Explore the vast range of titles available.

PurposeThis study aimed at describing the use of oral cyclines (i.e., doxycycline and minocycline) as suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) in patients with periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs).MethodsMedical charts of all patients with surgical revisions for PJIs who were given cycline-based SAT because of a high failure of various origins were reviewed. Data regarding tolerability and effectiveness of cycline-based SAT were analysed.ResultsSeventy-eight patients of mean age 64 ± 17 years received cycline-base SAT in the period from January 2006 to January 2014. PJIs involved the knee in 37 patients (47%), the hip in 35 (45%), the elbow in 4 (5%), and the shoulder in 2 (3%) and were qualified as early in 31 patients (39.7%). Staphylococcus spp. were the most common pathogens accounting for 72.1% of the total number of bacterial strains identified. All included patients had surgery which consisted in debridement and implant retention in 59 of them (75.6%). Doxycycline and minocycline were prescribed as SAT in 72 (92%) and 6 (8%) patients, respectively. Adverse events were reported in 14 patients (18%), leading to SAT discontinuation in 6 of them (8%). After a mean follow-up of 1020 ± 597 days, a total of 22 (28.2%) patients had failed including 3 cases (3.8%) with documented acquisition of tetracycline resistance in initial pathogen(s).ConclusionsOur results suggest that oral cyclines used as SAT in patients treated for PJI have an acceptable tolerability and effectiveness and appear to be a reasonable option in this setting.

Data demonstrating that antibiotics administered intraoperatively in patients with surgical revision for periprosthetic joint infection achieve concentrations exceeding minimal inhibitory concentrations of the identified bacteria at the surgical site when the new implant is inserted are lacking. We prospectively included patients with periprosthetic joint infection operated with one- or two-stage replacement during which cefepime (2g)-daptomycin (10mg/kg) combination was administered intravenously as intraoperative empirical antibiotic treatment. Three biopsies (two bones and one synovial membrane) were taken from each patient just before the insertion of the new implant. Eighteen adults of median age 68 years were included. Knee was involved in 10 patients (55.6%) and surgery consisted in one-/two-stage replacement in 11/7 patients. A tourniquet was used during the intervention in the 10 patients with knee prosthesis. Among 54 tissue samples, cefepime and daptomycin were detected respectively in 35 (64.8%) and 21 (38.9%) cases (P=0.01). A total of 17 bacteria dominated by staphylococci (n=14) were identified in 10 patients; tissue inhibitory quotient calculated in 51 samples was >1 in 22 cases (43.1%) for cefepime and in 16 cases (31.4%) for daptomycin. The proportion of tissue samples with detectable antibiotic was significantly higher in hip versus knee prosthesis (P=0.03). The present study suggests that intraoperative empirical administration of cefepime-daptomycin combination during septic prosthetic joint replacement results in a high proportion of tissue samples in which at least one of the two antibiotics was not detected or at a low concentration despite satisfactory concomitant blood serum concentrations.

Data on the tolerance and effectiveness of rifampicin–levofloxacin combination therapy (RLCT) in patients treated for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) according to daily dosage are lacking. A review of the clinical data from patients treated with RLCT for PJIs in a French referent center for PJIs was conducted. A total of 154 patients (75 F/79 M), with a median age of 64.1 years and median body weight of 83.1 kg, were included. The median daily dosages of rifampicin and levofloxacin were, respectively, 1,200 mg (range 300–2,100) and 750 mg (range 500–1,500), corresponding to a mean daily dose per kg of, respectively, 16.2 ± 4.3 mg/kg and 10.1 ± 3.0 mg/kg. After a mean follow-up period of 55.6 ± 27.1 months (range 24–236), 127 patients (82.5 %) were in remission. Adverse events attributable to rifampicin and levofloxacin were reported in 48 (31.2 %) and 13 (8.4 %) patients ( p  < 0.001), respectively. Patients who experienced rifampicin-related adverse events had been given higher rifampicin daily doses than the other patients ( p  = 0.04). The rifampicin daily dosage did not influence patient outcome and nor did the levofloxacin daily dosage on both tolerance and patient outcome. Our results suggest that adjusting rifampicin daily doses to the patient total body weight when combined with levofloxacin for the treatment of PJIs is associated with a poor tolerance. High daily doses of rifampicin (>600 mg) and levofloxacin (750 mg) do not improve patient outcome when compared to lower daily doses in this setting.

Background Outcome of patients with streptococcal prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is not well known. Methods We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study that involved patients with total hip/knee prosthetic joint (THP/TKP) infections due to Streptococcus spp . from 2001 through 2009. Results Ninety-five streptococcal PJI episodes (50 THP and 45 TKP) in 87 patients of mean age 69.1 ± 13.7 years met the inclusion criteria. In all, 55 out of 95 cases (57.9 %) were treated with debridement and retention of the infected implants with antibiotic therapy (DAIR). Rifampicin-combinations, including with levofloxacin, were used in 52 (54.7 %) and 28 (29.5 %) cases, respectively. After a mean follow-up period of 895 days (IQR: 395–1649), the remission rate was 70.5 % (67/95). Patients with PJIs due to S. agalactiae failed in the same proportion as in the other patients (10/37 (27.1 %) versus 19/58 (32.7 %); p  = .55). In the univariate analysis, antibiotic monotherapy, DAIR, antibiotic treatments other than rifampicin-combinations, and TKP were all associated with a worse outcome. The only independent variable significantly associated with the patients’ outcomes was the location of the prosthesis (i.e., hip versus knee) (OR = 0.19; 95 % CI 0.04–0.93; p value 0.04). Conclusions The prognosis of streptococcal PJIs may not be as good as previously reported, especially for patients with an infected total knee arthroplasty. Rifampicin combinations, especially with levofloxacin, appear to be suitable antibiotic regimens for these patients.

Determinants of persistent low-level viraemia [PLLV, a viral load (VL) of between 50 and 500 copies/mL] have not been elucidated. In a case–control study, we evaluated the influence of micronutrients on PLLV in a population of 454 HIV-1 adults having initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) between January 2007 and December 2011. Plasma levels of retinol (vitamin A), 25-OH vitamin D 2  + D 3 , vitamin E and zinc were measured at ART initiation in cases (PLLV after 6 months of ART) and in controls (VL <50 copies/mL after 6 months). Cases and controls were matched for the CD4 cell count (±50/mm 3 ) and ethnic origin. Intergroup differences in demographic, biological and treatment parameters and sunshine intensity at ART initiation were adjusted using a propensity score. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess intergroup differences in plasma micronutrient levels. Thirty-three of the 454 patients (7.3%) displayed PLLV (median VL: 92 copies/mL). Patients were predominantly male (89%), Caucasian (64%) and CDC stage C (25%). The median age was 38 years, the median initial VL was 5.2 log 10 copies/mL and the median CD4 count was 74/mm 3 . The 22 cases and matched controls were balanced in these respects, and had similar vitamin A/E levels. Two cases (9%) and 9 controls (41%) had a vitamin D level <10.3 ng/mL ( p  = 0.0015), and 2 cases (9%) and 10 controls (48%) had a zinc level <74.6 μg/dL ( p  = 0.04). Our results support in vitro studies suggesting that vitamin D favours HIV-1 replication and that HIV-1 is zinc-dependent. Wide-scale, prospective studies are required.

Intravenous benzylpenicillin is the gold-standard treatment for neurosyphilis, but it requires prolonged hospitalisation. Ceftriaxone is a possible alternative treatment, the effectiveness of which remains unclear. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of ceftriaxone compared with benzylpenicillin in the treatment of neurosyphilis. We did a retrospective multicentre study including patients with neurosyphilis who were treated at one of eight tertiary care centres in France, from Jan 1, 1997, to Dec 31, 2017. We defined neurosyphilis as positive treponemal and non-treponemal tests and at least one of otic syphilis, ocular syphilis, either neurological symptom with a positive result on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-VDRL or CSF-PCR tests, or more than five leukocytes in a CSF cell count. Patients with neurosyphilis were identified from the medical information department database of each centre and assigned to one of two groups on the basis of the initial treatment received (ie, benzylpenicillin group or ceftriaxone group). The primary outcome was the overall clinical response (ie, proportion of patients with a complete or partial response) 1 month after treatment initiation. The secondary endpoints were proportions of patients with a complete response at 1 month and serological response at 6 months, and length of hospital stay. Of 365 patients with a coded diagnosis of neurosyphilis in one of the eight care centres during 1997–2017, 208 were included in this study (42 in the ceftriaxone group and 166 in the benzylpenicillin group). The mean age of patients was 44·4 years (SD 13·4), and 193 (93%) were men. We observed 41 instances of overall clinical response (98%) in the ceftriaxone group versus 125 (76%) in the benzylpenicillin group (crude odds ratio [OR] 13·02 [95% CI 1·73–97·66], p=0·017). After propensity score weighting, overall clinical response rates remained different between the groups (OR 1·22 [95% CI 1·12–1·33], p<0·0001). 22 (52%) patients in the ceftriaxone group and 55 (33%) in the benzylpenicillin group had a complete response (crude OR 2·26 [95% CI 1·12–4·41], p=0·031), with no significant difference after propensity score weighting (OR 1·08 [95% CI 0·94–1·24], p=0·269). Serological response at 6 months did not differ between the groups (21 [88%] of 24 in the ceftriaxone group vs 76 [82%] of 93 in the benzylpenicillin group; crude OR 1·56 [95% CI 0·42–5·86], p=0·50), whereas hospital stay was shorter for patients in the ceftriaxone group than for those in the benzylpenicillin group (mean 13·8 days [95% CI 12·8–14·8] vs 8·9 days [5·7–12·0], p<0·0001). No major adverse effects were reported in either group. Our results suggest that ceftriaxone is similarly effective to benzylpenicillin for the treatment of neurosyphilis, potentially decreasing the length of hospital stay. Randomised, controlled trials should be done to confirm these results. None.

Increased rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have been reported among men who have sex with men. We aimed to assess whether post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with doxycycline could reduce the incidence of STIs. All participants attending their scheduled visit in the open-label extension of the ANRS IPERGAY trial in France (men aged 18 years or older having condomless sex with men and using pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine) were eligible for inclusion in this open-label randomised study. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) at a central site to take a single oral dose of 200 mg doxycycline PEP within 24 h after sex or no prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a first STI (gonorrhoea, chlamydia, or syphilis) during the 10-month follow-up. The cumulative probability of occurrence of the primary endpoint was estimated in each group with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. The primary efficacy analysis was done on the intention-to-treat population, comprising all randomised participants. All participants received risk-reduction counselling and condoms, and were tested regularly for HIV. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01473472. Between July 20, 2015, and Jan 21, 2016, we randomly assigned 232 participants (n=116 in the doxycycline PEP group and n=116 in the no-PEP group) who were followed up for a median of 8·7 months (IQR 7·8–9·7). Participants in the PEP group used a median of 680 mg doxycycline per month (IQR 280–1450). 73 participants presented with a new STI during follow-up, 28 in the PEP group (9-month probability 22%, 95% CI 15–32) and 45 in the no-PEP group (42%, 33–53; log-rank test p=0·007). The occurrence of a first STI in participants taking PEP was lower than in those not taking PEP (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53; 95% CI 0·33–0·85; p=0·008). Similar results were observed for the occurrence of a first episode of chlamydia (HR 0·30; 95% CI 0·13–0·70; p=0·006) and of syphilis (0·27; 0·07–0·98; p=0·047); for a first episode of gonorrhoea the results did not differ significantly (HR 0·83; 0·47–1·47; p=0·52). No HIV seroconversion was observed, and 72 (71%) of all 102 STIs were asymptomatic. Rates of serious adverse events were similar in the two study groups. Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported in 62 (53%) participants in the PEP group and 47 (41%) in the no-PEP group (p=0·05). Doxycycline PEP reduced the occurrence of a first episode of bacterial STI in high-risk men who have sex with men. France Recherche Nord & Sud Sida-HIV Hépatites (ANRS) and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Several definitions of long COVID are used in research and practice what challenges epidemiological investigations. Here we present differences in long COVID prevalence accounting for several definitions and concordance between the definitions, as well as the risk factors associated with long COVID. Definitions considered were WHO post-COVID19 condition (PCC) definition with several thresholds (at least low - standard definition, moderate or strong impact on daily activities), NICE1 and NICE2 definitions (reported at least one or at least two symptoms), United States National Centre for Health Statistics, and United Kingdom Office for National Statistics definitions and perceived long COVID. Prevalence of long COVID among French adult population (N = 10 615) in autumn 2022 ranged from 1.2% to 13.4%, conditional of the definition. The concordance between the definitions was at best moderate. Next, on a smaller representative sample of a French adult population (N = 1 813) eight potential risk factors groups for long COVID were assessed in a systematic epidemiological investigation, following a conceptual model. Fifteen factors from seven groups were associated with long COVID including early-defined sociodemographic characteristics, pre-existing chronic conditions, short-term work-related factors, current socioeconomic position, health behaviours, infection-related factors, and perception of COVID-19 severity and long COVID. The likelihood of long COVID was higher for individuals with higher number of diseases and for nineteen out of twenty-six most prevalent dyads and a triad. A more standardized definition would facilitate research and surveillance of long COVID. Furthermore, long COVID should be observed as an interplay of social, medical and contextual factors rather than a mere complication of SARS-COV-2 infection, while patients with multimorbidity may present some of the particularly vulnerable population groups.

Certain percentage of population experiences persistent symptoms months after an acute Covid-19 episode (Long-COVID), with a significant impact on daily-life. Few studies exist on its prevalence and its impact among the general population. The main objective of this survey was to estimate the prevalence of Long COVID among the general adult population in France. Secondary objectives were to evaluate Long COVID management and to assess impact of this clinical condition on quality of life and mental health. Cross-sectional study was performed in March-April 2022 using an online self-administered questionnaire. The sample was selected by the quota method from a panel of volunteers. Its representativeness was ensured by appropriate weighting. Three groups were described: Long-COVID, COVID without persistent symptoms, never COVID. Post COVID-19 condition as defined by the WHO was applied for prevalence estimation. The prevalence was calculated by age and sex. Health care consumption and impact of Long COVID on quality of life and mental health will be studied comparing the three groups, using weighted adjusted polytomic regressions. Here, we present preliminary findings on Long COVID prevalence. There were 27,537 respondents, 52% females, mean age (SD) 49 (±16.5). Confirmed or probable COVID-19 was reported by 33.9% of participants; of whom 85.1% had confirmed laboratory test. Majority (65.1%) had COVID-19 <3 months ago. Long COVID concerned 1,086 (4%) participants. Prevalence was higher for females 4.6% vs. 3.3% for males, and among younger population for both sex groups. Overall, prevalence of Long COVID by age group was: 18-34 (6%), 35-49 (4.7%), 50-64 (3.4%), ≥65 (1.8%). This is a first estimation of Long COVID prevalence among the French population. Representativeness of the sample should be interpreted with caution due to a sample based on volunteers’ response. Ongoing analyses will provide clearer understanding of the impact of Long COVID. Key messages • This is a first estimation of Long COVID prevalence among the French population. • There is a significant portion of the French population impacted by persisting or reoccurring symptoms defined by Long COVID; its impact and care management will be further evaluated.

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are severe infections that can be community or hospital acquired. Effects of time to appropriate treatment and impact of antimicrobial management team are discussed in terms of outcome of BSI. We sought to evaluate the impact of initial BSI management on short-term mortality. A prospective, multicenter survey was conducted in 121 French hospitals. Participants declaring BSI during a 1-month period were included consecutively. Data on patient comorbidities, illness severity, BSI management, and resistance profile of bacterial strains were collected. Predictors of 10-day mortality were identified by multivariate regression for overall BSI, health care-related and hospital-acquired BSI. We included 1,952 BSIs. More than a third of them were hospital acquired (39%). Multidrug resistance was identified in 10% of cases, mainly in health care-related BSI. Empirical therapy and targeted therapy were appropriate for 61% and 94% of cases, respectively. Increased 10-day mortality was associated with severe sepsis, septic shock, increasing age, and any focus other than the urinary tract. Decreased mortality was associated with receiving at least one active antibiotic within the first 48 hours. Intervention of antimicrobial management team during the acute phase of BSI was associated with a decreased mortality at day 10 in the overall population and in health care-related BSI. Optimizing BSI management by increasing rapidity of appropriate treatment initiation may decrease short-term mortality, even in countries with low rate of multidrug-resistant organisms. Early intervention of antimicrobial management team is crucial in terms of mortality.