 0.04, and 67 (59–81) vs. 80 (71–94), p = 0.02, respectively]. DmCO (%pred) and the ratio of DmCO to Vcap were much lower in patients with ILD [54 (48–72) vs. 83 (66–92), p < 0.001, and 0.22 (0.21–0.27) vs. 0.40 (0.35–0.53), p < 0.0001, respectively]. According to receiver operating characteristic analysis, the DmCO:Vcap ratio displayed higher sensitivity and specificity than TLC, vital capacity and DLCO in identifying ILD in our study group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: These results suggest that the partitioning of DLCO might be of interest for identifying ILD in SSc patients.

Although the demand for evidence-based decisions is increasing in clinical practice, recent systematic reviews on the accuracy of existing psoriasis severity scales, including the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), suggest that their validity is not fully characterized. We simulated the evaluation of PASI by two practitioners in 1,000 sets of 100 patients. PASI data from several practitioners who examined the same patients were used to generate PASI scores by two practitioners, in order to compare how well commonly used statistics assess the inter-rater agreement for the PASI. Because the PASI score has an asymmetric distribution, statistics such as Pearson's linear correlation coefficient “r” and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient overestimated the inter-rater agreement of PASI as compared with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC; r=0.8, ρ=0.7, ICC=0.5). When restricting the analysis to patients with a PASI <20, inter-rater agreement severely decreased (r=0.38, ρ=0.41, ICC=0.17), resulting in unacceptable therapeutic decision agreement (κ=0.38). Our study indicates that owing to the skewed distribution of the PASI its validity to influence therapeutic decisions is questionable. The ICC is preferable to the commonly used statistics (r and ρ) for assessing the inter-rater agreement reliability of asymmetrically distributed scores such as the PASI.

Hypomelanosis of Ito (HI) is a skin marker of somatic mosaicism. Mosaic MTOR pathogenic variants have been reported in HI with brain overgrowth. We sought to delineate further the pigmentary skin phenotype and clinical spectrum of neurodevelopmental manifestations of MTOR-related HI. From two cohorts totaling 71 patients with pigmentary mosaicism, we identified 14 patients with Blaschko-linear and one with flag-like pigmentation abnormalities, psychomotor impairment or seizures, and a postzygotic MTOR variant in skin. Patient records, including brain magnetic resonance image (MRI) were reviewed. Immunostaining (n = 3) for melanocyte markers and ultrastructural studies (n = 2) were performed on skin biopsies. MTOR variants were present in skin, but absent from blood in half of cases. In a patient (p.[Glu2419Lys] variant), phosphorylation of p70S6K was constitutively increased. In hypopigmented skin of two patients, we found a decrease in stage 4 melanosomes in melanocytes and keratinocytes. Most patients (80%) had macrocephaly or (hemi)megalencephaly on MRI. MTOR-related HI is a recognizable neurocutaneous phenotype of patterned dyspigmentation, epilepsy, intellectual deficiency, and brain overgrowth, and a distinct subtype of hypomelanosis related to somatic mosaicism. Hypopigmentation may be due to a defect in melanogenesis, through mTORC1 activation, similar to hypochromic patches in tuberous sclerosis complex. [Display omitted]

Introduction Biological therapies are valuable treatments for severe psoriasis. Children aged under 12 years are underrepresented in therapeutic trials for these drugs. The objective of the ‘BiPe Jr’ cohort study was to evaluate the drug survival, effectiveness, tolerance and switching patterns of biological therapies in children under 12 years of age with psoriasis. Methods We conducted a multicentre retrospective study of children with psoriasis who received at least one injection of a biological agent, even off-licence, before the age of 12 years in France and Italy, collecting the data between April and August 2021. The data collected were from March 2012 up to August 2021. Results In total, 82 children (mean age: 9.1 years; females: 61.0%) received 106 treatments. The drugs administered were adalimumab ( n  = 49), etanercept ( n  = 37), ustekinumab ( n  = 15), anakinra ( n  = 2), infliximab ( n  = 2) and secukinumab ( n  = 1). The most common form of psoriasis was plaque psoriasis (62.9%). The Physician Global Assessment and the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) scores decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months after treatment initiation for the three main biological drugs; PASI went from 14.1 ± 9.4 to 4.1 ± 11.3 for adalimumab ( p  = 0.001), 14.9 ± 9.3 to 5.1 ± 4.0 for etanercept ( p  = 0.002) and 11.6 ± 8.3 to 2.6 ± 2.2 for ustekinumab ( p  = 0.007). A trend towards higher 2-year maintenance rates was observed for ustekinumab and adalimumab, compared with etanercept ( p  = 0.06). 52 children discontinued their biological therapy, most frequently due to inefficacy ( n  = 28) and remission ( n  = 14). Seven serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported, including four severe infections. Discussion Our analyses of drug survival and treatment patterns, combined with those of previous studies conducted in older children, indicate that there is a trend towards higher 2-year survival rates of ustekinumab and adalimumab. The SAEs identified were rare, but highlight the need for increased vigilance concerning infections. Overall, the biological therapies showed good effectiveness and safety profiles when used in daily practice for the treatment of young children with psoriasis.

SummaryThe recent advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), including anti-programmed cell death 1 protein (anti-PD-1) agents has revolutionized the therapeutic approach of metastatic malignancies. Yet, ICI can disrupt immune tolerance resulting in enhanced immune activation in normal tissues with significant toxicity. A dysregulated activation of T-cells directed to normal tissues stands as the main mechanism of immune-related adverse events (irAE). To date, only two cases of immune-related inflammatory orbitopathy related to anti-PD-1 agents have been reported. This rare immune adverse event usually occurred early after ICI initiation. Here, we report the first case of late inflammatory orbitopathy occurring in a melanoma patient treated with pembrolizumab. Consequently, the occurrence of irAE under ICI should be monitored, even late after treatment instauration.

The long-term effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge for progressive or recurrent advanced melanoma following previous disease control induced by ICI has not been well-described in the literature. The objective of our retrospective multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICI rechallenge in patients with advanced melanoma who had achieved disease control with ICI in a real-life setting. Our study, which included 85 patients, predominantly rechallenged with anti-PD1 antibodies, confirms the efficacy of ICI rechallenge, with a best overall response rate of 54% and a disease control rate of 75%. Twenty-eight adverse events (AEs) were reported in 23 patients (27%), including 18 grade 1–2 AEs and 10 grade 3–4 AEs. Therefore, ICI rechallenge should be considered as a compelling therapeutic option. Background: The long-term effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge for progressive or recurrent advanced melanoma following previous disease control induced by ICI has not been thoroughly described in the literature. Patients and methods: In this retrospective multicenter national real-life study, we enrolled patients who had been rechallenged with an ICI after achieving disease control with a first course of ICI, which was subsequently interrupted. The primary objective was to evaluate tumor response, while the secondary objectives included assessing the safety profile, identifying factors associated with tumor response, and evaluating survival outcomes. Results: A total of 85 patients from 12 centers were included in the study. These patients had advanced (unresectable stage III or stage IV) melanoma that had been previously treated and controlled with a first course of ICI before undergoing rechallenge with ICI. The rechallenge treatments consisted of pembrolizumab (n = 44, 52%), nivolumab (n = 35, 41%), ipilimumab (n = 2, 2%), or ipilimumab plus nivolumab (n = 4, 5%). The best overall response rate was 54%. The best response was a complete response in 30 patients (35%), a partial response in 16 patients (19%), stable disease in 18 patients (21%) and progressive disease in 21 patients (25%). Twenty-eight adverse events (AEs) were reported in 23 patients (27%), including 18 grade 1–2 AEs in 14 patients (16%) and 10 grade 3–4 AEs in nine patients (11%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached at the time of analysis. Patients who received another systemic treatment (chemotherapy, targeted therapy or clinical trial) between the two courses of ICI had a lower response to rechallenge (p = 0.035) and shorter PFS (p = 0.016). Conclusion: Rechallenging advanced melanoma patients with ICI after previous disease control induced by these inhibitors resulted in high response rates (54%) and disease control (75%). Therefore, ICI rechallenge should be considered as a relevant therapeutic option.