Explore the vast range of titles available.

Tony Blair was the political colossus in Britain for thirteen years, winning three elections in a row for New Labour, two of them by huge majorities. However, since leaving office he has been disowned by many in his own party, with the term 'Blairite' becoming an insult. The election of Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader in 2015 seemed to be, if not an equal, at least an opposite reaction to Blair's long dominance of the centre and left of British politics. 0Drawing on new contributions from most of the main players in the Blair government, including Tony Blair himself, Jon Davis and John Rentoul reconsider the history and common view of New Labour against its record of delivering moderate social democracy. They show how New Labour was not one party but two, and how it essentially governed as a coalition, much like the government that followed it. 0This book tells the inside story of how Tony Blair worked out, late in the day, his ideas for improving the NHS and school reform; how he groped towards, and was eventually defined by, a foreign policy of liberal interventionism; how he managed a difficult relationship with his Chancellor for ten years; and how Gordon Brown finally took over just as the boom went bust and the New Labour era came to an end. Rentoul and Davis reveal how the governing tribes dealt with each other in the New Labour0years: not simply the 'Blairites' and the 'Brownites', but the 'temporary' ministers and the 'permanent', under-reported civil servants who worked alongside them. 0Many of the arguments that raged within and around the Blair government of 1997-2007 remain very much alive: reform of public services; the right course for the divided Labour Party; and the Iraq war. The Blair Government Reconsidered aims at a balanced account of how decisions were made, to allow the reader to make up their own mind about controversies that still dominate politics today.

The sudden explosion of Blair's physical and political energy was extraordinary. While George W Bush was still stumbling to find the right words - something he did not achieve until his address to the joint houses of Congress nine days after the attack - the British Prime Minister was flying from London to Berlin, Paris, Washington, New York and Brussels, all in the space of 48 hours. Part of the explanation is that he has more freedom in foreign affairs than in reforming public services. No one doubts that Blair is sincere in wanting to improve the health and education services, and, indeed, he is capable of bursts of sustained prime ministerial attention to policy detail. Taking on opponents like Slobodan Milosevic, Saddam Hussein or Osama bin Laden is more to Blair's taste than demonising or offending groups within the British political system, where his approach has always been inclusive and consensus-building.