Explore the vast range of titles available.

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 triggering the COVID-19 pandemic ranks as arguably the greatest medical emergency of the last century. COVID-19 has highlighted health disparities both within and between countries and will leave a lasting impact on global society. Nonetheless, substantial investment in life sciences over recent decades has facilitated a rapid scientific response with innovations in viral characterization, testing, and sequencing. Perhaps most remarkably, this permitted the development of highly effective vaccines, which are being distributed globally at unprecedented speed. In contrast, drug treatments for the established disease have delivered limited benefits so far. Innovative and rapid approaches in the design and execution of large-scale clinical trials and repurposing of existing drugs have saved many lives; however, many more remain at risk. In this review we describe challenges and unmet needs, discuss existing therapeutics, and address future opportunities. Consideration is given to factors that have hindered drug development in order to support planning for the next pandemic challenge and to allow rapid and cost-effective development of new therapeutics with equitable delivery.

A two-step process, in which circulating levels of amyloid P are reduced and then anti–serum amyloid P antibody is given to activate macrophage clearance mechanisms of tissue deposits, appears to reduce amyloid deposits in liver and some other organs. In systemic amyloidosis, the extracellular deposition of normally soluble plasma proteins as insoluble amyloid fibrils damages the structure and function of tissues and organs. 1 Current treatment consists of support or replacement of failing organs and measures to reduce the abundance of the amyloid fibril precursor protein. 1 , 2 A sufficient reduction of precursor supply arrests the accumulation of amyloid and can reduce morbidity and mortality. However, amyloid regression is very slow and often does not occur at all, in contrast to the usually swift clearance of other extracellular debris and efficient tissue remodeling — for example, after trauma. At least 65% . . .

Background Explainer animations are a means to communicate aspects of clinical trials to participants in a more engaging and accessible way. Delivered well these have the potential to enhance recruitment and retention. The range of media technology used to deliver this material is expanding rapidly but is highly fragmented. Usage of explainer animations across the UK is unknown, the aim of this research was to determine current usage across the 52 registered UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) Clinical Trials Units (CTUs) to understand the current landscape and any barriers that could be preventing wider uptake of this functionality. Methods A survey link was emailed to all UKCRC CTU Directors and Trial Management Leads to ascertain current usage of explainer animations within their CTU. The survey ran between 01 February 2023 and 07 March 2023. Results Responses were received from 35 CTUs—representing a response rate of 67%. 24 CTUs (69%) reported that they had created/used at least one explainer animation within their unit, although the usage, cost, length and production activities varied among the units. Conclusions The survey showed that a high proportion of the UKCRC CTUs have used explainer animations to provide information to participants about clinical studies. For those not using the technology yet, the most common reasons cited were a lack of expertise, lack of resources and costs to produce them. One of the desired outcomes of this project is the creation of a free-to-use library of animations to encourage wider uptake and avoid duplication.

Background Miridesap depletes circulating serum amyloid P (SAP) and dezamizumab (anti-SAP monoclonal antibody) targets SAP on amyloid deposits, triggering amyloid removal. In a phase 1, first-in-human study (FIHS), progressive amyloid removal was observed in some patients after ≤ 3 cycles of miridesap/dezamizumab. Methods This observational, non-interventional study in patients who received miridesap/dezamizumab during the FIHS (planned follow-up: 5 years) evaluated response to treatment based on routine assessments of disease status and key organ function. In a post hoc analysis, patients responding to treatment in the FIHS during follow-up were identified as responders and further categorized as sustained or declining responders. Results In the FIHS, 17/23 patients were treatment responders. Of these patients, seven (immunoglobulin light chain [AL], n = 6; serum amyloid A, n = 1) were considered sustained responders and ten (fibrinogen-a alpha chain [AFib], n = 5; AL, n = 4; apolipoprotein A-I, n = 1) were considered declining responders. We primarily present responder patient-level data for functional, cardiac, laboratory and imaging assessments conducted during the follow-up period, with non-responder data presented as supplementary. Conclusion No further development of miridesap/dezamizumab is planned in amyloidosis. However, long-term follow-up of these patients may provide insight into whether active removal of amyloid deposits has an impact on disease progression. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01777243. Registered 28 January 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01777243 .

Up to 70% of patients with primary biliary cholangitis develop pruritus (itch) during the course of their disease. Treatment of pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis is challenging and novel therapies are needed. Ursodeoxycholic acid, the standard first-line treatment for primary biliary cholangitis, is largely ineffective for pruritus. We investigated the efficacy and safety of GSK2330672, a selective inhibitor of human ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT), in patients with primary biliary cholangitis with pruritus. We conducted this phase 2a, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in two UK medical centres. Following 2 weeks of open placebo run-in, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio with a block size of 4 to receive GSK2330672 or placebo twice daily during two consecutive 14-day treatment periods in a crossover sequence. The treatment periods were followed by a 14-day single-blinded placebo follow-up period. The primary endpoints were safety of GSK2330672, assessed using clinical and laboratory parameters, and tolerability as rated by the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale. The secondary endpoints were changes in pruritus scores measured using the 0 to 10 numerical rating scale (NRS), primary biliary cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) itch domain score and 5-D itch scale, changes in serum total bile acids and 7 alpha hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4), and changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of ursodeoxycholic acid and its conjugates. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01899703. Between March 10, 2014, and Oct 7, 2015, we enrolled 22 patients. 11 patients were assigned to receive intervention followed by placebo (sequence 1), and 11 patients were assigned to receive placebo followed by intervention (sequence 2). One patient assigned to sequence 2 withdrew consent prior to receiving randomised therapy. One patient did not attend the placebo follow-up period, but was included in the final analysis. GSK2330672 treatment for 14 days was safe with no serious adverse events reported. Diarrhoea was the most frequent adverse event during treatment with GSK2330672 (seven with GSK2330672 vs one with placebo) and headache was the most frequent adverse event during treatment with placebo (seven with placebo vs six with GSK2330672). After GSK2330672 treatment, the percentage changes from baseline itch scores were −57% (95% CI −73 to −42, p<0·0001) in the NRS, −31% (−42 to −20, p<0·0001) in the PBC-40 itch domain and −35% (−45 to −25, p<0·0001) in the 5-D itch scale. GSK2330672 produced significantly greater reduction from baseline than the double-blind placebo in the NRS (−23%, 95% CI −45 to −1; p=0·037), PBC-40 itch domain, (−14%, −26 to −1; p=0·034), and 5-D itch scale (−20%, −34 to −7; p=0·0045). After GSK2330672 treatment, serum total bile acid concentrations declined by 50% (95% CI −37 to −61, p<0·0001) from 30 to 15 μM, with a significant 3·1-times increase (95% CI 2·4 to 4·0, p<0·0001) in serum C4 concentrations from 7·9 to 24·7ng/mL. In patients with primary biliary cholangitis with pruritus, 14 days of ileal bile acid transporter inhibition by GSK2330672 was generally well tolerated without serious adverse events, and demonstrated efficacy in reducing pruritus severity. GSK2330672 has the potential to be a significant and novel advance for the treatment of pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis. Diarrhoea, the most common adverse event associated with GSK2330672 treatment, might limit the long-term use of this drug. GlaxoSmithKline and National Institute for Health Research.

Background Animated short videos used to explain a concept or project are often called animated explainer videos (AEVs). AEVs can supplement or provide an alternative to participant information sheets as a means of giving information about clinical research to potential participants. Current use of AEVs tends to focus on the specifics of a particular trial, yet there are many common aspects of clinical research regardless of the interventions being investigated that can be poorly covered in current trial materials. The EXPLAIN initiative aimed to determine the top generic clinical trial topics considered most important by different UK trial stakeholders. The top three topics were then turned into AEVs and have been made freely available for use. Method A list of generic clinical trial topics which often need explaining to potential trial participants when they are approached to take part in research was developed. Using a two-round Delphi survey of stakeholder groups (trial participants, patients, members of the public, site staff and clinical trials unit staff), the list of topics was expanded and prioritised to identify the topics most in need of clear explanation. The top three topics formed the basis of three AEVs, co-developed with patient and public partners. Results Two hundred twenty-eight responses were received to the first round of the Delphi survey, and 167 of these respondents also completed the second round of the survey. The three topics prioritised for creation of animated explainer videos were as follows: (1) What is consent? (2) Who decides what treatment I get/What is randomisation? (3) Is it safe to take part in a trial/How do you know a trial is safe? Following virtual meetings with patient and public partners recruited from the Delphi respondents, a script for each AEV was co-produced before being developed into an AEV by a company specialising in animated video production. Conclusion There are a wide range of generic concepts in which the use of animated explainer videos could be useful to improve participant understanding of clinical research. Via consensus survey across multiple stakeholders, we have determined a hierarchy of the importance of explaining these concepts. We envisage that the three AEVs created from this project will form the basis of a readily accessible library of animations to be utilised by trialists.

Single cell spatial interrogation of the immune-structural interactions in COVID −19 lungs is challenging, mainly because of the marked cellular infiltrate and architecturally distorted microstructure. To address this, we develop a suite of mathematical tools to search for statistically significant co-locations amongst immune and structural cells identified using 37-plex imaging mass cytometry. This unbiased method reveals a cellular map interleaved with an inflammatory network of immature neutrophils, cytotoxic CD8 T cells, megakaryocytes and monocytes co-located with regenerating alveolar progenitors and endothelium. Of note, a highly active cluster of immature neutrophils and CD8 T cells, is found spatially linked with alveolar progenitor cells, and temporally with the diffuse alveolar damage stage. These findings offer further insights into how immune cells interact in the lungs of severe COVID-19 disease. We provide our pipeline [Spatial Omics Oxford Pipeline (SpOOx)] and visual-analytical tool, Multi-Dimensional Viewer (MDV) software, as a resource for spatial analysis. Mathematical tools can be used to help identify pathological features from images of diseased lungs. Here, the authors used mathematical tools combined with high resolution multiplex imaging mass cytometry to show an association between immature neutrophils, CD8 T cells and proliferating alveolar epithelial cells in areas of maximal alveolar damage in COVID-19 lungs.

Background The promotility agents currently available to treat gastroparesis and feed intolerance in the critically ill are limited by adverse effects. The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics of single doses of the novel gastric promotility agent motilin agonist camicinal (GSK962040) in critically ill feed-intolerant patients. Methods A prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, study was performed in mechanically ventilated feed-intolerant patients [median age 55 (19–84), 73 % male, APACHE II score 18 (5–37) with a gastric residual volume ≥200 mL]. Gastric emptying and glucose absorption were measured both pre- and post-treatment after intragastric administration of 50 mg ( n  = 15) camicinal and placebo ( n  = 8) using the 13 C-octanoic acid breath test (BTt 1/2 ), acetaminophen concentrations, and 3-O-methyl glucose concentrations respectively. Results Following 50 mg enteral camicinal, there was a trend to accelerated gastric emptying [adjusted geometric means: pre-treatment BTt 1/2 117 minutes vs. post- treatment 76 minutes; 95 % confidence intervals (CI; 0.39, 1.08) and increased glucose absorption (AUC 240min pre-treatment: 28.63 mmol.min/L vs. post-treatment: 71.63 mmol.min/L; 95 % CI (1.68, 3.72)]. When two patients who did not have detectable plasma concentrations of camicinal were excluded from analysis, camicinal accelerated gastric emptying (adjusted geometric means: pre-treatment BTt 1/2 121 minutes vs. post-treatment 65 minutes 95 % CI (0.32, 0.91) and increased glucose absorption (AUC 240min pre-treatment: 33.04 mmol.min/L vs. post-treatment: 74.59 mmol.min/L; 95 % CI (1.478, 3.449). In those patients receiving placebo gastric emptying was similar pre- and post-treatment. Conclusions When absorbed, a single enteral dose of camicinal (50 mg) accelerates gastric emptying and increases glucose absorption in feed-intolerant critically ill patients. Trial registration The study protocol was registered with the US NIH clinicaltrials.gov on 23 December 2009 (Identifier NCT01039805 ).

Experimental exposure of healthy volunteers to the T‐cell dependent neoantigen keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) permits the evaluation of immunomodulatory investigational medicinal product (IMP) pharmacology prior to the recruitment of patient populations. Despite widespread use, no standardized approach to the design and conduct of such studies has been agreed. The objective of this systematic review was to survey the published literature where KLH was used as a challenge agent, describing methodology, therapeutic targets addressed, and pharmacodynamic outcome measures. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies using KLH challenge in humans between January 1, 1994, and April 1, 2022. We described key study features, including KLH formulation, dose, use of adjuvants, route of administration, co‐administered IMPs, and end points. Of 2421 titles and s screened, 46 met the inclusion criteria, including 14 (31%) early phase trials of IMP, of which 10 (71%) targeted T‐cell co‐stimulation. IMPs with diverse mechanisms demonstrated modulation of the humoral response to KLH, suggesting limited specificity of this end point. Two early phase IMP studies (14%) described the response to intradermal re‐challenge (delayed type hypersensitivity). Challenge regimens for IMP assessment were often incompletely described, and exhibited marked heterogeneity, including primary KLH dose (25‐fold variation: 100–2500 mcg), KLH formulation, and co‐administration with adjuvants. Methodological heterogeneity and failure to exploit the access to tissue‐level mechanism‐relevant end points afforded by KLH challenge has impaired the translational utility of this paradigm to date. Future standardization, characterization, and methodological development is required to permit tailored, appropriately powered, mechanism‐dependent study design to optimize drug development decisions.

Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor (PPAR)δ Promotes Reversal of Multiple Metabolic Abnormalities, Reduces Oxidative Stress, and Increases Fatty Acid Oxidation in Moderately Obese Men Ulf Risérus 1 , Dennis Sprecher 2 , Tony Johnson 2 , Eric Olson 2 , Sandra Hirschberg 2 , Aixue Liu 3 , Zeke Fang 4 , Priti Hegde 5 , Duncan Richards 6 , Leli Sarov-Blat 5 , Jay C. Strum 5 , Samar Basu 7 , Jane Cheeseman 1 , Barbara A. Fielding 1 , Sandy M. Humphreys 1 , Theodore Danoff 3 , Niall R. Moore 8 , Peter Murgatroyd 9 , Stephen O'Rahilly 10 , Pauline Sutton 1 , Tim Willson 11 , David Hassall 12 , Keith N. Frayn 1 and Fredrik Karpe 1 1 Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K 2 Cardiovascular and Urogenital Center for Excellence in Drug Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 3 Human Target Validation, Cardiovascular and Urogenital Center for Excellence in Drug Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 4 Statistics, GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 5 Clinical Pharmacology and Discovery Medicine/Cardiovascular and Urogenital (CPDM CVU) Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 6 Addenbrooke's Centre for Clinical Investigation (ACCI) Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Cambridge, U.K 7 Department of Public Health, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden 8 Department of Radiology, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K 9 Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, U.K 10 Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K 11 GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 12 GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, U.K Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. F. Karpe, Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, U.K. E-mail: fredrik.karpe{at}ocdem.ox.ac.uk Abstract OBJECTIVE— Pharmacological use of peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR)δ agonists and transgenic overexpression of PPARδ in mice suggest amelioration of features of the metabolic syndrome through enhanced fat oxidation in skeletal muscle. We hypothesize a similar mechanism operates in humans. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS— The PPARδ agonist (10 mg o.d. GW501516), a comparator PPARα agonist (20 μg o.d. GW590735), and placebo were given in a double-blind, randomized, three-parallel group, 2-week study to six healthy moderately overweight subjects in each group. Metabolic evaluation was made before and after treatment including liver fat quantification, fasting blood samples, a 6-h meal tolerance test with stable isotope fatty acids, skeletal muscle biopsy for gene expression, and urinary isoprostanes for global oxidative stress. RESULTS— Treatment with GW501516 showed statistically significant reductions in fasting plasma triglycerides (−30%), apolipoprotein B (−26%), LDL cholesterol (−23%), and insulin (−11%), whereas HDL cholesterol was unchanged. A 20% reduction in liver fat content ( P < 0.05) and 30% reduction in urinary isoprostanes ( P = 0.01) were also observed. Except for a lowering of triglycerides (−30%, P < 0.05), none of these changes were observed in response to GW590735. The relative proportion of exhaled CO 2 directly originating from the fat content of the meal was increased ( P < 0.05) in response to GW501516, and skeletal muscle expression of carnitine palmitoyl-transferase 1b ( CPT1b ) was also significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS— The PPARδ agonist GW501516 reverses multiple abnormalities associated with the metabolic syndrome without increasing oxidative stress. The effect is probably caused by increased fat oxidation in skeletal muscle. Apo, apolipoprotein AST, aspartate aminotransferase AUC, area under the curve γGT, γ-glutamyltransferase LCM, laser capture microdissection LPL, lipoprotein lipase MRI, magnetic resonance imaging NEFA, nonesterified fatty acid TTR, tracer-to-tracee ratio Footnotes Published ahead of print at http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org on 16 November 2007. DOI: 10.2337/db07-1318. U.R. and D.S. contributed equally to this work. Additional information for this article can be found in an online appendix at http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db07-1318 . The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Accepted November 10, 2007. Received September 14, 2007. DIABETES