Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
1
result(s) for
"Ramasamy, Satiavani"
Sort by:
Multimodality imaging with CT, MR and FDG-PET for radiotherapy target volume delineation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
by
Prestwich, Robin J.D.
,
Wilson, Daniel J.
,
Bayman, Evrim
in
Adult
,
Aged
,
Biomedical and Life Sciences
2015
Background
This study aimed to quantify the variation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation between CT, MR and FDG PET-CT imaging.
Methods
A prospective, single centre, pilot study was undertaken where 11 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers (2 tonsil, 9 base of tongue primaries) underwent pre-treatment, contrast enhanced, FDG PET-CT and MR imaging, all performed in a radiotherapy treatment mask. CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs were contoured by 5 clinicians (2 radiologists and 3 radiation oncologists). A semi-automated segmentation algorithm was used to contour PET GTVs. Volume and positional analyses were undertaken, accounting for inter-observer variation, using linear mixed effects models and contour comparison metrics respectively.
Results
Significant differences in mean GTV volume were found between CT (11.9 cm
3
) and CT-MR (14.1 cm
3
),
p
< 0.006, CT-MR and PET (9.5 cm
3
),
p
< 0.0009, and MR (12.7 cm
3
) and PET,
p
< 0.016. Substantial differences in GTV position were found between all modalities with the exception of CT-MR and MR GTVs. A mean of 64 %, 74 % and 77 % of the PET GTVs were included within the CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs respectively. A mean of 57 % of the MR GTVs were included within the CT GTV; conversely a mean of 63 % of the CT GTVs were included within the MR GTV. CT inter-observer variability was found to be significantly higher in terms of position and/or volume than both MR and CT-MR (
p
< 0.05). Significant differences in GTV volume were found between GTV volumes delineated by radiologists (9.7 cm
3
) and oncologists (14.6 cm
3
) for all modalities (
p
= 0.001).
Conclusions
The use of different imaging modalities produced significantly different GTVs, with no single imaging technique encompassing all potential GTV regions. The use of MR reduced inter-observer variability. These data suggest delineation based on multimodality imaging has the potential to improve accuracy of GTV definition.
Trial registration
ISRCTN Registry:
ISRCTN34165059
. Registered 2nd February 2015.
Journal Article