Explore the vast range of titles available.

IntroductionImbalance of the gut microbiome is key to the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC). Faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is the transfer of homogenised and filtered faeces from a healthy individual to the gastrointestinal tract of a patient with disease. Published datasets show a positive signal for the use of FMT to treat UC, but the optimal route and dose of FMT remain unanswered.Methods and analysisThis prospective, multi-centre open-label, randomised pilot study will assess two possible routes of FMT delivery, via the nasogastric (NG) route or by delivery to the COLON, in 30 patients with active UC recruited from three sites in the UK. Stool will be collected from healthy screened donors, processed, frozen and stored under a Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) “specials” manufacturing licence held at the University of Birmingham Microbiome Treatment Centre. Thawed FMT samples will be administered to patients either via eight nasogastric infusions given initially over 4 days starting on the day of randomisation, and then again for 4 days in week 4 for foregut delivery (total of 240 g of stool) or via one colonoscopic infusion followed by seven weekly enemas according to the hindgut protocol (total of 360 g of stool). Patients will be followed up weekly for 8 weeks, and then at 12 weeks. The aims of this pilot study are (1) to determine which FMT administration route (NG or COLON) should be investigated in a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and (2) to determine if a full randomised controlled trial is feasible. The primary outcome will be a composite assessment of both qualitative and quantitative data based on efficacy (clinical response), acceptability and safety. At the end of the pilot study, decisions will be made regarding the feasibility of a full randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and, if deemed feasible, which route of administration should be used in such a study.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval for this study has been obtained from the East Midlands-Nottingham Research Ethics Committee (REC 17/EM/0274). At the end of the study, findings will be reported at national and international gastroenterology meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberISRCTN74072945

IntroductionPrimary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is the classical hepatobiliary manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The strong association between gut and liver inflammation has driven several pathogenic hypotheses to which the intestinal microbiome is proposed to contribute. Pilot studies of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in PSC and IBD are demonstrated to be safe and associated with increased gut bacterial diversity. However, the longevity of such changes and the impact on markers of disease activity and disease progression have not been studied. The aim of this clinical trial is to determine the effects of repeated FMT as a treatment for PSC-IBD.Methods and analysisFAecal micRobiota transplantation in primary sclerosinG chOlangitis (FARGO) is a phase IIa randomised placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of repeated colonic administration of FMT in patients with non-cirrhotic PSC-IBD. Fifty-eight patients will be recruited from six sites across England and randomised in a 1:1 ratio between active FMT or FMT placebo arms. FMT will be manufactured by the University of Birmingham Microbiome Treatment Centre, using stool collected from rigorously screened healthy donors. A total of 8 weekly treatments will be delivered; the first through colonoscopic administration (week 1) and the remaining seven via once-weekly enema (up to week 8). Participants will then be followed on a 12-weekly basis until week 48 from the first treatment visit. The primary efficacy outcome will be to determine the effect of FMT on serum alkaline phosphatase values over time (end of study at 48 weeks). Key secondary outcomes will be to evaluate the impact of FMT on other liver biochemical parameters, PSC risk scores, circulating and imaging markers of liver fibrosis, health-related quality of life measures, IBD activity and the incidence of PSC-related clinical events. Key translational objectives will be to identify mucosal metagenomic, metatranscriptomic, metabolomic and immunological pathways associated with the administration of FMT.Ethics and disseminationThe protocol was approved by the South Central—Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee (REC 23/SC/0147). Participants will be required to provide written informed consent. The results of this trial will be disseminated through national and international presentations and peer-reviewed publications.Trial registration numberThe trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 23 February 2024 (NCT06286709). Weblink: Study Details | FAecal Microbiota Transplantation in primaRy sclerosinG chOlangitis | ClinicalTrials.gov.

The aetiopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) involves the complex interaction between a patient’s genetic predisposition, environment, gut microbiota and immune system. Currently, however, it is not known if the distinctive perturbations of the gut microbiota that appear to accompany both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis are the cause of, or the result of, the intestinal inflammation that characterizes IBD. With the utilization of novel systems biology technologies, we can now begin to understand not only details about compositional changes in the gut microbiota in IBD, but increasingly also the alterations in microbiota function that accompany these. Technologies such as metagenomics, metataxomics, metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics and metabonomics are therefore allowing us a deeper understanding of the role of the microbiota in IBD. Furthermore, the integration of these systems biology technologies through advancing computational and statistical techniques are beginning to understand the microbiome interactions that both contribute to health and diseased states in IBD. This review aims to explore how such systems biology technologies are advancing our understanding of the gut microbiota, and their potential role in delineating the aetiology, development and clinical care of IBD.

ObjectiveAnti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) immunogenicity remains a major barrier to treatment persistence in inflammatory bowel disease, yet data from Middle Eastern populations are lacking. We characterised immunogenicity rates, predictors and loss of response mechanisms in a real-world cohort.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 314 anti-TNF treatment courses (212 infliximab, 102 adalimumab) in 248 patients at a tertiary centre in the United Arab Emirates. Immunogenicity was defined by detectable anti-drug antibodies on a drug-tolerant electrochemiluminescent bridging immunoassay with acid dissociation. Drug levels, predictors and loss of response mechanisms were analysed.ResultsImmunogenicity developed in 28.3% (89/314) of courses over median follow-up of 24.0 months (median time to detection 15.0 months, IQR 8.0–36.0). Infliximab and adalimumab had comparable rates (26.9% vs 31.4%; p=0.425). Immunogenicity-mediated failure was the leading cause of discontinuation (48.4%). Pre-event trough levels were significantly lower in immunogenic courses (median 3.0 vs 14.0 mcg/mL; p<0.001). Exploratory receiver operating characteristic thresholds of 5.3 mcg/mL for infliximab (area under the curve (AUC) 0.880) and 6.4 mcg/mL for adalimumab (AUC 0.861) predicted immunogenicity with high discrimination. On shared frailty Cox regression, prior surgery was the strongest predictor (HR 1.85, 95% CI 0.94 to 3.64; p=0.074). A sensitivity analysis excluding rescued patients strengthened the surgery signal (HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.41 to 5.56; p=0.003). Subcutaneous infliximab showed lower immunogenicity than intravenous infliximab (new starters 1/25 (4.0%), switchers 1/33 (3.0%) vs IV 57/212 (26.9%)); after propensity score matching on five covariates, the difference remained significant (3.8% vs 18.3%; p=0.013), though a new starters-only analysis did not reach significance (p=0.062).ConclusionImmunogenicity patterns in this Middle Eastern cohort are consistent with Western data, supporting pharmacokinetic rather than population-specific determinants. These findings suggest a potential benefit of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring and that subcutaneous infliximab may offer an immunogenic advantage warranting prospective validation.

ObjectivesWe aimed to systematically review the real-world evidence (RWE) on the effectiveness and utilisation of advanced therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Middle Eastern populations.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesPubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to May 2025.Eligibility criteriaObservational RWE studies investigating biologics or small molecules in Middle Eastern IBD patients (adult and paediatric) were included. Randomised controlled trials and case series with fewer than 10 patients were excluded. No language restrictions were applied.Data extraction and synthesisData were independently extracted by two reviewers. Due to significant heterogeneity in study design, populations and outcome reporting, a narrative synthesis was performed.ResultsFrom 884 records, 23 studies were included, originating primarily from Saudi Arabia (n=8) and Iran (n=4). For anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy, a Kuwaiti study of biologic-naive patients found 12-month endoscopic remission rates with infliximab of 56% for ulcerative colitis (UC) and 53% for Crohn’s disease (CD), while a Saudi study reported higher odds of treatment failure with adalimumab versus infliximab (OR=26.91). Ustekinumab demonstrated strong efficacy, achieving 76.9% clinical remission at 52 weeks in a Saudi paediatric anti-TNF refractory IBD cohort and showing higher probability of effectiveness than vedolizumab in another Saudi study. In contrast, vedolizumab remission rates in advanced therapy-experienced UC patients were 89.3% with intensified dosing. Newer agents also showed promise; risankizumab induction led to 43.2% clinical remission in an Emirati CD cohort, while tofacitinib achieved clinical remission rates of 56.4% and 61.1% at 52 weeks in Lebanese and Iranian UC cohorts, respectively.ConclusionsAdvanced therapies for IBD appear to be effective in Middle Eastern cohorts; however, the available evidence is methodologically diverse, with substantial heterogeneity in study design, population characteristics and outcome reporting, which limits the ability to draw strong conclusions and highlights the need for further robust evaluation. Prospective, collaborative regional registries are imperative to address these gaps and inform local guidelines.PROSPERO registration numberCRD420251083256.

Faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) has now been established into clinical guidelines for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Its therapeutic application in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is currently at an early stage. To date, there have been four randomized controlled trials for FMT in IBD and a multitude of observational studies. However, significant gaps in our knowledge regarding optimum methods for FMT preparation, technical aspects and logistics of its administration, as well as mechanistic underpinnings, still remain. In this article, we aim to highlight these gaps by reviewing evidence and making key recommendations on the direction of future studies in this field. In addition, we provide an overview of the current evidence of potential mechanisms of FMT in treating IBD.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a multisystem disease impacting various body systems including musculoskeletal, ocular, skin, hepatobiliary, pulmonary, cardiac, and haematological systems. The extraintestinal manifestations of IBD are frequent, common in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), and impact the morbidity and mortality of patients. The Embase, Embase classic, and PubMed databases were searched between January 1979 and December 2021. A random effects model was performed to find the pooled prevalence of joint, ocular, and skin extraintestinal manifestations of UC and CD. Fifty-two studies were included that reported on 352 454 patients. The prevalence of at least 1 joint, ocular, or skin extraintestinal manifestation in all IBD, UC, and CD was 24%, 27%, and 35% respectively. The prevalence between UC and CD were similar for pyoderma gangrenosum and axial joint manifestations. Ocular manifestations were found to be more common in CD than in UC. Peripheral joint manifestations and erythema nodosum were found to be more common in CD than UC. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis that reports on the prevalence of at least 1 joint, ocular, or skin extraintestinal manifestation in IBD. Our results are largely consistent with figures and statements quoted in the literature. However, our findings are based on significantly larger cohort sizes. Thus, our results have the potential to better power studies and more accurately counsel patients.

Mohamad H. Imam 1 and Sooraj Tejaswi 2 and Mohammed Nabil Quraishi 3 and James H. Tabibian 2 1, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tennessee Health and Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA 2, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA 3, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Received 9 November 2016; Accepted 9 November 2016 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. [...]gallstone disease remains a major public health burden worldwide.

In response to recent advancements in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management, the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) Clinical Services and Standards Committee (CSSC) has commissioned the BSG IBD section to update its guidelines, last revised in 2019. These updated guidelines aim to complement the IBD standards and promote the use of the national primary care diagnostic pathway for lower gastrointestinal symptoms to enhance diagnostic accuracy and timeliness. Formulated through a systematic and transparent process, this document reflects a consensus of best practices based on current evidence. The guideline, while developed primarily for the UK, is structured to support IBD management internationally. It is endorsed by the BSG executive board and CSSC without external commercial funding, with involvement primarily supported through professional roles in public institutions and the National Health Service (NHS). Methodological revisions since the prior guidelines have enhanced rigor in technical review and development, with methodology details published independently following peer review. In developing the recommendations, 89 clinical experts and stakeholders participated in an online survey, identifying primary outcomes, such as clinical and endoscopic remission, as well as adverse event metrics, all stratified by clinically relevant effect sizes. These guidelines are intended to support clinical decision-making but are not prescriptive, recognizing that individual clinical scenarios may warrant tailored approaches. Further research may inform future revisions as new evidence emerges.