Explore the vast range of titles available.

Prevalent fractures are major contributors to an increased risk of subsequent fractures, particularly in people with osteoporosis. While many studies have been conducted to assess the incidence of fracture in Japanese people with osteoporosis, far fewer have been conducted to assess the risk of subsequent fractures. This article reviews the morbidity, mortality, and risk of fracture in patients who are at high risk of subsequent fracture in Japan and the current treatment options available for these patients. Osteoporotic fractures in Japan are associated with high morbidity and mortality that result in significant financial and social costs. The rise in the proportion of elderly women in the Japanese population is contributing to a greater proportion of people with osteoporotic fractures and the high cost of osteoporosis. Although hip fractures have a significant effect on costs, a greater proportion of the Japanese population experience vertebral fractures. An increase in the incidence of vertebral fractures is concerning because preexisting vertebral fractures in older patients are associated with an increased risk of subsequent fractures. Hence, there is a clear rationale for pharmacological treatment of patients with prevalent vertebral fractures, or for those who are hospitalized or undergo surgery for osteoporotic fractures. Several pharmacological therapies are now available in Japan for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis. Understanding the consequences of subsequent fractures and the treatment options available for patients at high risk of subsequent fractures may contribute to clinical decision-making and improved outcomes for patients with osteoporosis.

Teriparatide is an anabolic therapy for osteoporosis approved in the United States since 2002 and European Union since 2003; however, approval in Japan lagged significantly. This report describes analyses based on International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E-5 guidelines that support bridging between Japanese studies and the large Fracture Prevention Trial (FPT). We analyzed data from single teriparatide doses in healthy Japanese and Caucasian postmenopausal women (J-PK) and from studies of 6 months [Phase 2, dose ranging (J-Ph2)] and 12 months [Phase 3, efficacy and safety (J-Ph3)] of randomized, placebo-controlled, once-daily treatment in Japanese subjects with osteoporosis. In J-PK, apparent teriparatide area-under-the-curve (AUC) and peak concentration ( C max ) were up to 40% higher in Japanese versus Caucasian women; however, body weight-adjusted values were comparable between populations; these findings were supported by population pharmacokinetic analyses. Between the FPT and Japanese studies, baseline demographic characteristics were similar but bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine (L1–L4) and body weight were lower for Japanese subjects. With teriparatide 20 μg/day, significant increases in BMD were observed compared to placebo at 12 months in both the FPT and J-Ph3 study, and percent change and actual change in BMD were comparable between studies. Dose response at 6 months was also comparable across populations. No novel safety signals were identified in Japanese subjects. These analyses show that teriparatide clinical data met ICH E-5 criteria for bridging. Findings from foreign trials such as the FPT can thus be extrapolated to Japanese subjects treated with teriparatide 20 μg/day.

In this previously reported multicenter study, teriparatide 20 μg/day was administered to elderly Japanese subjects (93 % female; median age 70 years) with osteoporosis and at high risk of fracture during a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period, which was followed by a 12 month treatment period in which all subjects received open-label teriparatide. Subjects were randomized 2:1 to teriparatide versus placebo (teriparatide n  = 137, placebo-teriparatide n  = 70). This was an exploratory analysis to determine whether the baseline status of serum bone turnover markers (BTMs) and vitamin D levels affect the efficacy of teriparatide at 20 μg/day. The BTMs included were type I procollagen N-terminal pro-peptide (P1NP) and type I collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTX). Changes in BMD were analyzed by subgroups: (1) tertile subgroups of BTM; (2) BTM determined by the upper limit of normal; and (3) level of vitamin D. Teriparatide increased lumbar spine BMD in all subgroups by 10 % or more through 24 months. Subgroups with higher baseline BTM levels had greater mean percent changes of lumbar spine BMD through 24 months. The baseline status of vitamin D sufficiency did not impact the mean percent change of lumbar spine BMD through 24 months. Results of this study suggest that clinically significant increases in BMD can be achieved in patients receiving teriparatide regardless of baseline BTM or vitamin D levels. Additionally, when vitamin D is coadministered, vitamin D insufficiency would not be expected to affect the overall efficacy of teriparatide.

This postmarketing surveillance study assessed the safety and effectiveness of daily teriparatide treatment in patients with osteoporosis in a Japanese clinical setting. In this prospective, multicenter, observational study, patients with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture received subcutaneous injections of teriparatide (20 μg/day) for a maximum of 24 months. For this interim report, data from 1,671 patients were eligible for analysis at the cutoff date. The mean age was 75.3 years; 93 % of patients (1,552/1,671 patients) were women. There were 117 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported in 101 of 1,671 patients (6.04 %); the most common reported ADRs were nausea, dizziness, headache, and palpitations. No clinically significant safety issues were identified, although 5 serious ADRs were reported in 4/1,671 (0.24 %) patients. At 12 months, 71.9 % of patients remained on teriparatide treatment. From 1 month, there were rapid increases in the biomarkers of bone formation P1NP and, to a lesser extent, BAP. In contrast, increases in the biomarkers of bone resorption, serum NTX, urinary NTX, and TRACP5b, were smaller. After 12 months of treatment, there was an increase in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip, and a decrease in the Visual Analog Scale score for back pain. The incidence of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures was 1.21 % and 3.18 %, respectively. In conclusion, the favorable safety profile and effectiveness of teriparatide observed in this population of Japanese patients with osteoporosis were accompanied by relatively high persistence with treatment, which is a key factor in the success of osteoporosis treatment.

This large-scale postmarketing surveillance of raloxifene (60 mg/day) was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of raloxifene for long-term use in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis. The baseline examination included 6,967 women (mean age, 70.4 years). Participants completed observation after 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of therapy. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) were reported in 776 participants (11.14 %), with a total of 87 serious ADR cases occurring in 76 participants (1.09 %). The most frequently reported ADRs were edema peripheral (45/6,967, 0.65 %) and venous thromboembolism (11/6,967, 0.16 %). Of the 6,967 participants, 2,784 were included in the effectiveness analysis. Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) increased significantly ( p  < 0.001, paired t test) compared with baseline at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months (2.51 %, 2.85 %, 4.76 %, and 3.51 %, respectively). Significant decreases in serum and urinary cross-linked amino-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) and urinary deoxypyridinoline levels from baseline were observed at 3 months, followed by a significant decrease of serum bone alkaline phosphatase at 6 months [ p  < 0.001 for all comparisons except serum NTX ( p  = 0.011), Wilcoxon signed-rank test]. Early reductions in the biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTM) observed at 3 months with raloxifene treatment correlated negatively with subsequent increases in lumbar spine BMD at 1 year ( r  = −0.347, p  = 0.008). The incidence of any new clinical fractures within 3 years was 1.18 % (82/6,967 participants). In summary, no new signals in safety were observed in the daily use of raloxifene. Moreover, the effectiveness profile of raloxifene was confirmed in practical use by this large-scale, long-term, postmarketing surveillance.

In the global Fracture Prevention Trial, teriparatide reduced the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures and significantly increased BMD. Recently, a 12-month, phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with BMD as a primary endpoint was conducted to assess the effects of teriparatide in Japanese subjects at high risk of fracture. Although BMD was significantly increased in the Japanese study, the study was not statistically powered to assess the anti-fracture efficacy with teriparatide treatment. A meta-analysis was carried out testing whether teriparatide had consistent anti-fracture efficacy in Japanese patients compared to that observed in the global fracture trial. Three studies in which fracture data were available from prospectively scheduled spinal radiographs were included in the analysis. A systematic review of the literature (Medline, Embase) confirmed that no studies with teriparatide had been excluded from this analysis. There was no significant heterogeneity for vertebral and non-vertebral fractures among the studies included in the meta-analysis. Odds ratio estimates (95% CI) were 0.29 (0.20, 0.43) for vertebral fracture and 0.53 (0.32, 0.86) for non-vertebral fracture. There was also a consistent effect of teriparatide to increase BMD across all studies. Furthermore, our analysis demonstrated that teriparatide-mediated increases in spine BMD accounted for 25–32% of the reduction in vertebral fracture risk in the combined population including Caucasian and Japanese patients, which was similar to that derived from Caucasian patients. These results provide evidence for the consistency of anti-fracture efficacy with teriparatide treatment in Japanese patients compared to those observed in Caucasian patients.

Glucocorticoid (GC)-induced osteoporosis (GIO) is frequently seen in patients with excessive GC. Numerous questions remain to be clarified about the pathogenesis and treatment of GIO, and the mechanism of GC-inhibited bone formation is not well known. Several studies suggest that parathyroid hormone (PTH) and hormone replacement therapy are effective for GIO. We therefore investigated whether PTH and estrogen would affect cell proliferation and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity inhibited by dexamethasone (Dex) in mouse osteoblastic cell-line MC3T3-E1 cells. Low-dose (10(-11) M) PTH as well as 10(-8) M 17-beta-estradiol (17beta-E2) significantly attenuated Dex-inhibited ALP activity, although 10(-8) M PTH did not affect it. ICI 182780 (10(-8) M) antagonized the effects of 17beta-E(2) on Dex-suppressed ALP activity. Neutralizing anti-IGF-I antibody (3 microg/ml) blocked the reverse effects of 17beta-E2 on ALP activity suppressed by Dex. PTH (10(-11) M), but not 17beta-E2, significantly attenuated [3H]thymidine incorporation inhibited by Dex. On the other hand, PTH and estrogen did not affect the level of 11-beta-hydrosteroid dehydrogenase type I mRNA increased by Dex. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that low-dose PTH and estrogen reversed Dex-inhibited ALP activity in the mouse osteoblastic cell-line.

Serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), a representative marker of bone anabolic action, is strongly related to bone mineral density during teriparatide therapy. This post hoc study analyzed data from a Phase III study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00433160) to determine if there was an association between serum PINP elevation and serum calcium concentration or calcium metabolism-related disorders. Japanese subjects with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture were randomized 2:1 to teriparatide 20 μg/day (n=137) or placebo (n=70) for a 12-month double-blind treatment period, followed by 12 months of open-label teriparatide treatment of all subjects. Serum PINP levels were measured at baseline, and after 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment. Serum calcium levels were measured at baseline, and after 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months of treatment. Serum PINP increased from baseline to 1 month of treatment and then remained high through 24 months. Twenty-eight of 195 subjects experienced PINP elevations >200 μg/L during teriparatide treatment. Serum calcium concentration in both the teriparatide and placebo groups remained within the normal range. There was no clinically relevant difference in serum calcium concentration between subjects with PINP >200 μg/L and subjects with PINP ≤200 μg/L. Two subjects experienced hypercalcemia and recovered without altering teriparatide treatment. Adverse events possibly related to calcium metabolism disorders included periarthritis calcarea (one subject) and chondrocalcinosis pyrophosphate (two subjects), but neither was accompanied with a significant increase in PINP or serum calcium concentration. Although the moderate size of this study prevented statistical analysis of any potential association between calcium metabolism-related disorders and elevated PINP, this analysis suggests that there was no association between serum PINP elevation during daily teriparatide treatment and serum calcium concentration or calcium metabolism-related disorders in Japanese subjects.

In this previously reported multicenter study, teriparatide 20 [mu]g/day was administered to elderly Japanese subjects (93 % female; median age 70 years) with osteoporosis and at high risk of fracture during a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period, which was followed by a 12 month treatment period in which all subjects received open-label teriparatide. Subjects were randomized 2:1 to teriparatide versus placebo (teriparatide n = 137, placebo-teriparatide n = 70). This was an exploratory analysis to determine whether the baseline status of serum bone turnover markers (BTMs) and vitamin D levels affect the efficacy of teriparatide at 20 [mu]g/day. The BTMs included were type I procollagen N-terminal pro-peptide (P1NP) and type I collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTX). Changes in BMD were analyzed by subgroups: (1) tertile subgroups of BTM; (2) BTM determined by the upper limit of normal; and (3) level of vitamin D. Teriparatide increased lumbar spine BMD in all subgroups by 10 % or more through 24 months. Subgroups with higher baseline BTM levels had greater mean percent changes of lumbar spine BMD through 24 months. The baseline status of vitamin D sufficiency did not impact the mean percent change of lumbar spine BMD through 24 months. Results of this study suggest that clinically significant increases in BMD can be achieved in patients receiving teriparatide regardless of baseline BTM or vitamin D levels. Additionally, when vitamin D is coadministered, vitamin D insufficiency would not be expected to affect the overall efficacy of teriparatide.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]