Explore the vast range of titles available.

The circulating metabolome provides a snapshot of the physiological state of the organism responding to pathogenic challenges. Here we report alterations in the plasma metabolome reflecting the clinical presentation of COVID-19 patients with mild (ambulatory) diseases, moderate disease (radiologically confirmed pneumonitis, hospitalization and oxygen therapy), and critical disease (in intensive care). This analysis revealed major disease- and stage-associated shifts in the metabolome, meaning that at least 77 metabolites including amino acids, lipids, polyamines and sugars, as well as their derivatives, were altered in critical COVID-19 patient’s plasma as compared to mild COVID-19 patients. Among a uniformly moderate cohort of patients who received tocilizumab, only 10 metabolites were different among individuals with a favorable evolution as compared to those who required transfer into the intensive care unit. The elevation of one single metabolite, anthranilic acid, had a poor prognostic value, correlating with the maintenance of high interleukin-10 and -18 levels. Given that products of the kynurenine pathway including anthranilic acid have immunosuppressive properties, we speculate on the therapeutic utility to inhibit the rate-limiting enzymes of this pathway including indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase.

Eosinophilic-related clinical manifestations are protean and the underlying conditions underpinning eosinophilia are highly diverse. The etiological workup of unexplained eosinophilia/hypereosinophilia can be challenging, and can lead sometimes to extensive, inappropriate, costly and/or invasive investigations. To date, guidelines for the etiological workup and management of eosinophilia are mainly issued by hematologists, and thus mostly cover the scope of clonal hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES). Here, thanks to an extensive literature review, and thanks to the joint work of a large panel of experts involving physicians from both adult and pediatric medicine and from various subspecialties (as well as a representative of a patients’ association representative), we provide recommendations for both the step-by step diagnostic workup of eosinophilia (whether unexplained or within specific contexts) as well as the management and follow-up of the full spectrum of eosinophilic disorders (including clonal, reactive, lymphocytic and idiopathic HES, as well as single-organ diseases). Didactic prescription summaries intended to facilitate the prescription of eosinophil-targeted drugs are also provided, as are practical diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms. Lastly, this set of recommendations also includes a summary intended for general practitioners, as well as an overview of the therapeutic patient education program set up by the French reference center for HES. Further updates will be mandatory as new validated information emerges.

BackgroundHigh levels of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) correlate with disease severity in COVID-19. We hypothesized that tocilizumab (a recombinant humanized anti-IL-6 receptor) could improve outcomes in selected patients with severe worsening COVID-19 pneumonia and high inflammatory parameters.MethodsThe TOCICOVID study included a prospective cohort of patients aged 16–80 years with severe (requiring > 6 L/min of oxygen therapy to obtain Sp02 > 94%) rapidly deteriorating (increase by ≥ 3 L/min of oxygen flow within the previous 12 h) COVID-19 pneumonia with ≥ 5 days of symptoms and C-reactive protein levels > 40 mg/L. They entered a compassionate use program of treatment with intravenous tocilizumab (8 mg/kg with a maximum of 800 mg per infusion; and if needed a second infusion 24 to 72 h later). A control group was retrospectively selected with the same inclusion criteria. Outcomes were assessed at D28 using inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) methodology.ResultsAmong the 96 patients included (81% male, mean (SD) age: 60 (12.5) years), underlying conditions, baseline disease severity, and concomitant medications were broadly similar between the tocilizumab (n = 49) and the control (n = 47) groups. In the IPTW analysis, treatment with tocilizumab was associated with a reduced need for overall ventilatory support (49 vs. 89%, wHR: 0.39 [0.25–0.56]; p < 0.001). Albeit lacking statistical significance, there was a substantial trend towards a reduction of mechanical ventilation (31% vs. 45%; wHR: 0.58 [0.36–0.94]; p = 0.026). However, tocilizumab did not improve overall survival (wHR = 0.68 [0.31–1.748], p = 0.338). Among the 85 (89%) patients still alive at D28, patients treated with tocilizumab had a higher rate of oxygen withdrawal (82% vs. 73.5%, wHR = 1.66 [1.17–2.37], p = 0.005), with a shorter delay before being weaned of oxygen therapy (mean 11 vs. 16 days; p < 0.001). At D28, the rate of patients discharged from hospital was higher in the tocilizumab group (70% vs. 40%, wHR = 1.82 [1.22–2.75]; p = 0.003). The levels of CRP and fibrinogen post therapy (p < 0.001 for both variables) were significantly lower in the tocilizumab group (interaction test, mixed model). Rates of neutropenia (35% vs. 0%; p < 0.001) were higher in the tocilizumab group, yet rates of infections (22% vs. 38%, p = 0.089) including ventilator-acquired pneumonia (8% vs. 26%, p = 0.022) were higher in the control group.ConclusionThese data could be helpful for the design of future trials aiming to counter COVID-19-induced inflammation, especially before patients require admission to the intensive care unit.

Eosinophils have widespread procoagulant effects. Eosinophilic cardiovascular toxicity mostly consists of endomyocardial damage or eosinophilic vasculitis, while reported cases of venous thrombosis (VT) are scarce. We aimed to report on the clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with unexplained VT and eosinophilia, and to identify predictors of relapse. This retrospective, multicenter, observational study included patients aged over 15 years with VT, concomitant blood eosinophilia ≥ 1G/L and without any other moderate-to-strong contributing factors for VT. Fifty-four patients were included. VT was the initial manifestation of eosinophil-related disease in 29 (54%) patients and included pulmonary embolism (52%), deep venous thrombosis (37%), hepatic (11%) and portal vein (9%) thromboses. The median [IQR] absolute eosinophil count at VT onset was 3.3G/L [1.6–7.4]. Underlying eosinophil-related diseases included FIP1L1-PDGFRA-associated chronic myeloid neoplasm (n = 4), Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (n = 9), lymphocytic (n = 1) and idiopathic (n = 29) variants of hypereosinophilic syndrome. After a median [IQR] follow-up of 24 [10–62] months, 7 (13%) patients had a recurrence of VT. In multivariate analysis, persistent eosinophilia was the sole variable associated with a shorter time to VT relapse (HR 7.48; CI95% [1.94–29.47]; p = 0.015). Long-term normalization of eosinophil count could prevent the recurrence of VT in a subset of patients with unexplained VT and eosinophilia ≥ 1G/L.

Background Intravascular large B‐cell lymphoma (lVLBCL) is a very rare type of large B‐cell lymphoma. Methods We conducted a retrospective study on IVLBCL patients treated from 2000 to 2016 in LYSA cooperative group centers. Results Sixty‐five patients were identified in 23 centers. Median age at diagnosis was 69 years (range 23–92). Thirty‐four patients (64%) had an IPI score >3 and 40 patients (67%) had a performance status ≥2. The most frequent extra‐nodal locations were bone marrow (n = 34; 52%), central nervous system (n = 25; 39%), and skin (n = 21; 33%). Nodal involvement and endocrine system were observed in 34% (n = 22) and 18% (n = 12) of all cases, respectively. Twenty‐six patients (41%) had macrophage activation syndrome. Tumor cells were frequently CD5 positive (52%) with a non‐germinal center origin (86%). BCL2 was expressed in 87% of all samples analyzed (n = 20) and 43% of patients had a MYC/BCL2 double expression. Fifty‐six patients were treated with a regimen of chemotherapy containing rituximab, among whom 73% reached complete remission. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 29.4 months and 63.8 months, respectively. History of autoimmune disorder (Hazard ratio [HR] 3.3 [1.4–7.8]; p < 0.01), nodal involvement (HR 2.6 [1.4–5.1]; p < 0.01), lack of anthracycline (HR 0.1 [0–0.4] for use; p < 0.001), or no intensification at first‐line regimen (p = 0.02) were associated with worse PFS. High‐dose methotrexate use was not associated with better PFS or OS. Conclusions Our study highlights the aggressive clinical picture of IVLBCL, in particular the frequency of macrophage activation syndrome, and the need for new therapies despite a response to R‐CHOP‐like regimen similar to non‐intravascular diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas. Intravascular large B‐cell lymphomas in a large cohort present aggressive features and a dismal prognosis is suggested when associated with autoimmune disorders and nodal involvement.

We thank Ventura et al for their correspondence1 on our study on paediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (MIS-TS) mimicking Kawasaki disease (KD) (Kawa-COVID-19).2 They report a 38-year-old woman with a KD-like presentation following SARS-CoV-2 infection and highlight the need for physicians to be aware of this syndrome also in adults. We fully agree that, despite being initially described and more frequent in children, a similar presentation may occur following SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults.3 To assess similarities and differences between paediatric and adult cases, we collected data of nine adult cases of Kawa-COVID-19 in three hospitals of the Great Paris region (six were previously reported in another case series3) and compared them with our paediatric Kawa-COVID-19 cohort.2 The main characteristics of adult and paediatric patients are described in table 1.