Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Source
      Source
      Clear All
      Source
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
2 result(s) for "Sabarna, Khaled"
Sort by:
Radiographic Positioning Standards for Joint Radiography Quality Assessment at Al Makkased Hospital-Jerusalem
The fact that anatomical structures overlap makes imaging the body challenging. Radiograph diagnostic accuracy generally refers to the degree to which an examination can be used to forecast the existence (or absence) of an illness or condition. By supplying diagnostic images, the technologist plays a crucial part in increasing diagnostic accuracy. To isolate and provide a clearer view of a body area being scanned, a technologist must be knowledgeable about the many postures and techniques needed. Different projections not only make anatomical parts easier to perceive, but they also aid in the anatomization of abnormalities and the localization of foreign bodies. This study focused on the precise positioning of patients' X-rays in the Al-Makkased Hospital emergency room when they reached there as a consequence of various accidents, falls, or other causes. Emergency photos from January to June (2020) were examined as part of our examination of digital radiography (DR) imaging, and problems with the photos were discovered. Our research revealed that the percentage of examination errors is just 14.6%, which is not a very significant number. The four joints that were evaluated in this investigation were the elbow, wrist, knee, and ankle. The three fundamental flaws that were examined while assessing projections were parallelism, location, and anatomy additional exposure errors were also found. Specifically, this project discussed standards for joint radiography quality, technique, framework, structure, and findings.
Assessment of Unjustified Brain Ct Requests in the Emergency Room of the Public Health Care System in Palestine
Computed tomography (CT), which gives doctors a precise cross-sectional image that clearly shows the features of the organs, is one of the most crucial pieces of medical imaging equipment. In contrast to other equipment, the CT scan may expose the patient to a very high dose of radiation. As a result of the hazards associated with imaging patients, the use of CT images must be restricted, especially when imaging the head. The aim of the study is to the evaluation of the percentage of unjustified brain CT requests at the emergency rooms of the governmental health sector in Palestine. The 1957-built Hebron Governmental Hospital (HGH) was chosen as a research study case with a clinical capacity of 237 beds and 596 staff members; it is one of the key Palestinian government hospitals currently operating in the Hebron Governorate of the West Bank-Palestine. Samples were taken from the hospital's emergency room between the first of the year and the end of the year in 2021. 6152 or so brain CT images were gathered. Following that, 500 instances were picked for the investigation. Radiologists were asked to assess 100 of these 500 cases to determine whether the patient needed a scan or not. According to the study, 78% of brain tomography images were for unjustifiable reasons. Additionally, it was revealed by the study's results that unnecessary head CT scans were more common than those from retrospective investigations. In particular, non-specialized doctors who request cross-sectional brain imaging for no apparent reason are to blame for this because of their lack of knowledge.