Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background and objective Probiotics with documented efficacy such as GG(LGG) and might be utilized as adjuncts to rehydration for the management of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) in children. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the potential role of LGG in acute diarrhea in the Indian pediatric population. Methods An observational, cross-sectional study [ GG Evaluation in Acute Diarrhea (LEAD)] was conducted among children aged one month to 12 years with acute watery diarrhea. In addition to standard management of diarrhea, LGG was given as an adjuvant treatment at the discretion of treating physicians based on their routine practice. Observations were documented on days one, three, and five. Outcomes such as frequency and duration of diarrhea, time to change in consistency of stools, Bristol Stool Chart (BSC) reading, and global assessment by healthcare practitioners (HCPs) and patients were also recorded. Results Of the 2,080 patients enrolled, 1,900 completed the five-day follow-up. There was marked improvement observed in the number of incidences of loose stools from day one (mean: 7.33) to day five (mean: 1.6). The mean time to improvement in stool consistency was 34 hours. The mean duration of diarrhea was 44.63 hours. A relatively shorter duration of diarrhea was reported among participants in this study. There was also a significant improvement in the number of vomiting episodes. Most patients and HCPs reported the product to be excellent/very good on the global assessment scale. No adverse effects were noted in any of the groups. Conclusion Based on our findings, LGG supplementation may be a beneficial adjuvant treatment in reducing the severity and duration of acute diarrheal episodes.

IntroductionFever and pain are common afflictions in the pediatric population, prompting the use of paracetamol and ibuprofen as primary treatment options. However, a comprehensive understanding of their comparative efficacy, safety profiles, and potential combined use remains crucial for informed clinical decision-making. In this prospective observational study, we aimed to delve into these aspects, shedding light on the optimal management strategies for fever and pain in pediatric patients.MethodologyA total of 108 children were enrolled and categorized into three groups, namely, paracetamol monotherapy, ibuprofen monotherapy, and a combination of both drugs. Axillary temperature monitoring and assessment of pain on the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Controllability (FLACC) scale/Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were employed as critical indicators. Concurrently, associated symptoms encompassing discomfort, activity levels, and appetite were meticulously recorded. To ensure safety, laboratory parameters including serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), serum creatinine, platelet count, and stool for occult blood were closely monitored before and after drug administration. The study duration spanned 48 hours post-initiation of the initial drug dose.ResultsA total of 108 pediatric cases were included in the study, spanning ages from six months to 18 years. Among them, the majority fell within the age group of six months to five years (n = 77). Participants were categorized based on the duration of fever, with 81 cases having a fever lasting more than 24 hours and 27 cases having a fever lasting less than 24 hours. The majority of cases presented with temperatures ranging from 38°C to 39°C. Comparison of drug efficacy in defervescence within the first four hours revealed that paracetamol alone took significantly longer than ibuprofen monotherapy or the paracetamol and ibuprofen combination (p = 0.026). In terms of the onset of effect, the paracetamol and ibuprofen combination showed comparable efficacy to ibuprofen alone.Regarding the total time without fever in 48 hours, significant differences were observed among the three drug regimens (p = 0.001 by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test). Paracetamol and ibuprofen were superior to paracetamol alone (p < 0.001) and ibuprofen alone (p = 0.014), while paracetamol alone and ibuprofen alone exhibited similar efficacy (p = 0.197). Based on the laboratory results as well as the clinical profile observed over 48 hours, we confirm safety based on this study. The combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen showed enhanced effectiveness in fever and pain relief.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the favourable efficacy of paracetamol, ibuprofen, and their combination in the pediatric population. The combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen showed enhanced effectiveness in fever and pain relief, with minimal adverse effects and no significant derangements in biochemical parameters. This study thus contributes valuable insights to optimize the therapeutic approach to fever and pain in pediatric patients.

Fever and pain are among the most common reasons for pediatric consultations, requiring effective and safe management strategies. Mefenamic acid, a well-established member of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) class, offers distinct advantages due to its unique pharmacological profile, including preferential cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibition, E-type prostanoid (EP) receptor blockade, and nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich-containing family, pyrin domain-containing-3 (NLRP3) inflammasome inhibition. These properties enable it to address both inflammatory and non-inflammatory fevers, providing comprehensive symptom relief. Despite its proven efficacy, the absence of pediatric-specific guidelines and perceived concerns about safety have limited its routine use in pediatric practice. This consensus paper, developed through a structured modified Delphi process involving 21 expert pediatricians across India, aims to address these gaps. The paper evaluates the safety, efficacy, and clinical applications of mefenamic acid, providing evidence-based best-practice recommendations. Highlights include its superior antipyretic efficacy compared to paracetamol and ibuprofen, with preclinical and limited clinical data suggesting potential antiviral activity, and a possible role in the management of febrile seizures and inflammatory conditions. While mefenamic acid demonstrates a favorable safety profile with appropriate use, further research is necessary to strengthen the evidence on long-term safety and expand its therapeutic scope. This consensus provides a comprehensive framework for optimizing the use of mefenamic acid in pediatric practice, ensuring improved patient outcomes. The long-term safety of mefenamic acid in children is still unclear, due to the limited availability of robust, longitudinal safety data. Future research should prioritize well-powered clinical trials, particularly in children aged six months to five years, using standardized outcome measures and long-term follow-up protocols. Addressing these evidence gaps is important to inform safe and effective use in pediatric practice.

Gastric acid-reducing medications (ARMs) such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine type 2 receptor blockers (H2 blockers) are crucial in pediatric care for treating various gastrointestinal conditions. These medications are frequently used to treat erosive esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). ARMs are essential to the administration of eosinophilic esophagitis and infection. Additionally, literature also supports its use in alleviating drug-induced dyspepsia, preventing stress-related mucosal damage, and lowering the risk of acid aspiration syndrome during anesthesia in critical care settings. Despite the widespread indications of ARMs, PPIs, the most potent acid suppressants, present concerns regarding safety and their inappropriate use in pediatrics. This paper aims to address these gaps by providing comprehensive, practical recommendations for ARM use in pediatric settings. The methodology involved a structured literature review and opinions from 24 pediatric specialists across India, including neonatologists, general pediatricians, pediatric gastroenterologists, a pediatric hepatologist, pediatric nephrologists, a pediatric pulmonologist, and a pediatric intensivist on the appropriate choice of ARM use in various clinical scenarios. They emphasized the benefits of H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) over PPIs, particularly in neonates and infants, where H2RAs offer a safer alternative due to their lower risk of adverse effects. The paper outlines the effective application of H2RAs in managing GERD, preventing stress ulcers, and treating drug-induced dyspepsia. It also provides guidelines for appropriate ARM use, stressing the need for careful patient evaluation to minimize the risk of unnecessary ARM use. Pediatricians also provided a view on the use of H2RAs beyond gastrointestinal indications, such as in urticaria, where they show promising clinical application when combined with H1-antihistamines. This paper offers valuable insights and recommendations for optimizing the use of ARM in pediatric practice. By highlighting the advantages of H2RAs and addressing the limitations and risks associated with PPIs, the paper aims to guide clinicians in making informed, evidence-based decisions. The goal is to improve clinical outcomes, promote the rational use of ARM, and enhance the quality of pediatric care.

Sir,--Rupa Chinai, in her article, 'Hepatitis B: Is mass vaccination the answer?' (January 29), suggests that only the high-risk group, such as homosexuals and intravenous drugabusers, be targeted and that there be universal serological screening of pregnant women and vaccination of...