Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Over the past two decades, most cancer vaccines have failed to be developed clinically. The lack of efficient priming with specific tumor antigens and/or weak adjuvants may explain this poor success rate. MVX-ONCO-1, a personalized cell-based vaccine, combines inactivated autologous tumor cells and encapsulated allogeneic human cells genetically engineered to produce granulocyte–macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). This unique technology allows sustained local delivery of strong adjuvant at the vaccination site. The combination of inactivated autologous tumor cells and potent local adjuvant delivery addresses these two unmet critical steps and may recapitulate in patients the successful combination observed in experimental models. Methods The SAKK 11/16, a Phase IIa trial with Overall Survival (OS) as the primary endpoint was the first efficacy study evaluating MVX-ONCO-1. Patients with Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) progressing after at least one line of systemic therapy were enrolled with 50% of patients alive at 26 weeks as the primary objective. Results In this hard-to-treat population, SAKK 11/16 met the primary endpoint, with 68.8% of patients alive at 6 months. The median OS was 11.4 months, with 32% of the patients alive after 18 months. Complete and partial responses were observed on MVX-ONCO-1 monotherapy. Moreover, all patients who developed a positive DTH reaction to their tumor cells upon vaccination survived at 12 months. Additionally, patients living for more than 12 months had higher circulating antibody titers against tumor-associated antigens. Explorative analysis looking at median OS from the start of anti-PD-1 therapy was 21.7 months. In addition, no new safety signals with no systemic adverse events (AE) related to the treatment and no manufacturing issues were observed in this multicenter trial. Conclusions These findings suggest that MVX-ONCO-1 can induce a coordinated immune response with clinical benefits as a standalone treatment, leading to prolonged survival. This effect may be enhanced by previous exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Trial registration (ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT02999646.

Conjugation or fusion to AlbudAbs™ (albumin-binding domain antibodies) is a novel approach to extend the half-life and alter the tissue distribution of biological and small molecule therapeutics. To understand extravasation kinetics and extravascular organ concentrations of AlbudAbs in humans, we studied tissue distribution and elimination of a non-conjugated 89Zr-labeled AlbudAb in healthy volunteers using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).MethodsA non-conjugated AlbudAb (GSK3128349) was radiolabeled with 89Zr and a single 1 mg (~ 15 MBq) dose intravenously administered to eight healthy males. 89Zr-AlbudAb tissue distribution was followed for up to 7 days with four whole-body PET/CT scans. 89Zr-AlbudAb tissue concentrations were quantified in organs of therapeutic significance, measuring standardized uptake value and tissue/plasma ratios. Plasma pharmacokinetics were assessed by gamma counting and LC-MS/MS of blood samples.Results89Zr-AlbudAb administration and PET/CT procedures were well tolerated, with no drug-related immunogenicity or adverse events. 89Zr-AlbudAb rapidly distributed throughout the vasculature, with tissue/plasma ratios in the liver, lungs, and heart relatively stable over 7 days post-dose, ranging between 0.1 and 0.5. The brain tissue/plasma ratio of 0.025 suggested minimal AlbudAb blood-brain barrier penetration. Slowly increasing ratios in muscle, testis, pancreas, and spleen reflected either slow AlbudAb penetration and/or 89Zr residualization in these organs. Across all tissues evaluated, the kidney tissue/plasma ratio was highest (0.5–1.5 range) with highest concentration in the renal cortex. The terminal half-life of the 89Zr-AlbudAb was 18 days.ConclusionEvaluating the biodistribution of 89Zr-AlbudAb in healthy volunteers using a low radioactivity dose was successful (total subject exposure ~ 10 mSv). Results indicated rapid formation of reversible, but stable, complexes between AlbudAb and albumin upon dosing. 89Zr-AlbudAb demonstrated albumin-like pharmacokinetics, including limited renal elimination. This novel organ-specific distribution data for AlbudAbs in humans will facilitate a better selection of drug targets to prosecute using the AlbudAb platform and significantly contribute to modeling work optimizing dosing of therapeutic AlbudAbs in the clinic.

Purpose This study describes chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) control rates in pediatric and adult patients who did or did not receive guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review of studies published in 2000 or later that evaluated CINV control in patients receiving guideline-consistent vs. guideline-inconsistent CINV prophylaxis and reported at least one CINV-related patient outcome. Studies were excluded if the guideline evaluated was not publicly available or not developed by a professional organization. Over-prophylaxis was defined as antiemetic use recommended for a higher level of chemotherapy emetogenicity than a patient was receiving. Results We identified 7060 citations and retrieved 141 publications for full-text evaluation. Of these, 21 publications (14 prospective and seven retrospective studies) evaluating guidelines developed by six organizations were included. The terms used to describe CINV endpoints and definition of guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis varied among studies. Included studies either did not address over-prophylaxis in their definition of guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis (48%; 10/21) or defined it as guideline-inconsistent (38%; 8/21) or guideline-consistent (3/21; 14%). Eleven included studies (52%; 11/21) reported a clinically meaningful improvement in at least one CINV endpoint in patients receiving guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis. Ten reported a statistically significant improvement. Conclusions This evidence supports the use of guideline-consistent prophylaxis to optimize CINV control. Institutions caring for patients with cancer should systematically adapt CINV CPGs for local implementation and routinely evaluate CINV outcomes.

Second-order conditioning (SOC; i.e., conditioned responding to S2 as a result of S1–US pairings followed by S2–S1 pairings) is generally explained by either a direct S2→US association or by an associative chain (i.e., S2→S1→US). Previous research found that differences in responses to S2 after S1 was extinguished often depended on the nature of the S2–S1 pairings (i.e., sequential or simultaneous). In two experiments with human participants, we examined the possibility that such differences result from S1 evoking S2 during extinction of S1 following simultaneous but not sequential S2–S1 pairings. This evocation of S2 by S1 following simultaneous pairings may have paired the evoked representation of S2 with absence of the outcome, thereby facilitating mediated extinction of S2. Using sequential S2-S1 pairings, both Experiments 1 and 2 failed to support this account of how extinction of S1 reduced responding to S2. Experiment 1 found that extinguishing S1 reduced responding to S2, while extinguishing S2 had little effect on responses to S1, although forward evocation of S1 during extinction of S2 paired the evoked representation of S1 with absence of the outcome. In Experiment 2 , evocation of S2 during S1 nonreinforced trials was prevented because S2–S1 pairings followed (rather than proceeded) S1-alone exposures. Nevertheless, responding to S2 at test mimicked S1 responding. Responding to S2 was high in the context in which S1 had been reinforced and low in the context in which S1 had been nonreinforced. Collectively, these experiments provide additional support for the associative-chain account of SOC.