Explore the vast range of titles available.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1)/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD‐L1) pathway have transformed urothelial cancer (UC) therapy. The correlation between PD‐L1 expression and ICI effectiveness is uncertain, leaving the role of PD‐L1 as a predictive marker for ICI efficacy unclear. Among several ways to enhance the efficacy of ICI, trials are exploring combining ICIs with serine/threonine‐protein kinase mTOR (mTOR) inhibitors in different tumor types. The potential interaction between mTOR inhibitors and PD‐L1 expression in UC has not been well characterized. In our study, we investigated how phosphoinositide 3‐kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors (TAK‐228, everolimus and TAK‐117) affect PD‐L1 expression and function in preclinical bladder cancer cell models. TAK‐228 increased cell surface levels of glycosylated PD‐L1 in all but one of the seven cell lines, regardless of baseline levels. TAK‐228 promoted the secretion of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and interferon‐β (IFNβ), both linked to PD‐L1 protein induction. Blocking EGF and IFNβ receptors reversed the TAK‐228‐induced PD‐L1 increase. Additionally, TAK‐228 enhanced IFN‐γ‐induced PD‐L1 expression and intracellular HLA‐I levels in some cells. TAK‐228‐treated bladder cancer cells exhibited resistance to the cytotoxic effects of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8)+ T cells. The addition of an anti‐PD‐L1 antibody diminished this resistance in T24 cells. Increased expression of PD‐L1 under TAK‐228 exposure was confirmed in patient‐derived explants (PDEs) treated ex vivo. These preclinical findings suggest that mTOR inhibition with TAK‐228 can increase PD‐L1 levels, potentially impacting the specific immune response against UC cells. This highlights the rationale for exploring the combination of mTOR inhibitors with ICIs in patients with advanced UC. mTOR inhibition with TAK‐228 can increase PD‐L1 levels, potentially impacting the specific immune response against bladder cancer cell lines.

Background Uveal melanoma metastasizes to the liver. We aimed to explore the metabolic activity of liver metastases (LM) as a biomarker for survival. Methods We analyzed newly diagnosed patients with metastatic UM (MUM) with LM detected by liver‐directed imaging and had undergone a PET/CT at diagnosis. Findings 51 patients were identified between 2004 and 2019. Median age was 62 years, 41% male and 22% ECOG ≥1. LDH, ALP, and GGT were elevated in 49%, 37%, and 57% of patients. Median LM SUVmax was 8.5 (3–42.2). Same size lesions presented a wide range of metabolic activity. Median OS was 17.3 m (95% CI:10.6–23.9). Patients with SUVmax ≥8.5 had an OS of 9.4 m (95% CI:6.4–12.3), whereas patients with SUVmax <8.5 had an OS of 38.4 m (95% CI:21.4–55.5; p < 0.0001, HR = 2.9). We observed similar results when studying M1a disease separately. Multivariate analysis showed SUVmax as an independent prognostic factor for the whole population and those with M1a disease. Interpretation Increased metabolic activity of LM seems to be an independent predictor of survival. MUM is a heterogeneous disease and metabolic activity probably reflects a different intrinsic behavior.

Antibodies targeting PD-1 or its ligand 1 PD-L1 such as atezolizumab, have great efficacy in a proportion of metastatic urothelial cancers 1 , 2 . Biomarkers may facilitate identification of these responding tumors 3 . Neoadjuvant use of these agents is associated with pathological complete response in a spectrum of tumors, including urothelial cancer 4 – 7 . Sequential tissue sampling from these studies allowed for detailed on-treatment biomarker analysis. Here, we present a single-arm phase 2 study, investigating two cycles of atezolizumab before cystectomy in 95 patients with muscle-invasive urothelial cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02662309 ). Pathological complete response was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints focused on safety, relapse-free survival and biomarker analysis. The pathological complete response rate was 31% (95% confidence interval: 21–41%), achieving the primary efficacy endpoint. Baseline biomarkers showed that the presence of preexisting activated T cells was more prominent than expected and correlated with outcome. Other established biomarkers, such as tumor mutational burden, did not predict outcome, differentiating this from the metastatic setting. Dynamic changes to gene expression signatures and protein biomarkers occurred with therapy, whereas changes in DNA alterations with treatment were uncommon. Responding tumors showed predominant expression of genes related to tissue repair after treatment, making tumor biomarker interpretation challenging in this group. Stromal factors such as transforming growth factor-β and fibroblast activation protein were linked to resistance, as was high expression of cell cycle gene signatures after treatment. A single-arm multicenter phase 2 trial demonstrates clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant PD-L1 blockade in patients with resectable muscle-invasive bladder cancer ineligible for cisplatin and examines biomarkers associated with patient outcome.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apalutamide prostate cancer compared to the pivotal trials patients and to identify the first subsequent therapy in a real‐world setting. Methods The study is prospective and observational based on real‐world evidence, performed by different medical disciplines and eight academics centres around Barcelona, Spain. It included all patients with metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and high‐risk non‐metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treated with apalutamide from June 2018 to December 2022. Results Of 227 patients treated with apalutamide, 10% had ECOG‐PS 2, and 41% were diagnosed with new‐generation imaging. In the mHSPC group (209 patients), 75 years was the median age, 53% had synchronous metastases, and 22% were M1a. In the nmCRPC (18 patients), 82 years was the median age, and 81% ≤6 months had PSA doubling time. Patients achieved PSA90 in 92% of mHSPC and 50% of nmCRPC and PSA ≤0.2 in 71% of mHSPC and 39% of nmCRPC. Treatment‐related adverse events occurred in 40.1% of mHSPC and 44.4% of nmCRPC. After discontinuation of apalutamide due to disease progression, 54.5% in mHSPC and 75% in nmCRPC started chemotherapy, while after discontinuation because of adverse events, 73.3% in mHSPC and 100% in nmCRPC continued with other hormonal‐therapies. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of apalutamide were similar to that described in the pivotal trials, despite including an older and more comorbid population. Usually, subsequent therapies after apalutamide differed depending on the reason for discontinuation: by disease progression started chemotherapy and by adverse events hormonal sequencing. This study is prospective and observational based on real‐world evidence, performed by different medical disciplines and eight academic centres around Barcelona, Spain. It included all patients with metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and high‐risk non‐metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treated with apalutamide. Of 227 patients treated with apalutamide, 10% had ECOG‐PS 2, and 41% were diagnosed with new‐generation imaging. In the mHSPC group (209 patients), 75 years was the median age, 53% had synchronous metastases, and 22% were M1a. In the nmCRPC (18 patients), 82 years was the median age, and 81% of ≤6 months had PSA doubling time. Patients achieved PSA90 in 92% of mHSPC and 50% of nmCRPC and PSA ≤0.2 in 71% of mHSPC and 39% of nmCRPC. In conclusion, the efficacy and safety of apalutamide were similar to that described in the pivotal trials, despite including an older and more comorbid population. Usually, subsequent therapies after apalutamide differed depending on the reason for discontinuation: by disease progression started chemotherapy and by adverse events hormonal sequencing.

In recent years, several nonhormonal and hormonal agents, including enzalutamide, have been approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) on the basis of improved overall survival in prospective clinical trials. The incorporation of these agents has revolutionized the treatment of CRPC but has also raised the question of what is the ideal sequence of administering them. Enzalutamide is a nonsteroidal second-generation antiandrogen that has been approved for the treatment of metastatic CRPC both in the post-docetaxel and chemotherapy-naïve settings. This article reviews the pharmacological characteristics of enzalutamide, the efficacy studies which led to its approval, its safety profile, and quality of life-related parameters as well as its place in the sequential treatment and management of metastatic prostate cancer.

SAR439459, a ‘second‐generation’ human anti‐transforming growth factor‐beta (TGFβ) monoclonal antibody, inhibits all TGFβ isoforms and improves the antitumor activity of anti‐programmed cell death protein‐1 therapeutics. This study reports the pharmacodynamics (PD) and biomarker results from phase I/Ib first‐in‐human study of SAR439459 ± cemiplimab in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT03192345). In dose‐escalation phase (Part 1), SAR439459 was administered intravenously at increasing doses either every 2 weeks (Q2W) or every 3 weeks (Q3W) with cemiplimab IV at 3 mg/kg Q2W or 350 mg Q3W, respectively, in patients with advanced solid tumors. In dose‐expansion phase (Part 2), patients with melanoma received SAR439459 IV Q3W at preliminary recommended phase II dose (pRP2D) of 22.5/7.5 mg/kg or at 22.5 mg/kg with cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W. Tumor biopsy and peripheral blood samples were collected for exploratory biomarker analyses to assess target engagement and PD, and results were correlated with patients' clinical parameters. SAR439459 ± cemiplimab showed decreased plasma and tissue TGFβ, downregulation of TGFβ‐pathway activation signature, modulation of peripheral natural killer (NK) and T cell expansion, proliferation, and increased secretion of CXCL10. Conversion of tumor tissue samples from ‘immune‐excluded’ to ‘immune‐infiltrated’ phenotype in a representative patient with melanoma SAR439459 22.5 mg/kg with cemiplimab was observed. In paired tumor and plasma, active and total TGFβ1 was more consistently elevated followed by TGFβ2, whereas TGFβ3 was only measurable (lower limit of quantitation ≥2.68 pg/mg) in tumors. SAR439459 ± cemiplimab showed expected peripheral PD effects and TGFβ alteration. However, further studies are needed to identify biomarkers of response.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer treatment and can result in complete remissions even at advanced stages of the disease. However, only a small fraction of patients respond to the treatment. To better understand which factors drive clinical benefit, we have generated whole exome and RNA sequencing data from 27 advanced urothelial carcinoma patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 monoclonal antibodies. We assessed the influence on the response of non-synonymous mutations (tumor mutational burden or TMB), clonal and subclonal mutations, neoantigen load and various gene expression markers. We found that although TMB is significantly associated with response, this effect can be mostly explained by clonal mutations, present in all cancer cells. This trend was validated in an additional cohort. Additionally, we found that responders with few clonal mutations had abnormally high levels of T and B cell immune markers, suggesting that a high immune cell infiltration signature could be a better predictive biomarker for this subset of patients. Our results support the idea that highly clonal cancers are more likely to respond to ICI and suggest that non-additive effects of different signatures should be considered for predictive models.

BackgroundRO7122290 (RO) is a bispecific antibody-like fusion protein that simultaneously targets FAP, abundantly expressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts in most solid tumors, and 4-1BB, transiently expressed on activated T cells. Pre-clinical experiments revealed strong intra-tumoral CD8+ T cells infiltration in FAP-positive tumors, cytokines induction and significant anti-tumor activity mediated by RO (signal 2 of T cell activation), upon TCR/CD3 engagement (signal 1) or in combination with atezolizumab (ATZ). In this first-in-human study, the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of RO were assessed, both as single agent (SA) (Part A) and in combination with ATZ (Part B).MethodsPts with advanced and/or metastatic solid tumors were eligible for this ongoing Phase 1/1b trial (EUDRACT 2017-003961-83). RO was administered intravenously, weekly (QW) at escalating dose levels (DLs). In Part A, 62 pts were treated at 13 DLs of RO, dose range 5–2000 mg. In Part B, 39 pts were treated at 8 DLs of RO, dose range 45–2000 mg, with ATZ 1200 mg Q3W. Secondary biomarker objective was characterization of PD effects in tumor tissue and blood. The endpoints were change from baseline in intra-tumoral density (cell/mm2) and proliferation (Ki67) of CD8+ T cells measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and change in activation (4-1BB) and proliferation (Ki67) of peripheral CD8+ T cells measured by flow cytometry. Exploratory objectives were characterization of PD effects in plasma/serum and measurement of intra-tumoral immune activation. The endpoints were change in peripheral cytokines (TNF-alfa, IFN-gamma, IL-6) and soluble(s) factors (sCD25, s4-1BB) concentration measured by ELISA, and intra-tumoral changes in gene expression measured by RNAseq.ResultsIn the periphery, we observed transient expression of 4-1BB on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, along with secretion of s4-1BB and inflammatory cytokines, suggesting 4-1BB targeting and potent T cell activation. The concomitant induction of proliferating T cells indicated the potential association to priming and formation of tumor-reactive T cells. In the tumor, we detected increased CD8+ T cells infiltration and proliferation, in both Parts. Proliferating CD8+ T cells increased in both tumor nests and surrounding stroma, with a preferential accumulation in the latter. RNAseq analysis revealed induction of 4-1BB, PD-1 and IFN-gamma, indicating intra-tumoral T cells activation in Part B.ConclusionsPD activity was consistent with the postulated MoA, confirming RO to be a potent tumor-targeted 4-1BB agonist in the clinical setting. Our observations suggest that RO can synergize with endogenous T cell receptor stimulation, both as SA and in combination with ATZ.

BackgroundTransforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) is a bifunctional regulator of tumor growth playing a role in tumor immune evasion and resistance to checkpoint blockade. Increased activation of TGFβ pathway correlated with reduced overall survival in patients with PD-1 resistance/refractory tumors. Therefore, the combination of a TGFβ inhibitor with an anti-PD-1 agent may benefit patients who are resistant to checkpoint blockade. SAR439459 is a ”second generation” human anti-TGFβ IgG4 monoclonal antibody. Here we report the preliminary PD results and patient selection strategy (mesenchymal CRC) of SAR439459 ± anti-PD-1 cemiplimab in patients with advanced tumors from an on-going phase 1 study (NCT03192345).MethodsPeripheral blood, serum and tumor biopsies from patients were collected for the assessment of both predictive and PD biomarkers. A consensus molecular subtyping 4 (CMS4) gene classifier was developed and used to identify mesenchymal CRC tumors based on an in-silico experiment followed by a validation using ~200 procured CRC tumor biopsy samples with customized NanoString assay. TGFβ level in plasma and tumor was measured by ELISA to assess target engagement of SAR439459. Well-known immune modulation events as the PD readout were measured: 1) immunophenotyping of circulating immune cells ; 2) cytokine/chemokine production by MSD assay; 3) PD-L1, CD8+ T cells and FoxP3+ Tregs in tumor micro-environment (TME) by immunohistochemistry; 4) TGFβ pathway activation gene signature in TME by RNAseq.ResultsSAR439459 ± cemiplimab, induced inhibition of plasma TGFβ level ≥ 90% at doses ≥ 0.25mg/kg Q2W, together with a clear trend of decrease in intra-tumoral TGFβ. RNAseq data from paired biopsies revealed concomitant down-regulation of TGFβ pathway. In periphery, SAR439459 ± cemiplimab increased proliferating T and NK cells. Concomitantly, enhanced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines confirmed peripheral immune activation. In TME, a trend of increased CD8+ T cell infiltration and conversion from ”immune-excluded” to ”immune-inflamed” phenotype was observed following the combination treatment in several cases. No significant modulation of PD-L1 or FoxP3 was observed from the available paired biopsies. Out of 137 pre-screened CRC patients, 58 (42%) were identified as carrying the CMS4 phenotype based on the gene classifier.ConclusionsClinical modulation of TGFβ level and the related pathway demonstrated SAR439459’s target engagement. Further analysis confirmed the peripheral immune activation in patients treated with SAR439459 ± cemiplimab. Coupled with CD8+ T cell modulation in TME, these findings suggest the identification of early PD biomarkers impacted by SAR439459 which is consistent with the mechanism of action and biological activity of TGFβ blockade therapy.Trial RegistrationNCT03192345Ethics ApprovalThe study protocols were approved by the institutional review board or independent ethics committee of each participating institution. All patients provided written informed consent priorto enrollment.ConsentWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this abstract and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Survival outcomes are poor for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who receive standard, first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. We assessed the overall survival of patients who received durvalumab (a PD-L1 inhibitor), with or without tremelimumab (a CTLA-4 inhibitor), as a first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. DANUBE is an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial in patients with untreated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, conducted at 224 academic research centres, hospitals, and oncology clinics in 23 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1) to receive durvalumab monotherapy (1500 mg) administered intravenously every 4 weeks; durvalumab (1500 mg) plus tremelimumab (75 mg) administered intravenously every 4 weeks for up to four doses, followed by durvalumab maintenance (1500 mg) every 4 weeks; or standard-of-care chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus cisplatin or gemcitabine plus carboplatin, depending on cisplatin eligibility) administered intravenously for up to six cycles. Randomisation was done through an interactive voice–web response system, with stratification by cisplatin eligibility, PD-L1 status, and presence or absence of liver metastases, lung metastases, or both. The coprimary endpoints were overall survival compared between the durvalumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy groups in the population of patients with high PD-L1 expression (the high PD-L1 population) and between the durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus chemotherapy groups in the intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients). The study has completed enrolment and the final analysis of overall survival is reported. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02516241, and the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT number 2015-001633-24. Between Nov 24, 2015, and March 21, 2017, we randomly assigned 1032 patients to receive durvalumab (n=346), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (n=342), or chemotherapy (n=344). At data cutoff (Jan 27, 2020), median follow-up for survival was 41·2 months (IQR 37·9–43·2) for all patients. In the high PD-L1 population, median overall survival was 14·4 months (95% CI 10·4–17·3) in the durvalumab monotherapy group (n=209) versus 12·1 months (10·4–15·0) in the chemotherapy group (n=207; hazard ratio 0·89, 95% CI 0·71–1·11; p=0·30). In the intention-to-treat population, median overall survival was 15·1 months (13·1–18·0) in the durvalumab plus tremelimumab group versus 12·1 months (10·9–14·0) in the chemotherapy group (0·85, 95% CI 0·72–1·02; p=0·075). In the safety population, grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 47 (14%) of 345 patients in the durvalumab group, 93 (27%) of 340 patients in the durvalumab plus tremelimumab group, and in 188 (60%) of 313 patients in the chemotherapy group. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse event was increased lipase in the durvalumab group (seven [2%] of 345 patients) and in the durvalumab plus tremelimumab group (16 [5%] of 340 patients), and neutropenia in the chemotherapy group (66 [21%] of 313 patients). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 30 (9%) of 345 patients in the durvalumab group, 78 (23%) of 340 patients in the durvalumab plus tremelimumab group, and 50 (16%) of 313 patients in the chemotherapy group. Deaths due to study drug toxicity were reported in two (1%) patients in the durvalumab group (acute hepatic failure and hepatitis), two (1%) patients in the durvalumab plus tremelimumab group (septic shock and pneumonitis), and one (<1%) patient in the chemotherapy group (acute kidney injury). This study did not meet either of its coprimary endpoints. Further research to identify the patients with previously untreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma who benefit from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, either alone or in combination regimens, is warranted. AstraZeneca.