Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
2 result(s) for "Sarkleti, Valentin"
Sort by:
Potential of Apple Vision Pro for Accurate Tree Diameter Measurements in Forests
The determination of diameter at breast height (DBH) is critical in forestry, serving as a key metric for deriving various parameters, including tree volume. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technology has been increasingly employed in forest inventories, and the development of cost-effective, user-friendly smartphone and tablet applications (apps) has expanded its broader use. Among these are augmented reality (AR) apps, which have already been tested on mobile devices for their accuracy in measuring forest attributes. In February 2024, Apple introduced the Mixed-Reality Interface (MRITF) via the Apple Vision Pro (AVP), offering sensor capabilities for field data collection. In this study, two apps using the AVP were tested for DBH measurement on 182 trees across 22 sample plots in a near-natural forest, against caliper-based reference measurements. Compared with the reference measurements, both apps exhibited a slight underestimation bias of −1.00 cm and −1.07 cm, and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) was 3.14 cm and 2.34 cm, respectively. The coefficient of determination (R2) between the reference data and the measurements obtained by the two apps was 0.959 and 0.978. The AVP demonstrated its potential as a reliable field tool for DBH measurement, performing consistently across varying terrain.
Quantification of Forest Regeneration on Forest Inventory Sample Plots Using Point Clouds from Personal Laser Scanning
The presence of sufficient natural regeneration in mature forests is regarded as a pivotal criterion for their future stability, ensuring seamless reforestation following final harvesting operations or forest calamities. Consequently, forest regeneration is typically quantified as part of forest inventories to monitor its occurrence and development over time. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology, particularly ground-based LiDAR, has emerged as a powerful tool for assessing typical forest inventory parameters, providing high-resolution, three-dimensional data on the forest structure. Therefore, it is logical to attempt a LiDAR-based quantification of forest regeneration, which could greatly enhance area-wide monitoring, further supporting sustainable forest management through data-driven decision making. However, examples in the literature are relatively sparse, with most relevant studies focusing on an indirect quantification of understory density from airborne LiDAR data (ALS). The objective of this study is to develop an accurate and reliable method for estimating regeneration coverage from data obtained through personal laser scanning (PLS). To this end, 19 forest inventory plots were scanned with both a personal and a high-resolution terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) for reference purposes. The voxelated point clouds obtained from the personal laser scanner were converted into raster images, providing either the canopy height, the total number of filled voxels (containing at least one LiDAR point), or the ratio of filled voxels to the total number of voxels. Local maxima in these raster images, assumed to be likely to contain tree saplings, were then used as seed points for a raster-based tree segmentation, which was employed to derive the final regeneration coverage estimate. The results showed that the estimates differed from the reference in a range of approximately −10 to +10 percentage points, with an average deviation of around 0 percentage points. In contrast, visually estimated regeneration coverages on the same forest plots deviated from the reference by between −20 and +30 percentage points, approximately −2 percentage points on average. These findings highlight the potential of PLS data for automated forest regeneration quantification, which could be further expanded to include a broader range of data collected during LiDAR-based forest inventory campaigns.