Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
2
result(s) for
"Qu, X. Melody"
Sort by:
Assessment of precision irradiation in early non-small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease (ASPIRE-ILD): study protocol for a phase II trial
2019
Background
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has become an established treatment option for medically-inoperable early-stage (Stage I-IIA) non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). SABR is able to obtain high rates of local control with low rates of symptomatic toxicity in this patient population. However, in a subset of patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), elevated rates of SABR-related toxicity and mortality have been described. The Assessment of Precision Irradiation in Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Interstitial Lung Disease (ASPIRE-ILD) study will conduct a thorough prospective evaluation of the clinical outcomes, toxicity, changes in diagnostic test parameters and patient-related outcomes following SABR for ES-NSCLC for patients with fibrotic ILD.
Methods
ASPIRE-ILD is a single-arm Phase II prospective study. The accrual target is 39 adult patients with T1–2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer with co-existing ILD who are not candidates for surgical excision. Pathological confirmation of diagnosis is strongly recommended but not strictly required. Enrolled patients will be stratified by ILD-related mortality risk. The starting SABR dose will be 50 Gy in 5 fractions every other day (biologically effective dose: 100 Gy
10
or 217 Gy
3
), but the radiation dose can be de-escalated up to two times to 50 Gy in 10 fractions daily (75 Gy
10
or 133 Gy
3
) and 45 Gy in 15 fractions daily (58 Gy
10
or 90 Gy
3
). Dose de-escalation will occur if 2 or more of the first 7 patients in a cohort experiences grade 5 toxicity within 6 months of treatment. Similarly, dose de-escalation can also occur if 2 or more of the first 7 patients with a specific subtype of ILD experiences grade 5 toxicity within 6 months of treatment. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints include toxicity (CTC-AE 4.0), progression-free survival, local control, patient-reported outcomes (cough severity and quality of life), rates of ILD exacerbation and changes in pulmonary function tests/high-resolution computed tomography findings post-SABR.
Discussion
ASPIRE-ILD will be the first prospective study specifically designed to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of SABR for ES-NSCLC in patients with co-existing ILD.
Trial registration
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier:
NCT03485378
. Date of registration: April 2, 2018.
Journal Article
Radiation-before-pathology approach in the palliative oncology setting: a pragmatic clinical trial protocol (RT-NOW)
by
O’Neil, Melissa
,
Bauman, Glenn S.
,
Nguyen, Timothy K.
in
Biopsy
,
Biopsy - methods
,
Cancer therapies
2025
Background
Patients with incurable but not-yet-biopsied cancers sometimes require urgent palliative radiation. However, wait-times for biopsy procedures and pathologic results can delay treatment, with significant consequences to patient quality of life and/or the chance of irreversible cancer complications. There is no prospective data to guide empirical decision-making in these urgent, palliative contexts.
Methods
In this prospective single-arm pragmatic clinical trial, we will enrol 48 patients with incurable cancer where a biopsy is delaying urgent palliative radiation. Patients will receive empiric upfront palliative radiation without biopsy-confirmation. The primary endpoint is the rate of inappropriate radiation, defined when the patient’s biopsy shows a non-malignant entity or a malignancy that is better treated upfront with systemic therapy (or therapy other than radiation). Secondary endpoints include: histologic diagnostic accuracy, molecular testing accuracy, biopsy complications rates, evidence of radiation effect in biopsy, time from enrolment to radiation/biopsy, and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) scores. Patients are eligible only if the probability of incurable malignancy is deemed > 95% and the risk of lymphoma < 20% by the treating physician, based on clinical examination and imaging investigations.
Discussion
This study will provide prospective data to guide oncologists and patients in making informed decisions when weighing the competing risks of delaying palliative radiation versus treating without pathologic confirmation.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov
Identifier: NCT06156800. Date of registration: December 5, 2023.
Journal Article