Explore the vast range of titles available.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common type of pancreatic cancer. It is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death and is associated with a very poor prognosis. KRAS driver mutations occur in approximately 95% of PDAC cases and cause the activation of several signaling pathways such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways. Regulation of these signaling pathways is orchestrated by feedback loops mediated by the balance between protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) and protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), leading to activation or inhibition of its downstream targets. The human PTPome comprises 125 members, and these proteins are classified into three distinct families according to their structure. Since PTP activity description, it has become clear that they have both inhibitory and stimulatory effects on cancer-associated signaling processes and that deregulation of PTP function is closely associated with tumorigenesis. Several PTPs have displayed either tumor suppressor or oncogenic characteristics during the development and progression of PDAC. In this sense, PTPs have been presented as promising candidates for the treatment of human pancreatic cancer, and many PTP inhibitors have been developed since these proteins were first associated with cancer. Nevertheless, some challenges persist regarding the development of effective and safe methods to target these molecules and deliver these drugs. In this review, we discuss the role of PTPs in tumorigenesis as tumor suppressor and oncogenic proteins. We have focused on the differential expression of these proteins in PDAC, as well as their clinical implications and possible targeting for pharmacological inhibition in cancer therapy.

SHOC2 scaffold protein has been mainly related to oncogenic ERK signaling through the RAS-SHOC2-PP1 phosphatase complex. In leukemic cells however, SHOC2 upregulation has been previously related to an increased 5-year event-free survival of pediatric pre-B acute lymphoid leukemia, suggesting that SHOC2 could be a potential prognostic marker. To address such paradoxical function, our study investigated how SHOC2 impact leukemic cells drug response. Our transcriptome analysis has shown that SHOC2 can modulate the DNA-damage mediated by p53. Notably, upon genetic inhibition of SHOC2 we observed a significant impairment of p53 expression, which in turn, leads to the blockage of key apoptotic molecules. To confirm the specificity of DNA-damage related modulation, several anti-leukemic drugs has been tested and we did confirm that the proposed mechanism impairs cell death upon daunorubicin-induced DNA damage of human lymphoid cells. In conclusion, our study uncovers new insights into SHOC2 function and reveals that this scaffold protein may be essential to activate a novel mechanism of p53-induced cell death in pre-B lymphoid cells.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents one of the deadliest cancers among all solid tumors. First-line treatment relies on gemcitabine (Gem) and despite treatment improvements, refractoriness remains a universal challenge. Attempts to decipher how feedback-loops control signaling pathways towards drug resistance have gained attention in recent years, particularly focused on the role of phosphatases. In this study, a CRISPR/Cas9-based phenotypic screen was performed to identify members from the dual-specificity phosphatases (DUSP) family potentially acting on Gem response in PDAC cells. The approach revealed the atypical RNA phosphatase DUSP11 as a potential target, whose inhibition creates vulnerability of PDAC cells to Gem. DUSP11 genetic inhibition impaired cell survival and promoted apoptosis, synergistically enhancing Gem cytotoxicity. In silico transcriptome analysis of RNA-seq data from PDAC human samples identified NF-ĸB signaling pathway highly correlated with DUSP11 upregulation. Consistently, Gem-induced NF-ĸB phosphorylation was blocked upon DUSP11 inhibition in vitro. Mechanistically, we found that DUSP11 directly impacts nc886 expression and modulates PKR-NF-ĸB signaling cascade after Gem exposure in PDAC cells resulting in resistance to Gem-induced cell death. In conclusion, this study provides new insights on DUSP11 role in RNA biology and Gem response in PDAC cells.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a poor prognosis hematopoietic malignance characterized by abnormal proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Although advances in treatment have greatly improved survival rates in young patients, in the elderly population, ~70% of patients present poor prognosis. A pan-cancer analysis on the TCGA cohort showed that AML has the second higher HUWE1 expression in tumor samples among all cancer types. In addition, pathway enrichment analysis pointed to RAS signaling cascade as one of the most important pathways associated to HUWE1 expression in this particular AML cohort. In silico analysis for biological processes enrichment also revealed that HUWE1 expression is correlated with 13 genes involved in myeloid differentiation. Therefore, to understand the role of HUWE1 in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) we constitutively expressed KRASG12V oncogene concomitantly to HUWE1 knockdown in stromal co-cultures. The results showed that, in the context of KRASG12V, HUWE1 significantly reduces cell cumulative growth and changes myeloid differentiation profile of HSPCs. Overall, these observations suggest that HUWE1 might contribute to leukemic cell proliferation and impact myeloid differentiation of human HSCs, thus providing new venues for RAS-driven leukemia targeted therapy approach.

BackgroundCXCR1/2 inhibitors are being implemented with immunotherapies in PDAC clinical trials. CXC-ligands are a family of cytokines responsible for stimulating these receptors; while typically secreted by activated immune cells, fibroblasts, and even adipocytes, they are also secreted by immune-evasive cancer cells. CXC-ligand release is known to occur in response to inflammatory stimuli. Adipose tissue is an endocrine organ and a source of inflammatory signaling peptides. Importantly, adipose-derived cytokines and chemokines are implicated as potential drivers of tumor cell immune evasion; cumulatively, these findings suggest that targeting CXC-ligands may be beneficial in the context of obesity.MethodsRNA-sequencing of human PDAC cell lines was used to assess influences of adipose conditioned media on the cancer cell transcriptome. The adipose-induced secretome of PDAC cells was validated with ELISA for induction of CXCL5 secretion. Human tissue data from CPTAC was used to correlate IL-1β and TNF expression with both CXCL5 mRNA and protein levels. CRISPR-Cas9 was used to knockout CXCL5 from a murine PDAC KPC cell line to assess orthotopic tumor studies in syngeneic, diet-induced obese mice. Flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry were used to compare the immune profiles between tumors with or without CXCL5. Mice-bearing CXCL5 competent or deficient tumors were monitored for differential tumor size in response to anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade therapy.ResultsHuman adipose tissue conditioned media stimulates CXCL5 secretion from PDAC cells via either IL-1β or TNF; neutralization of both is required to significantly block the release of CXCL5 from tumor cells. Ablation of CXCL5 from tumors promoted an enriched immune phenotype with an unanticipatedly increased number of exhausted CD8 T cells. Application of anti-PD-1 treatment to control tumors failed to alter tumor growth, yet treatment of CXCL5-deficient tumors showed response by significantly diminished tumor mass.ConclusionsIn summary, our findings show that both TNF and IL-1β can stimulate CXCL5 release from PDAC cells in vitro, which correlates with expression in patient data. CXCL5 depletion in vivo alone is sufficient to promote T cell infiltration into tumors, increasing efficacy and requiring checkpoint blockade inhibition to alleviate tumor burden.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive malignancy characterized by KRAS mutations in approximately 95% of cases. Despite recent advancements with KRAS inhibitors, therapeutic resistance has emerged, and combination approaches are needed. In particular, it is important to understand how downstream signaling of KRAS supports PDAC growth. For example, DUSP6, a dual-specificity phosphatase that modulates ERK1/2 phosphorylation and RAS pathway activity, has emerged as an important regulator of KRAS-MAPK signaling. Transcriptomic analyses demonstrate that DUSP6 is markedly overexpressed in PDAC tumors compared to non-tumoral pancreatic tissue. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals its upregulation in epithelial tumor cells, with further elevation in metastatic lesions relative to primary tumors. This upregulation correlates with the quasi-mesenchymal/squamous molecular subtype, and clinically, high DUSP6 expression is associated with poorer overall survival. Gene set enrichment analyses of metastatic samples indicate that DUSP6 is linked to pathways involved in cell migration and metabolism. To elucidate DUSP6 functional roles, stable knockdown of DUSP6 in PDAC cell lines resulted in increased ERK/MAPK activation and altered migratory capacity. Metabolic profiling showed enhanced basal glycolysis following DUSP6 suppression. However, combined inhibition of glycolysis and DUSP6 downregulation did not affect the migratory phenotype, indicating that glycolytic alterations do not drive migration. These findings highlight the dual and independent roles of DUSP6 in modulating migratory capacity and glycolysis in PDAC. This study underscores the significance of DUSP6 as a potential therapeutic target and provides new insights into its contributions to PDAC progression.Competing Interest StatementIn the past three years, CAL has consulted for Astellas Pharmaceuticals, Odyssey Therapeutics, Third Rock Ventures, and T-Knife Therapeutics, and is an inventor on patents pertaining to Kras regulated metabolic pathways, redox control pathways in pancreatic cancer, and targeting the GOT1-ME1 pathway as a therapeutic approach (US Patent No: 2015126580-A1, 05/07/2015; US Patent No: 20190136238, 05/09/2019; International Patent No: WO2013177426-A2, 04/23/2015).Footnotes* New supplementary data was added to support the previous findings, methodology section was revised and figures numbers were added.