Explore the vast range of titles available.

IntroductionAlthough SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were first approved under Emergency Use Authorization by the Food and Drug Administration in late 2020 for adults, authorisation for young children 6 months to <5 years of age did not occur until 2022. These authorisations were based on clinical trials, understanding real-world vaccine effectiveness (VE) in the setting of emerging variants is critical. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 VE against infection among children aged >6 months and adults aged <50 years.MethodsCASCADIA is a 4-year community-based prospective study of SARS-CoV-2 VE among 3500 adults and paediatric populations aged 6 months to 49 years in Oregon and Washington, USA. At enrolment and regular intervals, participants complete a sociodemographic questionnaire. Individuals provide a blood sample at enrolment and annually thereafter, with optional blood draws every 6 months and after infection and vaccination. Participants complete weekly self-collection of anterior nasal swabs and symptom questionnaires. Swabs are tested for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens by reverse transcription-PCR, with results of selected pathogens returned to participants; nasal swabs with SARS-CoV-2 detected will undergo whole genome sequencing. Participants who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 undergo serial swab collection every 3 days for 21 days. Serum samples are tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibody by binding and neutralisation assays.AnalysisThe primary outcome is SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cox regression models will be used to estimate the incidence rate ratio associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among the paediatric and adult population, controlling for demographic factors and other potential confounders.Ethics and disseminationAll study materials including the protocol, consent forms, data collection instruments, participant communication and recruitment materials, were approved by the Kaiser Permanente Interregional Institutional Review Board, the IRB of record for the study. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, presentations, participant newsletters and appropriate general news media.

ObjectivesSelecting effective implementation strategies to support guideline-concordant dental care is a complex process. For this research project, an online deliberative forum brought together staff from dental clinics to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of implementation strategies and barriers to implementation of a component of a dental (pit-and-fissure) guideline. The goal was to determine whether deliberative engagement enabled participants’ sharing of promotive and prohibitive voice about implementation strategies to promote guideline-concordant care.DesignQualitative analysis of online chat transcripts of facilitated deliberations from 31 small group sessions.SettingKaiser Permanente Dental (KP Dental) in the USA.ParticipantsAll staff from 16 dental offices.ResultsThe directed content analysis revealed that participants shared prohibitive and promotive voice when offering critique of the barriers and the implementation strategies suggested by the researchers. The analysis also revealed that the focus of the deliberations often was not on the aspect of the pit-and-fissure guideline intended by the research team for deliberation.ConclusionsThe deliberative forum discussions were a productive venue to ask staff in dental clinics to share their perspectives on strategies to promote guideline-concordant care as well as barriers. Participants demonstrated prohibitive voice and engaged critically with the materials the research team had put together. An important limitation of the deliberation was that the discussion often centred around an aspect of the pit-and-fissure guideline that already was implemented well. To ensure a deliberation oriented towards resolving challenging aspects of the pit-and-fissure guideline, greater familiarity with the guideline would have been important, as well as more intimate knowledge of the current discrepancies in guideline-concordant care.Trial registration numberThis project is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with ID NCT04682730. The trial was first registered on 18 December 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04682730.

The updated 2023–24 COVID-19 vaccine was available in the United States beginning September 2023. Our objective was to identify reasons for decisions related to vaccination of children in the household. In December 2023, adults in Oregon and Washington were asked whether they or their household children had received the 2023–24 COVID-19 vaccination. Adults with unvaccinated children were asked about intentions to vaccinate and to rank the top three reasons for their decision. Vaccine concordance between adults and household children was assessed. Among 1067 adult participants, 33 % (n = 352) of adults reported at least one unvaccinated household child: 23 % intended to vaccinate and 10 % did not intend to vaccinate. Among 243 adults who intended to vaccinate, 73 % selected “if there is more severe illness in my school or community”, as a primary reason; the highest ranked reason among those not intending to vaccinate was the belief that their child would not become severely ill (66 %). 78 % of adults made the same vaccine decisions for themselves and their children. Participant's perception of their child's individual risk from SARS-CoV-2 infection was the primary consideration impacting vaccine uptake and intent for 2023–24 COVID-19 vaccine.

Several studies have revealed that the hyper-inflammatory response induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a major cause of disease severity and death. However, predictive biomarkers of pathogenic inflammation to help guide targetable immune pathways are critically lacking. We implemented a rapid multiplex cytokine assay to measure serum interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-1β in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon admission to the Mount Sinai Health System in New York. Patients ( n  = 1,484) were followed up to 41 d after admission (median, 8 d), and clinical information, laboratory test results and patient outcomes were collected. We found that high serum IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α levels at the time of hospitalization were strong and independent predictors of patient survival ( P  < 0.0001, P  = 0.0205 and P  = 0.0140, respectively). Notably, when adjusting for disease severity, common laboratory inflammation markers, hypoxia and other vitals, demographics, and a range of comorbidities, IL-6 and TNF-α serum levels remained independent and significant predictors of disease severity and death. These findings were validated in a second cohort of patients ( n  = 231). We propose that serum IL-6 and TNF-α levels should be considered in the management and treatment of patients with COVID-19 to stratify prospective clinical trials, guide resource allocation and inform therapeutic options. Elevated levels of serum IL-6 and TNF-α at the time of hospitalization are independent and significant predictors of clinical outcome in two cohorts of patients with COVID-19.

Background: Glomerulonephritis (GN) is a leading cause of kidney failure and accounts for 20% of incident cases of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in Canada annually. Reversal of kidney injury and prevention of progression to kidney failure is possible; however, limited knowledge of underlying disease mechanisms and lack of noninvasive biomarkers and therapeutic targets are major barriers to successful therapeutic intervention. Multicenter approaches that link longitudinal clinical and outcomes data with serial biologic specimen collection would help bridge this gap. Objective: To establish a national, patient-centered, multidimensional web-based clinical database and federated virtual biobank to conduct human-based molecular and clinical research in GN in Canada. Design: Multicenter, prospective observational registry, starting in 2019. Setting: Nine participating Canadian tertiary care centers. Patients: Adult patients with a histopathologic pattern of injury consistent with IgA nephropathy, focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis, minimal change disease, membranous nephropathy, C3 glomerulopathy, and membranoproliferative GN recruited within 24 months of biopsy. Measurements: Initial visits include detailed clinical, histopathological, and laboratory data collection, blood, urine, and tonsil swab biospecimen collection, and a self-administered quality of life questionnaire. Follow-up clinical and laboratory data collection, biospecimen collection, and questionnaires are obtained every 6 months thereafter. Methods: Patients receive care as defined by their physician, with study visits scheduled every 6 months. Patients are followed until death, dialysis, transplantation, or withdrawal from the study. Key outcomes include a composite of ESKD or a 40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 2 years, rate of kidney function decline, and remission of proteinuria. Clinical and molecular phenotypical data will be analyzed by GN subtype to identify disease predictors and discover therapeutic targets. Limitations: Given the relative rarity of individual glomerular diseases, one of the major challenges is patient recruitment. Initial registry studies may be underpowered to detect small differences in clinically meaningful outcomes such as ESKD or death due to small sample sizes and short duration of follow-up in the initial 2-year phase of the study. Conclusions: The Canadian Glomerulonephritis Registry (CGNR) supports national collaborative efforts to study glomerular disease patients and their outcomes. Trial registration: NCT03460054.

In the 2nd year of the COVID-19 pandemic, knowledge about the dynamics of the infection in the general population is still limited. Such information is essential for health planners, as many of those infected show no or only mild symptoms and thus, escape the surveillance system. We therefore aimed to describe the course of the pandemic in the Munich general population living in private households from April 2020 to January 2021. The KoCo19 baseline study took place from April to June 2020 including 5313 participants (age 14 years and above). From November 2020 to January 2021, we could again measure SARS-CoV-2 antibody status in 4433 of the baseline participants (response 83%). Participants were offered a self-sampling kit to take a capillary blood sample (dry blood spot; DBS). Blood was analysed using the Elecsys[R] Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche). Questionnaire information on socio-demographics and potential risk factors assessed at baseline was available for all participants. In addition, follow-up information on health-risk taking behaviour and number of personal contacts outside the household (N = 2768) as well as leisure time activities (N = 1263) were collected in summer 2020. Weighted and adjusted (for specificity and sensitivity) SARS-CoV-2 sero-prevalence at follow-up was 3.6% (95% CI 2.9-4.3%) as compared to 1.8% (95% CI 1.3-3.4%) at baseline. 91% of those tested positive at baseline were also antibody-positive at follow-up. While sero-prevalence increased from early November 2020 to January 2021, no indication of geospatial clustering across the city of Munich was found, although cases clustered within households. Taking baseline result and time to follow-up into account, men and participants in the age group 20-34 years were at the highest risk of sero-positivity. In the sensitivity analyses, differences in health-risk taking behaviour, number of personal contacts and leisure time activities partly explained these differences. The number of citizens in Munich with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was still below 5% during the 2nd wave of the pandemic. Antibodies remained present in the majority of SARS-CoV-2 sero-positive baseline participants. Besides age and sex, potentially confounded by differences in behaviour, no major risk factors could be identified. Non-pharmaceutical public health measures are thus still important.