Explore the vast range of titles available.

Studies have examined the association between theory of mind (ToM) and prosocial behavior in children with mixed results. A handful of studies have examined prosocial sharing behavior in children with autism, who typically exhibit ToM deficits. Studies using resource allocation tasks have generally failed to find significant differences between the sharing behavior of children with autism and neurotypical children. We presented 18 neurotypical children and 33 children with autism with the Dictator Game. Children had the opportunity to allocate toys in recipient present and absent conditions. Both groups donated more items in the recipient present versus absent condition and chose the prosocial option at above chance levels. Children with autism behave as prosocially as neurotypical children do in this paradigm.

Although comparative psychologists have made considerable strides in the past several decades, expanding the breadth of species and questions examined, the field still suffers from an overemphasis on top-down approaches that begin and end with a focus on humans. This top-down perspective leads to biases and oversights that hamper the further development of the field. A bottom-up approach that considers species-specific abilities and behaviors in the context of theoretically relevant comparisons will be most useful in advancing knowledge of species-specific and shared abilities. This will allow a better determination of the extent to which continuities and discontinuities exist as a function of different ecological forces. In addition, a bottom-up approach will facilitate a shift in focus from using animals to better understand humans, to understanding animals themselves. This new approach will allow for an appreciation of how humans can benefit other species.

IntroductionChildren with medical complexity (CMC) have chronic, intensive care needs managed by many healthcare practitioners. Medical advances have enabled CMC to survive well into adulthood. However, the availability of supports as CMC transition into the adult care system remain suboptimal, contributing to poor care coordination, and discontinuity. Promoting Intensive Transitions for Children and Youth with Medical Complexity from Paediatric to Adult Care (PITCare) aims to assess whether intensive patient and caregiver-oriented transition support beyond age 18 will improve continuity of care for CMC compared with usual care.Methods and analysisThis is a pragmatic superiority randomised controlled trial in a parallel group, two-arm design with an embedded qualitative component. CMC turning 17.5 years old will be recruited (n=154), along with their primary caregiver. Participants randomised to the intervention arm will be provided with access to a multidisciplinary transition team who will support patients and caregivers in care planning, integration with an adult primary care provider (PCP), adult subspecialty facilitation and facilitation of resource supports for 2 years. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, 12 and 24 months. The primary outcome measure is successful transfer completion, defined as continuous care in the 2 years after age 18 years old. Secondary outcomes include satisfaction with transitional care, self-management, care coordination, healthcare service use, caregiver fatigue, family distress, utility and cost-effectiveness. Qualitative interviews will be conducted to explore the experiences of patients, caregivers, the transition team, and healthcare providers with the PITCare intervention.Ethics and disseminationInstitutional approval was obtained from the Hospital for Sick Children Research Ethics Board. Our findings and resources will be shared with child health policymakers and transitions advocacy groups provincially, nationally, and internationally.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov, US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, #NCT06093386.