Explore the vast range of titles available.

Aim This concept analysis aims to describe and define interprofessional communication within healthcare contexts by synthesising empirical evidence and existing literature. Design Utilising Schwartz-Barcott and Kim´s hybrid model, the study integrates theoretical exploration with empirical data analysis. Methods A comprehensive literature review and dictionary references inform the selection of theoretical frameworks. Data collection involves screening articles from databases including CINAHL, PSYCHINFO, WEB OF SCIENCE, SCOPUS, and PUBMED, resulting in 37 articles for review. Secondary analysis includes observational studies and focus groups conducted in psychiatric outpatient units, integrating theoretical and empirical insights for a nuanced understanding of communication complexities in healthcare settings. Results Theoretical exploration reveals the multifaceted nature of interprofessional communication, emphasising information sharing, collaboration, and decision-making. Antecedents, including education, logistical challenges, legal frameworks, and cultural dynamics, are identified. Empirical findings underline the importance of competence, curiosity, trust, cooperation, and clarity in communication. Influential factors such as leadership, cultural understanding, informal communication, transparency, and hierarchy emerge. Conclusions The synthesis highlights the central role of communication in healthcare and emphasises its impact on outcomes. Addressing communication barriers and promoting facilitators is important to supportive work environments and patient safety. Further research is necessary to deepen understanding and improve communication effectiveness in health care.

Background Communication in healthcare has been extensively studied, but most research has focused on miscommunication and the importance of communication for patient safety. Previous research on interprofessional communication has mainly focused on relationships between physicians and nurses in non-psychiatric settings. Since communication is one of the core competencies in psychiatric care, more research on interprofessional communication between other clinicians is needed, and should be explored from a broader perspective. This study aimed to explore and describe interprofessional communication in a psychiatric outpatient unit. Method During spring 2022, data consisting of over 100 h of fieldwork were collected from observations, formal semi-structured interviews and informal conversations inspired by the focused ethnography method. Data was collected at an outpatient unit in central Sweden, and various clinicians participated in the study. The data analysis was a back-and-forth process between initial codes and emerging themes, but also cyclical as the data analysis process was ongoing and repeated and took place simultaneously with the data collection. Results We found that a workplace’s history, clinicians´ workload, responsibilities and hierarchies influence interprofessional communication. The results showed that the prerequisites for interprofessional communication were created through the unit’s code of conduct, clear and engaging leadership, and trust in the ability of the various clinicians to perform new tasks. Conclusion Our results indicate that leadership, an involving working style, and an environment where speaking up is encouraged and valued can foster interprofessional communication and respect for each other´s professional roles is key to achieving this. Interprofessional communication between different clinicians is an important part of psychiatric outpatient work, where efficiency, insufficient staffing and long patient queues are commonplace. Research can help shed light on these parts by highlighting aspects influencing communication.

Aim: This concept analysis aims to describe and define interprofessional communication within healthcare contexts by synthesising empirical evidence and existing literature. Design: Utilising Schwartz-Barcott and Kim´s hybrid model, the study integrates theoretical exploration with empirical data analysis. Methods: A comprehensive literature review and dictionary references inform the selection of theoretical frameworks. Data collection involves screening articles from databases including CINAHL, PSYCHINFO, WEB OF SCIENCE, SCOPUS, and PUBMED, resulting in 37 articles for review. Secondary analysis includes observational studies and focus groups conducted in psychiatric outpatient units, integrating theoretical and empirical insights for a nuanced understanding of communication complexities in healthcare settings. Results: Theoretical exploration reveals the multifaceted nature of interprofessional communication, emphasising information sharing, collaboration, and decision-making. Antecedents, including education, logistical challenges, legal frameworks, and cultural dynamics, are identified. Empirical findings underline the importance of competence, curiosity, trust, cooperation, and clarity in communication. Influential factors such as leadership, cultural understanding, informal communication, transparency, and hierarchy emerge. Conclusions: The synthesis highlights the central role of communication in healthcare and emphasises its impact on outcomes. Addressing communication barriers and promoting facilitators is important to supportive work environments and patient safety. Further research is necessary to deepen understanding and improve communication effectiveness in health care.