Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
2 result(s) for "Rathon, Yanick"
Sort by:
In Haitian women and preschool children, iron absorption from wheat flour-based meals fortified with sodium iron EDTA is higher than that from meals fortified with ferrous fumarate, and is not affected by Helicobacter pylori infection in children
Fe fortification of wheat flour was proposed in Haiti to combat Fe deficiency, but Fe bioavailability from fortificants has never been investigated in Haitian women or preschool children, two key target groups. We aimed to investigate the bioavailability of ferrous fumarate (FeFum), NaFeEDTA and their combination from fortified wheat flour. We recruited twenty-two healthy mother–child pairs in Port au Prince, Haiti, for an Fe-absorption study. We administered stable Fe isotopes as FeFum or NaFeEDTA individually in low-extraction wheat flour bread rolls consumed by all participants in a randomised, cross-over design. In a final, identical meal, consumed only by the women, FeFum+NaFeEDTA was administered. We measured Fe absorption by using erythrocyte incorporation of stable isotopes 14 d after consumption of each meal, and determined Fe status, inflammatory markers and Helicobacter pylori infection. Fe absorption (geometric mean was 9·24 (95 % CI 6·35, 13·44) and 9·26 (95 % CI 7·00, 12·31) from FeFum and 13·06 (95 % CI 9·23, 19·10) and 12·99 (95 % CI 9·18, 18·39) from NaFeEDTA in mothers and children, respectively (P<0·05 between compounds). Fe absorption from FeFum+NaFeEDTA was 11·09 (95 % CI 7·45, 17·34) and did not differ from the other two meals. H. pylori infection did not influence Fe absorption in children. In conclusion, in Haitian women and children, Fe absorption from NaFeEDTA was 40 % higher than from FeFum, and the combination FeFum+NaFeEDTA did not significantly increase Fe absorption compared with FeFum alone. In the context of Haiti, where the high costs of NaFeEDTA may not be affordable, the use of FeFum at 60 mg Fe/kg flour may be a preferable, cost-effective fortification strategy.
IN HAITIAN WOMEN AND CHILDREN, IRON ABSORPTION FROM WHEAT FLOUR FORTIFIED WITH NAFEEDTA IS HIGHER THAN FROM FLOUR FORTIFIED WITH FERROUS FUMARATE AND IS NOT AFFECTED BY H. PYLORI INFECTION
Background and objectives: The prevalence of iron deficiency in Haiti is high and a program of iron fortification of wheat flour has been proposed; however, there are no data on iron bioavailability from iron fortificants in Haitian women or children, two key target groups. We aimed to investigate the bioavailability of ferrous fumarate (FeFum), NaFeEDTA and their combination from fortified wheat flour. Methods: We recruited 22 healthy mother-child pairs in Port au Prince, Haiti for an iron absorption study. We administered stable iron isotopes as FeFum or NaFeEDTA in low-extraction wheat flour bread rolls consumed by all participants in a randomized, cross-over fashion. In a final meal, consumed only by the women, FeFum+NaFeEDTA was administered. The amount of iron used in the test meal was chosen to simulate the fortification level currently discussed by the Haitian government. We measured iron absorption by using erythrocyte incorporation of stable isotopes 14 days after consumption of each meal, and determined iron status, inflammatory markers and H. pylori infection. Results: Iron absorption (geo mean (95% CI) was 9.24 (6.35,13.44) and 9.26 (7.00,12.31) from FeFum and 13.06 (9.23,19.10) and 12.99 (9.18,18.39) from NaFeEDTA in mothers and children, respectively (p<0.05 between compounds). Iron absorption from FeFum+NaFeEDTA was 11.09 (7.45,17.34) and did not differ from the other two meals. H. pylori infection did not influence iron absorption in either group or meal. Conclusions: In conclusion, in Haitian women and children consuming low extraction wheat flour, iron absorption from Na- FeEDTA was 40% higher than from FeFum, and the combination FeFum+NaFeEDTA did not significantly increase iron absorption compared to FeFum alone. In the context of Haiti, where the high costs of NaFeEDTA may not be affordable, the use of FeFum at 60 mg Fe/kg flour may be a preferable, cost-effective fortification strategy.