Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
2 result(s) for "STANCZYK, ALEXANDRA BOYLE"
Sort by:
Does Paid Family Leave Improve Household Economic Security Following a Birth? Evidence from California
Many policy makers, scholars, and advocates expect that paid family leave programs will improve household economic security in the period following a birth. Yet empirical evidence of this relationship remains limited. To build evidence in this area, this study draws on 2000–2013 American Community Survey data and a quasi-experimental design to estimate the influence of California's paid family leave program (CA-PFL) on mothers' risk of poverty and household income following a birth. Among mothers of 1-year-olds, results suggest that CA-PFL decreases risk of poverty in the prior year by an estimated 10.2 percent and increases household income over the same period by an estimated 4.1 percent. Gains concentrate among less-educated and low-income single mothers, who tend to have few other supports for combining employment and caregiving. Findings suggest that paid family leave can be an effective policy option to bolster economic security when children are young.
Paid family leave, household economic wellbeing, and financial resources around a birth
In the time around the arrival of an infant, household economic circumstances likely change in important ways. Risk of economic insecurity and instability may rise, as households face greater demands on resources, and almost all U.S. mothers take some time away from paid work (Laughlin, 2011). Additionally, the proportion of total household income contributed by mothers likely falls. These changes have implications for child and family wellbeing, women’s economic independence, and public program design. Paid family leave policies—which replace wages during time out of work to care for an infant—could buffer declines in women’s and households’ economic circumstances following a birth by providing resources during leave taking, supporting mothers’ labor force attachment, and promoting parents’ sharing of paid work and child care. Yet, research on the connections between paid family leave, household economic wellbeing, and mothers’ contributions to household income remains limited, especially in the U.S. This dissertation draws on national data to fill gaps in knowledge of how household financial circumstances change around a birth, and to estimate the effects of California’s broadly-available paid family leave program (CA-PFL) on household economic wellbeing and mothers’ contributions to household income following the birth of a child. The dissertation is structured around three distinct empirical chapters. The first empirical chapter draws on data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation to provide new descriptive evidence of month-to-month changes in household economic wellbeing and the composition of household income in the year leading up to and following a birth. Results show evidence of significant and enduring declines in household economic wellbeing and mothers’ contributions to household income in this time period. Declines in economic wellbeing are particularly large for single mothers who live without other adults. The second empirical chapter uses data from the American Community Survey and a quasi-experimental approach to estimate effects of CA-PFL on poverty and household income following a birth. Results suggest the program has little net effect on the economic wellbeing of mothers with infants. However, among mothers of one-year-olds, CA-PFL significantly decreases risk of poverty and increases household income. These positive, longer-run effects are concentrated among less-educated and single mothers. The final empirical chapter uses the same data and research design to show how CA-PFL shapes mothers’ contributions to household income following a birth. Results suggest that CA-PFL has little impact on mothers’ share of household income either in the short term (among mothers of infants) or in the longer term (among mothers of one- and two-year-olds), for the full sample. Importantly, subgroup analyses indicate that CA-PFL leads to short-term increases in single mothers’ contributions to household income, and longer-term gains among higher-educated mothers. Overall, findings from this dissertation demonstrate the need for practice and policy interventions to promote household economic wellbeing and mothers’ income contributions around a birth—particularly for economically disadvantaged groups—and suggest that a broadly-available paid family leave program, like CA-PFL, may be one such intervention.