Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTX) is a prognostic factor in many cancer types, and early prediction would help to modify treatment. In patients with gastric and esophagogastric junction (AEG) cancer, the accuracy of FDG PET-CT to predict early pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTX) is currently not known. Methods From a consecutive cohort of 72 patients, 44 patients with resectable, locally-advanced gastric cancer or AEG Siewert type II and III received neoCTX after primary staging with endoscopic ultrasound, PET-CT and laparoscopy. Overall, 14 patients did not show FDG uptake, and the remaining 30 were restaged by PET-CT 14 days after the first cycle of neoCTX. Metabolic response was defined as decrease of tumor standardized uptake value (SUV) by ≥35%. Major pathologic regression was defined as less than 10% residual tumor cells. Results Metabolic response after neoCTX was detected in 20/30 (66.7%), and non-response in 10/30 (33.3%) patients. Among metabolic responders, n  = 10 (50%) showed major and n = 10 (50%) minor pathologic regression. In non-responders, n  = 9 (90%) had minor and 1 (10%) a major pathologic regression. This resulted in a sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity 47.3%, positive predictive value 50%, negative predictive value 90% and accuracy of 63.3%. Conclusion Response PET-CT after the first cycle of neoCTX does not accurately predict overall pathologic response. However, PET-CT reliably detects non-responders, and identifies patients who should either immediately proceed to resection or receive a modified multimodality therapy. Trial registration The trial was registered and approved by local ethics committee PB_2016–00769.

Background Over the past two decades, most cancer vaccines have failed to be developed clinically. The lack of efficient priming with specific tumor antigens and/or weak adjuvants may explain this poor success rate. MVX-ONCO-1, a personalized cell-based vaccine, combines inactivated autologous tumor cells and encapsulated allogeneic human cells genetically engineered to produce granulocyte–macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). This unique technology allows sustained local delivery of strong adjuvant at the vaccination site. The combination of inactivated autologous tumor cells and potent local adjuvant delivery addresses these two unmet critical steps and may recapitulate in patients the successful combination observed in experimental models. Methods The SAKK 11/16, a Phase IIa trial with Overall Survival (OS) as the primary endpoint was the first efficacy study evaluating MVX-ONCO-1. Patients with Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) progressing after at least one line of systemic therapy were enrolled with 50% of patients alive at 26 weeks as the primary objective. Results In this hard-to-treat population, SAKK 11/16 met the primary endpoint, with 68.8% of patients alive at 6 months. The median OS was 11.4 months, with 32% of the patients alive after 18 months. Complete and partial responses were observed on MVX-ONCO-1 monotherapy. Moreover, all patients who developed a positive DTH reaction to their tumor cells upon vaccination survived at 12 months. Additionally, patients living for more than 12 months had higher circulating antibody titers against tumor-associated antigens. Explorative analysis looking at median OS from the start of anti-PD-1 therapy was 21.7 months. In addition, no new safety signals with no systemic adverse events (AE) related to the treatment and no manufacturing issues were observed in this multicenter trial. Conclusions These findings suggest that MVX-ONCO-1 can induce a coordinated immune response with clinical benefits as a standalone treatment, leading to prolonged survival. This effect may be enhanced by previous exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Trial registration (ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT02999646.

Background Former prospective analyses revealed gross tumor volume (GTV) as the most reliable parameter to statistically significantly predict disease control in head neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with definitive intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) +/-concomitant systemic therapy. The most 'unfavourable' subgroup was characterized by total GTV (tGTV) of > 70 cc, translating in ~50 and 65% 3-year disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OAS, vs 68% and 88% in tGTV < 70 cc, p = 0.001 and 0.0001), and ~25% distant spread (vs 6% for tGTV < 70 cc, p < 0.0001). The aim of this report was to analyze whether there is a subgroup out of patients with tGTV > 70 cc, which only marginally benefits from intensive curative treatment. Results Between 03/2002-03/2011, 112 HNC patients with tGTV > 70 cc were definitively irradiated with curative intention. Mean tGTV was 104 cc (71-251). 98/112 (88%) patients underwent systemic therapy. Parameters with potential impact on disease outcome were retrospectively tested. The 3-year local-regional control (LRC), DFS and OAS rates were 61%, 50%, and 58%. The used cut-off value of 130 cc revealed an inverse association between tGTV and outcome. Patients able to undergo any systemic therapy (n = 98, mean tGTV0 103 cc, mean age 60 years) showed a satisfying and significantly superior outcome compared to the subgroup with radiation alone (n = 14, mean tGTV 99 cc, mean age 73 years), with 53% vs 17% 3-year DFS (p = 0.01). Radiation alone for tGTV > 130 cc failed to aim its curative goal in 3/3 patients. Conclusion Patients with tGTV > 70 cc unable to undergo any systemic therapy represented a subgroup in which disease control was achievable in < 20% following curatively intended IMRT. Prospective testing of a larger sample size is needed to evaluate, if radiation alone for tGTV >~130 cc fails to meet its curative aim.

Purpose Except for early stages (T1/2 N0), the prognosis for patients with oral cavity cancer (OCC) is known to be worse than for those with pharyngeal carcinoma. While definitive intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)-chemotherapy affords loco-regional control rates (LRC) of approximately 80% in advanced pharyngeal cancer, corresponding rates are reported to be much lower for OCC. The aim of this work was to evaluate loco-regional disease control and overall survival (OAS) in a relatively large OCC patient cohort treated in the IMRT era. Methods and materials Between October 2002 and June 2011, 160 OCC patients were treated with curative intention IMRT at our department. 122 patients (76%) were referred with primary disease and 38 patients (24%) with a recurrent OCC at least 3 months after surgery alone. Definitive IMRT was performed in 44/160 patients (28%), whilst 116 patients underwent previous surgery. Simultaneous systemic therapy was administered in 72%. Results Patients with postoperative IMRT (+/−systemic therapy) with R0-1 status (n = 99) reached significantly higher LRC/OAS rates than patients following IMRT for macroscopic disease (n = 61), with 84%/80% versus 38%/33% at 3 years, respectively (p < 0.0001). This was found in patients treated for initial, as well as recurrent, disease. Less than 2% persisting grade 3/4 late effects were observed. Conclusions IMRT for R0-1 situations translated into a highly significant superior LRC and OAS compared to the IMRT cohort treated for macroscopic disease. Treatment was well tolerated.

Abstract In the randomized, phase 3 CheckMate 141 trial, nivolumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus investigator’s choice (IC) of chemotherapy at primary analysis among 361 patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) post-platinum therapy. Nivolumab versus IC as first-line treatment also improved OS among patients with R/M SCCHN who progressed on platinum therapy for locally advanced disease in the adjuvant or primary setting at 1-year follow-up. In the present long-term follow-up analysis of patients receiving first-line treatment, OS benefit with nivolumab (n = 50) versus IC (n = 26) was maintained (median: 7.7 months versus 3.3 months; hazard ratio: 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.94) at 2 years. No new safety signals were identified. In summary, this long-term 2-year analysis of CheckMate 141 supports the use of nivolumab as a first-line treatment for patients with platinum-refractory R/M SCCHN. Using a subgroup analysis of patient data from the CheckMate 141 trial, this article reports long-term outcomes among patients receiving first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck 2 years of follow-up.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and MEK inhibitors (EGFRi/MEKi) are beneficial for the treatment of solid cancers but are frequently associated with severe therapy-limiting acneiform skin toxicities. The underlying molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Using gene expression profiling we identified IL-36γ and IL-8 as candidate drivers of EGFRi/MEKi skin toxicity. We provide molecular and translational evidence that EGFRi/MEKi in concert with the skin commensal bacterium Cutibacterium acnes act synergistically to induce IL-36γ in keratinocytes and subsequently IL-8, leading to cutaneous neutrophilia. IL-36γ expression was the combined result of C. acnes-induced NF-κB activation and EGFRi/MEKi-mediated expression of the transcription factor Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4), due to the presence of both NF-κB and KLF4 binding sites in the human IL-36γ gene promoter. EGFRi/MEKi increased KLF4 expression by blockade of the EGFR/MEK/ERK pathway. These results provide an insight into understanding the pathological mechanism of the acneiform skin toxicities induced by EGFRi/MEKi and identify IL-36γ and the transcription factor KLF4 as potential therapeutic targets.

Objective Elderly patients with malignant head-and-neck tumors (HNT) often pose a therapeutic challenge. They frequently have significant comorbidities which may influence their ability to tolerate tumor-specific therapies. Our aim was to investigate the outcome of patients aged 80+ years undergoing curative intent intensity- or volume-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT/VMAT). Methods We retrospectively reviewed our HNT patients aged 80+ treated with curative IMRT/VMAT from December 2003 to November 2015. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local control (LC), and treatment tolerance were assessed. Outcome results were compared with that of a younger HNT patient cohort from our hospital. Results A total of 140 consecutive patients were included (65 postoperative, 75 definitive). Mean/median age at treatment start was 84.8/84.1 years (range 80–96 years). Mean/median follow-up time was 25/16 months (range 2–92 months). Of the 140 patients, 80 were alive with no evidence of disease when last seen, 28 had died due to the cancer, 12 remained alive with disease, the remaining 20 died intercurrently. Systemic concomitant therapy was administered in 7 %. Late grade 3–4 toxicity was observed in 2 %. All patients completed treatment. Hospitalization and feeding tube rates were 26 % and 11 %, respectively. The 2‑/3-year LC, DFS, and OS rates for the entire cohort were 81/80 %, 69/63 %, and 68/66 %, respectively. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients showed an inferior 3-year OS rate as compared to non-SCC patients (62 % vs 77 %, p  = 0.0002), while LC and DFS did not differ. Patients undergoing postoperative radiation attained a higher OS compared to the definitively irradiated subgroup with 74 vs. 60 % at 3 years ( p  = 0.01); however, DFS rates were similar for both groups (68 vs. 61 %, p  = 0.15). Corresponding rates for >1400 HNT patients <80 years treated during the same time interval were 81/80 %, 69/67 %, and 77/72 %, respectively. Conclusions Treatment tolerance in our patients aged 80+ was high. These results suggest that elderly HNT patients should not be denied potentially curative treatment strategies.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and MEK inhibitors (EGFRi/MEKi) are beneficial for the treatment of solid cancers but are frequently associated with severe therapy-limiting acneiform skin toxicities. The underlying molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Using gene expression profiling we identified IL-36[gamma] and IL-8 as candidate drivers of EGFRi/MEKi skin toxicity. We provide molecular and translational evidence that EGFRi/MEKi in concert with the skin commensal bacterium Cutibacterium acnes act synergistically to induce IL-36[gamma] in keratinocytes and subsequently IL-8, leading to cutaneous neutrophilia. IL-36[gamma] expression was the combined result of C. acnes-induced NF-[kappa]B activation and EGFRi/MEKi-mediated expression of the transcription factor Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4), due to the presence of both NF-[kappa]B and KLF4 binding sites in the human IL-36[gamma] gene promoter. EGFRi/MEKi increased KLF4 expression by blockade of the EGFR/MEK/ERK pathway. These results provide an insight into understanding the pathological mechanism of the acneiform skin toxicities induced by EGFRi/MEKi and identify IL-36[gamma] and the transcription factor KLF4 as potential therapeutic targets.

Background Adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy improves response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We aimed to demonstrate decreased toxicity with metronomic chemotherapy/bevacizumab compared with paclitaxel/bevacizumab. Methods This multicenter, randomized phase III trial compared bevacizumab with either paclitaxel (arm A) or daily oral capecitabine-cyclophosphamide (arm B) as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. The primary endpoint was the incidence of selected grade 3–5 adverse events (AE) including: febrile neutropenia, infection, sensory/motor neuropathy, and mucositis. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate, PFS, overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL), and pharmacoeconomics. The study was registered prospectively with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01131195 on May 25, 2010. Results Between September 2010 and December 2012, 147 patients were included at 22 centers. The incidence of primary endpoint-defining AEs was similar in arm A (25 % [18/71]; 95 % CI 15–35 %) and arm B (24 % [16/68]; 95 % CI 13–34 %; P  = 0.96). Objective response rates were 58 % (42/73; 95 % CI 0.46–0.69) and 50 % (37/74; 95 % CI 0.39–0.61) in arms A and B, respectively ( P  = 0.45). Median PFS was 10.3 months (95 % CI 8.7–11.3) in arm A and 8.5 months (95 % CI 6.5–11.9) in arm B ( P  = 0.90). Other secondary efficacy endpoints were not significantly different between study arms. The only statistically significant differences in QoL were less hair loss and less numbness in arm B. Treatment costs between the two arms were equivalent. Conclusion This trial failed to meet its primary endpoint of a reduced rate of prespecified grade 3–5 AEs with metronomic bevacizumab, cyclophosphamide and capecitabine.

Pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTX) is a prognostic factor in many cancer types, and early prediction would help to modify treatment. In patients with gastric and esophagogastric junction (AEG) cancer, the accuracy of FDG PET-CT to predict early pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTX) is currently not known. From a consecutive cohort of 72 patients, 44 patients with resectable, locally-advanced gastric cancer or AEG Siewert type II and III received neoCTX after primary staging with endoscopic ultrasound, PET-CT and laparoscopy. Overall, 14 patients did not show FDG uptake, and the remaining 30 were restaged by PET-CT 14 days after the first cycle of neoCTX. Metabolic response was defined as decrease of tumor standardized uptake value (SUV) by ≥35%. Major pathologic regression was defined as less than 10% residual tumor cells. Metabolic response after neoCTX was detected in 20/30 (66.7%), and non-response in 10/30 (33.3%) patients. Among metabolic responders, n = 10 (50%) showed major and n = 10 (50%) minor pathologic regression. In non-responders, n = 9 (90%) had minor and 1 (10%) a major pathologic regression. This resulted in a sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity 47.3%, positive predictive value 50%, negative predictive value 90% and accuracy of 63.3%. Response PET-CT after the first cycle of neoCTX does not accurately predict overall pathologic response. However, PET-CT reliably detects non-responders, and identifies patients who should either immediately proceed to resection or receive a modified multimodality therapy. The trial was registered and approved by local ethics committee PB_2016-00769.