Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
58
result(s) for
"SIBERTIN-BLANC, Guillaume"
Sort by:
الفلسفة السياسية في القرنين التاسع عشر والعشرين
يستعرض هذا الكتاب أهم النظريات المتصلة بالدولة، من بداية القرن التاسع عشر إلى يومنا هذا. وهو كتاب \"مدرسي\"، يعتمد الوضوح في عرض وسائل الفهم والفكر النقدي المناسبة لتحليل المسائل الكبرى المتصلة بالفكر السياسي المعاصر. في الكتاب إجابة عن أسئلة لا مناص من طرحها : كيف تشكلت أهم النظريات السياسية في التاريخ المعاصر ؟ ما معنى أن تكون الدولة دولة حقوق أو دولة وطنية أو دولة اجتماعية ؟ هل تنحصر السياسة في قرارات الدولة وأفعالها ؟ يجد الباحث والطالب، في النص وفي المراجع الملحقة بفصوله، ما يساعد كثيرا على مقاربة الظواهر السياسية، بطريقة واضحة وميسرة.
Book
De la causa del otro a la estrategia minoritaria: política y clínica de la alteridad incluida
Este artículo examina algunos problemas señalados por la distinción “antinómica” propuesta por Étienne Balibar entre una estrategia mayoritaria y una estrategia minoritaria. Tomando como punto de referencia la teoría guattaro-deleuziana del “devenir-menor”, y confrontándola con tres escenas políticas diferentes, tomadas de Frantz Fanon, Jacques Rancière y Judith Butler, busco distinguir diversas maneras de pensar la inclusión de una “causa del otro”, o de un punto de vista de minoridad, en la construcción de identidades políticas emancipatorias. Existen muchas maneras de problematizar una estrategia minoritaria a partir de prácticas de desidentificación como contenido mismo de la subjetivación política. Pero la hipótesis que se precisa a lo largo de esta confrontación es finalmente aquella de una antinomia interna a la idea de la estrategia minoritaria misma, que se intensifica cuando las identidades dominantes pierden la seguridad de su propia “mayoría”, o cuando la diferencia entre lo mayoritario y lo minoritario deviene tendencialmente inasignable a pesar de que devenga también más difícil de diferenciar la violencia de la exclusión de minorías de la violencia de su inclusión.
Journal Article
These women, these strangers: reproduction and domestic relation between Marxism and anthropology
This paper questions the proximity between two contemporary problematizations, in the first half of the 1970s, of the reproduction of the labor power, in Marxist feminism and in Marxist anthropology. Examining Silvia Federici’s itinerary from the 1970s to the 2000s and then Claude Meillassoux’s analysis of the capture of the “domestic mode of production” by imperialist capitalism, the essay examines their respective problematizations of the connection between wage theory and the question of primitive accumulation. And on this basis, it raises the question of a socio-anthropological division between two modes of generational renewal of human communities, by genesic reproduction and by migratory reproduction.
Journal Article
CES FEMMES, CES ÉTRANGERS
Cet article interroge le voisinage entre deux problématisations contemporaines, dans la première moitié des années 1970, de la reproduction de la force de travail, dans le féminisme marxiste et dans l’anthropologie marxiste. Examinant l’itinéraire de Silvia Federici des années 1970 aux années 2000 puis l’analyse par Claude Meillassoux de la capture du « mode de production domestique » par le capitalisme impérialiste, il examine leurs problématisations respectives du lien entre théorie du salaire et question de l’accumulation primitive. Et il repose sur cette base la question d’une division socioanthropologique entre deux modes de renouvellement générationnel des communautés humaines, par reproduction génésique et par reproduction migratoire.
This paper questions the proximity between two contemporary problematizations, in the first half of the 1970s, of the reproduction of the labor power, in Marxist feminism and in Marxist anthropology. Examining Silvia Federici’s itinerary from the 1970s to the 2000s and then Claude Meillassoux’s analysis of the capture of the « domestic mode of production » by imperialist capitalism, the essay examines their respective problematizations of the connection between wage theory and the question of primitive accumulation. And on this basis, it raises the question of a socio-anthropological division between two modes of generational renewal of human communities, by genesic reproduction and by migratory reproduction.
Journal Article
Ces femmes, ces étrangers : reproduction et rapport domestique entre marxisme et anthropologie
Cet article interroge le voisinage entre deux problématisations contemporaines, dans la première moitié des années 1970, de la reproduction de la force de travail, dans le féminisme marxiste et dans l’anthropologie marxiste. Examinant l’itinéraire de Silvia Federici des années 1970 aux années 2000 puis l’analyse par Claude Meillassoux de la capture du « mode de production domestique » par le capitalisme impérialiste, il examine leurs problématisations respectives du lien entre théorie du salaire et question de l’accumulation primitive. Et il repose sur cette base la question d’une division socioanthropologique entre deux modes de renouvellement générationnel des communautés humaines, par reproduction génésique et par reproduction migratoire. This paper questions the proximity between two contemporary problematizations, in the first half of the 1970s, of the reproduction of the labor power, in Marxist feminism and in Marxist anthropology. Examining Silvia Federici’s itinerary from the 1970s to the 2000s and then Claude Meillassoux’s analysis of the capture of the « domestic mode of production » by imperialist capitalism, the essay examines their respective problematizations of the connection between wage theory and the question of primitive accumulation. And on this basis, it raises the question of a socio-anthropological division between two modes of generational renewal of human communities, by genesic reproduction and by migratory reproduction.
Journal Article
UNE SCIENTIA SEXUALIS FACE À LA MYSTIQUE FASCISTE
The article proposes a rereading of Wilhelm Reich’s The Mass Psychology of Fascism in counterpoint to the Foucaldian historicization of the « repressive hypothesis ». It tests another hypothesis, according to which fascism not only represented one of the first objects of a Freudo-Marxist synthesis, but in effect overdetermined its formulation, causing it to take on (at the risk of breaking with the postulates of psychoanalysis and of Marxism) a dimension of excess analogous to that which it posited in the case of fascism, identifying it as the factor accounting for the latter’s traction on the « masses ». In the case of Reich, this would involve the idea of a « natural sexuality » or of an « orgasmic economy », to be turned back against a nazi biologism. It would also imply, in the case of Georges Bataille, writing at the same time, the idea of a « heterology » combining the lessons of the Freudian Massenpsychologie and those of the sociology of the sacred stemming from Durkheim, Hubert and Mauss, which could thus be turned against the fascist mysticism.
Journal Article
A Scientia Sexualis to Confront the Fascist Mystique
The article proposes a rereading of Wilhelm Reich’s The Mass Psychology of Fascism in counterpoint to the Foucaldian historicization of the «repressive hypothesis». It tests another hypothesis, according to which fascism not only represented one of the first objects of a Freudo-Marxist synthesis, but in effect overdetermined its formulation, causing it to take on (at the risk of breaking with the postulates of psychoanalysis and of Marxism) a dimension of excess analogous to that which it posited in the case of fascism, identifying it as the factor accounting for the latter’s traction on the «masses». In the case of Reich, this would involve the idea of a «natural sexuality» or of an «orgasmic economy», to be turned back against a nazi biologism. It would also imply, in the case of Georges Bataille, writing at the same time, the idea of a «heterology» combining the lessons of the Freudian Massenpsychologie and those of the sociology of the sacred stemming from Durkheim, Hubert and Mauss, which could thus be turned against the fascist mysticism.
Journal Article
Une scientia sexualis face à la mystique fasciste
A scientia sexualis to confront the fascist mystique The article proposes a rereading of Wilhelm Reich’s The Mass Psychology of Fascism in counterpoint to the Foucaldian historicization of the «repressive hypothesis». It tests another hypothesis, according to which fascism not only represented one of the first objects of a Freudo-Marxist synthesis, but in effect overdetermined its formulation, causing it to take on (at the risk of breaking with the postulates of psychoanalysis and of Marxism) a dimension of excess analogous to that which it posited in the case of fascism, identifying it as the factor accounting for the latter’s traction on the «masses». In the case of Reich, this would involve the idea of a «natural sexuality» or of an «orgasmic economy», to be turned back against a nazi biologism. It would also imply, in the case of Georges Bataille, writing at the same time, the idea of a «heterology» combining the lessons of the Freudian Massenpsychologie and those of the sociology of the sacred stemming from Durkheim, Hubert and Mauss, which could thus be turned against the fascist mysticism.
Journal Article
Le féminisme de la reproduction sociale et ses critiques
Les théories féministes de la reproduction ont été soumises à trois types d’objections : elles seraient soit fonctionnalistes, soit économicistes, ou biologisantes. Ces objections reposent sur un contresens concernant les notions marxistes de production et reproduction ainsi que sur une conception réifiée de la nature des sociétés capitalistes. De plus, ces objections ne sont pas capables de proposer une alternative convaincante et débouchent sur des impasses comme celles qui sont propres aux théories des systèmes double ou triple. Au contraire, le concept de reproduction sociale permet de sortir de ces impasses en même temps qu’il rend possible une conception non-réductionniste du mode de production capitaliste dans laquelle le capital n’est pas conçu comme le sujet d’un processus strictement « économique ». The feminist theories of reproduction have been subjected to three types of criticism: they would be either functionalist or determinist, from an economic or biological point of view.. These criticisms are premised on a misunderstanding of the Marxist notions of production and reproduction and on a reified understanding of what a capitalist society is. Moreover, these criticisms have not been able to offer a solid alternative and have ended up in even greater theoretical stalemates, particularly exemplified by dual and triple systems theories. On the contrary, the notion of social reproduction has the potential to avoid these stalemates, while at the same time suggesting a non-reductionist account of the capitalist mode of production: one in which capital is not seen as the subject of a strictly « economic » process.
Journal Article