Explore the vast range of titles available.

[...]the findings of this trial highlight that the reasons behind the limited use of ASOs in clinical and research settings—namely inadequate target engagement and insufficient biological activity—still held true. Nonetheless, Thornton and colleagues did a post-hoc targeted RNA sequencing analysis using a composite splicing index from patients treated with baliforsen and compared the results with those in healthy controls and untreated patients from natural history studies, providing evidence that this index could be an appropriate biomarker of biological activity. The limitations of the current study regarding sample size and availability of muscle biopsy samples, as well as the need to assess feasibility, reliability, and validity of the selected outcomes, are now being addressed in the ongoing observational studies of the international Myotonic Dystrophy Clinical Research Network. [...]far from being uninformative, the results of this trial improve both the understanding of pathophysiology and optimum trial design.

Eugenio Mercuri and colleagues2 report results of SUNFISH part 2, a randomised trial of once daily risdiplam versus placebo in 180 patients with type 2 or non-ambulant type 3 spinal muscular atrophy.2 The authors describe changes in motor function in patients after 12 months of treatment with risdiplam once daily relative to placebo.2 These promising results, along with the robust safety profile and the absence of retinal toxicity (which was a limitation in preclinical studies3), provide a new opportunity in the care pathway for patients with spinal muscular atrophy. [...]more than a third of patients in the study had severe scoliosis and, inevitably, joint retractions. [...]evidence from previous studies in children6 suggests that beneficial effects might require observational periods beyond 12 months, so the effects of risdiplam in adolescents and adults and chronically disabled patients might change as time passes.7 Risdiplam clearly represents a potential new treatment opportunity for young children with spinal muscular atrophy.

The advent of new therapies has increased the need to achieve early diagnosis in Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). The aim of the present study was to define the age of diagnosis in the three main types of SMA with pediatric-onset and the timing between the recognition of clinical signs and confirmed genetic diagnosis. All patients with a confirmed diagnosis of type I, II, III SMA followed in 5 Italian centers were included in this study, assessing age at symptoms onset, presenting sign or symptom, age at diagnosis, interval between clinical onset and diagnosis and type of medical investigations conducted in order to obtain the diagnosis. The cohort included 480 patients, 191 affected by SMA type I, 210 by type II and 79 by type III. The mean age at diagnosis was 4.70 months (SD ±2.82) in type I, 15.6 months (SD±5.88) in type II, and 4.34 years (SD±4.01) in type III. The mean time between symptom onset and diagnosis was 1.94 months (SD±1.84) in type I, 5.28 months (SD±4.68) in type II and 16.8 months (SD±18.72) in type III. Our results suggest that despite improved care recommendations there is still a marked diagnostic delay, especially in type III. At the time new therapies are becoming available more attention should be devoted to reducing such delay as there is consistent evidence of the benefit of early treatment.

The aim of this international collaborative effort was to report 36-month longitudinal changes using the 6MWT in ambulant patients affected by Duchenne muscular dystrophy amenable to skip exons 44, 45, 51 or 53. Of the 92 patients included in the study, 24 had deletions amenable to skip exon 44, 27 exon 45, 18 exon 51, and 28 exon 53. Five patients with a single deletion of exon 52 were counted in both subgroups skipping exon 51 and 53. The difference between subgroups amenable to skip different exons was not significant at 12 months but became significant at both 24 (p≤0.05) and 36 months (p≤0.01). Mutations amenable to skip exon 53 had lower baseline values and more negative changes than the other subgroups while those amenable to skip exon 44 had better results both at baseline and at follow up. Deletions amenable to skip exon 45 were associated with a more variable pattern of progression. Single exon deletions were more often associated with less drastic changes but this was not always true in individual cases. Our results confirm that the progression of disease can differ between patients with different deletions, although the changes only become significant from 24 months onwards. This information is relevant because there are current clinical trials specifically targeting patients with these subgroups of mutations.

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is an autosomal dominant inherited multi-system disorder that affects skeletal muscles but also many other organ systems. Molecular targets have been identified and targeted therapies are being developed and tested in first-in-human clinical trials. However, insufficient knowledge of the phenotypic heterogeneity and natural course of the disease, together with a lack of reliable biomarkers, complicate the design of clinical trials. The main objectives of this study are to 1) characterize the phenotypic heterogeneity and disease progression of DM1 in a large cohort; 2) identify baseline characteristics that predict subsequent progression; 3) validate RNA biomarkers of disease severity. This is a prospective, multi-site observational study with a follow-up period of 24 months including approximately 700 adult DM1 patients. Visits will occur at baseline, and months 12 and 24. All patients will undergo strength testing, myotonia assessment, a battery of functional outcome assessments, spirometry, and complete various questionnaires and cognitive tests. Blood and urine samples will be taken at each visit for biomarker studies. A subset of 60 patients will undergo a muscle biopsy at baseline and at an additional 3-month visit. The sensitivity to disease progression and minimally clinically important differences will be determined for the various clinical outcome measures. Associations between baseline patient characteristics and the rate of disease progression will be evaluated. The results of this large international study on DM1 will contribute to optimizing clinical trial design. Both data and biological samples will be collected for future research as well. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03981575.

Background There is an increasing number of papers reporting the real world use of Nusinersen in different cohorts of SMA patients. Main body The aim of this paper was to critically review the literature reporting real world data on motor function in type 2 and 3 patients treated with Nusinersen, subdividing the results according to SMA type, age and type of assessment and performing a meta-analysis of the available results. We also report the available data collected in untreated patients using the same measures. Of the 400 papers identified searching for Nusinersen and spinal muscular atrophy, 19 reported motor function in types 2 and 3: 13 in adults, 4 in children and 2 included both. Twelve papers reported untreated patients’ data. All studies reported positive changes on at least one of the functional measures and at every time point while all-untreated cohorts showed negative changes. Conclusion Our review suggests that Nusinersen provides a favorable benefit in motor function across a wide range of SMA type 2 and 3 patients over a 10–14 month observation period. Although a direct comparison with studies reporting data from untreated patients cannot be made, the longitudinal changes in the treated cohorts (consistently positive) are divergent from those observed in the untreated cohorts (consistently negative). The difference could be observed both in the global cohorts and in smaller groups subdivided according to age, type or functional status.

The aim of this study was to establish the possible effect of age, corticosteroid treatment and brain dystrophin involvement on motor function in young boys affected by Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy who were assessed using the North Star Ambulatory Assessment between the age of 4 and 7 years. The study includes 951 North Star assessments from 226 patients. Patients were subdivided according to age, to the site of mutation and therefore to the involvement of different brain dystrophin isoforms and to corticosteroids duration. There was a difference in the maximum North Star score achieved among patients with different brain dystrophin isoforms (p = 0.007). Patients with the involvement of Dp427, Dp140 and Dp71, had lower maximum NSAA scores when compared to those with involvement of Dp427 and Dp140 or of Dp427 only. The difference in the age when the maximum score was achieved in the different subgroups did not reach statistical significance. Using a linear regression model on all assessments we found that each of the three variables, age, site of mutation and corticosteroid treatment had an influence on the NSAA values and their progression over time. A second analysis, looking at 12-month changes showed that within this time interval the magnitude of changes was related to corticosteroid treatment but not to site of mutation. Our findings suggest that each of the considered variables appear to play a role in the progression of North Star scores in patients between the age of 4 and 7 years and that these should be carefully considered in the trial design of boys in this age range.

The aim of this study was to report 36-month longitudinal changes using the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) in ambulant patients affected by Duchenne muscular dystrophy amenable to skip exons 44, 45, 51 or 53. We included 101 patients, 34 had deletions amenable to skip exon 44, 25 exon 45, 19 exon 51, and 28 exon 53, not recruited in any ongoing clinical trials. Five patients were counted to skip exon 51 and 53 since they had a single deletion of exon 52. The difference between subgroups (skip 44, 45, 51 and 53) was significant at 12 (p = 0.043), 24 (p = 0.005) and 36 months (p[less than or equal to]0.001). Mutations amenable to skip exons 53 and 51 had lower baseline values and more negative changes than the other subgroups while those amenable to skip exon 44 had higher scores both at baseline and at follow up. Our results confirm different progression of disease in subgroups of patients with deletions amenable to skip different exons. This information is relevant as current long term clinical trials are using the NSAA in these subgroups of mutations.

Stride velocity 95th centile (SV95C) is a wearable-derived endpoint representing the 5% fastest strides taken during everyday living. In July 2023, SV95C received European Medicines Agency (EMA) qualification for use as a primary endpoint in trials of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) aged ≥ 4 years—becoming the first digital endpoint to receive such qualification. We present the data supporting this qualification, providing insights into the evidentiary basis of qualification as a digital clinical outcome assessment. Clinical trials, natural history studies, and patient surveys (ages 5 − 14 years) showed that SV95C is accurate, valid, reliable, sensitive, and clinically meaningful. SV95C significantly correlated with traditional DMD assessments, increased rapidly after steroid initiation (0.090 m/s 3 months post-treatment), and declined steadily in patients on stable steroid regimens. Compared with traditional assessments, SV95C demonstrated earlier sensitivity to disease progression (3 vs 9 months) and greater sensitivity at 12 months. Distribution- and anchor-based approaches revealed a change of − 0.10 to − 0.20 m/s as clinically meaningful. The EMA qualification of SV95C illustrates the willingness of regulators to accept novel digital endpoints for drug approval, setting an important precedent for the evidentiary basis of regulatory digital endpoint qualification that could transform clinical development in disorders affecting movement.

The objective of our study was to perform a randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate the effects of three strictly monitored exercise programs (SMEP) compared to “usual care” (UCP) in a cohort of ALS patients. We included patients with definite and probable ALS and disease duration ≤24 months. Patients were randomized to receive a SMEPs or a UCP. SMEPs included three subgroups of treatment: active exercises associated with cycloergometer activity (1A), only active (1B) and passive (1C) exercises, respectively. Moreover, SMEP patients and their caregivers were trained to a daily home-based passive exercise program. The UCP group was treated with passive and stretching exercises twice weekly. The treatment period for both groups was 6 months (T180), and patients were assessed by revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R),  % Forced Vital Capacity (FVC %), and McGill Quality of Life (MGQoL) questionnaire. ALSFRS-R score was also evaluated at 6 months after the treatment period (T360). Sixty ALS patients were randomly assigned to one of two arms: SMEP Group included 30 patients, ten subjects for each subgroup (1A, 1B, and 1C); 30 patients were included in the UCP Group. At T180 and T360, SMEPs group had significantly higher ALSFRS-R score compared to the UCP group (32.8 ± 6.5 vs 28.7 ± 7.5, p  = 0.0298; 27.5 ± 7.6 vs 23.3 ± 7.6, p  = 0.0338, respectively). No effects of SMEPs on survival, respiratory decline and MGQol were found. In conclusion, although no effect on survival was demonstrated, our data suggest that a strictly monitored exercise program may significantly reduce motor deterioration in ALS patients.