Explore the vast range of titles available.

Mid Regional pro-ADM (MR-proADM) is a promising novel biomarker in the evaluation of deteriorating patients and an emergent prognosis factor in patients with sepsis, septic shock and organ failure. It can be induced by bacteria, fungi or viruses. We hypothesized that the assessment of MR-proADM, with or without other inflammatory cytokines, as part of a clinical assessment of COVID-19 patients at hospital admission, may assist in identifying those likely to develop severe disease. A pragmatic retrospective analysis was performed on a complete data set from 111 patients admitted to Udine University Hospital, in northern Italy, from 25th March to 15th May 2020, affected by SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Clinical scoring systems (SOFA score, WHO disease severity class, SIMEU clinical phenotype), cytokines (IL-6, IL-1b, IL-8, TNF-α), and MR-proADM were measured. Demographic, clinical and outcome data were collected for analysis. At multivariate analysis, high MR-proADM levels were significantly associated with negative outcome (death or orotracheal intubation, IOT), with an odds ratio of 4.284 [1.893–11.413], together with increased neutrophil count (OR = 1.029 [1.011–1.049]) and WHO disease severity class (OR = 7.632 [5.871–19.496]). AUROC analysis showed a good discriminative performance of MR-proADM (AUROC: 0.849 [95% Cl 0.771–0.730]; p  < 0.0001). The optimal value of MR-proADM to discriminate combined event of death or IOT is 0.895 nmol/l, with a sensitivity of 0.857 [95% Cl 0.728–0.987] and a specificity of 0.687 [95% Cl 0.587–0.787]. This study shows an association between MR-proADM levels and the severity of COVID-19. The assessment of MR-proADM combined with clinical scoring systems could be of great value in triaging, evaluating possible escalation of therapies, and admission avoidance or inclusion into trials. Larger prospective and controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Fracture-related infections (FRIs) represent a significant complication in orthopedic trauma care, often leading to delayed bone healing, prolonged hospital stays, and increased patient morbidity. Pathogenesis involves microbial contamination during injury or surgery, compounded by patient-related risk factors such as diabetes, smoking, or immunosuppression. Diagnosis of FRI relies on a combination of clinical, radiological, and microbiological criteria. Common signs include persistent pain, swelling, erythema, purulent discharge, and non-union of the fracture. FRIs are classified based on the timing of infection onset into acute, delayed, and chronic forms, each requiring tailored management strategies. Treatment generally involves aggressive surgical debridement, possible hardware removal or retention, and targeted antibiotic therapy. In cases of severe tissue loss, reconstructive procedures may be necessary to restore bone and soft tissue integrity. Treatment strategies include early administration of prophylactic antibiotics, meticulous surgical technique, and timely soft tissue coverage in open fractures. A multidisciplinary approach involving orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease specialists, and microbiologists is essential for successful management. Early recognition and appropriate intervention are crucial to improving outcomes and minimizing long-term disability in patients with fracture-related infections.

Airway mucus is a highly specialised secretory fluid which functions as a physical and immunological barrier to pathogens whilst lubricating the airways and humifying atmospheric air. Dysfunction is common during critical illness and is characterised by changes in production rate, chemical composition, physical properties, and inflammatory phenotype. Mucociliary clearance, which is determined in part by mucus characteristics and in part by ciliary function, is also dysfunctional in critical illness via disease related and iatrogenic mechanisms. The consequences of mucus dysfunction are potentially devastating, contributing to prolonged ventilator dependency, increased risk of secondary pneumonia, and worsened lung injury. Mucolytic therapies are designed to decrease viscosity, improve expectoration/suctioning, and thereby promote mucus removal. Mucolytics, including hypertonic saline, dornase alfa/rhDNase, nebulised heparin, carbocisteine/N-Acetyl cysteine, are commonly used in critically ill patients. This review summarises the physiology and pathophysiology of mucus and the existing evidence for the use of mucolytics in critically ill patients and speculates on journey to individualised mucolytic therapy.

AimsThere is a lack of biomarkers validated for assessing clinical deterioration in patients with COVID-19 on presentation to secondary or tertiary care. This evaluation looked at the potential clinical application of C reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) and white cell count to support prediction of clinical outcomes.Methods135 patients presenting to Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust between April and June 2020 confirmed to have COVID-19 via reverse-transcription-qPCR were included. Biomarkers from within 24 hours of presentation were used to predict disease progression by Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. The endpoints assessed were 30-day all-cause mortality, intubation and ventilation, critical care admission and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) use.ResultsElevated MR-proADM was shown to have the greatest ability to predict 30-day mortality adjusting for age, cardiovascular disease, renal disease and neurological disease. A significant association was also noted between raised MR-proADM and CRP concentrations and the requirement for critical care admission and NIV.ConclusionsThe measurement of MR-proADM and CRP in patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection on admission shows significant potential to support clinicians in identifying those at increased risk of disease progression and need for higher level care, subsequently enabling prompt escalation in clinical interventions.

Background There is a lack of validated tools to assess potential disease progression and hospitalisation decisions in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a suspected infection. This study aimed to identify suitable blood biomarkers (MR-proADM, PCT, lactate and CRP) or clinical scores (SIRS, SOFA, qSOFA, NEWS and CRB-65) to fulfil this unmet clinical need. Methods An observational derivation patient cohort validated by an independent secondary analysis across nine EDs. Logistic and Cox regression, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess performance. Disease progression was identified using a composite endpoint of 28-day mortality, ICU admission and hospitalisation > 10 days. Results One thousand one hundred seventy-five derivation and 896 validation patients were analysed with respective 28-day mortality rates of 7.1% and 5.0%, and hospitalisation rates of 77.9% and 76.2%. MR-proADM showed greatest accuracy in predicting 28-day mortality and hospitalisation requirement across both cohorts. Patient subgroups with high MR-proADM concentrations (≥ 1.54 nmol/L) and low biomarker (PCT < 0.25 ng/mL, lactate < 2.0 mmol/L or CRP < 67 mg/L) or clinical score (SOFA < 2 points, qSOFA < 2 points, NEWS < 4 points or CRB-65 < 2 points) values were characterised by a significantly longer length of hospitalisation ( p  < 0.001), rate of ICU admission ( p  < 0.001), elevated mortality risk (e.g. SOFA, qSOFA and NEWS HR [95%CI], 45.5 [10.0–207.6], 23.4 [11.1–49.3] and 32.6 [9.4–113.6], respectively) and a greater number of disease progression events ( p  < 0.001), compared to similar subgroups with low MR-proADM concentrations (< 1.54 nmol/L). Increased out-patient treatment across both cohorts could be facilitated using a derivation-derived MR-proADM cut-off of < 0.87 nmol/L (15.0% and 16.6%), with decreased readmission rates and no mortalities. Conclusions In patients presenting to the ED with a suspected infection, the blood biomarker MR-proADM could most accurately identify the likelihood of further disease progression. Incorporation into an early sepsis management protocol may therefore aid rapid decision-making in order to either initiate, escalate or intensify early treatment strategies, or identify patients suitable for safe out-patient treatment.

BackgroundLyme disease is endemic in the UK with a high incidence in southwest England. Neurological involvement occurs in approximately 5% of infected individuals. Previous reviews in southwest England have shown a consistent phenotype in most cases, however anecdotal review suggests a small number of atypical cases, with diverse presentations, which provide a diagnostic challenge, even to experienced neurologists.MethodsWe performed a retrospective, observational study of all identified cases (positive screening ELISA confirmed by immunoblot and neurological symptoms) of neuroborreliosis from six hospitals between January 2015 and December 2017. In addition, we reviewed atypical cases seen over the last decade in the regional neurosciences centre in depth.Results72 patients were included in the observational study. 83% had characteristics of Bannwarth’s syndrome (cranial neuropathy, radiculopathy and CSF pleocytosis). Unusual cases included mononeu- ritis multiplex.Central nervous system involvement was rare. We saw cases presenting with cerebrovascular events, meningitis and encephalitis. Complete resolution of symptoms was reported in 72% of patients. 28% of patients reported residual symptoms, most commonly fatigue and memory problems.ConclusionsThis is the largest UK review of neuroborreliosis. The presentation is usually typical, but atypical presentations vary and can be challenging. The majority of patients recover fully.amyrossrussell@gmail.com

Background/Objectives: Bacteraemia can be fatal without antibiotic intervention. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (AST) provides the necessary information for targeted antibiotic therapy; however, the traditional method using disc diffusion can take over two days from a positive blood culture. Inappropriate empiric therapy is associated with increased mortality and increased antibiotic resistance, highlighting the need for more rapid turnaround times for AST. By making changes to an established method, turnaround times can be reduced. Methods: Eighty-two patient positive blood culture samples were collected from January to April 2022, representing the range of common bacteria causing sepsis. This followed the normal methodology in the laboratory of inoculating agar from positive blood cultures in preparation for European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) disc diffusion AST method. EUCAST methodology outlines that disc diffusion should be performed on isolates from an overnight culture of 16–24 h. This study looked at comparing disc diffusion results from cultures with 6 h of incubation to those with incubation times of 24 h, after organism identification by MALDI-ToF. Results from 6-h and 24-h cultures were compared by disc zone sizes and by interpreted susceptibility reading following EUCAST guidelines of sensitive, resistant, susceptible with increased exposure, or an area of technical uncertainty. Results: A total of 99.65% interpreted susceptibility readings matched across all organisms to all relevant antibiotics, with an average zone size difference of 1.08 mm between results from 6 h versus 24 h cultures. Conclusions: This method offers a non-automated way of using the traditional disc diffusion method, reducing turnaround times while still producing reliable and accurate results. This would mean validated ASTs can be set up in the same day as a blood culture flags positive rather than waiting for a longer culture. As this method is widely used within the laboratory already, it would mean that additional training is not required, as the process is the same, and only incubation time varies. This would positively impact patient outlook due to the shorter use of empiric therapy, and benefit antimicrobial stewardship (AMS).

Purpose Severe viral pneumonia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Recent COVID‐19 pandemic continues to impose significant health burden worldwide, and individual pandemic waves often lead to a large surge in the intensive care unit (ICU) admissions for respiratory support. Comparisons of severe SARS‐CoV‐2 pneumonia with other seasonal and nonseasonal severe viral infections are rarely studied in an intensive care setting. Methods A retrospective cohort study comparing patients admitted to ICU with COVID‐19 between March and June 2020 and those with viral pneumonias between January and December 2019. We compared patient specific demographic variables, duration of illness, ICU organ supportive measures and outcomes between both groups. Results Analysis of 93 COVID‐19 (Group 1) and 52 other viral pneumonia patients (Group 2) showed an increased proportion of obesity (42% vs. 23%, p = 0.02), non‐White ethnicities (41% vs. 6%, p < 0.001) and diabetes mellitus (30% vs. 13%, p = 0.03) in Group 1, with lower prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/asthma (16% vs. 34%, p = 0.02). In Group 1, the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio was much lower (6.7 vs. 10, p = 0.006), and invasive mechanical ventilation (58% vs. 26%, p < 0.001) was more common. Length of ICU (8 vs. 4, p < 0.001) and hospital stay (22 vs. 11, p < 0.001) was prolonged in Group 1, with no significant difference in mortality. Influenza A and rhinovirus were the most common pathogens in Group 2 (26% each). Conclusions Key differences were identified within demographics (obesity, ethnicity, age, ICU scores, comorbidities) and organ support. Despite these variations, there were no significant differences in mortality between both groups. Further studies with larger sample sizes would allow for further assessment of clinical parameters in these patients.

Infection rounds in Intensive Care Units (ICU) can impact antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). The aim of this survey was to assess the availability of microbiology, infection, AMS services, and antimicrobial prescribing practices in the UK ICUs. An online questionnaire was sent to clinical leads for ICUs in each region listed in the Critical Care Network for the UK. Out of 217 ICUs, 87 deduplicated responses from England and Wales were analyzed. Three-quarters of those who responded had a dedicated microbiologist, and 50% had a dedicated infection control prevention nurse. Infection rounds varied in their frequency, with 10% providing phone advice only. Antibiotic guidance was available in 99% of the units; only 8% of those were ICU-specific. There were variations in the availability of biomarkers & the duration of antibiotics prescribed for pneumonia (community, hospital, or ventilator), urinary, intra-abdominal, and line infections/sepsis. Antibiotic consumption data were not routinely discussed in a multi-disciplinary meeting. The electronic prescription was available in ~60% and local antibiotic surveillance data in only 47% of ICUs. The survey highlights variations in practice and AMS services and may offer the opportunity to further collaborations and share learnings to support the safe use of antimicrobials in the ICU.