Explore the vast range of titles available.

Porocarcinoma is a rare malignant adnexal tumor. Little is known about the location of the disease in the head and neck. Our aim is to offer the largest analysis of demographic, pathological, and treatment patterns of head and neck porocarcinoma in comparison with other locations of the neoplasm from an epidemiologically representative cohort. Method: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program of the National Cancer Institute was searched for all cases of porocarcinomas diagnosed between 2000 and 2018. This database is considered representative of the US population. Demographic, pathological, and treatment variables were compared between the head and neck and other regions. Overall and disease-specific survival was calculated and compared between groups. Results: 563 porocarcinomas were identified, with 172 in the head and neck. The mean age was 66.4 years. Males were more affected in the head and neck. Regional and distant invasion rates were low (2.9 and 2.3%, respectively). Local excision and Mohs surgery were the most frequent therapies. Five-year overall survival was 74.8%. Five-year disease-specific survival was 97%. Conclusions: Head and neck porocarcinoma affects more males than females. Regional or distant metastatic rates are low and overestimated in previous literature. Disease-specific mortality is low. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment.

(1) Background: Spiradenocarcinoma is an extremely rare malignant adnexal tumor and there are only few studies on survival outcomes. Our aim was to perform an analysis of the demographic and pathological characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of patients affected by spiradenocarcinoma. (2) Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database of the National Cancer Institute was searched for all cases of spiradenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2019. This database is considered representative of the US population. Demographic, pathological, and treatment variables were retrieved. Overall and disease-specific survival were computed according to the different variables. (3) Results: 90 cases of spiradenocarcinoma (47 females, 43 males) were identified. Mean age at diagnosis was 62.8 years. Regional and distant disease at diagnosis were rare, occurring in 2.2% and 3.3% of cases, respectively. Surgery alone was the most frequent treatment (87.8%), followed by a combination of surgery and radiotherapy (3.3%) and radiation therapy only (1.1%). Five-year overall survival was 76.2% and five-year disease-specific survival was 95.7%. (4) Conclusions: Spiradenocarcinoma equally affects males and females. Regional and distant invasion rates are low. Disease-specific mortality is low and is probably overestimated in the literature. Surgical excision remains the main form of treatment.

(1) Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction following mastectomy helps to restore quality of life while aiming at providing optimal cosmetic outcomes. Both prepectoral (PP) and subpectoral (SP) breast implants are widely used to fulfill these objectives. It is, however, unclear which approach offers stronger postoperative benefits. (2) Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature through PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ResearchGate, following the PRISMA guidelines. Quantitative analysis for postoperative pain as the primary outcome was conducted. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction and postoperative complications such as seroma, implant loss, skin necrosis, wound infection, and hematoma. (3) Results: Nine articles involving 1119 patients were retrieved. Our results suggested increased postoperative pain after SP implants and significantly higher rates of seroma following PP implants (p < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was found to be similar between the two groups; however, the heterogeneity of measurement tools did not allow us to pool these results. The rates of implant loss, skin necrosis, wound infection, and hematoma showed no significant differences between the two cohorts. (4) Conclusion: Our data suggest that both implant placements are safe and effective methods for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. However, homogeneity in outcome measurements would allow one to provide stronger statistical results.

No specific studies on the changes in the incidence of melanoma in the lower limbs and hips have been performed. This article aimed to examine trends in incidence rates of melanoma of the lower extremities in the U.S. Data from the SEER program provided by the National Cancer Institute were used to examine trends in melanoma incidence from 2000 to 2019. Data analysis was performed from October to December 2022. A total of 192,327 cases of melanoma of the lower limbs and hips were diagnosed from 2000 to 2019 and included in our study. The incidence rate increased from 9.78 to 13.65 cases per 100,000 person-year and by an average annual percent change (AAPC) of 2% (95%CI=1.4-2.9%). The incidence increased by an AAPC of 2.1% in men and 1.7% in women. The incidence among people under 50 remained stable but increased among those over 50 years. Localized stage disease was the only stage where a continuously increasing incidence was observed, with an AAPC of 1.7% (95%CI=0.9-2.5%). Lentiginous melanoma showed the highest incidence trend rate with an AAPC of 2.3% (95%CI=1.0-3.5%). The incidence rate of melanoma in the lower limbs and hips increased between 2000 and 2019, with a higher incidence in men, reversing the previously described trend of higher incidence among women. However, incidence among people under 50 remained stable, suggesting the efficacy of prevention campaigns in this population.

Background/Aim: Melanoma, an aggressive skin cancer, poses a significant threat to patients’ lives, with lower limbs and hips being among the most affected regions. Epidemiology and survival outcomes of patients with melanoma in the lower extremities were investigated and compared to other sites to better understand tumoral behavior and identify predictors of decreased survival. Patients and Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to search for all skin melanoma cases between 2000 and 2019. Demographic, pathological, and therapeutic factors were compared between affected regions. Overall and disease specific survival were calculated and compared among subgroups. A multivariable analysis was conducted to identify independent prognostic factors. Results: A total of 50,109 patients were diagnosed with melanoma in lower limbs and hips, while 224,121 patients had melanomas in other areas. More women (70.8%) and younger people (mean 55.2 years, SD 16.5) were affected with lower extremities melanoma, with better survival rates than other skin regions. Factors associated with better survival included female sex, younger age, horizontal growth pattern melanomas, and surgery with <1 cm margins. Conclusion: Melanoma affecting lower extremities is commonly diagnosed in young females. Prognosis depends on age, stage at diagnosis, and histologic subtype, but remains better compared to other locations.

Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most frequent vulvar neoplasia. While the primary role of surgery is widely accepted, large population studies are needed to compare survival between diverse treatment modalities and to identify independent prognostic factors to help council patients and guide oncological treatment. The U.S. National Cancer Index, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program data between 2000 and 2018 was screened for all squamous cell carcinoma affecting the vulva. Raw data was processed with IBM SPSS. Demographic, clinical-pathological and treatment data were studied. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and subgroups were compared using the log rank test. A multivariate cox regression was conducted to identify independent prognostic factors. A total of 11,360 patients were identified with a median age of 65. Median overall survival was 101 months. Surgery as a primary treatment is the therapeutic sequence associated with the best overall survival. Multivariate cox-regression did not meet proportional hazard assumption. Age, pathological grade, stage at diagnosis, treatment sequence and the use of chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factor. Surgery alone is the treatment sequence offering the best overall survival. Surgery should be offered to all eligible patients.

Purpose: The setting regarding the ideal timing for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) reconstruction remains unclear. Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is performed at the same time as mastectomy, while delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) is performed at any time after mastectomy except immediately. We compared both strategies to assess whether IBR or DBR should be performed to reduce postoperative adverse events. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Web of Science was conducted, aiming at articles comparing the recipient site outcomes of IBR versus DBR with DIEP. We used the Mantel–Haenszel method with a fixed effects model. Results were expressed as the OR with a 95% CI. Results: Two retrospective and two prospective studies were identified involving 5784 DIEPs (1744 immediate and 4040 delayed). We showed a significant difference in favor of IBR for wound healing issues (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.41, 0.77; p = 0.0003). However, no significant differences for hematoma, infection, fat necrosis, partial flap loss, and total flap loss rate were seen. Conclusions: Despite variability in the choice of the ideal time for breast reconstruction and outcomes reported among studies, immediate DIEP surgery appears to be a reliable setting with less delayed healing issues.

Pelvic exenteration and abdominoperineal resection are radical techniques commonly used for locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancy with high morbidity due to large pelvic defects. Flaps can help provide healthy, well-vascularized, non-irradiated tissues to fill pelvic dead space. We conducted a proportional meta-analysis to compare surgical outcomes of vertical rectus abdominus myocutaneous flap (VRAM) vs. gracilis flap for vulvo-perineal reconstruction following oncologic resection. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases. Proportional meta-analysis was performed to compare the surgical outcomes of using VRAM or gracilis flaps. Our review yielded 16 eligible studies. The pooled resolution rate of overall donor site complications for VRAM flap (pooled proportion = 0.576 [95% CI 0.387, 0.754]) was significantly higher than the pooled rate of overall donor site complications of gracilis flap (pooled proportion = 0.160 [95% CI 0.058, 0.295]). Partial and total flap necrosis were similar in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between minor and major complications for both flaps. Both flaps can be used safely for vulvo-perineal reconstruction following oncologic resection with similar recipient site outcomes, although the VRAM flap will have more donor site complications than the gracilis flap.

Sacral chordoma is a rare primary bone neoplasm associated with high morbidity. The aim of this study is to identify demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of this tumor and evaluate their impact on survival outcomes. The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database collecting data between 2000 and 2018 was searched for all cases of sacral chordoma. We analyzed demographic aspects, cancer stage and treatment patterns. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between subgroups using the log-rank test. A multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors of overall survival. Four hundred and forty-two patients were identified with a mean age of 62.7 years. Most tumors presented regional invasion at diagnosis (43.2%). Mean overall survival was 124.7 months. No significant difference in terms of overall survival was found between surgery alone and surgery associated with radiotherapy. Both options provided a significantly increased survival than radiotherapy alone. Age of less than 50 years or between 50 and 69 correlated significantly with improved survival. Age and stage at diagnosis impact significantly survival outcomes. Surgery remains the mainstay treatment with the highest overall survival. Its association with radiotherapy is currently questionable and needs further research.

(1) Background: Melanoma is the most common life-threatening cancer among skin cancers. Almost all locations of the skin can be affected by melanoma, and the upper limbs are one of the most frequent locations. We aimed to study the epidemiology and survival outcomes of patients with melanoma localized in the upper extremities compared with other sites. (2) Methods: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database is considered the most representative of the U.S. population; we extracted melanoma cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2019. Several characteristics, including demographical, pathological, and therapeutic, were recorded, and upper extremity melanomas and melanomas from other areas were compared. Overall survival was assessed, and the groups were compared. (3) Results: 69,436 patients had melanoma in the upper limbs and shoulders and 204,794 in other body parts. Overall, 35,267 patients with upper extremity melanoma were males, 34,169 were females, and the mean age was 60. For the rest of the body, there were 118,654 males and 86,140 females, with a mean age of 59. Surgery alone was the most commonly used treatment, while radiation therapy was the least used for all sites. Women appear to have better survival than men. Superficial spreading melanoma is the least lethal subtype, while nodular melanoma is the most dangerous. (4) Conclusion: Women under 50 are more at risk than men of the same age. The trend reverses after age 50 where men are at greater risk. In addition to gender and age, disease stage and major histologic subtypes influence survival.