Explore the vast range of titles available.

Flow stagnation and residence time (RT) are important features of diseased arterial flows that influence biochemical transport processes and thrombosis. RT calculation methods are classified into Eulerian and Lagrangian approaches where several measures have been proposed to quantify RT. Each of these methods has a different definition of RT, and it is not clear how they are related. In this study, image-based computational models of blood flow in an abdominal aortic aneurysm and a cerebral aneurysm were considered and RT was calculated using different methods. In the Lagrangian methods, discrete particle tracking of massless tracers was used to calculate particle residence time and mean exposure time. In the Eulerian methods, continuum transport models were used to quantify RT using Eulerian RT and virtual ink approaches. Point-wise RT and Eulerian indicator RT were also computed based on measures derived from velocity. A comparison of these methods is presented and the implications of each method are discussed. Our results highlight that most RT methods have a conceptually distinct definition of RT and therefore should be utilized depending on the specific application of interest.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has rapidly displaced surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, certain post-TAVR complications persist, with cardiac conduction abnormalities (CCA) being one of the major ones. The elevated pressure exerted by the TAVR stent onto the conduction fibers situated between the aortic annulus and the His bundle, in proximity to the atrioventricular (AV) node, may disrupt the cardiac conduction leading to the emergence of CCA. In this study, an in silico framework was developed to assess the CCA risk, incorporating the effect of a dynamic beating heart and preprocedural parameters such as implantation depth and preexisting cardiac asynchrony in the new onset of post-TAVR CCA. A self-expandable TAVR device deployment was simulated inside an electromechanically coupled beating heart model in five patient scenarios, including three implantation depths and two preexisting cardiac asynchronies: (i) a right bundle branch block (RBBB) and (ii) a left bundle branch block (LBBB). Subsequently, several biomechanical parameters were analyzed to assess the post-TAVR CCA risk. The results manifested a lower cumulative contact pressure on the conduction fibers following TAVR for aortic deployment (0.018 MPa) compared to nominal condition (0.29 MPa) and ventricular deployment (0.52 MPa). Notably, the preexisting RBBB demonstrated a higher cumulative contact pressure (0.34 MPa) compared to the nominal condition and preexisting LBBB (0.25 MPa). Deeper implantation and preexisting RBBB cause higher stresses and contact pressure on the conduction fibers leading to an increased risk of post-TAVR CCA. Conversely, implantation above the MS landmark and preexisting LBBB reduces the risk.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has rapidly displaced surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, certain post-TAVR complications persist, with cardiac conduction abnormalities (CCA) being one of the major ones. The elevated pressure exerted by the TAVR stent onto the conduction fibers situated between the aortic annulus and the His bundle, in proximity to the atrioventricular (AV) node, may disrupt the cardiac conduction leading to the emergence of CCA. In this study, an in silico framework was developed to assess the CCA risk, incorporating the effect of a dynamic beating heart and preprocedural parameters such as implantation depth and preexisting cardiac asynchrony in the new onset of post-TAVR CCA. A self-expandable TAVR device deployment was simulated inside an electromechanically coupled beating heart model in five patient scenarios, including three implantation depths and two preexisting cardiac asynchronies: (i) a right bundle branch block (RBBB) and (ii) a left bundle branch block (LBBB). Subsequently, several biomechanical parameters were analyzed to assess the post-TAVR CCA risk. The results manifested a lower cumulative contact pressure on the conduction fibers following TAVR for aortic deployment (0.018 MPa) compared to nominal condition (0.29 MPa) and ventricular deployment (0.52 MPa). Notably, the preexisting RBBB demonstrated a higher cumulative contact pressure (0.34 MPa) compared to the nominal condition and preexisting LBBB (0.25 MPa). Deeper implantation and preexisting RBBB cause higher stresses and contact pressure on the conduction fibers leading to an increased risk of post-TAVR CCA. Conversely, implantation above the MS landmark and preexisting LBBB reduces the risk.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has rapidly displaced surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, certain post-TAVR complications persist, with cardiac conduction abnormalities (CCA) being one of the major ones. The elevated pressure exerted by the TAVR stent onto the conduction fibers situated between the aortic annulus and the His bundle, in proximity to the atrioventricular (AV) node, may disrupt the cardiac conduction leading to the emergence of CCA. In this study, an in-silico framework was developed to assess the CCA risk, incorporating the effect of a dynamic beating heart and pre-procedural parameters such as implantation depth and preexisting cardiac asynchrony in the new onset of post-TAVR CCA. A self-expandable TAVR device deployment was simulated inside an electro-mechanically coupled beating heart model in five patient scenarios, including three implantation depths, and two preexisting cardiac asynchronies: (i) a right bundle branch block (RBBB) and (ii) a left bundle branch block (LBBB). Subsequently, several biomechanical parameters were analyzed to assess the post-TAVR CCA risk. The results manifested a lower cumulative contact pressure on the conduction fibers following TAVR for aortic deployment (0.018 MPa) compared to nominal condition (0.29 MPa) and ventricular deployment (0.52 MPa). Notably, the preexisting RBBB demonstrated a higher cumulative contact pressure (0.34 MPa) compared to the nominal condition and preexisting LBBB (0.25 MPa). Deeper implantation and preexisting RBBB cause higher stresses and contact pressure on the conduction fibers leading to an increased risk of post-TAVR CCA. Conversely, implantation above the MS landmark and preexisting LBBB reduces the risk.

TAVR has emerged as a standard approach for treating severe aortic stenosis patients. However, it is associated with several clinical complications, including subclinical leaflet thrombosis characterized by Hypoattenuated Leaflet Thickening (HALT). A rigorous analysis of TAVR device thrombogenicity considering anatomical variations is essential for estimating this risk. Clinicians use the Sinotubular Junction (STJ) diameter for TAVR sizing, but there is a paucity of research on its influence on TAVR devices thrombogenicity. A Medtronic Evolut® TAVR device was deployed in three patient models with varying STJ diameters (26, 30, and 34 mm) to evaluate its impact on post-deployment hemodynamics and thrombogenicity, employing a novel computational framework combining prosthesis deployment and fluid-structure interaction analysis. The 30 mm STJ patient case exhibited the best hemodynamic performance: 5.94 mmHg mean transvalvular pressure gradient (TPG), 2.64 cm 2 mean geometric orifice area (GOA), and the lowest mean residence time (T R )—indicating a reduced thrombogenic risk; 26 mm STJ exhibited a 10 % reduction in GOA and a 35% increase in mean TPG compared to the 30 mm STJ; 34 mm STJ depicted hemodynamics comparable to the 30 mm STJ, but with a 6% increase in T R and elevated platelet stress accumulation. A smaller STJ size impairs adequate expansion of the TAVR stent, which may lead to suboptimal hemodynamic performance. Conversely, a larger STJ size marginally enhances the hemodynamic performance but increases the risk of TAVR leaflet thrombosis. Such analysis can aid pre-procedural planning and minimize the risk of TAVR leaflet thrombosis.

Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is marked by thick, stiff, and calcified aortic valve leaflets, restricting their motion, and causing aortic valve stenosis (AS). Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) has become the preferred method for high- and intermediate-risk AS patients due to its minimally invasive nature and favorable outcomes, with potential extension to lower-risk populations. However, clinical complications persist. Especially, cardiac conduction abnormalities (CCAs) remain a significant concern, as TAVR can induce new onsets of CCAs, often requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). The high prevalence of PPI, heart block, and arrhythmias associated with TAVR necessitates a thorough exploration of their underlying mechanisms and risk factors. The extensive adoption of TAVR also faces challenges due to the presence of evidence indicating subclinical leaflet thrombosis characterized by Hypoattenuated Leaflet Thickening (HALT), resulting in restricted leaflet movement. Studies examining long-term outcomes have shown a rising incidence of TAVR leaflet degeneration and thrombosis, posing a significant risk to younger and low-risk TAVR recipients. Consequently, there is a need for a thorough analysis of TAVR performance and an assessment of thrombogenic risk associated with procedural and anatomical factors. Hence, the long-term durability of TAVR leaflets remains a major concern. This complication poses a unique risk for TAVR in low-risk patients, necessitating corrective procedures such as TAVR explant and redo-TAVR. Nevertheless, due to the lack of data, pre-procedural planning for such options remains challenging to comprehend.The dissertation proposes the development of computational modeling frameworks adopting the digital twin concept to address post-TAVR CCA and TAVR leaflet thrombosis. These approaches aim to predict the risk of post-TAVR complications and optimize pre-procedural planning. Recognizing the imperative for long-term TAVR success, the research further explores redo-TAVR. These goals will be achieved through the following specific aims:Specific Aim 1: Post‐TAVR cardiac conduction abnormality (CCA) risk assessment.a) A computational framework for post‐TAVR CCA risk assessment for balloon-expandable TAVR system.b) Risk assessment of post-TAVR CCA from a dynamic heart perspective.c) Effect of the distribution of calcium deposits in the new onset of CCA.Specific Aim 2: Computational framework to analyze TAVR leaflet thrombosis.a) Evaluating the effect of Sinotubular Junction Size on the structural and hemodynamic performance of TAVR.b) Effect of Sinotubular Junction Size on Leaflet Thrombosis.Specific Aim 3: Computational modeling of redo-TAVR.a) Assess the structural feasibility of Redo-TAVR. b) Conduct a hemodynamic performance analysis of various redo-TAVR combinations

Flow stagnation and residence time (RT) are important features of diseased arterial flows that influence biochemical transport processes and thrombosis. RT calculation methods are classified into Eulerian and Lagrangian approaches where several measures have been proposed to quantify RT. Each of these methods has a different definition of RT, and it is not clear how they are related. In this study, image-based computational models of blood flow in an abdominal aortic aneurysm and a cerebral aneurysm were considered and RT was calculated using different methods. In the Lagrangian methods, discrete particle tracking of massless tracers was used to calculate particle residence time and mean exposure time. In the Eulerian methods, continuum transport models were used to quantify RT using Eulerian RT and virtual ink approaches. Point-wise RT and Eulerian indicator RT were also computed based on measures derived from velocity. Lagrangian coherent structures in the wall shear stress vector field were calculated and a close connection between these structures and near wall RT was shown. A comparison of these methods is presented and the implications of each method are discussed. Our results highlight that most RT methods have a conceptually distinct definition of RT and therefore should be utilized depending on the specific application of interest.