Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Series Title
      Series Title
      Clear All
      Series Title
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Content Type
    • Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Country Of Publication
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Target Audience
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
2 result(s) for "Sandel, Michael J. Liberalism and the limits of justice"
Sort by:
الليبرالية وحدود العدالة
يقدم المجتمع الليبرالي نفسه على أنه لا يسعى إلى فرض نمط وحيد للحياة بل يترك مواطنيه أحرارا إلى أقصى حد ممكن في اختيار القيم التي ترضيهم لذلك نجد أن هذا المجتمع يحتاج إلى مبادئ تتوخى العدالة من دون فرض رؤية مسبقة للحياة الخيرة ومع ذلك هل من الممكن إيجاد مثل هذه المبادئ ؟ وفي حالة الإجابة بالنفي ترى ما هي الآثار المترتبة على ذلك بالنسبة إلى العدالة كمثل أخلاقي وسياسي.
FOR A PRODUCTIVE, JUST AMERICA
THERE are some things money can't buy and other things it tries to buy but shouldn't - elections, for example, or in an earlier day, salvation. But the sale of elections, like the sale of indulgences, usually brings a demand for reform. What is wrong with buying these things? And where else should money's writ not rule? How the good things in life should be distributed is the the subject of [Michael Walzer]'s new book, ''Spheres of Justice,'' which offers an imaginative alternative to the current debate over distributive justice. Mr. Walzer illustrates this point with an argument for greater public provision of medical care, an argument that appeals not to a universal ''right to treatment,'' but instead to the character of contemporary American life and the shared understandings that define it. What the care of souls meant to the medieval Christians, he argues, the cure of bodies means to us. For them, eternity was a socially recognized need - ''hence, a church in every parish, regular services, catechism for the young, compulsory communion, and so on.'' For us, a long and healthy life is a socially recognized need -''hence, doctors and hospitals in every district, regular checkups, health education for the young, compulsory vaccination, and so on.'' Medical care becomes a matter of membership in the society. To be cut off from it is ''not only dangerous but degrading,'' a kind of excommunication. HE uses the history of the word ''vacation'' to show how far we have come from the communal life: ''In Ancient Rome, the days on which there were no religious festivals or public games were called dies vacantes, 'empty days.' The holidays, by contrast, were full - full of obligation but also of celebration, full of things to do, feasting and dancing, rituals and plays. This was when time ripened to produce the social goods of shared solemnity and revelry. Who would give up days like that? But we have lost that sense of fullness; and the days we crave are the empty ones, which we can fill by ourselves as we please.''