Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background A woman with a history of GDM has at least seven-fold increased lifetime risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), compared to women who have normoglycemic pregnancies. Postpartum lifestyle modification has been shown to reduce postpartum weight retention and prevent the progression to T2DM. The aim of this study was to explore the postpartum dietary and physical activity-related beliefs and behaviors among women in Singapore who had GDM in their most recent pregnancies. Methods Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 14 women, who were up to four months postpartum and had GDM in their most recent pregnancies. Interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Three themes were identified in the analysis: (1) risk perception and knowledge regarding future diabetes, (2) suboptimal diet and physical activity after delivery and (3) factors influencing the postpartum lifestyle. Conclusions The study findings provided useful information on the postpartum lifestyle beliefs and behaviors among women with a history of GDM. Most participants had low risk perception of future diabetes and their diet and physical activity after delivery were suboptimal due to various influences. These insights can be used to design tailored materials and programs to support women who have had GDM reduce their risk of developing future T2DM.

IntroductionCervical cancer remains a significant public health concern in Singapore, with current screening rates at 43%, well below the national target of 70%. In 2019, human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing was introduced into the national cervical cancer screening programme, but barriers to participation include embarrassment, privacy concerns and discomfort with clinician-sampled tests. Self-sampled HPV DNA testing offers a promising alternative by providing more privacy and convenience. This study aims to evaluate the impact of including self-sampled HPV DNA testing as an alternative to clinician-sampling on screening uptake, clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in primary care.Methods and analysisThis pragmatic, open-label, two-arm randomised controlled trial employs a Zelen design. A total of 650 women aged 30–69 who are due for cervical cancer screening will be recruited from National Healthcare Group Polyclinics in Singapore. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention arm (offering both self-sampling and clinician-sampling) or the usual care arm (clinician-sampling only). The primary outcome is the proportion of participants in each arm detected with high-risk HPV. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of participants in each arm who undergo cervical cancer screening (uptake), are referred for colposcopy and are detected with CIN 2/3 or cervical cancer, as well as cost-effectiveness. Acceptability and feasibility of self-sampling will be evaluated through post-screening questionnaires.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was granted by the National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Review Board. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, healthcare conferences and shared with policymakers to guide potential inclusion of self-sampling in Singapore’s national cervical cancer screening programme. Findings from this trial will provide crucial evidence for the potential inclusion of self-sampling in Singapore’s national cervical cancer screening programme, which could increase screening rates and improve public health outcomes.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06528184.

Purpose This study explores physicians’ perceptions of the advanced practice nurse (APN) role in the primary care setting in Singapore. Methods and Design A descriptive qualitative design utilizing face‐to‐face semistructured interviews was conducted on a purposive sample of 16 primary care physicians from six primary care clinics. Thematic analysis and constant comparative analysis were used. Findings Three themes were identified: a collaborative partner in primary care, a conduit for specialist care and information, and a leader in community care. Physicians generally reported positivity about the clinical role of APNs and their potential in leading community care. However, they verbalized role ambiguity beyond clinical practice. Conclusions Physicians viewed primary care APNs as competent healthcare professionals. They viewed APNs as specialists in their fields, with the potential for expanding their services into the community. However, there remains gaps in physicians’ understanding of the primary care APNs’ nonclinical roles. The findings from this study indicate a need for nursing schools and nurse leaders to increase awareness of the complete APN role among physicians. APNs’ roles in educating healthcare professionals and delivering care to the community can be further developed. Clinical Relevance APNs are at the forefront in leading nursing care. There is a need to develop greater collaborative partnerships while delineating their respective roles in patient care.